<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx</link><description>
From NBC/NJ's Aswini AnburajanObama vigorously defended two negative mailers dropped in Ohio that Hillary Clinton says came “straight out of Karl Rove’s playbook.”
The mailing, one on NAFTA and the other on health care, raised the ire of the New York</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695329</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:43:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695329</guid><dc:creator>voter, az</dc:creator><description>Not the first time he has put mailers ut he don't tell truth.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695413</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:53:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695413</guid><dc:creator>JANET,PHILLY,PA</dc:creator><description>OBAMA DO YA THING BABY!!!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695417</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:53:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695417</guid><dc:creator>Billy, Normal, IL</dc:creator><description>Hillary, isn't Karma a wonderful thing? &amp;nbsp;What goes around comes around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just like her plagiarism charges... maybe she should buy stock in Xerox:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAYItnI-lPo"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAYItnI-lPo&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695427</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:55:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695427</guid><dc:creator>RENEA,PLYMOUTH,MI</dc:creator><description>HILLARY CAN NOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.SHE STATE I WAS NOT IN THE SENATE WHEN NAFTA WAS PASSED.HILLARY BLAMES NAFTA ON BUSH 1 IS LAUGHABLE.BILL CLINTON PASSED NAFTA IN TO LAW.HILLARY WAS NOT IN THE SENATE WHEN SCHIP INSURANCE FOR 6 MILLION CHILDREN &amp;nbsp;WAS PASSED IN TO LAW IN 1997 BUT SHE DOES WANT TO CREDIT FOR THAT BILL! </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695430</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:55:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695430</guid><dc:creator>Henry Schwarz, Bellingham WA</dc:creator><description>This is just another typical stunt the Clintons are pulling. Somehow they think it's all right to compare Obama to Bush, but heavens to Betsy don't you criticize this precious woman. As the male part of Billary said after one of the earlier debates last year: &amp;quot;The boys were too rough on Hillary.&amp;quot; Long live the double standard!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695472</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:59:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695472</guid><dc:creator>Kevin in Peoria</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Mailers on NAFTA and health care were out before Super Tuesday. &amp;nbsp;And now into Ohio where NAFTA is a critical issue for blue collars, where the real Clinton position needs to be shown. &amp;nbsp;As for healthcare, all need to know that the Clinton position is a &amp;quot;mandate&amp;quot; which requires enforcement, even if by wage garnishment. &amp;nbsp;The voters of TX, OH, VT and RI should be informed as to the differences between HRC and BO, as Hillary continues to insist at the debates. &amp;nbsp;Doth she protest too much? &amp;nbsp;Hillary's outburst in Ohio today will not be kind for her, especially when contrasted with Barack's calm demeanor in response. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695476</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:00:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695476</guid><dc:creator>CS, NY</dc:creator><description>There is no way that this will be good for her candidacy coming on the heels of her debate performance. All it does is undermine her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We could witness a total implosion by March 4th if she is not careful.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695486</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:01:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695486</guid><dc:creator>Betty Kentucky</dc:creator><description>Yes, karma is a wonderful thing. I just didn't think the Clintons were ever going to feel its wrath. At least Obama hasn't wagged his finger at the television cameras and say &amp;quot;I did not have sex with that woman,&amp;quot; unless by sex you mean sex.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695487</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:01:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695487</guid><dc:creator>Peter S, Georgia</dc:creator><description>In both his mailer and his response to Senator Clinton, Senator Obama attacks Clinton for her support of NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;In his response, he refers to her specifically &amp;quot;as part of the Clinton Administration.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose if he is finally labeling her as part of the administration, instead of &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; being First Lady, and giving her blame for the administration's actions, he should give her at least partial credit for those balanced budgets, for those 22 million new jobs, for those eight years of peace and prosperity, for an end to ethnic cleansing in the Balkans. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about it, Senator Obama? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695492</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:01:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695492</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>Obama is a fool if he thinks people are going to believe his utter BS. &amp;nbsp;Talk to the Jesus who loves you bama we are sick to death of your rants! He talks unite and be good and play nice and do not dis me man I am the ONE! &amp;nbsp;We must be the shinning example of how a inexperienced nobody can be president. &amp;nbsp;Just say sorry for the drugs (I WAS LED ASTRAY) sorry that bad bought that lot for me, I HAD NO IDEA! POOR Bama is a babe in the woods!&lt;br&gt;I never get posted anymore but hey j merle you don't either. This is OBAMA country!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695501</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:03:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695501</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>IN your dreams nucklehead!&lt;br&gt;There is no way that this will be good for her candidacy coming on the heels of her debate performance. All it does is undermine her. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We could witness a total implosion by March 4th if she is not careful. &lt;br&gt;CS, NY (Sent Saturday, February 23, 2008 7:00 PM)&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695502</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:03:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695502</guid><dc:creator>Gregory Peek, Birmingham, Alabama</dc:creator><description>The Clinton campaign has a way of playing games with history. Both Clintons have given President Johnson credit for signing the 1964 Civil Rights Act, to dispute the relationship between accomplishments and inspirational speakers. What they failed to mention was that that Act was actually introduced by President Kennedy in 1963 after he was inspired by the leadership of Martin Luther King Jr., Fred Shuttlesworth and others here in Birmingham. It was President Kennedy's exceptional leadership qualities that allowed him to take what was, at that time, a bold initiative. Barack Obama has the same leadership qualities. He can lead as others can not.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695508</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:03:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695508</guid><dc:creator>HMT-MI</dc:creator><description>wink wink---Hillary is so excercised---that female thing again.All good little obamanoids will rush screaming about that mean cruel Hillary defending herself against mr wonderful.This is one a$$ kissing obama site.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695511</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:03:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695511</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>Obama is a fool if he thinks people are going to believe his utter BS. &amp;nbsp;Talk to the Jesus who loves you bama we are sick to death of your rants! He talks unite and be good and play nice and do not dis me man I am the ONE! &amp;nbsp;We must be the shinning example of how a inexperienced nobody can be president. &amp;nbsp;Just say sorry for the drugs (I WAS LED ASTRAY) sorry that bad bought that lot for me, I HAD NO IDEA! POOR Bama is a babe in the woods!&lt;br&gt;I never get posted anymore but hey j merle you don't either. This is OBAMA country!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695513</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:03:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695513</guid><dc:creator>Jake B, San Francisco</dc:creator><description>I don't agree with the Obama campaign's decision to send these mailers out, because they do appear to be negative, and go against what the spirit of the campaign is. But compared to the spurious attacks from Clinton, all I can say is &amp;quot;live by the sword, die by the sword.&amp;quot; Obama's mailers are no where near as negative and untruthful as Clinton's have been. Clinton also does not do a good job of talking out of both sides of her mouth. In the debate, she said she was honored to be on the stage with Obama. Now she compares him to George W. Bush. Either she was lying about being honored by Obama, or she thinks Bush is honorable. I can't tell which perspective is the lie. Her campaign anymore is looking like a Janus, and if she's not careful, she may wind up looking like Medusa. At any rate, every move she makes now she ends up revealing her true character as that of a liar. So sad.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695519</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:04:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695519</guid><dc:creator>RobK, Seattle, Wash.</dc:creator><description>HIllary's flip-flop on NAFTA:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ0swdRvYgw"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ0swdRvYgw&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695522</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:05:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695522</guid><dc:creator>ArtOfWar2</dc:creator><description>She can dish it, but she can't take it. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For at least a month, Clinton has been telling people that Obama's Health care plan lives out 15 Million Americans. Clearly a &amp;quot;spin&amp;quot; which means &amp;quot;not quite wrong, but not quite right&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She is a master at old-school politics. &amp;nbsp;It's a simple 9 step execution: &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Step 1: Cry foul... &lt;br&gt;Step 2: Come across angry... &lt;br&gt;Step 3: Claim despicable...&lt;br&gt;Step 4: Claim enough is enough...&lt;br&gt;Step 5: Assert the devil himself would not have...&lt;br&gt;Step 6: Pronounce shame on you...&lt;br&gt;Step 7: Suggest &amp;quot;not one of us&amp;quot;...&lt;br&gt;Step 8: You have been asking for it...&lt;br&gt;Step 9: Go Nuclear. (You are justified) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Works every time... &amp;nbsp;My cousin uses it to his wife every time she says &amp;quot;I know you were with your friends last night honey, but why do you smell like that..&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brilliant... Oh it was nice how she dropped Edwards in.. &amp;nbsp;That's a smooth spend... &amp;nbsp;I'll tell my cousin to add step 6.5, &amp;quot;Your mother always said you were...&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;This adds the extra edge of making it seem like it's not just him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go Clinton, you need to bottle this stuff. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;QUESTION FOR SENATOR CLINTON:&lt;br&gt;So is this how you plan deal with other elected officials, republicans, and world leaders? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All your experience have taught you how to mis-manage, go broke, cheat, blame, blame, blame... then puppy-dog. She is a natural.. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS&lt;br&gt;Clinton appears to be a little bi-polar if you ask me. &amp;nbsp;She switches moods like no one I've every seen.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695568</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:11:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695568</guid><dc:creator>AzFnOfOB</dc:creator><description>Billy, that was a great post and so right on!! Obama took it easy on her in the beginning...but now she won't go away so he's going in for the kill. Her lies and deception to her supporters has been pointed out and she doesn't like it. To bad Hillary! Don't go away mad....just go away! </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695580</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:13:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695580</guid><dc:creator>Noah, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Obama is the last chance I’m giving the Democratic party because voting for Hillary is just not an option for me. If the Democrats are too stupid to choose the obviously better candidate, they have lost my vote for life. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its time to Break the Bush/Clinton dynasty and get Obama in because I’m sure I’m not the only Democrat out there who’s ready to walk in Barack doesn’t make it&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’d almost rather see McCain get in then Hillary just so we’re not ruled by the same two families for 28 years in a row. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695588</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:14:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695588</guid><dc:creator>Marbw</dc:creator><description>PLEASE CONCEDE, HILLARY CLINTON, AND LET THE HEALING BEGIN&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mb_OE822t4"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mb_OE822t4&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695591</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:14:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695591</guid><dc:creator>Supdadindi, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>HP Boston - there is a simple reason that you fail to get posted. . .you are an idiot. &amp;nbsp;Maybe you HAD NO IDEA, maybe you were LED ASTRAY, POOR HP in Boston, all stressed up and nowhere to go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And contrary to the assertion, this is not OBAMA country, but it certainly is thinking country. . .thus, you don't get posted.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695608</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:16:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695608</guid><dc:creator>john w.</dc:creator><description>where there's smoke there's fire... on Hillary's hair. What a bunch of politically calculated bloviation this crap truly is. A wounded animal surely lashes out at anything it can, so just beware of rabies.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695610</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695610</guid><dc:creator>Marbw</dc:creator><description>Hey guys at FR, could you please post the video of Barack's rebuttal that people saw?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695617</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:17:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695617</guid><dc:creator>annie, Santa Maria, CA</dc:creator><description>Better watch out Barrack. &amp;nbsp;Hillary is going to send Bill and his wagging finger in your face--to tell you how dumb you are---and you have no right to contest Hillary &amp;nbsp;(ie Billary)</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695619</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:18:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695619</guid><dc:creator>john, Kennewick, WA</dc:creator><description>Oh please, playing the victim is such an obvious tactic that it just cannot be viewed as serious. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On NATA, you either get to claim the first Clinton era (good and bad) within your &amp;quot;years of experience&amp;quot; or you don't. &amp;nbsp;Which will it be?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Duh, &amp;quot;subsidies&amp;quot; and mandates are other words that mean money. &amp;nbsp;Somebody pays. &amp;nbsp;Who? &amp;nbsp;How? &amp;nbsp;Further, do you retain choice whether to pay into health insurance to pay or don't you? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I look forward to an HRC mailing that answers these very simple questions.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695625</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695625</guid><dc:creator>mexed, san antonio, texas</dc:creator><description>I was leaning to Obama. Not now. False, untrue, and he knows it. What is not false is that his health care plan will fail and cost everyone more because most will opt-out. It's a great Republican plan but has no business being offered by a Democrat. What is not false is that in the last debate he tried to claim as his own position what Hillary said a long time ago about negotiating with &amp;quot;those who disagree&amp;quot;. Problem is, Obama, you ought to try that in your campaign instead of attacking those who. Or, maybe in a few days you will change your plan to be for everyone and say that you had the idea first. Obama, you talk sweet. Sweet talk is often untrue.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695630</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:18:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695630</guid><dc:creator>Sev, RI</dc:creator><description>I think we have seen back to back 19 debates on these candidates, read as much as we can on these candidates. &amp;nbsp;watched MSNBC, CNN, Youtube. American people have seen these candidate in and out. These fliers on healthcare will not make any difference at this point. We all know both disagree on their healthcare policies. Mandat Universal healtcare for Clinton vs Affordable healcare cost for adults (but mandate healtcare plan for Kids) for Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing that scares me in Clinton's press conference is the tone.... The Texas debate is still fresh in our memories in the way she moved us at the end of the debate... the emotion, the goosebumps, the mother that seems to care about us.&lt;br&gt;And suddenly, the mood shift this morning... and the language content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the only thing I can get from her comments is that she now knows the nomination is slipping away from her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the same time I don't appreciate Obama coming out to suggest that she should Quit. This is a fight. Mike Huckabee is still in the race on the other aisle&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695650</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:20:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695650</guid><dc:creator>Kevin, SF, CA</dc:creator><description>RobK, great video. Very enlightening. While on the subject of Hillary's double-talk, here's her on Iraq: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMgGORbd72w"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMgGORbd72w&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695651</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:20:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695651</guid><dc:creator>J.  in PA</dc:creator><description>All this is going to do is draw attention to the content of his assertions...As Russert pointed out on MTP, Hillary has blatantly flip-flopped on NAFTA, she'll pay for it now at the debate Tuesday when Russert is moderating.&lt;br&gt;What an act by her today, making this seem like new shocking news. &amp;nbsp;She is a shameless fake. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695657</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:21:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695657</guid><dc:creator>Busted</dc:creator><description>Fund Raising Fraud caught on tape:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695658</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:21:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695658</guid><dc:creator>MNDem</dc:creator><description>I find it very interesting that Hillary huffed and puffed, but never proved that the assertions in the Obama mailer were false. &amp;nbsp;Why? &amp;nbsp;It is because they are true.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695660</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:21:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695660</guid><dc:creator>Jerry, Austin, Texas</dc:creator><description>I was supporting Obama until the last couple days, I have been reading way to much stuff about this guy and today just put the icing on the cake. He is no different than the rest I just know less about him.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695670</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:22:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695670</guid><dc:creator>Marbw</dc:creator><description>HRC quoted Krugman(whose son supports her); Barack has Robert Reich and dozens of experts who agree with his plan. BTW, this back-and-forth has been going on since Iowa. Barack Obama has won more pledged delegates/more states/more popular votes/has more donors so far to tackle McBush .&lt;br&gt;AGAIN, PLS CONCEDE, HILLARY CLINTON.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695673</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:22:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695673</guid><dc:creator>Eric J</dc:creator><description>Oh my gosh - I forgot Hillary was still in the race! </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695688</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:24:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695688</guid><dc:creator>annoyed, delaware</dc:creator><description>In light of today's events I have come to realize that Hillary Clinton is everything she says she is not. &amp;nbsp;How do you attack Obama on his healthcare plan and then scold him when he attacks you on yours. &amp;nbsp;There is a fundamental difference between the 2 - 1 is to mandate (senator clinton's) and one is to not (senator obama's) by definition mandate means to to put something basically into law which the law needs to be enforced so by mandating healthcare she will need to reprimend those who do not abid by the law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is nothing inaccurate about his mailer that simply points that out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think by making this an issue they way she did is only going to hurt her and show the american people that she is everything that he is not! hypocritical, and still playing the same old political game!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695693</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:25:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695693</guid><dc:creator>Don, Cincinnati OH</dc:creator><description>Hillary is a hypocrite. &amp;nbsp;I live in Cincinnati and an hour before seeing her act irate on TV I received a mailer from the Clinton campaign. &amp;nbsp;The mailer blasted Obama on NAFTA (he must have supported it as a community organizer in Chicago in 92-93) while totally misrepresenting her statements on NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;Her back is to the wall, the polls are moving in Obama's direction and this his her last gasp to stay alive in the race. &amp;nbsp;Hopefully my fellow Ohioans can see through her charade.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695698</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:26:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695698</guid><dc:creator>Earl of Sidgwick, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>Clinton did support NAFTA. Her book; her words. Clinton's healthcare plan is to garnish wages. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I think there are a number of mechanisms that are possible, including going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Her words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an independent, all i can say is Dems need to wake up. The Clinton, Pelosi, Reid failures need to end.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695703</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:26:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695703</guid><dc:creator>Diamond</dc:creator><description>What a coward. No political fortitude. No spine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She knew about the mailing and she was asked about it by George Staphanopoulos, but she didn't say it was inaccurate. Her internal polls must show that her lead has disappeared. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695716</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:27:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695716</guid><dc:creator>Dolores F, Miami, FL</dc:creator><description>sorry, he does and says things and always has an excuse. and, the media is completely manipulating the situation. the buck never stop with Obama. &amp;nbsp;We have just witnessed a POTUS not taking any resposibility. They are the same. Barack is the Democrats version of Bush. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695724</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:27:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695724</guid><dc:creator>Toni C</dc:creator><description>LOL at least she didn't call him a Nazi like her supporters did on the Harry and Louise styled mailer a couple weeks ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh I forgot, she just now saw these.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary attacks Obama on the one hand while simultaneously telling a flat out lie that she just saw these things,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is what happens when lying is second nature to your political chops. &amp;nbsp;(uh-- I thought it was a vote for inspectors)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How dare Obama attack her for universal healthcare when that is all she has done for weeks. LOL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama's plan is not universal if people choose not to take it when its a good deal. &amp;nbsp;What happens to Hillary care people is reflected in the mailer. &amp;nbsp;THe healtcare gestapo will get ya (or its not universal just like oBama's) or you will take the mandate with subsidies and like it. &amp;nbsp;You can argue subsidies but if you still can't afford it, the mailer is accurate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is already happening in MA so where's the beef? &amp;nbsp;Denying it is not honest Hillary. &amp;nbsp;But to call it Rove tactics is just silly. &amp;nbsp;If it's true ....it's true, the end.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THe fact that Obama understands why the mandate is DOA and cedes a liberty issue is good. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's mandate life insurance while we are at it. &amp;nbsp;(Didn't think so...but what about those children at risk of their irresponsible parents?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary will not get her mandates through congress in my opinion. &amp;nbsp;What does she think the mailer won't go out when the GOP fights it? DUH!! &amp;nbsp;Face it it's mandates and they will polarize and die. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Universally. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry Hillary BWAAAAAA!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If she thinkls this will get her elected she is nuts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Desperate housewife.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695725</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:28:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695725</guid><dc:creator>James Wichita KS</dc:creator><description>Clinton trying to have it both ways, cherry pick the good stuff from Bill and leave out the bad (NAFTA).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey... I grew up in Ohio &amp;amp; Michigan, drive through the small towns and you will see a depressing sight. NAFTA was a killer for those states. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is right to point this out. What is worse is her response to trade treaties. &amp;quot;We'll re-evaluate&amp;quot;... I think the people in Ohio and Michigan want better. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She can come out hard when she is questioned, too bad that same passion is not there for the people of Ohio and Michigan.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695727</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:28:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695727</guid><dc:creator>JG in Denver</dc:creator><description>Desperation tactics by the Clintons to rally their supporters for one last hurray. Never trust the Clintons.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695738</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:29:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695738</guid><dc:creator>Marbw</dc:creator><description>KNOW THE FACTS&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://factcheck.barackobama.com/"&gt;http://factcheck.barackobama.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LEARN &amp;amp; ISSUES&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/index.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/issues/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/speeches/index.php"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/speeches/index.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/issues/&lt;/a&gt;economy/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HEALTHCARE&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/issues/&lt;/a&gt;healthcare/&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Specifics &lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k-SetojeUE&amp;amp;eurl=http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k-SetojeUE&amp;amp;eurl=http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama's plan-- download THE BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE--&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/"&gt;http://www.barackobama.com/issues/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695752</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:30:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695752</guid><dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator><description>All of this is a waste of effort for all. &amp;nbsp;Why does Obama need to place anything in print on Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Does he think the American People are not capable of doing there own research on Clinton's Health Care Program. &amp;nbsp;The fact that the mailers were placed by Obama before super Tuesday and now in Ohio is enough for me to say the &amp;quot;game&amp;quot; is just getting rotten. &amp;nbsp;The American People deserve better than dirty politics. &amp;nbsp;How about stepping up and showing some class..... &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695767</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:32:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695767</guid><dc:creator>BlueDog</dc:creator><description>What an incredible acting job on the part of Hillary Clinton. To pull out a political flier from weeks ago and make it out to be some big deal as if he had claimed she was the illegitimate daughter of *** Nixon or something. What does the flier actually say- not much? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It’s not like he accused her of pimping her daughter in Wisconsin- which she did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It’s not like he accused her brother of getting paid to get people pardoned by her husband- all of which happened. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It’s not like he blamed her and her husband, because she was at ever cabinet meeting, for selling out the working people of the United States through NAFTA and by offer most favored Nation status to China- which is exactly what they did. Out sourcing started under Clinton not Bush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to say &amp;quot;the lady doth protest too much.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is up to the forth estate to set the record straight if they have the guts to face the Clinton attack machine.&lt;br&gt;Ironic for Hillary Clinton to shame anyone. In order to shame someone you have to understand and appreciate what shame is. The Clinton’s are devoid of shame. Shame is not a part of their ethical, moral or cultural lexicon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Attack! Attack! Distract! Distract! That is the Clinton strategy. As for Karl Rove- yeah he learned everything from them. It is time for change we don’t need these people to lead this country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;20 years of Clinton’s and Bush’s is enough. We've all had enough of this garbage.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695794</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:34:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695794</guid><dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator><description>Hillary is using this occasion to get publicity. She has run out out money and her days are short. A desperate move, indeed. I am worried about her future after the selection. She can not manage her campaign, can not control her temper, and can not communicate a consistent message that is her own. What can she do other than crying and venting and maybe panting in private? </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695805</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:36:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695805</guid><dc:creator>Roy G</dc:creator><description>Aswini;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re: Hillary's outburst 2/23&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where she told Obama he should be&lt;br&gt;ashamed of himself for lying about her&lt;br&gt;health plan in his &amp;quot;Harry &amp;amp; Louise&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;mailers to OH and TX.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have been pointing you guys for a month&lt;br&gt;to this and other Obama camp tactics, that&lt;br&gt;bear no relationship to his statement on&lt;br&gt;60 Minutes 2/10;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We're not going to fabricate things. We're&lt;br&gt;not going to try to distort or twist her positions.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is the documentation;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://HitJobMemo.com"&gt;http://HitJobMemo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This post doesn't have to make the blog, just&lt;br&gt;forward please to the reporter above - balanced&lt;br&gt;Obama coverage requested</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695832</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:39:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695832</guid><dc:creator>J. Ed, New Mexico</dc:creator><description>Well folks instead of being consumed with emotion because we support one candidate over another let's try to look at this situation in pragmatic terms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this a NEW mailing just shot out after the debate? NO. Is this mailing in slanderous and in violation of Federal Laws which govern this types of campaign materials? NO&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HRC claims 35 years of 'EXPERIENCE', therefore everyone get out your calculators and do the math, Was NAFTA enacted within the last 35 Years? OMG - YES!!! Was a Clinton involved in its being established? &amp;nbsp;DING &amp;nbsp;DING DING!!! Yes! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then Rush out and get her book and read it to find out what her opinion was at the time... pause... She thought it was a POSITIVE part of HER husband’s administration. Since she was NOT an elected politician at the time, I guess she can now find fault with it and say she is going to fix it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now the fact is that take her vote as an elected official for the Iraq war, her change in stance on NAFTA and the poor management of her campaigns finances and GOSH for an EXPERIENCED politician she either is a slow learner or has poor judgment. These inconsistencies should make everyo9ne pause and think, what evidence is there that her Universal Health Care plan will be any better?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is apparent that because there has been no missteps in the Obama campaign that she and her staff can latch on to, that DRAMA is needed in order to stay in the limelight as March 4th draws nearer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sadly she has to contend with the attention grabbing McCain situation and therefore her SUDDEN realization that this mailer was out there gave her a drama moment. If this suddenly came to her attention, given that the Ohio vote is forthcoming and she has an 'Experience' staff supporting her, what kinds of delay can we imagine would occur in her administration if she were elected? Something to think about.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695837</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:39:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695837</guid><dc:creator>mm,ma</dc:creator><description>How would Obama implement all his ideas is a big puzzle, with the country in debts and with current account and federal deficit and recession looming large. He is promising moon to everyone to gather votes and would leave them in lurch once he gets it. Look at the black state union that he is not attending since the black votes are not important to him any more. He now needs the latinos. He never ran a clean campaign, thats the BS thrown by the media. His supporters are blatantly shameless and even worse than the republican supporters.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695839</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:40:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695839</guid><dc:creator>AzFnOfOB</dc:creator><description>HP Boston: Your rambling attacks of Obama and drugs shows you to be amongst the illiterate. Otherwise, you'd know your rants are sheer BS. You Hillary supporters are running scared....as you should be. You fear truth....and hide your heads in the sand. It's better to attack with lies than to admit failure. Give it a rest and watch closely how you're supposed to run a country with the love and admiration that Barack and Michelle Obama do. They are the epitome of what we need leading our country...not someone with a long history of corruption, scandal and betrayal. The Clinton's need to ride off into the sunset somewhere.....if they have any dignity left. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695841</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:41:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695841</guid><dc:creator>Billy, Normal, IL</dc:creator><description>Umm, I may be bad at math, but aren't the 8 years of her husband's administration counted within the &amp;quot;35 years of experience&amp;quot; she claims to have?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695842</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:41:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695842</guid><dc:creator>Vinn, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Another cheap Hillary rhetoric..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The sooner she is knocked out , teh btter it is for the Party and the Country..</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695867</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:44:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695867</guid><dc:creator>Louis Snyder</dc:creator><description>Either the mail outs were genuine or they were not. And the deception in them is either true or false. Please respond about both questions and RSVP</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695870</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:44:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695870</guid><dc:creator>Susan in Orlando</dc:creator><description>I agree with an earlier post. If he is going to connect her to the Clinton Administration and its foibles, then give her the props too. &amp;nbsp;I don't know about everyone else but my portfolio sure looked a lot better than it does now. And, I wasn't worried about how the next few generations are going to pay for all the debt we now have. And, we were spiraling into some abyss in terms of competition with other countries. &amp;nbsp;This guy is getting a little too full of himself. He has no reason to put out any &amp;quot;questionable&amp;quot; ads given his belief that he is winning. Oh wait, maybe he doesn't really believe he is winning and is starting to come to grips with the fact that he really can't walk on water and his worshipers may find out before June. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695879</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:45:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695879</guid><dc:creator>Billy, Normal, IL</dc:creator><description>By the way, the Obama campaign is exactly right. &amp;nbsp;Her &amp;quot;anger&amp;quot; today IS tactical. &amp;nbsp;It's her excuse for going nuclear/scorched-earth in the next debate and on until March 4.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The trouble is, this is like a movie where you figure out the ending in the first five minutes. &amp;nbsp;Hillary, by now we all know that &amp;quot;Rosebud&amp;quot; is the sled.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695881</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:46:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695881</guid><dc:creator>Jason, Princeton, NJ</dc:creator><description>This 'outrage' is manufactured. These are not new mailers, and the Clinton campaign has been well aware of them for a while. The mailer is factually correct.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton supported NAFTA until she flip-flopped at the beginning of this campaign. Hillary Clinton supports a health care mandate that will penalize Americans who can't afford whatever deal is hammered out with the Health Insurance industry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary's campaign wants to have their cake and eat it too - they've tried to smear Obama (see: 'xerox' comment, lies about the 'present' votes in the IL legislature) to no avail, and this is just one of the last, dull arrows in a *very* desperate campaign's quiver - a thinly veiled attempt to mount an offensive going into the last democratic debate of the race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The voters of Ohio and Texas will see through this sad, last gasp of a losing campaign on March 4th.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695885</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:46:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695885</guid><dc:creator>ME, Santa Ana, CA</dc:creator><description>The reality on the healthcare proposals:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We ALREADY have universal health care. &amp;nbsp;It is just being run inefficiently and in a fiscally unsound manner. &amp;nbsp;Anyone who is sick can go to an emergency room and get care at an exorbitant price. &amp;nbsp;If they are not &amp;quot;covered&amp;quot; then the taxpayers pay anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fiscal conservatives should applaud any system that offers a low-cost option for health care as it will SAVE money, not COST money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a result of people using the ER has a primary care facility, ERs are going out of business and the health care system is being harmed. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Allowing either campaign to make the healthcare debate a key debate is silly. &amp;nbsp;Clinton is pushing it to scare people/create differentiation where this is little and Obama is pushing it because Clinton is pushing it. &amp;nbsp;Both effectively want the same thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regardless, NO plan will matter unless it can be pushed through. &amp;nbsp;Clinton has tried and failed because the Clinton's have so much political baggage and several sworn enemies who will oppose ANYTHING they propose. &amp;nbsp;(sad, but true)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One or both of the following must happen for the slate of democratic plans(including healthcare) to succeed: &amp;nbsp;The democratic candidate must win and the congress must be democratic AND sufficiently so to assure passage of a bill over Republican objections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The simple truth is that Obama has pulled millions of new voters into the system. &amp;nbsp;Those millions will vote democratic in their congressional races. &amp;nbsp;Obama leads in general election polls. &amp;nbsp;Clinton does not. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, both of the required steps for achieving a healthcare plan (presidency, congress) are MORE likely with an Obama nomination.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695891</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:46:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695891</guid><dc:creator>Mimi Trudy</dc:creator><description>What we're seeing from Hillary is either &amp;quot;kicks of a dying horse&amp;quot; or the case of &amp;quot;a drowning woman will clutch at a straw.&amp;quot; Give it up momma</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695894</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:47:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695894</guid><dc:creator>Mary Dawn</dc:creator><description>I've been reading these blogs with interest, and thus far I have been impressed by the vitriolic and ignorant statements made by what appear to be uneducated individuals. I say uneducated, because it seems they can't put a coherent thought together without calling names and being ugly. &amp;nbsp;I'm signing off. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695909</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:48:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695909</guid><dc:creator>J</dc:creator><description>Jake,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Running a positive campaign does not mean you won't highlight issues. &amp;nbsp;There wasn't a single ad hominem attack on HRC in those mailings. Just attacks on her POLICIES (which by the way not a single Hillary supporter can refute). &amp;nbsp;Dispute the contents of the mailings if you dare but to call it negative campaigning is quite desperate.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695916</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695916</guid><dc:creator>MaryEllen, PA</dc:creator><description>Who is the REAL Hillary? &amp;nbsp;This latest outburst is so one hundred eighty out from the candidate at Thursday's debate that it just boggles my mind. &amp;nbsp;It would appear that the person who appeared at the debate as concerned about America was not being genuine with the American people. &amp;nbsp;It seems now that it was an act of the first class order. &amp;nbsp;The attacks today, in my opinion, only reinforce the Hillary that we have seen hidden depending on the situation. &amp;nbsp;Angry, self-centered, manipulative, divisive and down-right nasty. &amp;nbsp;You can object to the mailings, but it should be done in a civilized &amp;nbsp;manner. &amp;nbsp;Although I do have to marvel at the fact that as of today they are an issue - they have been out for a couple weeks - is that because she is desperate because the end appears near for her candidacy? &amp;nbsp;Kudoes to Barack for handling this with a calm and resolute demeanor.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695918</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695918</guid><dc:creator>Maria Isabel</dc:creator><description>Very dissapointing to hear empty rethoric and a misleading and dishonest candidate fighting agaisnt Universal Health Care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The second mailer from the Obama campaign mimics Harry and Louise ads that the health care industry used to scare people into opposing universal health care. The ad claims &amp;quot;Hillary's health care plan forces everyone to buy insurance, even if you can't afford it.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might be a hard core Democrat, but I won't be able to vote for such a dishonest man. &amp;nbsp;He does say one thing and his Campaign is another. &amp;nbsp;I listen to a lot of african american firious people with lots of resetnment...I can only thing he uses the same tactics to get african americans to vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a pitty to see this coming from my party.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695924</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695924</guid><dc:creator>Steve H. Mpls Mn</dc:creator><description>Another desperate act from a vengeful vindictive woman who is getting her Butt handed to her by a the Rookie of the year</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695925</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695925</guid><dc:creator>Suzanne, WI</dc:creator><description>You go Obama!&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Hillary wants to dish it out, but can't take it!&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Her campaign has been negative from the start, and she needs to own up to support for NAFTA and the health care mandates. &amp;nbsp;It was only a matter of time before these two issues would blow up in her face. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Time for the Clinton's to go and bring a man with integrity.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695928</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:50:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695928</guid><dc:creator>M Cohen Westchester County NY</dc:creator><description>CHECK THE FACTS:&lt;br&gt;NY Newsday (source of the quote )calls the Obama NAFTA mailer &amp;quot;misleading&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/02/_the_democratic_campaign_has.html"&gt;http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/02/_the_democratic_campaign_has.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FACTSCHECK.ORG a non=partisan website calls Obama's healthcare claims &amp;quot;misleading&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These are not organizations associated with Hillary. &amp;nbsp;They just tell the truth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695934</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:51:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695934</guid><dc:creator>Mimi Trudy, houston, tx</dc:creator><description>What we're seeing from Hillary is either &amp;quot;kicks of a dying horse&amp;quot; or the case of &amp;quot;a drowning woman will clutch at a straw.&amp;quot; Give it up momma</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695939</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:52:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695939</guid><dc:creator>Maria Isabel</dc:creator><description>Very dissapointing to hear empty rethoric and a misleading and dishonest candidate fighting agaisnt Universal Health Care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The second mailer from the Obama campaign mimics Harry and Louise ads that the health care industry used to scare people into opposing universal health care. The ad claims &amp;quot;Hillary's health care plan forces everyone to buy insurance, even if you can't afford it.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might be a hard core Democrat, but I won't be able to vote for such a dishonest man. &amp;nbsp;He does say one thing and his Campaign is another. &amp;nbsp;I listen to a lot of african american firious people with lots of resetnment...I can only thing he uses the same tactics to get african americans to vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a pitty to see this coming from my party.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695942</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:53:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695942</guid><dc:creator>Browny</dc:creator><description>I was reading a history book about Clinton presidency..&lt;br&gt;Bill Clinton was vigoursly promoting NAFTA...as per the book...&lt;br&gt;There was nothing said Hillary was trying to prevent it as first lady...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695949</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:54:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695949</guid><dc:creator>Bobby and Carmen Ortiz</dc:creator><description>Obama has been distorting Hillary's voting record; her stance on various issues and her intentions for a very long time. &amp;nbsp;It is all documented on Hillary's facthub website. &amp;nbsp;It is time for Obama to stop preaching one way and behaving another. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My family and I are happy and relieved that Hillary is confronting Obama on his abject dishonesty. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enough is enough.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695956</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:54:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695956</guid><dc:creator>Floridavoter</dc:creator><description>Mexed, you are mistaken. Obama's position has always been to negotiate with those who disagree, Hillary and McCain take the same old line that sitting down with the Prez is such an honor that only those who already agree qualify. This fails to take into account that thanks to Dubya it's not such an honor anymore.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695957</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:55:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695957</guid><dc:creator>Rose Toneri in Ohio</dc:creator><description>TELL THE TRUTH OBAMA. &amp;nbsp;YOU ALWAYS MISREPRESENT HILLARY ON HEALTHCARE AND ON NAFTA AND MANY OTHER ISSUES TOO. &amp;nbsp;WE ARE TIED OF YOUR LIES. &amp;nbsp;WE ARE TIRED OF IT. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695960</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:55:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695960</guid><dc:creator>DCortez, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>35 years of experience is catching up to her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695972</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:56:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695972</guid><dc:creator>Deborah, Greenlawn, NY</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; What part of the definition of 'mandatory' doesn't she understand? &amp;nbsp;And since she refuses to come up with a response to how this mandatory requirement would be enforced, he has a real point. A blogger from MA on the Obama site noted that her boyfriend was a victim of this mandatory/Romney plan and just gets nailed for fines and fees but still can't afford the health care even though he wants it.The blogger's point was that it doesn't work. Only hurts people and generates revenue for government/insurance cos.? &lt;br&gt; Numerous sources, including her autobiography, can back up her (albeit not so passionate at the time) support of NAFTA, what comes around... Sen. Obama should go easy, because NAFTA and the like is reality&lt;br&gt;and Texas kinda likes it.&lt;br&gt; A lot of sour grapes in her rant...&amp;quot;big rallies&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;speeches&amp;quot;...if her campaign were better managed and not broke, she could get her own mailings out. And yes, they are both Dems. but they are NOT on the same team. They are adversaries right now. Hardball, Lady.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;Oh, and how does it feel to have &amp;quot;everything I said was factually accurate&amp;quot; (Bill about SC) turned around&lt;br&gt;on you! &amp;nbsp;At least this wasn't a racial smear. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;So get over it. Aren't you the one who has been vetted, took the hits, has 35 years of political experience?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695974</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:56:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695974</guid><dc:creator>Mom, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Hillary needs to remember &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;That she has the NERVE to criticize Obama for fighting back! &amp;nbsp;He has let you get away with soooooo many lies in an attempt to run a civilized campaign, to throw a fit because he finally put out fliers telling people the facts you don't want them to hear - how is that unethical?? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Will she cry again and to get votes if the tantrum of outrage doesn't work? &amp;nbsp;She embarrasses women everywhere. &amp;nbsp;Is this irrational behavior suppose to convince us she is presidential?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695975</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:56:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695975</guid><dc:creator>Minnie Thom</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton has finally seen the light. &amp;nbsp;She cannot allow the lies being perpetrated by Senator Obama and his underhanded campaign team to go unchallenged. &amp;nbsp;I was proud of her today. &amp;nbsp;She is the real Democrat in this race. &amp;nbsp;She fights for the Democratic Party and for all Democrats across the country. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695976</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:56:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695976</guid><dc:creator>Drew DeRuiter   Louisville, KY</dc:creator><description>Hillary is about winning at all cost. &amp;nbsp;The more she speaks the more I dislike her. &amp;nbsp;Even if she somehow weasels her way to win the Democratic primary there is no way she can win the General Election. &amp;nbsp;Maybe the Democratic Party needs to learn the hardway. &amp;nbsp;Look at all the polls. &amp;nbsp;Obama would beat McCain who would beat Clinton. &amp;nbsp;I don't want to vote for McCain but I will unfortunately have to if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination. &amp;nbsp;It would be the first time in 20 years I voted Republican.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695989</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:58:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695989</guid><dc:creator>MaryEllen, PA</dc:creator><description>Who is the REAL Hillary? &amp;nbsp;This latest outburst is so one hundred eighty out from the candidate at Thursday's debate that it just boggles my mind. &amp;nbsp;It would appear that the person who appeared at the debate as concerned about America was not being genuine with the American people. &amp;nbsp;It seems now that it was an act of the first class order. &amp;nbsp;The attacks today, in my opinion, only reinforce the Hillary that we have seen hidden depending on the situation. &amp;nbsp;Angry, self-centered, manipulative, divisive and down-right nasty. &amp;nbsp;You can object to the mailings, but it should be done in a civilized &amp;nbsp;manner. &amp;nbsp;Although I do have to marvel at the fact that as of today they are an issue - they have been out for a couple weeks - is that because she is desperate because the end appears near for her candidacy? &amp;nbsp;Kudoes to Barack for handling this with a calm and resolute demeanor.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#695996</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:59:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:695996</guid><dc:creator>lfr</dc:creator><description>I believe the flyers are true.&lt;br&gt;Hillary said she would garnish wages, if necessary, to pay for health care.&lt;br&gt;Bill championed NAFTA and she supported it.&lt;br&gt;She's the one who should be ashamed...hissyfits are unpresidential.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696005</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:00:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696005</guid><dc:creator>Sem, VA</dc:creator><description>why does she want to look clean? am shocked! see 2 links.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&amp;amp;feature=related"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&amp;amp;feature=related&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I&amp;amp;feature=related"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I&amp;amp;feature=related&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696008</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:00:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696008</guid><dc:creator>Eric, Gig Harbor, Wash.</dc:creator><description>If Hillary Clinton doesn't drop out now... there will be no Democratic Party as we know it in existence after next November. The former First Lady's attack politics... as shown today in her timely complaints about fliers that the Obama campaign is sending out have shown how disengenuous she really is. This type of campaigning, at best, disillusions millions of people who want to believe in an America ready to unite... not an America catering to the aspirations of one person...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exhibit A) If Mrs. Clinton wins the nomination of the Democratic Party, she will not (and I say will not) win against McCain... current polls show this and he can pull the national security trump card on her... remember she voted for the War in Iraq, then went back on herself? Many Americans disagree with McCain that we should have a &amp;quot;100-year war,&amp;quot; but many don't want someone who can't make up their mind on national security either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exhibit B) It is becoming increasingly clear that the only way Hillary can win the Democratic Party nomination for President is by hoping for a brokered convention... effectively disenfranchising every new voter who joined the Democratic Party for the first time this year because of Senator Obama. Not to mention it would most likely put her nomination at odds with the popular majority of Democrats. This means that the newest members of the Democratic Party, including myself, would become disillusioned with the party's form of choosing a nominee - not from the people but from the elite.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696016</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:02:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696016</guid><dc:creator>Steve Clements Springfield. MO</dc:creator><description>Hillary wants to take credit for the good things of the Clinton administration and claim to be experienced because of it. Fine, but her experience includes support for NAFTA while many of us Union people were working and demonstrating against it, and warning how it would lead to manufacturing jobs leaving this country. That's her experienced leadership too. Give her the credit deserved.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696020</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:02:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696020</guid><dc:creator>aMom in Kansas</dc:creator><description>Here's an excerpt from a February 14, 2008 Huffington Post article by David Sirota:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton has made statements unequivocally trumpeting NAFTA as the greatest thing since sliced bread. The Buffalo News reports that back in 1998, Clinton attended the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and thanked praised corporations for mounting &amp;quot;a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA.&amp;quot; Yes, you read that right: She traveled to Davos to thank corporate interests for their campaign ramming NAFTA through Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On November 1, 1996, United Press International reported that on a trip to Brownsville, Texas, Clinton &amp;quot;touted the president's support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would reap widespread benefits in the region.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Associated Press followed up the next day noting that Hillary Clinton touted the fact that &amp;quot;the president would continue to support economic growth in South Texas through initiatives such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In her memoir, Clinton wrote, &amp;quot;Senator Dole was genuinely interested in health care reform but wanted to run for president in 1996. He couldn't hand incumbent Bill Clinton any more legislative victories, particularly after Bill's successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, we are all expected to just forget that, so that Hillary Clinton's campaign can manufacture supposed &amp;quot;outrage&amp;quot; that anyone would say she supported NAFTA - all at a time her chief strategist, Mark Penn, simultaneously heads a firm that is right now pushing to expand NAFTA into South America.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696021</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:02:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696021</guid><dc:creator>Cory Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Hillary you are truly the most manipulative and sleezy of all politicians. Everyone sees through your BS. Do the country a favor and drop your bid. Remember the flier she sent out in Wisconsin? &amp;quot;Barack, which one of these people doesn't deserve heathcare?&amp;quot; What goes around comes around. Since when does a couple extra years in the senate and being first lady make you &amp;quot;the most experienced candidate?&amp;quot; Lets not forget that this lady moved to the state of New York just to run for senate. She is an embarassment to this country.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696026</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:02:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696026</guid><dc:creator>T Terry</dc:creator><description>I have no doubt that this is the way both candidates see each others policies. &amp;nbsp;And actually they are both right to some extent, but not totally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point drop earlier about the 9 point change is a good example of what Clinton is doing in order to gain some of the momentum back. &amp;nbsp;Obama does this as well but he is perceived a little more smooth at accomplishing the feat. &amp;nbsp;This is classic politics and no matter what politician you pick this applies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The procedure is a way to help shift a point into your favor, but the participants have to be willing to accept, I dare say, change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696045</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:05:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696045</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>whwhwhwhat...i am blown away at how people can compare barack to bush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;these must be people who work for the clinton campaign. no sane person would think that way</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696055</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:06:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696055</guid><dc:creator>Deborah, Greenlawn, NY</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt; The contents of the brouchures were not made up. The sources were nailed down and include HRC's own words.&lt;br&gt; If there were lies, that would be wrong and negative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Frankly, I don't think the Obama campaign needed&lt;br&gt;to even send them out, but this was probably planned when she still had her 20+% point lead.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;Good grief, doesn't her &amp;quot;shame on you Barack Obama&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;sound just like her as the scold, the angry wife, the aggravated mother, the Catholic school nun?&lt;br&gt; I guess the kumbaya/New Hampshire moment at the end of the debate the other night is over, huh?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696056</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:06:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696056</guid><dc:creator>Mike B. Alabama</dc:creator><description>We need to get real,let me give Hilary credit for this line though it is not an original. She bashed Obama on Healthcare in the last debate and in her TV ads currently running. But Obama should not criticize a fellow Dem. on Healthcare Hilary now states. Obama is not being straight on her support of NAFTA and that is dirty tactics she claims. While her camp continues to mill up the ridiculous issue of plaigiarism on Obama. Clinton has paid speech writers and uses her husband's lines. What is up with all the double talk about dirty tactics and bad treatment. People who live in glass houses.......somebody else said it originally and it appiles to both Clinton and Obama. As Bill said.....&amp;quot;Give me a break&amp;quot;....this is the silly season (Obama). Hilary......politics ain't beanbag (somebody said it first) so get over it and show some class.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike B&lt;br&gt;Zeus&lt;br&gt;God of ridiculous political thought&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696066</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:08:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696066</guid><dc:creator>Mike Marcello, Saco, Maine</dc:creator><description>Hillary is done! &amp;nbsp;Obama has been a gentleman throughout this entire process. &amp;nbsp;If he had gone negative in New Hampshire, you'd be done. &amp;nbsp;Here's the amazing story, You and your husband had a chance at Health Care and failed. &amp;nbsp;You and your husband has a chance at trade and failed. &amp;nbsp;You and your husband can look at each other age as the country moves forward without the two of you!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696075</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:09:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696075</guid><dc:creator>Michael, Columbia, SC</dc:creator><description>The Clintons do not deserve any credit for the budget surpluses in the 1990s. &amp;nbsp;First of all, the surpluses he claimed to have in his budget proposals during the 1992 elections were completely fraudulent, reminiscent of Reagan's &amp;quot;voodoo economics.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Every independent study of them showed that to be the case, and Clinton himself as forced to admit it less than 2 weeks into office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the budgets surpluses in the 90's were the direct result of the booming 90's economy, which had absolutely nothing to with the Democratic administration at the time, the Republican administration that preceded it, or either party in Congress at any time. &amp;nbsp;The 90's economy was 100% the product of a technological revolution the likes of which we hadn't seen in 100 years. &amp;nbsp;The internet boom-- and nothing else-- gave us budges surpluses in the 90's. &amp;nbsp;The .com bust-- and nothing else-- brought them back down. &amp;nbsp;The Iraq war, of course, has since sent the deficit off the charts, but that's another story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary has been taking credit for everything that went right in the 90's regardless of whether she, her husband, or anyone else deserves credit for it, but she has avoided responsibility for anything and everything that went wrong.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#696096</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:11:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:696096</guid><dc:creator>already voted, Texas</dc:creator><description>Must be a slow news day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wasn't it a &amp;quot;scream&amp;quot; that put an end to Howard Dean's campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do we treat women who scream -- as &amp;quot;more experienced?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Must be, we do. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697640</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:23:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697640</guid><dc:creator>Mark Smith, Oslo Norway</dc:creator><description>If Obama is the nominee as Axelrod claims why send out these mailers? The boon statement has widely been discredited in the media. Why cannot Obama admit it? The reason for the new outrage is that they were sent out in Ohio. Shouldn&amp;#180;t that be obvious?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW The anti-abortion mailer was not from the Clinton campaign, but from a 527.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697644</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:25:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697644</guid><dc:creator>DHJ, Wichita, KS</dc:creator><description>George Staphanopolos asked Mrs Clinton if people would not sign up for her healthcare plan what would happen? Mrs. Clinton said out of her mouth, thier wages would be garnished. Maybe she forgot.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697645</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:26:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697645</guid><dc:creator>A. K, Oklahoma City, OK</dc:creator><description>Then, there was G.B Senior, then B.C then G.B junior, now Billary. Let's Get ready for J.B, followed by C.C who is already in training. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, that is the state of our politics. Are we becoming a monarchy or are we witnessing the birth of the American Kingdom let by the 2 families?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697649</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:30:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697649</guid><dc:creator>Felix, Littleton CO</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton was on board with NAFTA and I'm sure there are any number of video clips available showing her pointing to it as an accomplishment of the Clinton administration. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She also has said herself that her health care mandate might mean garnishing wages of those who don't comply. She has not gone into detail about just what average people could expect in the way of subsidies to make it affordable nor how her plan would address systemic causes of the high cost of our health care system. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Without ways to lower those costs dramatically, her plan will leave many of us avoiding health care as much as possible &amp;nbsp;because of the high out of pocket costs which, in turn leads to a system of expensive treatments and procedures after we've already become really sick instead of much less expensive routine health maintenance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary's sudden rage over either of these mailers, which hardly just turned up, is just another stab at a better strategy. &amp;nbsp;With all the pundits talking about how she seemed to be on the verge of a graceful exit after her gracious concluding statement at the close of the last debate, her campaign probably decided they needed to dispel that notion. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overnight, she goes from being honored to appear on the same stage with Obama to outrage over mailings she surely knew about before the debate. Will it help? &amp;nbsp;Probably not. In fact the contrast between the calm collected Obama and the ranting Hillary hardly works to her advantage. &amp;nbsp;Especially since she throws plenty of mud herself, much of it not terribly fact based.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697670</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697670</guid><dc:creator>Theresa Smith, Garland, Texas</dc:creator><description>Drama Queen!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697675</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:45:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697675</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>Well I'm rooting for Obama but if he doesn't win I'll be happy to vote for Hillary. Only a jackass would vote republican again.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697701</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:10:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697701</guid><dc:creator>K T cobbin</dc:creator><description>Kas anyone notice that Barrack looks like Bob Marley (that is if Obama had a mustache and dreadlocks?)</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697703</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:11:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697703</guid><dc:creator>K T cobbin</dc:creator><description>Has anyone noticed how much Obama looks like Bob Marley (that is if Obama had dreadlocks and a mustache)???</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697723</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:24:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697723</guid><dc:creator>nieddu</dc:creator><description>Desperation is compelling Hillary to the latest &amp;nbsp;attacks, her internal polling are confirming Obama is eroding her lead in Ohio, Texas is already Obama's. Expect a bitchy debate next Tuesday. &amp;nbsp; She sure doesn't look cool when angry!!!!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697729</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:28:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697729</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle, Wash</dc:creator><description>I didn't know Hillary was a good actor. I think she will be fine even if she loses. With all this skils, she will have a good future in Hollywood. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697748</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:41:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697748</guid><dc:creator>Ronald, Houston , Tx</dc:creator><description>People keep calling Barack Hussein Obama a uniter, but look what he has done to the Democratic Party already. &amp;nbsp;He is tearing it apart. &amp;nbsp;There is so much animocity between democratic supporters of Hillary and Barack that Republicans are sitting back licking their chops because they know that a whole lot of democrats are going go vote for McCain simply because they cannot stand Obama or his wife and vice versa for Hillary and Bill. &amp;nbsp;I admit that Barack has tons more charisma than the boring Mcain but he is just too divisive a candidate. &amp;nbsp;His talk of changing Washington will not happen, Bush said the same thing when he campaigned and he's had 8 years to try. &amp;nbsp;He will not be able to change the thinking of Republican legislators that have been entrenched for 20 or 30 years. &amp;nbsp;I do think that Hillary needs to stand up to the false accusations in the Obama mailings but she needs to stay under control of her emotions right now. &amp;nbsp;She is playing right into his hands with her little rant this afternoon. &amp;nbsp; Her campaign needs to realize that people are drawn to Barack because he can lie through his teeth and still keep his composure. &amp;nbsp;He is a master at it. &amp;nbsp;I wish Al Gore would run and give the Democratic Party a candidate that all Democrats could rally behind.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697755</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:49:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697755</guid><dc:creator>BO</dc:creator><description>You Hillblazers (what kinda name is that?) need to hit the bars and celebrate cause we need to take your votes and give them to Mr. President Barack Obama. Obviousily, you guys hate to lose. &amp;nbsp;thats what happens when you dont use common sense with an open mind. deep down inside you know its true.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697778</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:06:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697778</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Coady, Winter Springs, FL</dc:creator><description>Say Good-bye, Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697780</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:08:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697780</guid><dc:creator>Donna, CA</dc:creator><description>Get a clue people..you are so one sided on your Obama kool-aid. So I guess if Obama does become president we will have his wife telling him what to do. You can't have it both ways. Hillary Clinton was not even a Senator when Nafta was voted on. Do really want me to believe a person shouldn't support their spouse. You all are jokes including msnbc for defending this.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697790</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:16:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697790</guid><dc:creator>Jason Broome, Hattiesburg, MS</dc:creator><description>Mr. Todd, Mr. Murray, and Mr. Montanaro,&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; In regard to Senator Clinton's thoughts about not changing for change's sake, if you watch &amp;quot;The War Room&amp;quot;--a documentary about the 1992 Clinton Campaign, you will notice in one spot that then President George Herbert Walker Bush said of then Governor Clinton's promises of change that you can't be for change for changes sake. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I find it interesting that Senator Clinton would echo the former president Bush's line of reasoning which he used against the hopeful, optimistic candidacy of her husband in the 1992 presidential election. It makes it appear that when she supported her husband's call for change it was the reasonable thing to do, but somehow when Senator Obama, of whom in the last debate she: 1. Noted how much she fundamentally agreed with him on almost every issue, and 2.Gave such a glowing report of during the closing moments of the debate speaks of hope and change his word are hallow and his supporters are--in contrast to her in the 92' election-- being unreasonable. I would be very happy for someone to explain what appears to be an inconsistency. Senator Clinton's campaign has my permission to email me with an explanation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;God Bless America</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697815</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:42:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697815</guid><dc:creator>Ml, Fresno CA</dc:creator><description>YES, KARMA IS A WONDERFUL THING; Specially when it comes back around to Obama by McCain. &amp;nbsp;I can't wait to see your faces when Obama gets all he has coming to him by McCain in November. &amp;nbsp;Man I'm sooo excited!!! I can't wait to see your mouths drop. &amp;nbsp;I assure you the Indepented vote that has been helping Obama win, will go back to voting Republican. How blind you are...lol.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697836</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:05:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697836</guid><dc:creator>Jacqueline P Gendell; Pittsburgh. PA</dc:creator><description>I am astonished that there are even a few people left who are still allowing themselves to be deceived by the Clintons. It was obvious to me, the first time I heard Bill Clinton speak, and then was further reinforced by his behavior during his presidency, that he is a sociopathic narcissist. He is able to lie without shame, remorse or deception, which are the most obvious signs of his inherent personality disorder. Hillary, is even more explicit in her deviant, self-serving behaviors and retoric. If one would just stand back, from all her drama, (that has clearly been poised to draw attention away from the true facts in her political agendas,) and observe how she has already been manipulating the American Public, just during the short time of these primaries, you could not help but discern her true nature. She has altered her appearence, her attitudes and even her basic political beliefs since the beginning of this campaign, to serve her ascendency into the White House. Bill Clinton did exactly the same. I was proud to hear Barack insightfully point out, at the 2nd to last debate, that she was &amp;quot;being so agreeable, that she had seemingly changed her political platform to conform to his&amp;quot;. I have been reading opinions in the news, that state that Hilary and Barack essentially agree on all the major issus. Initially, if you can remember, and get out of the fog of her confusing, dramatic ramblings, their policies were dramatically different. Barack has not changed his originally posited beliefs on the major issues of this election. However, she certainly has. I feel like I am experiencing deja vu, with another Clinton administration. Another question that continues to arise for me, is from whence did all &amp;quot;her experience&amp;quot; arise. Was she running our Country during the 1990's, or was Bill. I thought they had &amp;quot;reined her in&amp;quot; to appear more like a First &amp;quot;LADY&amp;quot;. Again, Barack so astutely pointed out, that she wrote or made the decisions to back the major legislature that was initiated during the Bill years. ( I never worried who would be wearing the &amp;quot;pant suits&amp;quot; if she was elected president.) Lastly, I will remind you, of her failed attempts to &amp;quot;take over the health care system,&amp;quot; as soon as Bill became President. Are you aware that she forbid any Doctor, not even One doctor, from sitting in on her private discussions with her appointed staff, during her planning to develop a Health Care System. Can you even begin to imagine what our already fractured health care system would be like if it was framed and directed by lawyers, politicians and CEO's of Insurance Companies. Do you also remember the retroactive Tax that she was responsible for imposing as soon as Bill took office, and her promise, during one of her debates, to raise taxes &amp;quot;as soon as she is President&amp;quot;!Her malignent narcission prevents her from recognizing her contradictions, her obvious impostering and her plethora of falsehoods that she levies upon us Americans,(unfortunately, her poor staff, not only have been able to clearly observe her true nature, but they have had to live with it as well.) As Barack so eloquently stated, &amp;quot;This is not about being a Democrat or a Republican&amp;quot;, (and I will add, it's not about being a woman or an African American,) &amp;quot;it's about being an American.&amp;quot; Thank you Barack, be giving me some hope, that maybe we can all begin to work together to help and foster each others best attributes, so that we may regain some of pride, and greatness in our Country!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697842</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:12:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697842</guid><dc:creator>Ms. Baez, California</dc:creator><description>Hillary is shameless and after yesterday's drama, a bit unstable. I truly hope that people don't fall for the okie doke. Hillary's slip is showing and it's time for her to be a lady and handle that. Then go and sit down somewhere....stop all of this foolishness.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697859</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:41:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697859</guid><dc:creator>Toni, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>One obvious thing took place in the last debate in Texas, that people seem to somehow overlook is the indisputable fact that Hillary Clinton (whom it was she that seeks to debate Obama), side-stepped or would not dwell on the topical issues of:&lt;br&gt;1. Transparency and Accountability: the over three hundred million dollars she got and spent on pork in her home state as a pet project. Obama had explained his, an amount by far less than Clintons, and was also prepared to make copies available to the moderators of the debate; She also had the chance here to dispel or put to rest the issue of filing or declaring her tax returns in details, like Obama has done, but she failed to so do.&lt;br&gt;2.She was scurrilously in a great deal of hurry to get away from the issue of Super-delegates when this now essentially forms the bedrock of her campaign.&lt;br&gt;3.She did not address the issue of her voting for the war in Iraq at all as if that was mightily irrelevant: But chose to only conveniently concern herself with talking about ending the war in 6 months. She needs to apologize to the American people first for her bad judgment that has cost the country so much in terms of lives and money. This is certainly one of the reasons why the country is now experiencing recession considering the staggering amount in billions that America spends in Iraq,and supported by Clinton. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697860</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:46:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697860</guid><dc:creator>Crock-of-Barack</dc:creator><description>INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ACKNOWLEDGED AND CONDEMNED OBAMA’S USE OF HARRY &amp;amp; LOUISE STYLE ATTACKS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Harbage, 2/23/08: “As Senator John Edwards former Healthcare Advisor and a currently unaffiliated healthcare reform proponent, I think that anyone familiar with the Harry and Louise campaign from the early 1990s would immediately recognize the similarity between the insurance industry’s attacks and the Obama Campaign’s mailer. This attack simply drives the debate to the lowest common denominator of generating fear.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Ezra Klein, American Prospect: “When I say that Obama is demagoguing universal health care, this sort of campaign literature is what I'm talking about…The Obama campaign kept their hairstyles and barely even changed their clothing -- which is really quite unfair to Harry and Louise, who probably let go of the plaid years back. What's worse is that the argument they're making is applicable to any kind of universal health care arrangement, including the arrangements Obama himself will eventually have to adopt.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Paul Krugman, New York Times, 2/1/08: “Sorry, but this is just destructive — like the Obama plan, the Clinton plan offers subsidies to lower-income families. And BO himself has conceded that he might have to penalize people who don’t buy insurance until they need care. So this is just poisoning the well for health care reform. The politics of hope, indeed…I know that Obama supporters want to hear no evil, but this is really, really bad.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Factcheck.org 2/4/08: “We agree that there is a resemblance between the photo on the Obama mailer and the [Harry and Louise] TV spots. In those ads actors portraying a white, middle-class couple expressed grave concerns about how the Clinton administration's health care plan would affect them. The ads were part of a $17 million campaign by the insurance industry that was widely credited – rightly or wrongly – with contributing to the defeat of the Clinton plan, and the ads still anger many advocates of broader government efforts to provide health insurance.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Trudy Lieberman, Columbia Review of Journalism, 2/4/08: “[Obama’s] new mailer attacking [Senator Clinton’s] proposal resurrects the ghosts of Harry and Louise, the infamous pair in TV commercials sponsored by the insurance industry, which helped sink Bill Clinton’s efforts at reform. In those ads, a man and woman seated at the kitchen table worry that under his plan they wouldn’t be able to choose their doctor. The message: “If we let the government choose, we lose.” In Obama’s mailer, a man and a woman are seated in the same positions at a kitchen table—the woman even has the same long, blonde hair. The message: “Hillary’s plan forces everyone to buy insurance even if you can’t afford it. Is that the best we can do for families struggling with high health care costs?”</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697863</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:47:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697863</guid><dc:creator>pet,ohio</dc:creator><description>clintons dirty washington politics again. she knew about these mailers before the debate and now comes out as a mad dog after her academy award performance at the debate pretending to be civil and presidential.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the flyer is BASED ON FACTS, NOT FICTION. it is another clinton ploy to APPEAR AS A VICTIM WHEN IN FACT SHE IS THE AGRESSOR. it is another desperate bid in a desperate campaing. she will now go on the attack and will try to draw obama into her dirty politics.&lt;br&gt;I URGE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SEE THROUGH HER TACTICS AND PLOYS AND UNDERSTAND THAT THE FLYERS ARE BASED ON FACTS.&lt;br&gt;the clintons supported nafta and they support mandatory health care under penalty if you dont comply. HILARY AND HE HUSBAND TREAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE LIKE A BUNCH OF IDIOTS,BUT I THINK AMERICA SHOULD SHOW THE CLINTONS WHO ARE THE REAL IDIOTS, THEY ARE. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HILARYS ANGER IS JUST A FARCE TO INCITE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AGAINST OBAMA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VOTE OBAMA IF YOU CARE ABOUTH THIS COUNTRY AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICA AS A PROSPEROUS AND UNITED COUNTRY.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697865</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:56:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697865</guid><dc:creator>Green King, Ohio</dc:creator><description>I respect the Clintons but I’m tired to see themselves disrespect&lt;br&gt; they on integrity and humiliate the nation values (lying for no reason).&lt;br&gt;I can campaign for Clinton but I would vote for Obama, because honesty&lt;br&gt;matter and more and more it prove that Clinton’s lack of this great ideal&lt;br&gt;Ladies and gentleman, stop being voluntarily ignorant the media proves&lt;br&gt; that this man Obama is right once again you must see these videos &lt;br&gt;Links before showing no sense, shameful &amp;nbsp;and hostile comments like &lt;br&gt;Clinton’s are doing all the time. They say one think and deny it the next day.&lt;br&gt;But even they can fool the entire nation, there’s a man who does take&lt;br&gt;this kind of hypocrisy and shameful behavior from the Clintons and is &lt;br&gt;this OBAMA. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;You can also have no sympathy for the man but one thing is true. If&lt;br&gt;You want a clean environment start cleaning from your own house.&lt;br&gt;Lets have a green America starting by the white house.&lt;br&gt;Clinton’s so far are the ones who fight against their own campaign&lt;br&gt;The couple cannot even agree with each other, that’s why the nation&lt;br&gt;wants another direction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You will know Obama secrets and get more of his votes going to this youtube link , we gotta chance this people mind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qetpi5PvFDI&amp;amp;feature=related"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qetpi5PvFDI&amp;amp;feature=related&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Green K&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697868</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:59:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697868</guid><dc:creator>Carol, Lakeland, Fl.</dc:creator><description>This is out of Carl Rove play book. Just who is Obama, he now says he is not a part of the Democrat party. Give me a break, you Obama supporters would sell your sole to the highest bidder.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697886</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:37:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697886</guid><dc:creator>KarLee, Gig Harbor, Wash</dc:creator><description>Okay, America, the beauty of the internet is that WE (ordinary citizens) can talk to each other across the states to hear what REALLY happened in the campaigns prior to today's fireworks, so that we can judge for ourselves what the REAL TRUTH is. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In question,today's allegations as Hillary claims she had no knowledge BEFORE today, when a supporter stuck these mailings in her hand, that Obama was circulating an ad campaign criticizing her universal health care plan, and we should all be enraged that one Democrat would stoop so low as to slam another Democrat's Universal HC Plan. &amp;nbsp;Her anger seemed very genuin indeed. &amp;quot;Shame on you, Obama!&amp;quot; she scolds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;America, she's not being honest with us, and I can prove it if you read on.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I live in Washington State and our caucus was held on February 9th. At least two weeks PRIOR to our caucus here (i.e. at the end of January), the first Democratic ad campaign that aired on our WA state channels was a Hillary ad accusing Obama of not wanting/believing in Universal HC because his plan would leave out 15 million people, meanwhile levelling the accusation that Obama wouldn't do all he could to help the American people like Hillary would. Hillary threw this &amp;quot;first punch&amp;quot; negativity slamming Obama's intentions and his plan.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Two days LATER,in response/defense against Hillary's &amp;quot;first punch&amp;quot;, Obama aired his first ad on TV, depicting a couple sitting at a kitchen table discussing how they can't afford health insurance already,so how they will they ever afford an additional chunk taken out of their wages under Hillary's plan.(I recognized this same couple in the flyers Hillary held in her hand today--It's the same ad.) Obama ends the ad by saying that his plan promises affordable health care without penalties which would strain those who need help most. His ad never launched a personal attack on Hillary or her motives, just the mandated portion of her plan. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; Then Hillary called &amp;quot;foul&amp;quot; to the WA newspapers, saying that Obama's ad was similar to the original ads against Universal HC while she and Bill were still in the White House. &amp;nbsp;She then followed up with an even stronger negative ad against Obama stating that he wants to permanently kill Universal HC and accused him of not caring about the American people. &amp;nbsp;Obama did NOT respond with another negative ad, but simply stated in his Seattle rally that he and Hillary had similar plans, but recommended different methods of implementation.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;So my questions are these, America....if this same controversy over the very same ad had already played out here in WA state at the end of January, why all of Hillary's sudden indignation and &amp;quot;Shame on you, Obama&amp;quot; comments now,claiming she had just barely seen these ads when a &amp;quot;supporter shoved these mailings into her hand&amp;quot; today? &amp;nbsp;And why point Democrats' outrage solely at Obama for slamming another candidate's universal healthcare when she was doing exactly that prior to Feb 9th, throwing the &amp;quot;first punch&amp;quot; of negative ads. &amp;nbsp;Obama is telling the truth when he says that she knew about these ads weeks ago, and he questions the &amp;quot;Why Now?&amp;quot; of her vehement anger to the cameras today. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Even more importantly, she was given several chances &amp;nbsp;during the last debate in Texas to look straight into Obama's eyes and confront him about this ad campaign specifically, to tell him to his face that she didn't think he was ready to be president,to say she was sick of his speeches, etc. and she didn't do it. It was only after the moderators of the debate refused to &amp;quot;let her off the hook&amp;quot; about her negative attacks/remarks about plagerism that we got that lame Xerox comment. Next, she says she's honored to be on the stage with him, but two days later she is &amp;quot;calling him out&amp;quot; to meet her in Ohio when she wouldn't confront him in Texas &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;C'mon America. &amp;nbsp;We're smarter than falling for this, aren't we? Let's keep these email blogs going between states so that we can keep finding the REAL truth.&lt;br&gt;Sorry, Hillary--I'm not buying today's act and neither should the American people. You just lost my vote.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697903</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:16:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697903</guid><dc:creator>POLpursun</dc:creator><description>I thought that Barack had now finally ascertained who he was running against ----- Bill or Hill? --- yes Hill rather than Billary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No such luck. NOW the question has resurfaced --- is it Hill or Hill? ---- which Hill?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it the person of the final debate remark this past Thursday? &amp;nbsp;Is it the screamer, screecher, badass, weeks-old-pamphlet toting mudslinger ----- &amp;quot;Meet me in Ohio,&amp;quot; she threatens. &amp;nbsp;You go girl, mash him up next Tuesday!! {YEAH, RIGHT.} &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very large variances make averages meaningless. &amp;nbsp;Yes, no one's temperament can be represented by, say, a horizontal straight line. &amp;nbsp;However, the ever-changing roller coaster rides of HRC takes one, metaphorically, from the mountain top of Everest to the closest man (or woman) has come to the centre of the earth. Who is it, really, with the feet planted solidly on the surface of Mother Earth? &amp;nbsp;Do we know? Can we know?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697905</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:22:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697905</guid><dc:creator>Mark in Pennsylvania.  </dc:creator><description>Pretty erratic behavior by a campaign in disarray. &amp;nbsp;Seems completely like they are trying to determine how to end this thing, whether negative or not. &amp;nbsp;It is sad to see her come down to this. &amp;nbsp;Obviously the nomination is complete, she knows it, and now they just have to figure a way out. &amp;nbsp;Too bad for her. &amp;nbsp;Especially since the issues in the mailers were nothing short of accurate. &amp;nbsp;I wish the campaign was going to be active on 4/22 in PA, but this pretty much shows the end. &amp;nbsp;I had three Clinton supporters in my household alone that have left Hillary last night over that embarrassing rant. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697907</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:44:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697907</guid><dc:creator>Lilly, Omaha, NE</dc:creator><description>Why don't you both go into more detail about your health plans during the debate? &amp;nbsp;Healthcare is a critical issue for the American middle class. &amp;nbsp;Right now it's not affordable for many of us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Clinton, my confusion is.....do I have to pay for a mandated healthcare reform, i.e., I have to dash out &amp;amp; buy insurance (if I had none), that I possibly wouldn't have the money for?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, Senator Obama, how do you plan to make insurance more affordable? &amp;nbsp;Taking into account that even if the premium is lower, some still may not be affordable?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lilly</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697928</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:26:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697928</guid><dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator><description>Why does Obama believe he has the corner on change? It's a part of everyone's life. &amp;nbsp;We make mistakes, we learn from them, and we make adjustments. &amp;nbsp;I thought this was called change. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Clinton had the courage to try opening NA borders to free trade. &amp;nbsp;At the time, his party had his back. Why isn't Obama criticizing his DFL pals that supported NAFTA? &amp;nbsp;Did someone twist their arms and force them to pass that legislation? He continues to cut the hands that feed him. Simply because they didn't get it right the first time, doesn't mean the idea is wrong. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary clearly states she wants to amend NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;We have a great opportunity to get it right this time. &amp;nbsp;So, taking foward direction and CHANGING something is NOT okay unless it comes from the great and mighty Obama? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's overplaying the mandate because he knows it has a negative connotation. I agree with Hillary's plan. &amp;nbsp;I don't want the tab for the uninsured. &amp;nbsp;She can quantify and define her plan without his hijacking it in the public eye. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He was very unfair in those mailers.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697932</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:33:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697932</guid><dc:creator>Man for Hillary, Arkadelphia, AR</dc:creator><description>If Hillary isn't nominated, I'm voting for McCain or Huckaby. Obama just dosn't have the experience needed for presidency. Obama lost my vote when he started using celebrity's to get attention. Hillary has stood on her own feet through the campaign. She is a professional. Celebrities aren't setting a good example lately. And these mailers are something that republicans do to smear democrats anyway, so I'll just vote republican. Come to think of it, this is exactly what the republicans like to see, the demorcat party is divided so it's very likely that neither Hillary or Obama will win the general election.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697938</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:41:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697938</guid><dc:creator>D. Dyer</dc:creator><description>If Hillary is not nominated, I WILL NOT VOTE this year. &amp;nbsp;I CANNOT vote for Obama and I WILL NOT vote republican...</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697939</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:44:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697939</guid><dc:creator>Svanbasten, Atlanta</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Shame on you Ahmadejanad, Shame on you Hugo Chavez&amp;quot;, says President Hillary Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that what people realy want a President who will be calling a public conference and saying shame on you my enemy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We want a stronger leader and commander in chief who will articulate his own and his countries views and opinions to the rest of the world in a strong and convincing manner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It really is OBAMA time. Expect a TKO in the 12 round on March 4th, after 11 rounds and the corner is not throwing in the towel.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697940</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:45:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697940</guid><dc:creator>Maureen Ferry, Colwyn,PA</dc:creator><description>If Obama thinks Hillary is &amp;quot;exercised&amp;quot;, wait until he gets a load of a neocon workout.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697942</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:49:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697942</guid><dc:creator>Donna, Tampa, Fl.</dc:creator><description>Hillary about time you start calling this AH out. QUIT being nicey nice with the raciat IDOIT. THe debate on Tuesday make him talk about issues that he doesn't seem to know anything about. Don't drop out go to June, because all the S. is gone to start coming out, and you Obama supporters who says let the healing begin. Never get behind a muslim, racist. Obama supporters would sell their souls at any price.&lt;br&gt;HILLARY, McCAIN or NADER Nooooooooooo MUSLIM</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697943</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:52:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697943</guid><dc:creator>Lisa PA</dc:creator><description>All this talk about finger wagging, is Obama going to wag his finger at us as he declares &amp;quot;I did not get stoned and have sex with that MAN&amp;quot;!! (Larry Sinclair).&lt;br&gt;The polygraph is this week, what's pristine Obama going to do when Sinclair passes the polygraph, giving merit to his claims?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697944</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:53:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697944</guid><dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator><description>Obama is a snake. &amp;nbsp;He's all pretty speeches and no substance. &amp;nbsp;I'm ready for a black president...just not this one. &amp;nbsp;For the first time in my life, if he is the nominee, I'll be voting for a Republican, something I'd never thought I'd do.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697945</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:57:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697945</guid><dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator><description>Just because Obama is winning doesn't mean he's the right choice. &amp;nbsp;May I remind you of the last 8 years and the train wreck that that &amp;quot;winner&amp;quot; has caused. &amp;nbsp;Obama will be an on the job training president and his dear wife---let's just hope she can find something to be proud of the US for. &amp;nbsp;I find it interesting that she makes such a negative comment about the US and yet the media barely calls her on it. &amp;nbsp;In the end, Obama doesn't have experience and church inspired fire and brimstone speeches wont get the job done. &amp;nbsp;We need a man (or in this case) a woman who will get the job done better. &amp;nbsp;Apparently, however, Americans are fine allowing Oprah to decide their nominee (and yes, I'll admit I am plagarizing that line from SNL--funny but true). &amp;nbsp;I can make up my own mind without Oprah telling me.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697947</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:01:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697947</guid><dc:creator>ObamaVetsdotcom</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I suppose if he is finally labeling her as part of the administration, instead of &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; being First Lady, and giving her blame for the administration's actions, he should give her at least partial credit for those balanced budgets, for those 22 million new jobs, for those eight years of peace and prosperity, for an end to ethnic cleansing in the Balkans.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think you want to go there because if you do, you would also have to give her credit for treating terrorist as &amp;quot;criminals&amp;quot; as was the Clinton official policy as well as credit for sitting on her hands:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five US military personnel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the 1996 al-Khobar towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 US military personnel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the 1998 bombing of US embassies in Africa, which killed 257 and injured 5,000&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured three US sailors&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the Clinton administration really do was embolden Al-Quiada.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary will need to take credit for allowing the genocide in the Balkans to go unabated for seven years before something was done about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary would need to take credit for ordering Marines stationed at the White House to remove their uniforms because they were &amp;quot;offensive&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary would have to take credit for her husband's impeachment and her questionable judgment for remaining loyal to him out of preserving her own political future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The list can go on so do you really want to use that logic? </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697948</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:02:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697948</guid><dc:creator>Chris11</dc:creator><description>Why is it that Obama gets to make the rules as he goes? &amp;nbsp;At the debates he preeches one thing and on the trail he is doing another. &amp;nbsp;If Clinton says anything in regards to his policies or approach, then she is going negative, even if it is true. &amp;nbsp;But if he chooses to go negative, even if it is false, then it is she who is making a big deal out of nothing. &amp;nbsp;He has a way of twisting anything back on Clinton and I seriously wish that the america people would take note of this for a change. &amp;nbsp;This guy is really unbelievable and I cannot believe that at least the political analysts can't see right through him. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697953</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697953</guid><dc:creator>J W P</dc:creator><description>Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to decieve. &amp;nbsp;And you may quote me on that. &amp;nbsp;So long Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697954</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697954</guid><dc:creator>J W P</dc:creator><description>Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to decieve. &amp;nbsp;And you may quote me on that. &amp;nbsp;So long Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697957</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:10:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697957</guid><dc:creator>Kathy Andres, DeWitt, MIchigan</dc:creator><description>Hillary must not have been listening when the audience Booed her in Texas when she went on the attack! &amp;nbsp;Enough already!!! &amp;nbsp;This kind of behavior will is certain to loose the nomination for her. She seems intelligent, can's she find a better way to win. Shame on her for not owning up to Bill's NAFTA law, voting to authorize the war on Iraq, and certainly for taking over $800,000 from healthcare lobbyist behind closed doors! &amp;nbsp;She acts as though she is &amp;quot;entitled&amp;quot; to win. Well, she is not entitled. We the people are entitled to vote for a new way of doing things. &amp;nbsp;P.S.S. She avoided Tavis Smiley's question about what her intentions were for Michigan and Florida delegates. If she fights for them, and becomes the nominee, John McCain will win and he knows it!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697958</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:11:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697958</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Nashville, TN</dc:creator><description>Hillary's outburst was undignified, overly-dramatic, and certainly not how we want a president to act.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama's calm, thoughtful response is what we expect and need from our leaders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697959</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:11:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697959</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Dayton, OH</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;The most important question for Sen. Obama:&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;Does he still stand by his position not to wear the American flag because of the Iraq war?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Commander and Chief, will he wear the Stars and Stripes, that so many, even those who disagreed with their country, fought and died for? &amp;nbsp;Brave men and women in uniform like, my dad, wore the flag on their uniform even though there were issues at times they disagreed with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd like an answer on this, please.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama may face grilling on patriotism&lt;br&gt;Sen. Barack Obama's refusal to wear an American flag.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23315711/from/ET/"&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23315711/from/ET/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697961</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:13:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697961</guid><dc:creator>Larry Vandemeer, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>SHAME ON YOU HILLARY!!!! You have been attacking Obama every single day on his health care plan. And now you say nobody should be speaking out on your health care forced mandates and NAFTA?? SHAME ON YOU HILLARY!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are the worst kind of politician HILLARY!!! One that will say and do anything to win the chair just because you think you are entitled for it. SHAME ON YOU HILLARY!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton Flip-Flops on NAFTA - Meet The Press &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=QJ0swdRvYgw"&gt;http://youtube.com/watch?v=QJ0swdRvYgw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697964</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:15:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697964</guid><dc:creator>anita preer, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>NAFTA has been the issue avoided for too long. &amp;nbsp;I am glad it is out in the open now. It was Clinton's signature accomplishment, besides balancing the budget, by throwing all the women and children off of welfare. She wants to claim credit for the years as first lady, she has to take credit for NAFTA and Welfare Reform as well. Those two things have devastated the poor and working people of this country. And they were Clinton initiatives. &amp;nbsp;Let her defend them or try to distance herself from them -- if she can. I don't see how. She is on the record over and over again as supporting NAFTA. She just doesn't want to talk about it now, especially in Ohio &amp;nbsp;where the people have suffered so much from it. It's part of her &amp;quot;35 years of experience.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697966</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:19:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697966</guid><dc:creator>nanamama, kansas city, mo</dc:creator><description>This is &amp;nbsp;one 65 year old white female THAT is NOT voting for Hillary Clinton!!! Yes, I will vote for&lt;br&gt;McCain before I vote for her! She did pimp out her daughter for her campaign, she does want it both&lt;br&gt;ways, she is a self-centered hypocrite who can dish it out, but can't take it. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697967</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:19:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697967</guid><dc:creator>Mac,  Joilet, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Hillary is less than Presidential, Her style is less than professional. &amp;nbsp;It appears she has a &amp;quot;psycological&amp;quot; problem during her outrage about the mailings. &amp;nbsp;Hillary's &amp;quot;temperment&amp;quot; will not work in the quest for change. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately the mailings are true and she can't stand the heat. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697968</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:21:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697968</guid><dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator><description>I think the Hillary campaign has finally figured out that hitting on a message (early Sat) and working it all weekend, stealing the headlines, well, that's how you win a campaign. It does raise the stakes for Texas and Ohio but those stakes were extremely high from the get go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The political reality is that Hillary can change the dynamics of this race on March 4 in a dramatic fashion. The debate gets on even brighter spotlight on it Tue and she has set the agenda for the evening. When Hillary is on the ropes, she sharpens her focus and it is a powerful thing to witness how she fights back. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All campaigns try to manipulate the other candidates messages. It's naive to think otherwise. That's just part of politics. It's up to the public to draw the line. This lady is not going quietly.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697969</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:22:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697969</guid><dc:creator>Shtuey</dc:creator><description>I'm Barack Obama, and everything I say is true because I say it is. &amp;nbsp;Even when the media says I'm distorting the truth, or outright lying--like saying Hillary Clinton will have anyone who can't afford to pay for health insurance made into Soilent Green, even though her plan in reality provides strong subsidies for anyone who can't afford it; or that I don't take money from federal lobbyists (just from their wives, the companies they represent, and the law firms they work for...oh, and I also take it from companies that have issues pending in Washington that I vote on, but really my money is clean...just ask Oprah). &amp;nbsp;I just figure that the American people are too stupid and lazy to actually read the truth about Clinton's plans, or about my cheating on my campaign finance pledges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the next time you feel like something I said isn't true just remember that Oprah thinks I'm awesome and believes everything I say, so that ought to be good enough for you. &amp;nbsp;Now go back to sleep sheep while Oprah and I make more Kool-aid. &amp;nbsp;Don't make me sick Oprah on you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697971</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:24:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697971</guid><dc:creator>Joan Conklin, Burnaby, Canada</dc:creator><description>Good Morning...If you have not seen the Utube What Hillary does not want you to know..the Clinton Chronicles go check it out. I was shocked at the Clinton ethics. Bill and Hillary belong behind bars. Please check it out. Think back folks to what happened during the Clinton years in the White House...it was a shame. &amp;nbsp;I could never vote for her...which is like putting them back in POWER.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697974</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:28:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697974</guid><dc:creator>Mike U</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Desperate housewife going for the presidency? Hillary, your outbust was very &amp;quot;unprolitical&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697984</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:48:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697984</guid><dc:creator>sonia barajas</dc:creator><description>As we were sitting in the our kitchen having dinner we saw the clip with Hillary Clinton crying bloddy murder against Obama she looked scary we all looked at each other in total disbelieve, this woman is scary, people should learn to read between the line is not in the cards for her to winn she is an insider and thats not what the majority of the people want like it or not the Clintons did good things but, Nafta started this country on the wrong path noone can dispute that teary eye or not.....</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697985</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:49:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697985</guid><dc:creator>John, Morgan Hill, California</dc:creator><description>The points of the mailers are that:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) &amp;nbsp;Hillarycare &amp;quot;covers everyone&amp;quot; by passing a law requiring everyone to buy health insurance. &amp;nbsp;Hillary has been blasting Obama's plan for &amp;quot;leaving 15 million people out&amp;quot;, which is based on someone's guess as to what the lack of mandated insurance might result in. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an aside: Hillary has said that her plan is like Social Security, everyone has to participate. &amp;nbsp;Well, even that isn't factually correct. &amp;nbsp;Anyone who isn't earning wage income doesn't participate in Social Security, so the unemployed and TRUST FUND MILLIONAIRES are not required to participate in Social Security. &amp;nbsp;Someone living off of lottery winnings or income from an inheritance is ipso facto not a Social Security participant. &amp;nbsp;Income from any source other than a job isn't part of the Social Security system. &amp;nbsp;Social Security is paid for by a tax on work and it is in fact a highly regressive tax in that it hits the working poor and working middle class the hardest. &amp;nbsp; Even work related income over $97,500 per year is exempt from the Social Security tax.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) &amp;nbsp;Hillary and Bill have both promoted &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; for their entire time in Washington including NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;Ramping up trade with China was another of the signature &amp;quot;Clinton Accomplishments&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Most of the working class in this country has come to feel that unfettered &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; trade is doing them more harm than good. &amp;nbsp;The facts of Hillary's support for NAFTA are clearly on the record, and her dodge that she wasn't in the Senate when it passed is absurd in face of her &amp;quot;35 years&amp;quot; claim.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, which Hillary is running? &amp;nbsp;The shrill Catholic school nun thundering &amp;quot;shame on you&amp;quot; or the adoring fan saying &amp;quot;I'm proud to be here with Barack Obama&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp; Which one, if either, is the real Hillary Clinton?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697986</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:49:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697986</guid><dc:creator>mary jo cremers st. cloud mn </dc:creator><description>get off the obama band wagon people. use your heads. we are looking to elect a president, not a public speaker. can you really see this man taking over the most demanding job in the world.????? </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697990</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:58:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697990</guid><dc:creator>Sonny Sentrella, Runnemede, NJ</dc:creator><description>I don't know about anyone else but I am just so tired of hearing the name &amp;quot;Clinton&amp;quot; either Bill or Hillary, (and Bush too for that matter) I just think that whole Bush/Clinton era needs to go and never return, and just on that point alone I will not vote for her.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697996</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:03:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697996</guid><dc:creator>DAN, ROCKVILLE MD.</dc:creator><description>DOES ANYONE BELIEVE THAT BILL WILL NOT BE A CO PRESIDENT IN HILLARY'S OVAL OFFICE? WHAT COULD BE BETTER FOR THE NATION'S DECISION MAKING. TO BILL; STAY AT THE POINT. DON'T LET THE MEDIA SCARE YOU OFF. THEY JUST ARE AFFRAID THAT WITYH YOU IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO HARRASS HILLARY LIKE THEY DID TO YOU. YOU CAN RESPOND WITH LOGIC AND DERECTNESS TO THEIR STUPID ATTACKS. GO BILL DON'T HOLD BACK.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697997</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:04:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697997</guid><dc:creator>Penny, Pittsview,Al.</dc:creator><description>I fear for all of you Obama supporters and for our country and our freedom as we know it... Obama is not on our side, he with his terrorist backers plan to bring down this country and what better way to do it than from inside our White House. Americans beware of Obama, he is unAmerican, Not for the people... Go Hilary we need you to run this country and get us back on track!!!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#697999</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:06:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:697999</guid><dc:creator>Pat Stone ,Charleston, WV</dc:creator><description>Love and admiration from Michelle Obama? I wish that Edwards had stayed in the race.&lt;br&gt;Hillary has too much baggage...namely, Bill. But the thought of living with 8 years of Michelle Obama's gloating and subtle and not so subtle reverse discrimination is going to be hard to take.&lt;br&gt;Edwards ... Gore where are you when we need you.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698005</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:14:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698005</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Hon, HI</dc:creator><description>Get Lost hillary</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698015</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:21:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698015</guid><dc:creator>Dan Washington, LA, CA.</dc:creator><description>Obama did not show up for the State of the Black Union conference hosted by PBS' Tavis Smiley, was he afraid of being black did not want the white man to see him as a supporter of black rights. Senator Clinton has supported the rights of all races. She worked into her schedule to show her support. Obama had plenty of time to put the event on his schedule. I can’t support a man that does not support the rights of all the people including his own race. I was leaning towards Obama but have changed my mind and now will vote for Hillary Clinton for President. America needs to wake-up and see Obama for who he is all talk and no action. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698016</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:21:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698016</guid><dc:creator>pj, dc</dc:creator><description>NO word on the MSNBC website on the State of the Black Union Forum yesterday. &amp;nbsp;Obama decided not to attend. &amp;nbsp;Clinton was the only major candidate to attend in New Orleans. &amp;nbsp;Tavis Smiley criticized Obama's decision. &amp;nbsp;Smiley and his family received some threats believed to come from Obama followers. &amp;nbsp;I guess this news might appear critical of the Obama campaign. &amp;nbsp;Can't have that on the MSNBC website...</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698019</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:23:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698019</guid><dc:creator>Dan Washington, LA, CA.</dc:creator><description>Obama did not show up for the State of the Black Union conference hosted by PBS' Tavis Smiley, was he afraid of being black did not want the white man to see him as a supporter of black rights. Senator Clinton has supported the rights of all races. She worked into her schedule to show her support. Obama had plenty of time to put the event on his schedule. I can’t support a man that does not support the rights of all the people including his own race. I was leaning towards Obama but have changed my mind and now will vote for Hillary Clinton for President. America needs to wake-up and see Obama for who he is all talk and no action. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698023</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:29:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698023</guid><dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator><description>To HP Boston:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks like we have a very unpopular view here but the facts are the facts aren't they people. &amp;nbsp;Running for the highest office in our fine country all candidates must be analyzed under the same standards. &amp;nbsp;Only now is Obama being pu to the test and I think we all need to see how the political process plays out. &amp;nbsp;As a fellow Bostonian we put his good friend Deval Patrick into office based on his change rhetoric. &amp;nbsp;The first thing he CHANGED was the curtains in his office for 10K of taxpayer money. &amp;nbsp;The only thing he has done was to lobby for a casino to be built in MA. &amp;nbsp;Give me a break! &amp;nbsp;We can't wait to clean house in MA. &amp;nbsp;As an independent voter who typically votes democrat I can't wait to say good-bye to Ted, Kerry, and Deval soon! &amp;nbsp;Please keep an open mind and think twice. &amp;nbsp;Oh and let's keep it about the issues here enough of the personal attacks on both sides!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698025</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698025</guid><dc:creator>Jade7243</dc:creator><description>And in the category &amp;quot;Best Performance by an Actress in a Losing Presidential Primary Campaign, Ohio and Texas, the Oscar goes to.... (drumroll) HILLARY DIANE RODHAM CLINTON!!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;There are a lot people responsible for this... and I'd like them to know just how I feel.... HEADS ARE GONNA ROLL!!! YOU CAN'T IGNORE ME, OBAMA!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698026</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:30:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698026</guid><dc:creator>Green Bay, WI</dc:creator><description>Barak Obama comes off as a pompous --- as far as I'm concerned. &amp;nbsp;He'd be great in Hollywood or Motown, and I do believe he would opt for either if he had the choice. &amp;nbsp;Instead, if he is elected President, he will be utilizing his silver tongue to try to shovel it down American's throat. &amp;nbsp;He is the kid that got away with copying in high school, I'm sure. &amp;nbsp;Of course, he will have to learn to not plagiarize if he goes into the recording industry, and all of those speeches have been recorded, so I hope he is paying out the royalties for lifting them without giving credit where credit is due. &amp;nbsp;Clinton's been under fire for weeks, let's turn the table and see how the Obama camp fairs. &amp;nbsp;He'll never get my vote. &amp;nbsp;He is one walking chameleon. &amp;nbsp;By the way, where’s Michele this week, did she get locked up or told to go shopping? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698029</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:35:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698029</guid><dc:creator>Charles Mahr, Belleville Illinois</dc:creator><description>I find it interesting on how &amp;quot;Presidential&amp;quot; she seems when she responds to &amp;quot;truths&amp;quot; not attacks. &amp;nbsp;Take a look at how Obama and McCain have replied to negative attacks from Bill and Hillary as well as the NY Times. &amp;nbsp;Obama and McCain reply in a precise, controlled manner while Hillary replies with an enraged response based on emotion. &amp;nbsp;Hmmm...Doesn't show presidential control to me. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698031</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:38:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698031</guid><dc:creator>cc, bosto, ms</dc:creator><description>To HP, Boston. How to you live in my town? Boston I know that we have more brains than you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Out side of that Hill's did the same thing to Barack say months ago. Now she is saying that these mails are an attack. What would you call what she did. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is strange that she now saw these mailers when they have been out for weeks and that she now says that they have been in contact with Barack's people for just about that long. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yea, she is playing for the &amp;quot;cry&amp;quot; vote. Sad! Just sad.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698032</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:39:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698032</guid><dc:creator>Martin Edwin &amp;quot;Mick&amp;quot; Andersen, Churchton, Maryland</dc:creator><description>High-Noon Hillary?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Meet me in Ohio?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What, is she threatening to punch Barack Obama's lights out?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What happened to the new &amp;quot;new Hillary&amp;quot; of couple of days ago?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Of is it the new, new &amp;quot;new Hillary&amp;quot;--so many changes in personality it is hard to remember the iterations.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feigning outrage over a tempest in a teapot like she does doesn't seem very wise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially when her own campaign's wheels are falling off, with revelations of Pharaonic spending by aides and other wasting of campaign resources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And now, Ralph Nader announces he is running for president.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Against Obama he can probably shave just a point or two in the general election, but not throw the election to the GOP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Against Hillary and the politics of special interest (look at the lobbyists et al who subsidized her campaign's Pharaonic spending)it will be like shooting fish in a barrel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's restore integrity to the Democratic Party and sanity to the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That means staying the course with Barack Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MARTIN EDWIN &amp;quot;MICK&amp;quot; ANDERSEN</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698038</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:45:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698038</guid><dc:creator>Claire H  Cincinnati OH</dc:creator><description>Take a look at the photos that the local media posted on Cincinnati.com. Hillary Clinton looks positively insane!!! Is this who we want for our next president? A woman who cannot express herself without attacking her opponents and has a complete inability to control her temper? I think not...</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698045</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:53:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698045</guid><dc:creator>Brian Legere, Wilmington, NC</dc:creator><description>Hillary comes off as shrill and negative as always. Hasn't she learned that this doesn't work and that the people are tired of old style politics.&lt;br&gt;If she is going to take credit for the Clinton golden years she has to take some blame for NAFTA. You can't have it both ways.&lt;br&gt;Lastly, If you watched Meet the Press or any number fo the other political shows you would have seen how Hillary &amp;quot;plagiarized&amp;quot; both her husband and John Edwards during the last debate at at other previous times. &amp;quot;Get Real&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Hillary is fake.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698051</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:57:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698051</guid><dc:creator>Jon, Dallas</dc:creator><description>MSNBC won't say but Washingtontimes is doing a good job exposing Obama taking money from lobbyists &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080222/NATION/853452725/1002"&gt;http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080222/NATION/853452725/1002&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is a liar&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary for President 08&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698059</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:00:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698059</guid><dc:creator>JTP, mainstreet, USA</dc:creator><description>The Clintons will say anything to win, no matter it affects the country. &amp;nbsp;They both made worse attacks against Obama, and never apologized. &amp;nbsp;She can't even congratulate him when he wins a primary! &amp;nbsp;The Clintons have no moral center whatsoever.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698069</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:08:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698069</guid><dc:creator>VJ, FLorida</dc:creator><description>Thank God, Nader is running for President.&lt;br&gt;Now if Obama gets democrats ticket, I can give my vote to Nader again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary 08</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698070</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:08:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698070</guid><dc:creator>Jim, Carbondale, IL</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton supported NAFTA, period. &amp;nbsp;How many jobs have been lost because of the irresponsibility because of her and her husband? &amp;nbsp;She supported the Iraq war, period. &amp;nbsp;In fact, she didn't even read the bill before she voted on it! &amp;nbsp;Her healthcare plan in 1994 was secretive, and she refused to work with congressional leaders (even democrats) to get it done. &amp;nbsp;It was an utter failure, period. &amp;nbsp;You reap what you sow, and now the chickens have come home to roost. &amp;nbsp;Shame on you, Hillary Clinton, for trying to take the party and our nation down with you. &amp;nbsp;You chose to listen to pollsters and consultants rather than doing what was right. &amp;nbsp;You've made your choice, and the American people are making theirs. &amp;nbsp;When you turn your back on the people, you need to abide the result when they eventually get disgusted and turn their back on you!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698075</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698075</guid><dc:creator>Byron Samuels  Tampa,FL</dc:creator><description>All I can say is NO BILLIARY 2008</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698076</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:12:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698076</guid><dc:creator>Byron Samuels  Tampa,FL</dc:creator><description>All I can say is NO BILLIARY 2008</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698081</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:15:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698081</guid><dc:creator>Julie,York Haven, PA</dc:creator><description>She is upset due to the fact that these mailers were proven inaccurate before, but he still continues to use them. Seems like dirty politics to me. As far as NAFTA she said that she would revisit it and see what changes need made. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698082</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:16:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698082</guid><dc:creator>Faye Shearer, Carrollton, TX</dc:creator><description>Hillary's angry outburst is a clear indication of her true colors. She does not demonstrate a Presidential demonor. &amp;nbsp;As far as her tears in a prior campaign, I was shocked, We cannot have a President that cannot control their emotions. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;HRC, if you can't stand the heat- get out of the kitchen.&lt;br&gt;I am from Texas and I have never heard anyone say that they like Clinton, to the contrary, most say &amp;quot;Yes, I would love to see a qualified woman President, just not THAT woman&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;I do not believe that HRC is electable. &amp;nbsp;I have no respect for this woman.&lt;br&gt;This is my own opinion and it is my right to have my own opinion. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698086</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:18:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698086</guid><dc:creator>Vinod Kumar, Virginia Beach, VA</dc:creator><description>By attempting to stage such low level of political stunts,Hillary is sabotaging whatever credibility is left in her campaign.As a supporter of her campaign, I am pained to observe her distraction from the issues and indulgence in petty politics.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698089</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:18:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698089</guid><dc:creator>(John Doe</dc:creator><description>I am sick of the media giving OBama a free ride. I hope Hillary rips his a$$ in the upcomimng debate. Obama who runs on being different, words, and bringng people together, &amp;nbsp;is a joke.&lt;br&gt;I will NOT vote for him no matter how many lies he send out about Hillary &amp;nbsp;and dream speeches he gives. &lt;br&gt;If he elected it will be the first time in the history of the United States of America that a nominee has been elected by the media.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698091</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698091</guid><dc:creator>Vinod Kumar, Virginia Beach, VA</dc:creator><description>By attempting to stage such low level of political stunts,Hillary is sabotaging whatever credibility is left in her campaign.As a supporter of her campaign, I am pained to observe her distraction from the issues and indulgence in petty politics.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698099</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:21:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698099</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>Im not impressed with any of these politicans.&lt;br&gt;Here is one thing to think about.&lt;br&gt;Mrs. Clinton has the Governor Of Michigan backing her big time. Now take a good look at what has happen to michigan. Do you want THIS for you! with another big know it all in your pocket telling you what you have to do with your hard earned money. Look again at Michigan..very scarey. No mailers are going to help you out at all. Just crap talk! Be careful Taxes kill</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698109</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:26:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698109</guid><dc:creator>Sandra Walker,Mexico city,NM</dc:creator><description>John Kerry,Ted Kennedy and Daschle voted for NAFTA in 1993.These people are staunch supporters of Obama.How do you explain that?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698119</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698119</guid><dc:creator>Danny Davis,  De Leon, Texas</dc:creator><description>FACTS ARE FACTS&lt;br&gt;Did Hillary support Husbands BILL NAFTA &amp;nbsp;YES&lt;br&gt; DID IT cost american jobs YES&lt;br&gt;Hillary now say NAFTA was a mistake YES&lt;br&gt;Is Hillary's healthcare Mandatory YES&lt;br&gt;Will low paid workers be forced to buy insurance YES&lt;br&gt;Will those who don't buy or cannot afford to buy have their wages garnished YES&lt;br&gt;does not matter what Obama &amp;nbsp;said . this is the facts&lt;br&gt;hillary you lost my vote&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698122</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:36:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698122</guid><dc:creator>HMT-MI</dc:creator><description>This is a nasty site to go on if you do not support Obama.As one of his cult members wrote on this site if you do not support Obama you should go stick your head in the sand---thats what many of us are doing ,along with our votes.Many of those not caught up in this quagmire of hate are just going to write in Hillary Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698130</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:42:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698130</guid><dc:creator>Gene britton</dc:creator><description>These Anti Clinton hating Obama supporters are going &amp;nbsp;to pay a price for their mean and degrading comments. If and I say if, Obama should win the nomination, he is going to need everyone of us Hillary supporters and thensome. When the republican attack machine gets through with him it will be pathetic.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698132</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698132</guid><dc:creator>Gene britton</dc:creator><description>These Anti Clinton hating Obama supporters are going &amp;nbsp;to pay a price for their mean and degrading comments. If and I say if, Obama should win the nomination, he is going to need everyone of us Hillary supporters and thensome. When the republican attack machine gets through with him it will be pathetic.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698133</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:43:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698133</guid><dc:creator>MA</dc:creator><description>America deserves to know the truth to Larry Sinclair'&lt;br&gt;s expose on Obama. &amp;nbsp;Guess, we'll know the outcome of the polygraph test says whitehouse.com tomorrow. &amp;nbsp;We don't want to be duped before the March 4th primary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698134</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:43:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698134</guid><dc:creator>MA</dc:creator><description>America deserves to know the truth to Larry Sinclair'&lt;br&gt;s expose on Obama. &amp;nbsp;Guess, we'll know the outcome of the polygraph test says whitehouse.com. &amp;nbsp;We don't want to be duped before the March 4th primary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698136</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:43:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698136</guid><dc:creator>MA</dc:creator><description>America deserves to know the Larry Sinclair expose on Obama. &amp;nbsp;Guess, we'll know the outcome of the polygraph test says whitehouse.com. &amp;nbsp;We don't want to be duped before the March 4th primary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698137</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:43:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698137</guid><dc:creator>MA</dc:creator><description>America deserves to know the truth to Larry Sinclair'&lt;br&gt;s expose on Obama. &amp;nbsp;Guess, we'll know the outcome of the polygraph test says whitehouse.com tomorrow. &amp;nbsp;We don't want to be duped before the March 4th primary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698138</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:43:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698138</guid><dc:creator>MA</dc:creator><description>America deserves to know the truth to Larry Sinclair'&lt;br&gt;s expose on Obama. &amp;nbsp;Guess, we'll know the outcome of the polygraph test says whitehouse.com. &amp;nbsp;We don't want to be duped before the March 4th primary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698140</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:45:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698140</guid><dc:creator>Ellis B. Kingman, Az.</dc:creator><description>Was it not Hillary who said,&amp;quot; taking nasty swipes at each other is the'fun part'?&amp;quot; Unlike some of Hillary's mailers, Obama's are based on documentation (NAFTA) and words directly from Hillary's mouth, she did say her mandated health insurance would be enforced by garnishment of wages and in her most recent debate said,&amp;quot; sometimes government needs to use a stick to force compliance&amp;quot;. America may be ready for a woman or black as president, but will never be ready to adopt communism as a replacement for democracy.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698146</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:47:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698146</guid><dc:creator>Honesty, central california</dc:creator><description>Tim Russert and Chuck Todd, fool me once shame on me. fool me twice shame on me. Be clear that even if Hillary looses this primary she remains a stronger and a more honorable candidate in our eyes. What hypocrites you and your pathetic panel are to imagine that Hillary will not speak up for herself if you the press who is suppose to be the agent of neutrality and truth will not speak up. All through out this primary you have cleverly used the fear factor and awful awful criticisms to restraint and diminish Hillary's campaign. Time and time again Obama goes negative and outright insults and distorts Hillary’s and Bill's record.Yet you do absolutely nothing about it even when he outright admits &amp;nbsp;that it is a campaign tactics he clearly approved. The latest hit mail and distortion of Hillary's record distributed by Obama &amp;nbsp;and his camp and admitted by Obama did not sway you to see the gross injustice of gaging one candidate and allowing the other to spill his venom. Now Hillary decides to speak for her self, you and your pathetic sad and deranged &amp;nbsp;panel are crying fowl. Oh what happened to the angelic Hillary of the debate night. Oh she turned to something else.Give me a break Tim. She has every God given right to speak up for herself if you won’t. You and your MSNBC refer to it as Hillary’s complaint. You &amp;nbsp;do not see it as an attack on Hillary by Obama. How sad! Why in God's name will you not put down your pathetic hypocritical hats &amp;nbsp;and call a spade a spade. Why can't you decry what Obama did in Ohio and Texas as unjust and immoral since you have asked Hillary not to speak up on Obama's obvious weaknesses because it will be unfair. You restraint her on speaking on her issues , while Obama keeps taking &amp;nbsp;jabs at her and her husband. Michell Obama made a blatant statement that she will not &amp;nbsp;vote for Hillary should she become the nominee. Such a statement did not surface on your site or your so called twisted political presentations and comments let alone &amp;nbsp;you condemn it. I can imagine what you will do if Bill had said the exact same thing. Tim Russet has made it a point of duty to systematically tear the Clintons down in every one of his meet the press since the primary started. You Chuck have the role of agent of dark and unattainable political forecast against Hillary, a tactics you have used to depress her support both politically and financially. I am authentically black. It truly makes me sick to the stomach to see the way you have conducted yourselves and denied the voters and the electorates from having their aching problems honestly spoken to and the way you have turned a very important process into a frivolous childlike affair. Obama knew he was and will remain a BLACKMAN when he entered the race and he knew the job he sought is the highest in the world. He knew that irrespective of the color of the skin, he had to truly prove himself. He has not done this, because you the press will not allow Hillary have honest debate on the very important issue affecting the AMERICAN PEOPLE.You took delight in calling her names instead of focusing on clarifying the the candidates' stance on issues that affect this nation. You allowed the grandiose verbose word &amp;quot;change &amp;quot;to overshadow the people's hunger for solutions. You deliberately refused to ask what the change is for. Frivolous journalists in MSNBC have failed this nation . Shame shame shame shame shame shame shame on you MSNBC for prepackaging the democratic primary at the detriment of the American &amp;nbsp;people. We allowed you to fool once. You will not fool us twice. Ralph Nader is now in the race, thanks to you . Let the political discuss begin. I am a strong democratic supporter, but your actions and conduct so unfairly done in this primary process has left me and many of my friends less enthusiastic about the primary and the national election. I know and I am convinced that you Todd will not have the backbone to publish this. I hope you will read it to see how pathetic and skewed your news channel has become. Can you imagine that most of us get more objective news from Fox News than from you. We used to revere your news presenters. Not anymore! I'ld rather spend my day watching Fox NEWS channel and maybe CNN than to watch you.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698149</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:52:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698149</guid><dc:creator>John, Maine</dc:creator><description>I am sick of all you Obama fans crying when Clinton uses attack ads saying she is a bad person for doing that, but then when your canidate does the same thing, your not saying &amp;quot;shame on him&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;your sticking up for him. &amp;nbsp;I am sick of the Obama walks on water routine.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698154</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:54:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698154</guid><dc:creator>Camie, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>This is repulsive on the part of Clinton-&lt;br&gt;her campaign knew about these factual mailings weeks ago, and sent their own response already.&lt;br&gt;The Clinton camp has consistently sent out mailings and emailings that are downright dishonest- don't forget New Hampshire and Nevada.&lt;br&gt;I think her outrage is really because someone is telling the truth about her. She must really think the American people are idiots.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698156</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:57:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698156</guid><dc:creator>Rasheed Quarmiley Dayton,Ohio</dc:creator><description>Attention!!!! OHIOANS Hillary Clintons healthcare plan calls for all americans to pay the same price for her plan she says thats the only way it would be fair??? how is it fair for a man 21 in perfect health to pay the same amount as a man 61 this plan is unfair to young people who in most cases are in perfect health to pay the same as an old fart like me and others. young people are not in the same wage earning bracket as most middle age americans. they have high student loan payments because our government has made college unaffordable for most middle class families to send their children to college so they have to borrow money just to get a decent education. We already have them paying in payroll tax for medicaid and medicare which most dont use or need now she wants to burden them even further by making them pay the same amount as me who has to see a doctor because of the toll working so many years has took on my body. Hillary you know that this is not fair to our young adults who are in thier prime, just starting their families and careers I say NO!SHAME on you hillary for trying to break the backs of our young for are failed policies and divisions that have put us in this situation in the first place and you wonder why you cant carry the young vote. Why should they vote for your stupid mandate it is a crippler to them right from the start, that is why they vote for Obama because he is not holding them responsible for our broken politics. STEP aside and give the younger generation a chance to fulfill his or her american dream. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698159</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:59:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698159</guid><dc:creator>john</dc:creator><description>Are these Just Words?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Obama is the canidate, I will be voting McCain, and will volunteer to get my state ohio to vote for someone with some depth also</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698163</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698163</guid><dc:creator>Greg, NH</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;sorry, he does and says things and always has an excuse. and, the media is completely manipulating the situation. the buck never stop with Obama. &amp;nbsp;We have just witnessed a POTUS not taking any resposibility. They are the same. Barack is the Democrats version of Bush.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try visiting &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html&lt;/a&gt; and look at the ACTUAL record of each candidate rather than getting yourself caught in the middle of the media races.. &amp;nbsp;You may be surprised to know that Barack Obama is rallying cosponsors to address issues on a broader and complete dynamic than most other senators. &amp;nbsp;In addition, you may also be surprised to learn about the bills he's got that address many more issues that impact Americans and global society in a positive manner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If he was a fake or, what he believes in is just a fairy tale, then why is he currently in hot pursuit to address many of the issues? &amp;nbsp;And it's not like he IS the American president; he's still trying to help our country, econonmics, people, foreign affairs and the global situation as a Senator!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is a person that has made up his mind to commit his efforts to the people... It would appear that he's going to keep trying to do whatever he can for us whether he makes president or not. &amp;nbsp;It's in his heart and it is the foundation of his ambition. &amp;nbsp;As the Washington Post wrote, &amp;quot;Judge him by his Laws&amp;quot; and I will add, judge him by his record and concerns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, HRC enacted a bill to have Lead Paint removed from homes as to protect children. &amp;nbsp;Thats fine but, on a broader scope, lead paint is on toys and many other things that can harm children even outside of your homes. &amp;nbsp;Barack Obama, having two children of his own, viewed this as being a larger problem than just your homes; he enacts a bill to protect children from lead paint on a broader scale. &amp;nbsp;This would include your home, toys, etc. &amp;nbsp;Children just shouldn't be exposed to lead paint under ANY circumstance! &amp;nbsp;One of these bills seems to be vague and one seems to address the overall issue. &amp;nbsp;Which would YOU decide upon? &amp;nbsp;In doing research, you can find out MANY pros and cons to the candidate and what their true concerns are and HOW they plan on addressing issues. &amp;nbsp;Children are children; innocent lives that SHOULDN'T be affected by things like this. &amp;nbsp;Whether they are your children or someone elses child somewhere else, to address the foundation of the problem means NO ONES children will have to suffer from this! &amp;nbsp;I agree with HIS approach because it isn't selfish nor is it limited in such a nature that is outcasts certain people while valuing others; it helps as many as it can reach! &amp;nbsp;This stands virtually the same with many of his other bills.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People seem to condemn a person by the media and not make the effort to understand the true concerns of the people. &amp;nbsp;It's not saying the Hillary doesn't have good ideas or support realistic bills; its saying that a bill that is written to help some and eliminate others is a bill yet to be admired because it is favorable. &amp;nbsp;We don't need this sort of bias in our bills. &amp;nbsp;They need to help everyone whether you are the &amp;quot;status quo&amp;quot; or a regular blue collar worker and Barack Obama's bills do not alienate anyone! </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698164</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698164</guid><dc:creator>Fred C Dobbs  Sierra Madre, CA</dc:creator><description>Since the NY Times ran a wonderful eight year old story on John McCain will they follow suit on Barack Obama?&lt;br&gt;We were treated to the Obama Girl, will we now be treated to the Obama Man - Larry Sinclair?&lt;br&gt;Bill O'Reilly alluded to Sinclair last week. Fact, fiction or muckracking? &amp;nbsp;It is better to know now in view of Obama's admitted cocaine use!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698177</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:09:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698177</guid><dc:creator>PROBAMA,PEORIA,IL</dc:creator><description>HILLARY IS BECOMING THE NAGGING WIFE WHILE EVERYONE IS AT THE STRIPCLUB WITH OBAMA!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698179</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:10:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698179</guid><dc:creator>PROBAMA,PEORIA,IL</dc:creator><description>HILLARY IS BECOMING THE NAGGING WIFE WHILE EVERYONE IS AT THE STRIPCLUB WITH OBAMA!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698185</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:12:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698185</guid><dc:creator>Monice, OKC</dc:creator><description>Will the real Hillary Clinton please stand up?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has become evident that we are dealing with a woman with a split personality. &amp;nbsp;We never know which one we will get. &amp;nbsp;One minute she is very combative and rude, the next minute she is passionate and calm. When she, on rare occasions, shows the calmer compassionate side, people ask the question &amp;quot;why don't we see more of the real Hillary?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Well, that is because the calm, compassionate side is not the real Hillary Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the voters should ask themselves is, &amp;nbsp;do we want someone as our President that is up one minute and down the next. &amp;nbsp;She could be on one of those high moods and lead us into another war or make decisions that will harm the people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This woman has all the characteristic of being bipolar. &amp;nbsp;We certainly do not need anyone leading our nation with that problem. &amp;nbsp;A person can be on medication for bipolar, but stress will bring out those moods regardless. &amp;nbsp;Being President is a very stressful situation. &amp;nbsp;She will not be able to act and think calmly to make rational decisions. &amp;nbsp;Look how upset and irate she gets now when things aren't going her way or when she hears something that she doesn't like. &amp;nbsp;Her supporters and the media think she wins the debates because she bucks her eyes, points her finger and is so animated. &amp;nbsp;I think you win any argument or debate when you show grace, style and class and still get your point across. Obama maintain class and style at all times. &amp;nbsp;He has encountered more negative attacks from her and team but still he rise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When she showed that fake irate attitude this weekend about those flyers, which by the way were truthful, she is the one that is trying to dupe the people, does she honestly think the people do not know the truth about NAFTA and her stance on healthcare. &amp;nbsp;Come on give us a break quoting her famous line.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698188</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:13:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698188</guid><dc:creator>Monica, OKC</dc:creator><description>Will the real Hillary Clinton please stand up?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has become evident that we are dealing with a woman with a split personality. &amp;nbsp;We never know which one we will get. &amp;nbsp;One minute she is very combative and rude, the next minute she is passionate and calm. When she, on rare occasions, shows the calmer compassionate side, people ask the question &amp;quot;why don't we see more of the real Hillary?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Well, that is because the calm, compassionate side is not the real Hillary Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the voters should ask themselves is, &amp;nbsp;do we want someone as our President that is up one minute and down the next. &amp;nbsp;She could be on one of those high moods and lead us into another war or make decisions that will harm the people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This woman has all the characteristic of being bipolar. &amp;nbsp;We certainly do not need anyone leading our nation with that problem. &amp;nbsp;A person can be on medication for bipolar, but stress will bring out those moods regardless. &amp;nbsp;Being President is a very stressful situation. &amp;nbsp;She will not be able to act and think calmly to make rational decisions. &amp;nbsp;Look how upset and irate she gets now when things aren't going her way or when she hears something that she doesn't like. &amp;nbsp;Her supporters and the media think she wins the debates because she bucks her eyes, points her finger and is so animated. &amp;nbsp;I think you win any argument or debate when you show grace, style and class and still get your point across. Obama maintain class and style at all times. &amp;nbsp;He has encountered more negative attacks from her and team but still he rise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When she showed that fake irate attitude this weekend about those flyers, which by the way were truthful, she is the one that is trying to dupe the people, does she honestly think the people do not know the truth about NAFTA and her stance on healthcare. &amp;nbsp;Come on give us a break quoting her famous line.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698190</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:16:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698190</guid><dc:creator>Greg, NH</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I was supporting Obama until the last couple days, I have been reading way to much stuff about this guy and today just put the icing on the cake. He is no different than the rest I just know less about him.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jerry in Austin,&lt;br&gt;I sympathize for you and I know how you must feel with all of this propaganda constantly whipping about. &amp;nbsp;I am not a legally appointed advocate for political education however, my occupation often rides parallel to many political issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I may, I recommend visiting the Thomas (i.e., Thomas Jefferson)The Library of Congress (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html&lt;/a&gt; - in the center of the page it entitles you to search on the specific candidate) and look over the records of each candidate. &amp;nbsp;The issues they take concern in and the showing of co-sponsors will give you an idea of the issues the candidates are truly concerned about and what have they done to pursue getting that bill to legislature. &amp;nbsp;It is probably beter to make yourself knowledgeable of this and similar processes so it can help you to keep a clear view of the candidates rather than a lot of the hype.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't know about this resource, I hope this helps!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698191</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:17:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698191</guid><dc:creator>Jim Destin,Fl</dc:creator><description>If a person in a campaign rally crowd has to inform Hillary about mailers that have been out for weeks , then her campaign is more disorganized than anyone has imagined. So they hand her the mailers and her &amp;quot;angry&amp;quot; response is to present a well rehearsed speech with a well rehearsed tag line. This is just another attempt to create an issue much like the plagarism claim. Obama will hand it back to her once again at the debate next week in the form of old stale politics . This race is over folks . </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698198</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:23:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698198</guid><dc:creator>Greg, NH</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;So, both of the required steps for achieving a healthcare plan (presidency, congress) are MORE likely with an Obama nomination.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Me, Santa Anna, CA;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the overall concept and purpose of &amp;quot;change.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Not only that but, the Clintons &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; is also affected by their visions of their own previous failures! &amp;nbsp;This type of view doesn't provide possibility of change in fact, it promotes totally the opposite! &amp;nbsp;Therefore, what Hillary calls &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; probably won't help make these things happen today more so than drowning them out because her vision and experience is molded by yesterdays failures! &amp;nbsp;We need a fresh start with a fresh mind and can work a little harder to push these things to happen!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698216</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:34:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698216</guid><dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator><description>Clinton acts like this is the first she has ever heard of the fliers;&lt;br&gt;a lie of course. &amp;nbsp;However, if true, then she obviously is not paying attention to what is going on around her. &amp;nbsp;As president, this would get America into a lot of trouble. &amp;nbsp;Remember what happened when George W. Bush didn't pay attention to a report entitled &amp;quot;bin Laden Determined To Attack Within The US&amp;quot;?!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We don't need four more years of someone who doesn't what's going on around him/her.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698224</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:40:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698224</guid><dc:creator>Tony, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Most of you here (this includes Obama) are a bunch of complete idiots. NAFTA is not responsible for job losses. The jobs are going to Asia and not to Canada or Mexico (NAFTA members). Why HRC can't simply point this out to you numb nuts is hard to understand. &lt;br&gt;Hillary has a better health care plan than Obama's republican-like plan. &lt;br&gt;Hillary voted for the Iraq war because she saw intelligence reports (satellite pictures and all) which Obama did not see so how can he make the arguement that he made a superior judgement call when he did not have the same information (remember Powell making the same arguement at the U.N?) &lt;br&gt;Those shameless republicans who are voting en masse for Obama and making threats that they will only vote democratic if Obama is the nominee should come out and state their true intentions. We all know they will NOT vote for ANY democrat.&lt;br&gt;Take it to the bank, Obama will likely LOSE in a general election because he the demographics do not favor him. The only core &amp;quot;blue&amp;quot; state he won is Illinios. Winning in states like Alaska and Nebraska won't do it.&lt;br&gt;PS. I am black and I have a degree in economics so I think with my brain, not my skin. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698236</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:53:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698236</guid><dc:creator>Greg, NH</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I might be a hard core Democrat, but I won't be able to vote for such a dishonest man. &amp;nbsp;He does say one thing and his Campaign is another. &amp;nbsp;I listen to a lot of african american firious people with lots of resetnment...I can only thing he uses the same tactics to get african americans to vote.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maria, now thats not true. &amp;nbsp;I am certain that the average African American is smart enough to do their research and come to a sensible vote just like anyone else. &amp;nbsp;For example, Al Sharpton ran for President and he didn't get that much support from either community. &amp;nbsp;If African Americans were caught up in the &amp;quot;spin,&amp;quot; they would have done the same for previous elections where African Americans were on the ballot. &amp;nbsp;This didn't happen so it is probably safe to assume that everyone takes the time to be aware enough to understand the difference between political persuasion and truth.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698238</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:54:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698238</guid><dc:creator>Noel, Hot Springs AR</dc:creator><description>Honored to share the stage with Obama, now indignant about mailers that are weeks old. &amp;nbsp;A new kind of politics Clintophrenics.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698239</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:55:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698239</guid><dc:creator>jeff, miami</dc:creator><description>NEWSWEEK and FACTCHECK.org have completely debunked his fliers a few weeks ago!!! GOOGLE IT!!!!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698242</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:57:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698242</guid><dc:creator>Sara I., Columbus, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Didn't anyone see Obama's FULL, live response yesterday? He was absolutely FAR from presidential when responding to the allegation that his campaign reproduced a false newspaper quote - but, because the media has decided to join Hillary in sabotaging her campaign (I admit that she is in on the downhill spiral) - you CANNOT FIND IT anywhere on the internet. I wish some news media outlet would post the WHOLE response, beyond 2 minutes, 42 seconds, to show people the meeker side of Obama. It exists, and we ought to be wary. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698243</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:58:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698243</guid><dc:creator>Olivia Hammond Cleveland OH</dc:creator><description>More of he Obama playing old negative lying usual Washington Politics, some change!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698248</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:59:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698248</guid><dc:creator>MC  Sallisaw, OK</dc:creator><description>Since we are so divided and many voters like both democratic candidates, and they are running a very tight race, and their policies are almost the same, I say why can't we run them both against the republican and let the american voters choose which one they want. &amp;nbsp;The electoral votes are not our voices. &amp;nbsp;I think that the primaries should all be run on the same day. &amp;nbsp;People like to go with a winner, whether the understand their policies or not, and when they see who is ahead that is exactly they way they vote. And if any of you think that either one of them can get a health care reform passed, think again. &amp;nbsp;They cannot do it alone, remember the democratic way - called the house and the senate. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698261</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:07:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698261</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>Obama / Rove is the ticket you kool aide drinker are voting in, how will that be working for YA?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698263</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:09:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698263</guid><dc:creator>LAURA, Dayton, OH</dc:creator><description>EVIDENCE from www.factcheck.org, a notably neutral site that has been a non-partisan debunking outlet:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the front of the four-page NAFTA mailer appears a headline saying, &amp;quot;Hillary Clinton believed NAFTA was 'a boon' to our economy.&amp;quot; But in fact, Clinton never used the word &amp;quot;boon&amp;quot; to describe the effects of the trade agreement on the U.S. economy, and it's not clear she ever said anything like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Obama mailer quotes a New York newspaper article that ran during her 2006 Senate reelection campaign. Two reporters for the Long Island daily Newsday gave brief descriptions of her stands on a number of issues, including this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Newsday, Sept. 11, 2006: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Clinton thinks NAFTA has been a boon to the economy, but voted against the Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement, saying it would drive jobs offshore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The day after the mailer surfaced, another Newsday reporter, Dan Janison, conceded that the newspaper didn't get that from Clinton or her campaign. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Newsday's Dan Janison, Feb. 14: The word [&amp;quot;boon&amp;quot;] was our characterization of how we best understood her position on NAFTA, based on a review of past stories and her public statements. ... We do not have a direct quote indicating her campaign told us she thought it was good for the economy at that time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We frankly find Clinton's past position on NAFTA to be ambivalent. Bloomberg News reported last year that Clinton &amp;quot;promoted her husband's trade agenda for years.&amp;quot; Bloomberg quoted her at the 1998 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, as praising corporations for mounting &amp;quot;a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of Nafta,'' and adding, &amp;quot;It is certainly clear that we have not by any means finished the job that has begun.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, Clinton biographer Sally Bedell Smith says Clinton privately argued against NAFTA inside the White House and was &amp;quot;not very much in favor of free trade.&amp;quot; In an interview with Tim Russert on MSNBC last year she said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sally Bedell Smith, Oct. 27, 2007: And Hillary was really prepared to try and kill NAFTA. [Special Trade Representative] Mickey Kantor had to take her out ... behind the White House, sat her down on a bench, and said, we have to go first with NAFTA. We can come back to health care later, but we have to do NAFTA because we need a success and we need a bipartisan success. And he was absolutely right. And what convinced her at the time was not necessarily the merits of NAFTA, but the fact that it was a good political decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, even then, she was not very much in favor of free trade. And so she is consistent. And Bill Clinton continues to be. So, if they were both in the White House together, I wouldn’t want to be in the middle of that little fight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We could find no direct quote from Clinton praising NAFTA's economic effects. The Obama campaign cites a 1996 United Press International article as saying that Clinton on a trip to Brownsville, Texas, said NAFTA &amp;quot;would reap widespread benefits in the region.&amp;quot; But that's a paraphrase, not a direct quote, so it's not clear to us exactly what she said on that trip.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier, she was criticized by pro-NAFTA forces for a lack of support. In 1993 pro-NAFTA executive Gary R. Edson of Ameritech Corp. complained publicly of a &amp;quot;deafening&amp;quot; silence from Hillary Clinton during the fight to gain Congressional approval:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gary R. Edson, Oct. 18, 1993: NAFTA should be made the clear priority, with a concerted campaign involving the entire administration, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose silence on the issue has been deafening. &lt;br&gt;And about the same time, a National Journal reporter quoted pro-NAFTA lobbyists as complaining that Hillary was undermining efforts to get the trade pact approved out of fear that pushing for it would alienate supporters of the administration's health care proposal. The headline: &amp;quot;If NAFTA's Bogging Down, Is Hillary to Blame?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We take no position here on whether NAFTA is a boon to the economy or a detriment, and note only that there are plenty of arguments on both sides. We do judge that the Obama campaign is wrong to quote Clinton as using words she never uttered, and it has produced little evidence that she ever had strong praise of any sort for NAFTA's economic benefits.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698268</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:12:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698268</guid><dc:creator>JOANIE08, MONTGOMERY, AL</dc:creator><description>THIS DOES SEEM LIKE AN OBAMA BLOG. I WONDER IF THE NEWSPEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT INFLUENCE THEY HAVE ON PEOPLE. THEY DON'T MISS A CHANCE TO THROW THINGS OUT TO GUESTS THAT MAKE HILLARY LOOK BAD, BUT IT IS OBAMA OBAMA MANIA WITH THEM. JUST WATCH THE PICTURES THEY SHOW AND THE SOUND BITES THAT ARE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE. THEY JUMP ON ANYTHINE HILLARY SAYS AND NOW THEY ARE JUST AS MUCH AS SAYING SHE NEEDS TO DROP OUT. THEY COULD BE A LITTLE MORE UNBIASED IF YOU ASK ME. ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS LOOK BACK AT THEIR COMMENTS. THEY ARE SO MUCH MORE NEGATIVE WITH HILLARY THAN OBAMA. &amp;nbsp;THEY ARE AFRAID TO MENTION, I GUESS, THAT OBAMAS MIDDLE NAME IS HUSSEIN. I THINK THEY ARE AFRAID TO SAY ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT HIM. WHY DID HE TAKE HIS FLAG PIN OFF? WHY WOULDN'T HE PUT HIS HAND OVER HIS HEART WHEN THE NATIONAL ANATHEM WAS PLAYED? SURE LOOKS UNPATRIOTIC TO ME BUT YOU CAN BELIEVE THAT IF IT WAS HILLARY THAT DID THAT IT WOULD BE EVERYWHERE. I WILL PICK A CANDIDATE NAMED HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON OVER ONE NAMED BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ANY DAY. &amp;nbsp;THIS WILL PROBABLY NOT BE USED BECAUSE I AM NOT PRAISING BARACK HUSSEIN. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698272</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:14:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698272</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>Obama / Rove is the ticket you kool aide drinker are voting in, how will that be working for YA?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698279</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:19:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698279</guid><dc:creator>Tracey, Ohio</dc:creator><description>The Dr. Jekyl/Mr. Hyde philosophy of the Clinton campaign speaks to, I believe, one of the reasons that Democrats are having a difficult time rallying around Sen. Clinton. Are we going negative? Should Sen. Clinton soften up, show her human side, wipe a tear or 2 away during one of her appearances? I just want truth and honesty-- wow, what a novel concept in politics. The theatrics at both ends of the spectrum do her campaign no justice. I also don't think this helps Sen. Clinton with the voters because it brings to question, which Hillary will we get if she is elected President?? </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698287</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:28:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698287</guid><dc:creator>Mitch, Denver</dc:creator><description>Hillary's &amp;quot;shame on you&amp;quot; outburst on Saturday puts the lie to her schmaltzy &amp;quot;I'm honored to be here with Barack Obama&amp;quot; performance on Thursday night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ohio, for goodness sake, put a stake in Clinton's undead campaign and let's move on.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698295</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:34:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698295</guid><dc:creator>Rita Garcia</dc:creator><description>There has been different &amp;quot;rules&amp;quot; throughout the campaign applied to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;This has made it difficult for a level of transparency the US voter deserve...beyond that, it is a bit righteous to mislead the American people as say it is okay just because the political opponent didn't jump in response. &amp;nbsp;Don't mislead the American people in the effort to serve yourself. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698296</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:34:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698296</guid><dc:creator>Diego D. E. Santa Fe, NM</dc:creator><description>Another PILE from the &amp;quot;Obamistas&amp;quot;!! &amp;nbsp;Can't have it both ways Obama. &amp;nbsp;Your cult-like rhetoric betrays the fact that you are a POL. &amp;nbsp;You cannot deny the printed word of your brochures. &amp;nbsp;Damn, OBAMA, get off the high horse and stop thinking that you and your campaign will &amp;quot;save us!!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Your politics and tactics are just TOO smooth for this minority voter. &amp;nbsp;Your groupies in cluding all the MSNBC anchors believe you are the second coming. &amp;nbsp;I think that you are a typical, smooth, political hack. &amp;nbsp;You are the &amp;quot;flavor of the month&amp;quot; and you will cost the Dems the election. If you beat HRC, I will vote for good ole Ralph Nader. &amp;nbsp;Some may consider this a waste, but voting for OBAMA is certainly a waste. &amp;nbsp;I do not need and or want a simpleton preacher as my PREZ. &amp;nbsp;I get &amp;quot;preached to&amp;quot; enough.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698299</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:37:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698299</guid><dc:creator>Rita Garcia, Lake Elmo, MN</dc:creator><description>CONTROL THE CAMPAIGN SPENDING...The dollars invested in the campaign is truely an embarassing use of financial resources. &amp;nbsp;If these funds were directed elsewhere, everyone would have health care, the social security reserve could be recovered, and services for those in need provided. Let's not put the White House up for sale. &amp;nbsp;Establish spending limits for campaigns. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698303</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:39:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698303</guid><dc:creator>Jerry, irvington, New Jersey</dc:creator><description>I like how these comments educated me on stuff about hillary i never knew.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698308</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:41:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698308</guid><dc:creator>Disenfranchised Floridian</dc:creator><description>by Sam Stein&lt;br&gt;The Huffington Post&lt;br&gt;Did Hillary Clinton Really Support NAFTA? Aides, Say No&lt;br&gt;February 14, 2008 01:13 PM &lt;br&gt;As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arguing that she was once a supporter of the North American Free Trade Agreement that contributed to the loss hundreds of thousands of American jobs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;A little more than a year ago,&amp;quot; an Obama mailer reads, &amp;quot;Hillary Clinton thought NAFTA was a 'boon' to the economy.&amp;quot; The piece goes on to argue that the New York Senator is &amp;quot;changing her tune&amp;quot; now that she's campaigning in the Buckeye State.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The attack is, most observers say, misleading. The &amp;quot;boon&amp;quot; line, a paraphrase lifted from a September 2006 Newsday article, has yet to be confirmed as an authentic quote. But, more importantly, the mailer misrepresents what former Clinton administration officials and biographers say was Hillary Clinton's long-held opposition to the legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;In August in 92, we had to make a decision,&amp;quot; Mickey Kantor the former U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Clinton adviser, and free trade advocate recalled for the Huffington Post. &amp;quot;President Clinton had to make a decision as governor, whether or not he would support [George H.W. Bush's] NAFTA, and of course he did... Hillary Clinton was one of the great skeptics in the discussion as to whether he should do. So she was always skeptical beginning in 1992 and onward.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, as Kantor went on to note, Hillary Clinton long held reservations over the labor and environmental fallouts of the free trade agreement. In addition, she was, at the time, eager to see her health care reform (not NAFTA) pushed through Congress. As such, Clinton biographer Sally Bedell Smith writes in her book &amp;quot;For Love of Politics,&amp;quot; her disapproval of the trade agreement was both political and philosophical. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The economic team and other key advisors, including Mack McLarty, Mickey Kantor, and David Gergen, were likewise urging Bill to use his momentum to push or congressional ratification of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)...Liberal Democrats, including Hillary, opposed it primarily because it could take jobs away from American workers. But as an advocate of global economic cooperation, Bill was drawn to its free-trade philosophy. &lt;br&gt;It fell to Mickey Kantor, the U.S. Trade Representative responsible for implementing NAFTA, to reason with Hillary. One day in August, he sat her down on a bench behind the White House and tried to strike a compromise. &amp;quot;I said, 'If you want to drop NAFTA, we can kill it, but we shouldn't,'&amp;quot; Kantor recalled. &amp;quot;I said, 'The way to do it is to introduce health care, spend a month on it, and then do NAFTA, then go back to health care.'&amp;quot; With misgivings, Hillary acquiesced to the proposed sequence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carl Bernstein, another Clinton biographer, echoed much the same tale during a recent appearance on CNN.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;'Bill,'&amp;quot; he recalled Hillary Clinton as saying, &amp;quot;'you are doing Republican economics when you are doing NAFTA.' She was against NAFTA. And if she would somehow come out and tell the real story of what she fought for in the White House and failed in a big argument with her husband she would end up moving much closer to those [John] Edwards followers.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So why didn't we hear such protests from Hillary Clinton during her husband's administration?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The whole time that she was first lady,&amp;quot; said Robert Shapiro, the undersecretary of commerce during the Clinton White House years, &amp;quot;she, like everybody else...[was] not supposed to deviate from the position of the administration. There is no freedom of speech in there, and that certainly applies to a first lady.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the 2008 campaign trail, Clinton has been free of those shackles. And, on many occasions, she has expressed misgivings about NAFTA, although usually she qualifies her statements by saying she supports the underlying idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I believe in the general principles it represented,&amp;quot; she said last February, noting that she voted against CAFTA [the Central American Free Trade Agreement] because of a lack of environmental and labor standards. &amp;quot;But what we have learned is that we have to drive a tougher bargain. Our market is the market that everybody wants to be in. We should quit giving it away so willy-nilly. I believe we need tougher enforcement of the trade agreements we already have.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton ``is committed to free trade and to the growing role of the international economy,'' Steven Rattner, a Clinton fundraiser and co-founder of Quadrangle Group LLC, a New York buyout firm told Bloomberg.com. ``She would absolutely do the right thing as president.'' &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More recently, at the Las Vegas Democratic Debate on November 15, 2007, she offered the following, more concise declaration: &amp;quot;NAFTA was a mistake to the extent that it did not deliver on what we had hoped it would.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698319</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:49:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698319</guid><dc:creator>clikdawg, Centerville, USA</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;What am I supposed to do &amp;nbsp;-- &amp;nbsp;accuse him of cheatin' better than me?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- &amp;nbsp;Doyle Lonigan (as played by Robert Shaw) in &amp;quot;The Sting&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even nasty racketeer Lonigan knew what a losing ploy this is ...</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698323</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:55:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698323</guid><dc:creator>John spokane,wash</dc:creator><description>The anger from the Hillary camp is disturbing to me. &amp;nbsp;It seems to me her moods change daily. &amp;nbsp;At the debate she was 'honored' to be next to Barrack, now he is like karl &amp;nbsp;Rove. &amp;nbsp;First she is for the war now against. &amp;nbsp;She is for Nafta now against. &amp;nbsp;The only constant seems to be her flip flopping. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698330</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698330</guid><dc:creator>Sharon Sarver, Marietta, Mississippi</dc:creator><description>Hillary says she will be working the first day. &amp;nbsp;Bush blames everyone on his mistakes, everyone but himself. &amp;nbsp;Hillary starts losing votes and she blames others because she is losing. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She attacks Obama and then screams if he attacks her. &amp;nbsp;She isn't getting ahead by being a strong leader so drops a few tears for the sympathy votes. &amp;nbsp;She changes her position to suit the need for more votes. &amp;nbsp;It appears that she is riding on her husbands coattails, taking credit for the good he accomplished and yet, no matter what she says, if it's not good she either denies it, says she will fix it, ignores/refuses to answer the question, claims the men are picking on her or changes the subject. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not so sure she can make any intelligent decisions that has any substantial reasoning behind them. &amp;nbsp;Especially on the first day. &amp;nbsp;The shame thing?...oh gads....I'm sorry mommy for making you upset! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She has already stated many times that it's going to take a long time to figure out what Bush has done, thereby no decisions until she can figure him out. &amp;nbsp;Well people, who can figure him out? &amp;nbsp;Not even her! &amp;nbsp;And who cares about the details of what he has done. &amp;nbsp;Let's move on. &amp;nbsp;Let's get Obama in to move things on to tomorrow. &amp;nbsp;Yesterday is done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm white, and even if he was white, I'd still be voting for Obama. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698333</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:04:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698333</guid><dc:creator>Jason Hayden</dc:creator><description>Hillary promised not to use the NY senate as a stepping stone to the presidency ...and that exactly what she did ( she had been planning this in 1996 ) She lied and hoodwinked NY and is trying do the same in the rest of the country .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also Hillary is not that smart , she failed the NY bar exams twice whereas Obama was a Law Professor . So , go figure who is the smart one .</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698355</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:18:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698355</guid><dc:creator>changeishere, Dallas,TX</dc:creator><description>Hillary just threw herself under the bus. &amp;nbsp;Live by the sword die by the sword. No amount of tears and sympathy will save her now from her blatant support of NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;Obama didn't lie, this is the truth and even Tim Russert called her out on the flip flop months ago. &amp;nbsp;Check it out on youtube. </description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698359</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:20:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698359</guid><dc:creator>Sharon Sarver, Marietta, Mississippi</dc:creator><description>As to the flag pin. &amp;nbsp;I have always considered myself patriotic. &amp;nbsp;I don't wear a flag pin. &amp;nbsp;Bush and many like him are patriotic (so they say). &amp;nbsp;They wear the flag pin! An American needs to wear a flag pin to prove he/she is patriotic? &amp;nbsp;Do all Americans wear flag pins? Pins put holes in clothes! That's all they do!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698370</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:28:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698370</guid><dc:creator>mary holzer,  Apple Valley MN</dc:creator><description>I am so sick of listening to you obamoonies. &amp;nbsp;I daresay that he will get the nomination but I wonder if you know what you will be getting. Witness George Bush...the compassionate conservative uniter.....elected by the right wing evangelical nutcrackers. &amp;nbsp;Wasn't that a wonderful choice too.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698404</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:44:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698404</guid><dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator><description>Please compare Obama's mailers (totally accurate as to health care, by Clinton's own statement, and accurate on NAFTA, by her own statements in her book and elsewhere) and the two that Clinton has been sending out on Social Security (saying his proposal would take more money from middle class and seniors - not true) and pro-choice (saying his 7 'present' votes did not support a woman's right when in fact those votes were made *at the request of* Ill. Planned Parenthood). &amp;nbsp;Do you want the candidate that continues to focus on the campaign and the voters or the one who throws a hissy-fit when she sees unflattering, but true, statements? &amp;nbsp;Karl Rove's #1 rule: hit your opponent at their strength and your weakness. &amp;nbsp;She is doing just this in attacking Obama's integrity in running his campaign. He has shown integrity all along, and she has taken the low, ugly road since Iowa. &amp;nbsp;Karl Rove's #2 weakness: Assume the voters are idiots and that they will believe anything that you say loudly enough and repeat often enough. &amp;nbsp; She's a very apt student, I'll give her that. --- But I do believe the voters are too intelligent to fall for these truly Rovian tactics again. &amp;nbsp;If not, we'll get the candidate we deserve, I suppose.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698414</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:49:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698414</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>More of he Obama playing old negative lying usual Washington Politics, some change! &lt;br&gt;Olivia Hammond Cleveland OH (Sent Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:58 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;exactly</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698418</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:52:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698418</guid><dc:creator>KHR, Vancouver, BC</dc:creator><description>Daryl, have you done your homework and actually researched their policies and their work in the Senate before making your comments? The information is there if you want to do this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll give you a head start:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d109/sponlst.html#sC"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d109/sponlst.html#sC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110/sponlst.html#sC"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110/sponlst.html#sC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d109/sponlst.html#sO"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d109/sponlst.html#sO&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110/sponlst.html#sO"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/d110/sponlst.html#sO&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These are just the last two sessions but it will keep you occupied for awhile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the &amp;quot;almighty&amp;quot; Oprah is running the show, how do you explain that Obama is losing the female demographic to Clinton given that this is Oprah's main viewing audience?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698446</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:08:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698446</guid><dc:creator>V in Seattle</dc:creator><description>Concede??!! &amp;nbsp;I've got news for you Obama people... no healing will take place until the blame and bashing and aggressive divisiveness from YOUR campaign is admitted and stopped. &amp;nbsp;IT'S NOT CHANGE WHEN IT'S THE SAME 'Ol HATE AND FEAR GAME. &amp;nbsp;Go back to the sandbox and wait until you grow up. &amp;nbsp;Or at least go join the republican hate machine. &amp;nbsp;You're already on their side. &amp;nbsp;Hillary Clinton for President all the way. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698471</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:23:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698471</guid><dc:creator>Sam, Coralville, IA</dc:creator><description>Abraham Lincoln said &amp;quot;If they don't stop lying about us, we're going to start telling the truth about them.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I have been waiting and waiting for Obama to stand up to Hillary's false accusations. &amp;nbsp;He's been such a gentlemen. &amp;nbsp;Now he finally gives her a taste of her own medicine, except, instead of telling ugly lies he tells THE UGLY TRUTH!!! &amp;nbsp; And she can't stand it! &amp;nbsp; OMG!!! &amp;nbsp;ROTFL!!! &amp;nbsp;What's so funny is that with all her puffy, ruffled feathers she and her followers don't even see the irony! &amp;nbsp;I know it's not nice to laugh at stupid people (after all, you can't fix dumb) but sometimes they just ask for it!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698474</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:26:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698474</guid><dc:creator>Sam, Coralville, IA</dc:creator><description>Clinton keeps saying Obama is all talk and no action. &amp;nbsp;And while he speaks as a true gentleman, look at how he has managed and organized his campaign and funds, while she has mismanaged hers! &amp;nbsp;His words are uplifting and inspiring yes (I know that's a crime among Clinton supporters) but his actions speak so much louder!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698498</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:34:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698498</guid><dc:creator>Roy, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>Hillary can't cherry pick the things during Bill's reign that she thinks may be popular now. She must claim all or none..so she did support NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;End of Story.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698499</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:35:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698499</guid><dc:creator>Irma Ss.  New York, New YOrk</dc:creator><description>In November, McCain will win because the Democrats ANNOINTED &lt;br&gt;Obama as their candidate. &amp;nbsp;This is why:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dont make fun of war heroes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dont inject race into politics . &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I mean why it is okay to say &amp;quot; I am black man &amp;nbsp;etc &amp;quot;, &amp;nbsp; The press would go to town if &amp;quot;John McCain said&lt;br&gt;I am white man etc. &amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The disenfranchisement of Michigan and yes FLORIDA again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I support Hilary but it may be too late for her now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698502</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:37:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698502</guid><dc:creator>changeishere, Dallas,TX</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is passive/aggressive borderline Bipolar. I'm not saying it negative, but the mood swings that I've seen are indicative of her behavior. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd rather voter for a candidate that is level headed and defends himself from attacks and lies with facts. &amp;nbsp;The fact the Hillary is losing money on her campaign and ran a horrible one at that compared to Obama's further leads me to believe that my support in Obama is a good choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You Hillary supporters, like it or not she's played her last desperate hand and voters will be turned down by unpresidential like demeanor. &amp;nbsp;I've been following history for years and Hillary's outburst reminds me that of Nixon and he was very unstable. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those of you trying to make a issue out of Baracks' declination of attending SOTBU, well the man is trying to win a primary. &amp;nbsp;Obviously you are too lazy to youtbue that Obama has been featured on Tavis' talk show, not to mention he campaigned in LA unlike CLinton who sent her hubby in her place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why doesn't HIllary thank her supporters in the atates she's lost? &amp;nbsp;IF she doesn't acknowledge them means that it never happened? Where is Hillary's tax return she refuses to disclose to the public? &amp;nbsp;WHy hasn't she talked about her court case based on campaign finance fraud regarding Peter Paul?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another thing, there is no Sinclair story which is why the media outlets haven't reported on it. At the time in question, Sinclair was in mental hospital. Nice try at the smear though. Just weak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey Dixiecrats, Obama is bringing in record numbers of NEW VOTERS so whether you whine and cry about Hillary losing and voting either McBush or Darth Nader is your democratic right, but Obama is going to win it. Take you hateful selves to McBush. He needs more warmongering to support his cause. thanks. buh bye</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698529</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:52:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698529</guid><dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator><description>To HP Boston: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks like we have a very unpopular view here but the facts are the facts aren't they people. &amp;nbsp;Running for the highest office in our fine country all candidates must be analyzed under the same standards. &amp;nbsp;Only now is Obama being pu to the test and I think we all need to see how the political process plays out. &amp;nbsp;As a fellow Bostonian we put his good friend Deval Patrick into office based on his change rhetoric. &amp;nbsp;The first thing he CHANGED was the curtains in his office for 10K of taxpayer money. &amp;nbsp;The only thing he has done was to lobby for a casino to be built in MA. &amp;nbsp;Give me a break! &amp;nbsp;We can't wait to clean house in MA. &amp;nbsp;As an independent voter who typically votes democrat I can't wait to say good-bye to Ted, Kerry, and Deval soon! &amp;nbsp;Please keep an open mind and think twice. &amp;nbsp;Oh and let's keep it about the issues here enough of the personal attacks on both sides! &lt;br&gt;Cassandra (Sent Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:29 AM&lt;br&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have gone to my town hall and registered as an INDEPENDENT. &amp;nbsp;I am so outraged at TED, KERRY, DEVAL AND the rest of the boys. I will not vote for these Dems ever again! Massachusetts wants and voted for HILLARY.&lt;br&gt;I will never vote for the MEDIA/OBAMA ticket.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698538</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:56:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698538</guid><dc:creator>changeishere, Dallas,TX</dc:creator><description>To you Richard, Dayoton, OH. Playing the &amp;quot;patriotic&amp;quot; card is tasteless and desperate. So wearing an american flag pin for a baseless and useless war (that most troops didn't want to go to in the 1st place) is &amp;quot;sign&amp;quot; of being unpatriotic? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why don't you stop deflecting from the real issue, and that more and more vets are coming home with limbs blown off from a war that should of never been fought in the first place. &amp;nbsp;As a honorably discharged Army vet and Obamavets supporters, the flimsly, petty flagpin issue is the least of our issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why don't you ask your dear President Bush why our servicemembers are stretched thin in Iraq? &amp;nbsp;Why don't you ask President Bush why he doesnt have a solid exit strategy? &amp;nbsp;Why don't you stop playing this pathetic attempt of trying to discredit Obama who didnt vote for this senseless war that has cost the U.S. TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS AND THOUSANDS OF LIVES towards your very own Commander in Chief. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This tit for tat of Obama is about as useless as Republicans diversion tactics. &amp;nbsp;PUT THE BLAME WHERE IT BELONGS, at the feet of President Bush for this senseless ongoing war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698547</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:01:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698547</guid><dc:creator>Maria I</dc:creator><description>Obamas Mailers in Ohio - Karl Rove's tactics as Hillary says&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lets stick to this topic. &amp;nbsp;Ohio mailers are not only misleading and dishonest but based on Karl Rove's politics of fear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you all know this strategy was very powerful and used by Bush to win all his elections since Texas and the White House. Let's don't let a fellow Democrat get away with this type of dishonest tactics to win the elections. &amp;nbsp;We don't need another dishonest President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read the NAFTA and Healthcare Mailers distributed in Ohio. They are false and scary. As Hillary pointed out Obama talks about hope and union and his field campaign does another thing. This is dishonest. This is not part of the Democratic values.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This needs to be pointed out to Ohio voters. &amp;nbsp;His message on the trail is false as is his Campaign.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698557</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:05:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698557</guid><dc:creator>student, Cincinnati</dc:creator><description>To all those saying she had known about these attack ads before...&lt;br&gt;I watched her speak in Cincinnati on Saturday and saw a old woman standing near the stage trying to ge Hillary's attention to show her the ads. &amp;nbsp; I am assuming as Hillary was going around shaking hands this woman showed Hillary the ads. &amp;nbsp;Hilalry said nothing about the attack ads during her HOUR speech, where she did discuss Obama for a bit, at Cincinnati State... BUT RIGHT after going around and shaking hands she did address the two ads. &amp;nbsp;I might be wrong...but I doubt it</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698573</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698573</guid><dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator><description>Remember this gem:&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;states like “President Bush’s state, Texas” were “embarrassed by the scores, so they just made the tests easier.” --Hillary Clinton&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice going Hillary! &amp;nbsp;Good thing Texas isn't a must-win state. &amp;nbsp;Oh, wait...it is!</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698578</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:14:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698578</guid><dc:creator>Mie Trudy, tx</dc:creator><description>Hillary's &amp;quot;kicks of a dying horse&amp;quot; again.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698579</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:14:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698579</guid><dc:creator>Maria I</dc:creator><description>A large percentage of Americans understand that Hillary does not have anything to do with Iraq and NAFTA. Agree that jobs are going to ASIA...How disinformed can we the American people be. &amp;nbsp;Well we might deserve another Bush, I mean Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama's Campaign is based on stupid ideas that he is planting in a lot of people that are uninformed. &amp;nbsp;I don't care that McCain is Republican, at least I understand his record and where he stands. I just want an honest President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope Hillary gets elected, I care for Healthcare, I care for education, I care for children issues. Hillary has cared about and fought for these issues for a long time. My vote is with Hillary! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698585</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:16:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698585</guid><dc:creator>alfred, Houston, Tx</dc:creator><description>obama did drugs, at least he admitted it. bill didn't inhale??? O-K and gwb there's not telling what he's done. obama did the best thing by coming clean. he took away ammo from the competition. &amp;nbsp;i agree, however, that obama selectively accuses hillary, the then first lady, of ills of bills administration however, the good parts she gets no credit. it's politics, attack the bad, ignore the good. the clintons have their attacks also and he would be some dope head if it wasn't old news. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;she says her experience is important and obama does not have enuff. &amp;nbsp;hmmm...we currently have/had collectively over 100 yrs leading us now and look where we have been led. &amp;nbsp;is he ready? i don't know, but he is a breath of fresh air from the crap we got. &amp;nbsp;the clinton years were good for the most part, however it's was largely due to the technology success &amp;amp; leaps made during that decade (the internet). &amp;nbsp;many of those booming companies are belly up now and did so under the current admin. &amp;nbsp;i don't know what's next but i want iraq fixed (we can't leave asap), immigration addressed, asian imports &amp;amp; slave labor addrssed, healthcare affordable, my retirement secured, and my country safe and free. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698593</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:18:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698593</guid><dc:creator>Michelle, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>I didn't know that one candidates ad should be neutral and stating pros about your opponents positions and policies. This is a typical political tactic. Like the clinton ads in Wisconsin (debates and healthcare). That is just how the game is played. I wonder why this mailer is so bad. If you to site part of your 35 years of experience to your husbands administration then you have to take the good with the bad...unless releasing whitehouse records would be helpful to shed a clear light on what you did and didn't do. Linking herself with the clinton administration has been benifical for Sen. Clinton for the most part...It just so happens that ohio democrates will have a thing or to say about that.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698612</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:24:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698612</guid><dc:creator>Will, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>WHY don't we see headlines that read; &amp;quot;Obama attacks Clinton ... again!?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this Obama's honeymoon period BEFORE he even wins the nomination?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama,12&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698619</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:29:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698619</guid><dc:creator>Dale Howard</dc:creator><description>Hillary is done!! She is struggling at best, she keeps saying it's about the people but the truth is it's all about her majesty. She can't handle the truth just like she couldn't handle the military in uniforms serving her dinner in the white house.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She has nothing but contempt for anyone in uniform, I will be happy when those fats are aired again to those that think they support her.</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698627</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:34:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698627</guid><dc:creator>W,Carlsbad,CA</dc:creator><description>Anyone know where we can see the mailers from both camps?</description></item><item><title>Obama defends his mailings</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/23/695284.aspx#698667</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:54:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:698667</guid><dc:creator>Diane,Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Obama supported NAFTA as a Chicago activist in 1993. Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Tom Daschle all voted for NAFTA in 1993. Hillary Clinton argued against NAFTA with husband Bill in White House, but as First Lady or any administration member you did not publicly state your personal opinions if it was an opposing opinion. Ask David Gergen, Carl Bernstein or Richard Shapiro, they have documentation on all the facts about Hillary's true opinion about the negative affects of NAFTA on our economy and how she wants to fix it now.&lt;br&gt; Another lie on these posts is the one about Obama providing Health Care Plans in Illinois. As a resident of Illinois who did vote for Obama for the Senate, we fell for his promises of hope and change, his big wide smile of friendship across the aisle. Well folks, we are still waiting. Ask the African American Black residents who are still waiting for their neighborhoods to get cleaned up and crime rates to go down and the slumlords to leave their neighborhoods. Ask them if they are satisfied with Obama's record as their savior to get them out of poverty and their children off of drugs and stop the killing's in their schools. No one has ever mentioned Obama's failing record as Illinois' Senator who made promises not kept. Who let Nuclear waste go unregulated and contaminate out water supplies and let thousands of jobs leave Illinois for Mexico. He did let the corporations of Exelon and Maytag who owned the Nuclear plant and the Maytag plant to donate to his campaigns. He did let slumlord Rezko continue to rent to African Americans who cannot afford to live anywhere else and did purchase a million dollar home from Rezko for $300,000 less than market value. Now if you want to put your hopes and dreams in the hands of Obama, be my guest, but I am no longer waiting for him to make good on his promises. Fool me once, do not fool me twice. I am going to take my chances on another candidate who will be CHANGE. A WOMAN FOR PRESIDENT AFTER 43 MEN IS CHANGE FOLKS! The men have not done such a Great Job so Far, so I will vote for Hillary Clinton, a BIG CHANGE from what we have had. As a professional educator I do not need OPRAH or the MEDIA telling me who MY PRESIDENT should be, I am capable of making that decision Thank You! I already voted for Obama and regret that vote! I never voted for George Bush, although everyone else chose to vote for his &amp;quot;I am a uniter, not a divider&amp;quot; speeches and regret their votes now. So do you want to regret your votes or do you need to learn the hard way? I for one do not want another 4 years of a President who does not have the respect of World Leaders for my President like they lack respect for Bush. The world feels the US is arrogant and Obama's arrogance will not mend our relationships with other countries. Hillary Clinton does have the respect of World Leaders, even if you Obama supporters do not, but you need to think clearly of how our standing in the world will improve if Obama is President? If he could not fix his local neighborhoods in Chicago, how can he fix our whole country and our two wars and our foreign relations? Lot of important issues to think about right? You bet, this is a grownup's job, not a rookie's.</description></item></channel></rss>