Obama gains more supers

Carolyn — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:04:58 GMT

He will get more. They know a true leader when they see one!

Obama gains more supers

Jan — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:06:13 GMT

All of them should go ahead and back Obama. They know that the Clintons' are bad news for everyone except for themselves.

Obama gains more supers

Mary, Washington — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:06:20 GMT

Here is some interesting analysis of what might happen in a Michigan re-vote, based on the results from the first election coupled with exit polls:

http://ccpsblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/what-would-happen-in-michigan.html

Obama gains more supers

Mark Thieme — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:06:39 GMT

The Clinton party is over. But the trashing of America has just begun. God help us.

We have heard that Obama is trying to win on math alone... Obama HAS won.

That is the reality any intelligent person would perceive, even if that reality is a great disappointment.

It is over... how she could destroy the party and its chances in November with a campaign based on mudslinging and character assassination, a campaign doomed to fail unless Obama quits or is otherwise disabled...

Is she hoping he will fall down the stairs? Wow.

She has gone over the top, but not in delegates.

Many are questioning her present state of mind and for good reason.

The media do a disservice if they do not, at least, shine a light on what is happening and what the mentality into which the Clinton campaign has morphed.

Thank you Newsweek and Jonathon Alter.

Say it louder and clearer, Chuck. It's important.

You know very well of what I speak, I suspect.

Obama gains more supers

We want a FIGHTER — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:07:58 GMT

Keep fighting Barack, keep fighting. Come back hard on the snake Wolfson for trying to link your name to Ken Starr's. Can you imagine the yelling and screaming and whining Senator Clinton would be doing on national TV had someone from the Obama campaign DARED to link her to a hated figure in the opposite party?

Obama gains more supers

Thomas, Phoenix, AZ — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:09:27 GMT

So much for a momentum-changing day for the Hillary campaign...I guess lies and half-truths don't always work.

Obama gains more supers

Jim, Kalamazoo, MI — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:10:00 GMT

It is interesting to consider that if Democrats had the same "winner take all" policy as Republicans do with their primary, Sen. Clinton would be at about 1,920 delegates right now...and much closer than Sen. Obama to securing the nomination.

I also wish the press would talk about the fact that if Michigan and Florida decide to hold primaries that the actual number needed for the nomination will also have to rise. The current number of 2,024 was calculated without Michigan and Florida.

Obama gains more supers

Chicago Illinois — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:10:30 GMT

Hillary should fight in every state. She should go toe to toe with Obama in Wyoming and Mississippi. She should get rid of Mark Penn who was responsible for her big state strategy. Had she fought she could have picked up a number of the twelve she lost after super Tuesday. At a minimum she would not have lost as many delagates. Penn statements to the media that Maria Doyle was responsible for Hillary's slide is simply fingerpointing by a paid political hack who accepts no responsibility. The only way Hillary will lose is if she keeps taking advice from hacks like Penn. Thank heaven for McAullife and Ickes. Go Hillary Go

Obama gains more supers

scott — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:10:53 GMT

You cant help but to think that she wins the popular vote by 5% inTexas yet loses the superdelegate count, which is an idependant vote not tied to voter constituents yet usually happens like that so HOW did Obama win in the caucus? Does this contradict what obama said initially about superdelegates should go with the voters in thier area - despite Kennedy being able to be an exception to the rule of course because it is in obamas favor (flip-flopping on this isssue too - lol)

Mississippi should fall hard for Dumbama and probably Wyoming but Hillary needs to stay close in those states - can she win Wyoming? And if she can pull one of these off - wooo wooo!

Checkmate!

Obama gains more supers

Farah, new york, ny — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:11:46 GMT

Didn't the Dayton mayor Rhine McLinand also W Va Rep Nick Rahall endorse him today? Both are superdelegates.

Obama gains more supers

Garrett, Seattle — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:11:51 GMT

When is CO going to figure out its delegate allocation? Are they just slow about it, or is there something special about how they dole them out that makes it take longer?

Obama gains more supers

Patty,sd,ca — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:12:19 GMT

It doesn't matter. SHe won and he is done.After Florida and michigan move to her column he is done.

Obama gains more supers

C A, Tuscaloosa, AL — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:15:12 GMT

I thought Hillary was supposed to be in the drivers seat now. She did win Ohio, remember? Then why is it that superdelegates keep coming into Obama's camp?

You have a mess Howard Dean. You had just better meet with Hillary and tell her to pack it in.

Obama gains more supers

turnip — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:15:20 GMT

Carleton-VT also goes for Obama today.

Boxer- Ca goes to Clinton.

Obama gains more supers

Carthage — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:15:43 GMT

ONE MORE SUPER_DELEGATE for BHO today: Vermont dem. party chair Ian Carleton.... drip, drip...

Obama gains more supers

Dan — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:16:07 GMT

care to add W VA's Nick Rahall?

Obama gains more supers

Farah, new york, ny — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:18:17 GMT

Ian Carleton, VT superdelegate also announced he is supporting Obama.

Obama gains more supers

trouble — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:19:34 GMT

The slow steady stream continues...
Five more superD's since Tuesday.
Hilliary gains a whole 12 delegates before giving some back after Wyoming & Mississppi. What's the point of all this?
Hillary stays in = party destroyed

Obama gains more supers

Kenny G, Boulder Co — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:20:34 GMT

Neither Hillary or Barack will have enough delegates to win the nomination going to the convention this summer. What a fight it will be to watch the Florida and Michigan delegates try to vote, and Howard Dean screaming at them to leave. Denver police are ordering extra Tasers for the occasion.

Obama gains more supers

Carl Lewis, Falls Church, VA — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:22:40 GMT

Ian Carleton - head of Dem. Party in Vermont also endorsed Sen. Obama today.

Obama gains more supers

mark, anytown, usa — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:24:04 GMT

So, Chuck, by the math...Obama is going to win the Texas delegates. It seems to me that winning a state like Texas should maybe be a headline.

http://infogiant.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/hillary-wins-texas-oh-waitno-she-didnt/

Obama gains more supers

JohnnyU, WA State — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:24:16 GMT

Hillary should reisgn the race, say she's sorry for all the lies she told about Barack Obama, and not damage the party any further.

Obama gains more supers

Aaron — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:24:37 GMT

don't forget "Ian Carleton, a superdelegate from Vermont, announced he is supporting Senator Barack Obama for President today"

Obama gains more supers

williamc, Memphis TN — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:25:58 GMT

If the Democrats had primaries that were winner take all, Hillary would be winning by over 300 delegates. Also if you were to include Mich. and Florida, she would be blowing Barrack Hussein Obama away. The super delegates need to take this into consideration when they cast their votes. They would be throwing them toward a candidate that has no chance to win the big states in November if they go with Obama.

Obama gains more supers

someone over the rainbow — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:26:18 GMT

I think this is the DNC saying, enough to the Clintons. That's the only way to explain these delegates still jumping ship after Hillary's "big wins".

The problem is that the voting public is nowhere near being that nuianced. This will fly over our collective head and we'll still be in-fighting. Isn't the King Solomon parabole of the 2 mothers fighting for the infant?

I wonder which candidate will step down for the good of the party? It seems Hillary would have the ship go down with her.

Obama gains more supers

someone over the rainbow — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:26:49 GMT

Obama gains more supers

Jmp, Northern Minnesota — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:27:03 GMT

Come one, stop calling Texas a 'win' for Clinton.

It was a 'win' for Obama--a definite win on delegates, even though some haven't been 'officially' allocated.

At the very least, start calling TEXAS a DRAW.

Obama gains more supers

JG, MI — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:28:11 GMT

Hillary is making such a big deal out of March 4 -- she nets 12 delegates (or less). Obama gets 174 and Hillary 186 -- to me that's a 48%/52% split -- not exactly a landslide....

Obama gains more supers

Bull the Dog — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:30:04 GMT

Patty from SD, CA, scared the heck out of these superdelegates by saying it is perfectly acceptable to lie in politics. Superdelegates are not as dumb as she is, and I honestly beleive Patty needs a psychologist to help her out because to say that lying is acceptable is a sign of som sort of psychological disorder.
We refuse to be mislead and we -- Americans -- demand accountability. No matter who Americans vote for, we should not permit disintegrity in our government and we expect all elected officials to be accountable for their actions -- we are not voting for them to deceive us, but to lead us with integrity and accountability like Abraham Lincoln.

Obama gains more supers

Faithe Zercher, Harrisburg, Pa — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:36:08 GMT

NPR is reporting that Obama won Texas due to the results of the caucus. He will gain 3 delegates more than Clinton out of Texas. Spread the word! Why isn't anyone else reporting this?

Obama gains more supers

MK Sizemore, Williamsburg, VA — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:36:11 GMT

Actually, there were three superdelegates who came out in support of Obama today. You missed Ian Carleton of Vermont.

from the Obama website:
BURLINGTON, VT –Ian Carleton, a superdelegate from Vermont, announced he is supporting Senator Barack Obama for President today, citing his ability to unite the country:

“Vermonters overwhelmingly embraced Senator Obama's message of hope and change in our State's primary earlier this week, and so it is with great excitement and optimism that I pledge my support for Barack Obama. Since the very beginning of his campaign I, along with so many Vermonters, have been deeply moved by Senator Obama's commitment to moving beyond the negative partisan rhetoric that has sadly characterized our nation's politics for so long. His leadership and vision for a more productive and decent future is exactly what this nation needs at this moment in history.”

Ian Carleton is the Chairman of the Vermont Democratic Party and an attorney at firm Sheehey Furlong & Behm in Burlington.

Obama gains more supers

A. Kline, Nevada City, CA — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:41:18 GMT

She voted for the war. The Democratic Party needs to present a true anti-war candidate this year. Let's do this.

Obama 08!

Obama gains more supers

John Doe — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:43:04 GMT

First Read, why don't you just do every one a favor and say you support Obama. It is so obvious that you are so biased in your reporting. That way at least one would know why you put out the garbage you do and continually slam Hillary. Would be fair don't you think since you are so very biased in your reporting?

Obama gains more supers

pete — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:46:46 GMT

She can't win... the math doesn't work. It's too late. I'm not saying she should quit yet, but she should also not drag this out all spring either.

Obama gains more supers

scott golden — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:47:37 GMT

As well it could mean Clinton has closed the gap by 22 delegates - LOL! Those superdelegates form the caucuses may still very well vote for Clinton - why so pessamistic, Domenico? Oh, that's rigth you support Dumbama - I forgot, my bad dude!

Obama gains more supers

Dirk, Brunswick, Georgia — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:47:46 GMT

Someone tell MSNBC and Chuck Todd that fawning over Obama is soooooo passe'. So last week. Did Chuck Todd watch Saturday Night Live?

Obama gains more supers

Kris STL — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:48:56 GMT

Hopefully he will smash her in Wyoming and Mississippi. Of course to Clinton Wyoming won't count b/c there are more horses than people, an dMississippi will not count b/c there are too many black people in the democratic electorate that will not vote for her!!! So Clinton if you do get the democratic nod than I will congratulate you for being the President of Calitexnewjersarizohio!!!

Obama gains more supers

Sem, VA — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:53:31 GMT

This means Obama has gained about 45 superdelegates since super tuesday, while clinton has lost 6. So the net gain for obama is about 50 superdelegates in one month. What a momentum! this sends a message - superdelegates are obama. over the pledged delegates, practically, clinton has not gained. Obama leads by about the same margin despite her so called big wins. Obama 08

Obama gains more supers

Sierra, SF — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:53:34 GMT

Crooked Hillary

From Huff Post:

'...Spin Cycle

Flashback! HRC once thought taxes should be open

A trip down memory lane:

Eight years ago, when Hillary parachuted into NY to become our Senator, she and Howard Wolfson became completely obsessed with opponent Rick Lazio's tax returns, which he did not release until the end of August..

They talked about them at every opportunity. In early July, Hillary called it "frankly disturbing." A guy in an Uncle Sam outfit was dispatched to be a nuisance at various Lazio events in August. Howard himself showed up once to try to rattle Lazio by offering him a copy of some Chappaqua property tax receipt after Lazio said he'd release his state returns as soon as Hillary released hers (which didn't exist, because she had just moved up here).

This produced a lot of coverage. We've copied one of the stories after the jump, if you're interested. But obviously, what brings it to mind is the current discussions of when, if ever, Clinton and Wolfson will release her tax returns as she runs for president this year. Their attitude has been, basically, when they feel like it.

Pressed again today by the Obama campaign, Wolfson said: "Their tax returns since they left the White House will be made available on or around April 15."

Maybe a reporter could, like, actually risk getting Wolfson mad by trying to pin him down on whether "on or around April 15" will definitely be before the Pennsylvania primary on April 22, and why a 2001 return from a sitting NY senator can't be copied by, say, March 15?

Without being too cute here, the question is why Clinton and Wolfson were so obsessed by Lazio's returns that they were disrupting his events, but they now treat it as an irrelevancy when Hillary's returns are requested. There's occasionally the suggestion that different standards apply to a primary. But that makes no sense, especially when you're already an officeholder. Republicans are entitled to see Hillary's returns before making their decision, but not Dems?

No, it seems more like a reflection of the way Hillary and her team think. Principled people would reason as follows: "Since we made a huge fuss about Lazio's returns in 2000, to be consistent we should be very diligent about being just as transparent as Obama and releasing our own returns this year. Otherwise, we would be behaving like hypocrites."

But that's not what they're doing. So the reasoning is apparently this: "We acted like Lazio's tax returns were a big deal in 2000 because it was in our self-interest to do so, and this year we'll act like our returns aren't a big deal because it's in our self interest to do so. We don't act on principle, and we don't care about being consistent, and we don't care about being hypocritical."

Is there another explanation? If not -- what a great role model for our daughters!!!

New York Times: 8/17/2000

Obama gains more supers

Bull the Dog — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:54:33 GMT

BTW First Read,
Someone posted asking all journalists to release federal tax documents of their own! What a crazed person. That means all journalists are presidential candidates, and we'll have hundreds or even thousands of candidates competing for the presidency.
Many posters post outright silly comments because they are unable to think about anything else to say of substance. And the Rekzo issue is their best defense in the face of Hillary's own many more Rekzo-type scandals and even worse.

Obama gains more supers

WILLIS, HOUSTON, TX — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:55:37 GMT

ALL THE SUPER-DELEGATES SHOULD MIGRATE TO OBAMA BECAUSE OF CAMP HILLARY'S LIES ON NAFTA! THOSE LIES COST OBAMA ELECTIONS IN OHIO AND TEXAS!

THIS WOULD TEACH HER A LESSON!!

Obama gains more supers

Gary, Austin, TX — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:56:11 GMT

Ian Carleton, a superdelegate from Vermont, announced he is supporting Senator Barack Obama for President today ALSO!!!

That brings the total for the day to +3 for Obama. Please change your count.

Obama gains more supers

F CURTIS — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:56:13 GMT

THERE ARE CHILDREN IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK HARLAM DISTRICT WHO HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THAT CALL FROM HILLARY CLINTON FOR YEARS READ THE BOOK "AMAZING GRACE BY jONATHAN kOZOL.THE CALL NEVER WAS ANSWERED BY HER OR RUDY.

Obama gains more supers

Gary, Austin, TX — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:56:31 GMT

Ian Carleton, a superdelegate from Vermont, announced he is supporting Senator Barack Obama for President today ALSO!!!

That brings the total for the day to +3 for Obama. Please change your count.

Obama gains more supers

Tim Sullivan — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:56:49 GMT

Much Ado About Nothing should be the title of media coverage of the Democratic race this week.

Obama gains more supers

Who's Sane — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:58:33 GMT

SUPER! Let the floodgates open.

Obama gains more supers

oknOK — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:00:39 GMT

My question is this. If the purpose of the super delegates is to make a final determination after all is said and done, why are they allowed to pledge their delegates now? I'd find that especially hard to understand in states that haven't voted yet.

Obama gains more supers

ki houston — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:01:43 GMT

all the crying from clinton , get over it . she cant win . the math does not work period . and if you think the superdelegates are going to overturn the will of the people you are dilusional. she is just in the race to cause havic .

Obama gains more supers

Tom in MA — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:02:05 GMT

In Obama's scheme of things Benitez-Thompson must vote for Hillary. Or does that only apply to Hillary's superdelegates?

Obama gains more supers

JT, New Orleans, La. — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:02:56 GMT

What's the deal with Texas?? Where are the results from the caucus? According to the rules, the caucus portion of the Texas "two Step" COUNTS for allocated delegates right? Clinton did NOT win Texas!!! Where is the coverage on this? Doesn't this make "Clinton's big Comeback" seem a little stupid?

Obama gains more supers

Gary, Franklin, WI — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:03:57 GMT

In addition to tracking the number of superdelegates who have indicated a preference for Clinton or Obama, it would be useful to identify from each campaign the following: (1) how many come from states the candidate won (primary or caucus), (2) how many come from states the candidate lost (primary or caucus), and (3) how many come of states yet to be decided (primary or caucus).

Two of the most commonly known superdelegates are Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Clinton won Massachusetts, but Kennedy and Kerry are supporting Obama. Often we hear superdelegates should reflect the voters from their States. The only way Kennedy and Kerry can justify their position is to claim superdelegates have the right to make up their own minds regardless of voter sentiment. If that is so, why does there remain so much pressure for Clinton to get out?

The Democratic nominee, by party rules, will be chosen by superdelegates in 2008 if neither candidate is able to get enough "pledged" delegates. After 2008, the Democratic Party must revisit the McGovern commission rules, adopted after the 1968 convention. They are no longer justifiable or relevant in our Internet/24-hour news and commentary world. At the very least, the number and influence of superdelegates must be substantially reduced!

Obama gains more supers

Wayne — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:04:12 GMT

It looks like Obama's "slim" 100+ delegate lead is actually a large one when you consider that Hillary only nets 12 delegates after 4 states vote.

Obama gains more supers

s.b. calif. — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:05:44 GMT

55 million dollars doesn't buy much now adays does it?

Obama gains more supers

one american — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:07:15 GMT

Ok, here it goes. Here we have Two Democrats, Hillary and Obama, competing against each other. Democrats, yes democrats, who I noticed have a tendency to vote for-- guess which party--that is right—Democrats. Now, stay with my reasoning here; I will not go too fast for you, ok. Since the “Democrats” are voting for “Democratic Presidential Nominees” is it just possible, even plausible, and down right probable, that the “Democrats” will vote for a “DEMOCRAT” during the general election! Furthermore, and I will try not to get too complex here, since the “Democrats” have been turning out in record numbers to vote or Hillary or Obama (both of which are: democrats,) isn’t it probable that they will vote for a “DEMOCRATIC” candidate! Now comes the “tricky part.” Doesn’t this simply, and I mean very simple, basic logic suggest that Hillary’s argument that she can win the “Big Blue States” against another “DEMOCRAT” become meaningless? And finally, since Barrack Obama seems to be able to draw in independents better than Hillary, wouldn't he be (and I’m just spit balling here) A MORE ELECT ABLE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE—since he is leading in the popular vote and in pledged delegates that represent the will of the American People. Oh, rest assure, we Democrats will prevail because somewhere, I once read, yes, that’s’ it---A government for the people—by the people---Yes, yes They must have been talking about the “Super Delegates.” Not.

Obama gains more supers

TRUTH — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:08:32 GMT

Lets face the facts Clintons big wins on Mar 4th only netted her 12 delegates and Obama made a good point that after tonights Clintons wins the delegate count would be the same as before! Who are we fooling? Clinton can not win and Obama will remain the leader in delegates going into the convention and realistically the democratic party is beign hurt and only giving ammo to the republicans. Look I know this was Clintons year and I agree she is a fighter and I respect that but the Obamas grassroot movement swept America and inspired millions like JFK. History will be made this year and I hope Hillary puts her pride and ego aside and puts her party and America first in order to succeed in the November elections.

Obama gains more supers

HW - California — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:08:54 GMT

What's the big deal about 3 out of 4 when she only picks up 12 delegates. Clinton will do anything to win the primary and then get smoked in the general, way to be leader !!

Obama gains more supers

T. Lewis, Long Beach, Ca. — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:09:56 GMT

The Clinton party is desperate. This is the ONLY reason they are arguing about Florida and Michigan! As a kid, we stuck to the sandlot rules much much better. The rules shouldn't be changed just because you think you are going to lose. If they do, I'M OUT on the Democrats! SHAME ON YOU HILLARY! YOU ARE A SORE LOSER!

Obama gains more supers

jd, staunton,va — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:10:43 GMT

whoa, Please do not leave out Vermont Democratic Party Chair Ian Carleton. 2+1= 3
http://208.122.14.138/thefield/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/ian2.jpg
ian2.jpg

Obama gains more supers

C.Myles; Chincoteague, VA — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:52:41 GMT

Finally someone speaks a complete truth ....Hillary really IS a monster. The divisiveness, lies, scandals, innuendos, playing the race card, tax fraud, illegal deals. How could anyone want such a crybaby loudmouth like her as a President?

Obama gains more supers

thomas, Boston, Ma — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:55:55 GMT

I urge Clinton's supporters will vote for McCain if the Obama's supporters still go NEGATIVE with Clinton.

I DON'T SEE WHY Clinton's supporter will vote for Obama becuase THEY DON'T LIKE YOU!!!

Obama gains more supers

Kimberly Beasley, Chicago, IL — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:56:00 GMT

Hillary should run in the Republican race if she wants "winner take all" rules. This is the Democratic party. Rules are rules. This goes for Michigan and Florida, too. Deal with it.

Obama gains more supers

James, Chicago — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:00:50 GMT

I keep hearing things about a fraud case involving the Clintons in CA going on right now. Does anyone know anything about it?

Obama gains more supers

JD, Pittsburgh, PA — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:01:05 GMT

Simple math. Obama needs to win one of the three remaining big states, PA, MI, or FL. If he doesn't then the pledged delegates and popular vote will be close enough that super delegates will turn to Hillary and her strength in winning big states that were lost in 2004; OH, TX and FL.

Obama gains more supers

Henry, Dallas, Texas — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:01:24 GMT

It ain't over yet. Obama folks, let the states (people)speak! He got his butt kicked so stop crying like Obamababies!

Obama gains more supers

Ernest Kread, Rockville, MD — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:13:06 GMT

There remains 1 unallocated add-on delegate in Rhode Island which will be assigned by voice vote on June 19th at the RI DNC party meeting.

Obama gains more supers

Gavin Wright, Essex, VT — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:21:47 GMT

My GOD American Fools! Wake UP! Google "OHIO cross voters" and see if you can figure out how Hillbilly "WON" in Ohio. Could it possibly BE that tens of thousands of the Limbaugh Braindead party faithful deliberately voted across R-party lines (see Ohio state law and SoS Brunner on the legal issues) to prop up Hillbilly's "easy to beat" status against McCain???
Howie, Ron, Supers, DNC, DEMS at large, SURE!, go ahead, support her "R-JOKE" nomination, and what happens when all those fat, laughing, well-discipined (the deliberate crooked voters, not you good guys out there...) Rush "Republican" RNC-Kool-Aid voters violate Ohio law by RE-crossing BACK to "R-land", and pull the Diebold trigger for Old "100 Years War" John in November?
LANDSLIDE! For McCain. Becasue NO ONE is gonna vote for HILLARY in a general election. How Long, Oh Lord, How Long, before you dumbass, self-destructive democrats figure out the R-Enemy is AGAIN playing you for the fools you are? Anyone that continues to support the Hillbillys is ASSURING another massive Dem loss in NOVEMBER...against EASILY the weakest candidate, the crookedest, failed Right Wing fanatic Republican policy regime since ???? WHEN? ...NONE!!!! BUSH-Cheney-Exxon-Mobile IS the most crooked, senseless war-mongering, fraudulent, Constitution busting administration failure in US History!
So, sure, vote for Hillary. One of two reasons: 1: She's a WOMAN? Well, that's just plain sexist, isn't it? OR, 2. She IS beatable. THOSE are the ONLY qualifiers.
This IS America, and here in America, we get EXACTLY the type of government we DESERVE. No? Take another long look at the International Disgrace stinking up OUR White House because his Fixers FIXED the voting networks and the US Supreme Court, if anyone needs another grim reminder of just how screwed up WE have let this country get.
Would the insider Republican Right faithfuls ever go so far as to actually vote DEMOCRAT if they really thought HILLBILLY was gonna win? Think about it. They are DEADLY, VICIOUS, LOOSERS facing moral & political extinction. They are NOT going to go quietly into the night. They are trying to spawn, to birth "HILLBILLY" to carry on the Party Evil and "Deliver the Vote for JEB" in 2012. Hell, YES! I can't wait! BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH. Let's go for Thirty years! It's been working 'just perfect' for America's taxpayers and voters so far.