<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx</link><description>From NBC's Mark Murray and NBC/NJ's Aswini AnburajanSeizing on the release of a White House schedule showing Clinton at a 1993 NAFTA meeting, as well as a report suggesting that she praised the trade accord while there, the Obama campaign held a conference</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789373</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:21:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789373</guid><dc:creator>ME, CA</dc:creator><description>For those wondering how the Democratic Party could be engaged in the circus we’ve seen the past few weeks, what we’re witnessing is an epic behind-the-scenes battle by 250 of the most senior and most powerful individuals in the Democratic Establishment (the superdelegates for Senator Clinton). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Clinton’s superdelegates are largely individuals who don’t hold public office now but who have held significant positions within the party over the past 3 decades. &amp;nbsp;They all signed on early, figuring that they would secure plum jobs in a new Clinton Administration or nice Ambassadorships. &amp;nbsp;It’s also well-known within the party that Bill and Hillary were not shy with the “you’re either with us or with the terrorist” threats. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, we’re now witnessing some very powerful people who don’t often get told “No” doing whatever they can to resurrect what they consider their “RIGHT.” &amp;nbsp;These people have been on the sidelines for 8 years and fully expected that their meal ticket to a gold-plated government job would have a Clinton stamp on it. &amp;nbsp;That’s why despite his overwhelming lead in delegates and popular vote, Senator Obama has not yet been given what he has earned. &amp;nbsp;These are powerful individuals with strong voices behind the scenes. &amp;nbsp; And, if they can’t win this time around, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Hillary Clinton will attempt to sabotage Obama’s chances so that she can run again in 2012.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789380</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:22:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789380</guid><dc:creator>diane</dc:creator><description>Finally. &amp;nbsp;discussing something other than race and Wright. &amp;nbsp;geez. &amp;nbsp;it's getting old.&lt;br&gt;Anyway, this does need to be discussed. &amp;nbsp;How much was Clinton involved and for the voters to take into account.&lt;br&gt;This is issue oriented and serious.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789385</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:23:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789385</guid><dc:creator>A Younger White Voter</dc:creator><description>Her older white supporters don't care. &amp;nbsp;They're going to vote for her no matter what she says. &amp;nbsp;They've been duped into believing she has &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; and that's what they want in a candidate, whether it's real or manufactured by PR.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789391</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:24:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789391</guid><dc:creator>We want transparency</dc:creator><description>Why does the media keep letting Clinton get away with blaming Obama for whispering to the Canadian government when SHE was the one who did it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More importantly, Senator Clinton RELEASE your brackets.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789395</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:24:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789395</guid><dc:creator>BDN, Chicago</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is no longer relevant in this election. &amp;nbsp;It's Obama vs. McCain now.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789409</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:25:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789409</guid><dc:creator>Dicky V</dc:creator><description>Prediction: &amp;nbsp;The next Mark Penn memo will be on how Senator Clinton can't release her NCAA brackets until April 15 because she's too busy doing the people's work.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789415</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:26:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789415</guid><dc:creator>Lessons Learned </dc:creator><description>Wow! I'll bet you people from Ohio feel pretty dumb now: &amp;nbsp;Lessons learned: &amp;nbsp;Don't believe Clinton. &amp;nbsp;She lies!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789417</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:26:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789417</guid><dc:creator>Consistency of Obama’s inconsistencies </dc:creator><description>To: &amp;nbsp; Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Senator Ted Kennedy&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Senator John Kerry&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From: &amp;nbsp;An American Voter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RE: &amp;nbsp;Repetitive Pattern of Inconsistency of Sen. Barack Obama&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dear Madame Speaker, et al:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Obama is 100% ‘UNELECTABLE’ (very sad). His consistency of the inconsistency has left many voters to question his Judgment, Character and Leadership abilities to steer this country through very serious times! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TRUST IS GONE, period ! Once you no longer have trust (especially with the working class of this country), it is very very difficult to regain, if at all. In the remaining states, the voters are going to come out in huge numbers and crack this election wide open in favor of Sen. Clinton as many are finally realizing the inconsistencies of Sen. Obama is a repetitive pattern that leaves us all to question if this is “Change we can really believe in.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Superdeligates need to wake up and realize the scandals involving Sen. Obama will NOT soon be forgotten by the voters, nor will the scandals be swept quietly under the carpet and go away (as many in the media are hoping). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially, when Sen. Obama is willing to disenfranchise millions of voters to suit his specific needs when he stands at podium and claims he wants to “UNITE” America ! How is disenfranchising millions of voters ‘uniting’ America?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Makes absolutely no sense – again, we see a repetitive pattern of the consistency of the inconsistencies. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trust me, come November ---voters will remember and as such, MI and FL will go to McCain if Senator Clinton is not the democratic nominee. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you all willing to gamble the White House?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789418</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:26:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789418</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Instead of attacking Senator Clinton, Senator Obama should explain to the American people why his top economic policy advisor was telling the Canadians that his promise to fix NAFTA shouldn’t be taken seriously,&amp;quot; Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said in an email. &amp;quot;The fact is that independent accounts make clear that Senator Clinton did not support NAFTA and that she is the candidate Americans can trust to fix it.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;___________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because it can't be &amp;quot;just words&amp;quot; when they hurt someone and then be &amp;quot;JUST WORDS????????&amp;quot; when they uplift someone...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is Barack Obama lecturing all Americans about America's history? Over 600 thousands of soldiers died during American Civil War that led to end black slavery, not worth it? Every country had history of slaving people. The root of black slavery was African traders themselves from Africa that their economy depended solely on the trade with the Europeans to sell prisoners from warring bands. America has many accomplishments and failures in their history. For better or worst, America had strived and became a stronger country that many people around the world would like to come and live in America because of the opportunity. I believe African-Americans are given alot of opportunity that many are educated and successful. Those who are not lucky and blame the Americans or the Whites in America of racism has entirely absurd accusations. Maybe Barack Obama should address the black communities, parental responsibilities so every African-Americans can go to school then finish college than many blacks left uneducated and end up in streets becoming criminals.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789419</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:26:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789419</guid><dc:creator>Just Wondering</dc:creator><description>Has the Hillary camp given up on the lame line about &amp;quot;that's audacious but not hopeful&amp;quot;?</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789433</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:28:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789433</guid><dc:creator>Toby Higbie, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>A little context on the last point please. &amp;nbsp;As you've reported, the Canadians admitted that their report was a distortion, and suspicion is it was intended to sway the election.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789441</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:29:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789441</guid><dc:creator>Kris STL</dc:creator><description>How do Clinton supporters spin this!!! I mean she did wag her finger at Obama and act all hihg and mighty like he was lying about her record. How can you trust someone who can lie so easily and blame someone else for her short-comings. &amp;nbsp;I also noticed this article mentioned nothing about the story that it was the Clinton's givin the wink and the nod to the Canadians not the Obama team! Wussup w/ that FR!?</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789443</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:29:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789443</guid><dc:creator>Jaime, Lantana, FL</dc:creator><description>CLINTON told Canada to take her words on NAFTA &amp;quot;with a grain of salt.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Man! &amp;nbsp;These people are delusional!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789444</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:29:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789444</guid><dc:creator>Nashville_fan</dc:creator><description>Even though Senator Clinton has clearly been dishonest about NAFTA, I don't expect her to pay much of a price for it. Sadly, that is what America has come to expect from &amp;quot;the Clintons&amp;quot;, and for many of Senator Clinton's supporters, apparently this brazen ability to &amp;quot;fight&amp;quot; her way through any crisis, even if it is of her own making, is a positive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am really glad that all of this Reverend Wright stuff is coming out right now. Because I think it shows how Senator Obama responds to a crisis. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you &amp;nbsp;contrast the way Senator Obama responds to a crisis to the way Senator Clinton does, it speaks VOLUMES about their very different leadership styles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Obama recognizes differences, seeks common ground, and takes the high road. Senator Clinton recognizes differences, seeks to exploit them, and plays the victim. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know about the rest of America, but I've had enough of the low road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789447</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:30:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789447</guid><dc:creator>Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA</dc:creator><description>A Younger White Voter - ditto.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think her supporters do know her experience claims are bogus; they just don't care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But for the rest of us, it is funny to see her &amp;quot;shame on you&amp;quot; turned back at her. Not that it will matter, either, because obviously the monster isn't capable of shame.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789451</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:30:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789451</guid><dc:creator>just the facts ma'm</dc:creator><description>Nice try obama but you're twisting the facts again!! ....mrs clinton was NOT there at that meeting as an advisor, &amp;nbsp;and she wasn't there as an advocate...she was there &amp;nbsp;gathering facts and information (as any good future senator should) and she was gathering information on the ins and outs of the plan and how it would &amp;nbsp;effect the people of her perspective future state- New York....so, &amp;nbsp;as usual you got it wrong again and the good people of pennsylvania are too smart and not as simple minded as YOU make them out to be.....you should be concentrating on repairing your Rev Wright damage at this point!!!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789452</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:31:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789452</guid><dc:creator>Obama is the only MORAL Candidate, MD</dc:creator><description>H.R. Clinton, the most devisive Democrat ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Democratic with the highest &amp;quot;unlikeables&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When will she realize that America needs a visionary leader, one who is willing to LEAD rather than play ball. &amp;nbsp;When will she realize she is damaging the Democratic party with her tactics. &amp;nbsp;When will she realize its time to withdraw rather than continiuing to act un-Presidential just like W?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is the only candidate that embodies the President that we've all waited for watching the West Wing, The American President, Dave.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All Clinton reminds us of is Reese Witherspoons dispicable and slimy candidate in &amp;quot;Election&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789453</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:31:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789453</guid><dc:creator>colene, New York, New York</dc:creator><description>Integrity trumps skin color, people, every time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's time to get real.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789458</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:33:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789458</guid><dc:creator>Reality Check  </dc:creator><description>Hey &amp;quot;Consistency of Obama's Inconsistencies,&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just because you put your blather into an official-looking memo doesn't mean it has any basis in the facts. &amp;nbsp;You just wrote 10 paragraphs on utter conjecture and slander. &amp;nbsp; What a crock.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789466</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:34:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789466</guid><dc:creator>Terry, Great Plains</dc:creator><description>The Canadians claimed that Hillary informed them with a wink and nod on NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;It is confirmed that they sought out Obama's advisor and confirmed that Obama's advisors comment was consistent with his NAFTA position.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also clear is Hillary's experience in the White House in supporting NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;Where is the attack when the facts support the NAFTA position of both parties? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789469</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789469</guid><dc:creator>Nashville_fan</dc:creator><description>Dear patty, sd:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is not going to work. America is on to the &amp;quot;divide and conquer&amp;quot; routine. It's not about black versus white. It's about the &amp;quot;haves&amp;quot; versus the &amp;quot;have nots&amp;quot;. Always has been.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789477</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:35:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789477</guid><dc:creator>Get it right please</dc:creator><description>First read:&lt;br&gt;Can you please put an editorial after Singer's continued misrepresentation of the truth? &amp;nbsp;You let him say it as if it's true when the Canadian Government has officially said it is not.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789480</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:35:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789480</guid><dc:creator>adam/nyc</dc:creator><description>Hillary lied. It's proven. It's proven again, and again, and again, and again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789502</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:38:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789502</guid><dc:creator>Voter in PA</dc:creator><description>Is this the same Sen. Obama who stated that no one from his campaign met with Canadian officials regarding NAFTA prior to his debate with Sen. Clinton...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only to CHANGE his story to 'We did in fact meet, but it was at their request&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IS THIS THE SAME OBAMA??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ummm, sure is &amp;quot;Change&amp;quot; we can believe in!&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789508</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:38:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789508</guid><dc:creator>turnip</dc:creator><description>Independent accounts??!!! &amp;nbsp;You mean the First Lady's own records of her actions whhile in the White House are not to be believed?</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789527</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:41:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789527</guid><dc:creator>Jerome, Parkesburg, PA</dc:creator><description>patty, sd, ca&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are amazing!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't bother reading anything else in these posts, I only search to find you and marvel at your stupidity.&lt;br&gt;Thankfully you have not failed us yet with any of your sad postings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have found Baghdad Bob ladies and gentleman! He now posts under the name of patty,sd,ca. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing you have said before or after this matters, but go ahead and knock yourself out. </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789528</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:41:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789528</guid><dc:creator>The end of the Democratic Party</dc:creator><description>Why would this surprise anyone? &amp;nbsp;The Clintons have always been liars, always will be liars, and have no respect for anything but themselves and their quest for power. &amp;nbsp;RIP Democratic Party....</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789549</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:43:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789549</guid><dc:creator>J, OH</dc:creator><description>First Read, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You need to talk about the Nafta thing better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was verified that the Clinton Camp first contacted the Canadians. Bill had been hanging around a Canadian official for a few days (some woman). &amp;nbsp;Then the Canadian embassy started hounding Obama's campaign to meet. The Canadian offical during the budget meeting said the Clinton's called them. &amp;nbsp;Then released this story and memo against Obama, right before voting, but that was later refuted. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a huge set up by the Clinton's right before Texas and Ohio.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789553</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:43:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789553</guid><dc:creator>obie, burtrum, mn</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;A little context on the last point please. &amp;nbsp;As you've reported, the Canadians admitted that their report was a distortion&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too would like followup on the Canadian storyline. &amp;nbsp;I remember that the source of the Canadian leak, the chief of staff of a bigshot, reportedly said the &amp;quot;wink and a nod&amp;quot; came from the Clinton campaign and not Obama. &amp;nbsp;What ever happened to that information? &amp;nbsp;Was it forgotten in the fuss over the Obama economic advisor's role? &amp;nbsp;I know this was big news in Canada for awhile, but barely covered a news cycle in the US.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clearly, this storyline changed the dynamics in Ohio. &amp;nbsp;Since it was that important, I would hope we would get to the bottom of it.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789556</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789556</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Tsai</dc:creator><description>Obama supporters:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no question that Senator Clinton has lied, is lying, and will continue to lie to get votes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The question is: do you think voters really care? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take a look at who is in office right now. It's clear that many voters don't want an honest person in office. If the majority of the Democratic electorate indicates that they would rather have the liar they know than an honest person that they do not know, then this is the &amp;quot;wisdom&amp;quot; of the crowd.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789565</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789565</guid><dc:creator>Sara, Michigan</dc:creator><description>HRC is a liar, and will never be my president.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ABC (Anyone But Clinton) '08!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789568</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789568</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>Obama Camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;It's about time! &amp;nbsp;She will do anything to win. How about going after Clinton on Mr. Peter Paul? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote Obama 08!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789570</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789570</guid><dc:creator>Kym</dc:creator><description>Why does the media keep letting Clinton get away with blaming Obama for whispering to the Canadian government when SHE was the one who did it? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More importantly, Senator Clinton RELEASE your brackets. &lt;br&gt;We want transparency (Sent Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:24 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LMAO at that post about the brackets!!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789580</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:46:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789580</guid><dc:creator>Noel, Hot Springs ,AR</dc:creator><description>Define independent sources. &amp;nbsp;Are these the same kind of independent sources that wanted to buy a primary in Michigan?</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789584</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:46:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789584</guid><dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator><description>First read: &lt;br&gt;Can you please put an editorial after Singer's continued misrepresentation of the truth? &amp;nbsp;You let him say it as if it's true when the Canadian Government has officially said it is not. &lt;br&gt;Get it right please (Sent Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:35 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree firstread, you need to at least report the facts as they had been presented and say that the canadian embassy said it was not true and that Clinton camp actually called them.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789587</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:47:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789587</guid><dc:creator>Shtuey</dc:creator><description>Here's what David Gergen, who was present at the meeting in question, has to say about then First Lady Hillary Clinton's view.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I was actually there in the Clinton White House during the NAFTA fight and I must tell you Hillary Clinton was extremely unenthusiastic about NAFTA. And I think that’s putting it mildly. I’m not sure she objected to all the provisions of it but she just didn’t see why her husband and that White House had to go and do that fight. She was very unhappy about it and wanted to move on to health care. So I do think there’s some justification for her camp saying, you know, she’s never been a great backer for NAFTA.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once again, Chuck Todd is trying to clobber Clinton with a whole lot of nothing. &amp;nbsp;Now why don't we get back to talking about how Barack Obama is unelectable in November because he is a duplicitous lying fraud who has surrounded himself with racist and anti-semitic ne'er do wells.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789591</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:47:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789591</guid><dc:creator>Geoff in Brooklyn</dc:creator><description>NOTE that the CLinton team's response statement re-iterates the lie that she &amp;quot;did not support NAFTA.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Well, the ABCnews story quotes several who were at the mtg references int he schedule docs as saying she STRONGLY supported it. &amp;nbsp;Someone is lying. &amp;nbsp;Gee, I wonder who.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789600</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:47:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789600</guid><dc:creator>C A, Tuscaloosa, AL</dc:creator><description>These are all mote points. The race is over. And if the Clintons try and do something underhanded to try and steal this nomination the you know what will hit the fan. There will be chaos at the convention, thousands will walk out and Hillary can forget getting any votes from Obama supporters. There will be a backlash like nothing you have seen before from the &amp;quot;majority&amp;quot; of people who will have voted for Obama. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To all voters in States yet to hold primaries and to all yet uncommitted superdelegates:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is time to get behind a single candidate so that we can get out of this war in Iraq: give those deserving a tax break: improve our public school system; work towards national health care at least initially for all children and seniors; provide help to those wishing to attend college; eliminate the influence of special interest as those who support and fund Hillary; and move forward with a progressive agenda for this country including improved race relations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is time to get behind Obama and give the guy some time to prepare his battle against McCain which he can win. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Special Note: I see that the Obama camp has proposed a plan to seat the delegates in Michigan and just splitting the Michigan delegate vote. The Clinton camp has declined. So now tell me all you Hillary supporters that she is more concerned for the rights of voters then she is for her own gain. Now that is unAmercian. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789612</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:48:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789612</guid><dc:creator>Tuck,ks</dc:creator><description>no , the Canadians didn't say anything about a distortion, They instigated a full investigation into who leaked the memo show&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OBAMA CONDEMNED NAFTA THEN TOLD THE CANADIANS IT WAS JUST CAMPAIGN RHETORIC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;obama, he cant' be trusted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BUt thanks for the link showing CLinton has more exectutive experience, and obamamama has none</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789613</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:49:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789613</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan Capehart</dc:creator><description>Looks like the chickens have come home to roost for Obama. Down in every poll. He's more unpopular then Bush, and is just ahead of Charles Manson. And Manson is giving a speech on race relations later today, you know, a gift from himself to all of us.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789614</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:49:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789614</guid><dc:creator>Drew hanson, Arlington, Tx</dc:creator><description>The writing is on the wall and the light at the end of the tunnel is making it clear to read. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks like this: Obama Versus McCain&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well done Obama !!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can count on this 53 year old Irish/Swedish male's vote !!! </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789618</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:49:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789618</guid><dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator><description>About time the main stream media points out the facts on Hillary and NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other media outlets have quotes from people attending the meeting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Hillary was responsible for deciding who would attend the November 1993 meeting and who would not.&lt;br&gt;2) Hillary was in charge of swinging women to vote for NAFTA.&lt;br&gt;3) These attendees have said they are shocked that Hillary is saying she strongly opposed NAFTA all along. They would never have voted for NAFTA had she not persuaded them.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789662</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:53:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789662</guid><dc:creator>New Independent</dc:creator><description>Does anyone else notice that the Clinton campaign NEVER answers a question? &amp;nbsp;Instead they change the question and say ask Obama this or that. &amp;nbsp;When they asked why Clinton hasn't released her tax records yet, they said ask Obama to release his Illinois records?? &amp;nbsp;Answer the questions already!!! &amp;nbsp;And why doesn't the media remind everyone that it was the Clinton campaign that contacted Canada NOT Obama?</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#789670</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:53:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789670</guid><dc:creator>Enrique, Chicago</dc:creator><description>Just like with the Iraq war, Hillary has changed her position on NAFTA. If Hillary manages to steal the nomination, Republicans will tear her down. She does not have a consistent policy on Iraq and now it's clear that she lied to the voters in Ohio on her position on NAFTA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition, these 11,000 documents give no proof of the foreign policy &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; that she claims to have. Republicans will call out Hillary for padding her resume. </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790023</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:38:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790023</guid><dc:creator>LB, Virginia</dc:creator><description>I have New Independent! I keep writing reporters and asking them: why don't you stick with your question until either Clinton herself, that horrible Howard character, or Mark Penn ANSWER the question asked. It's frustrating for us out here because we don't have any power to ask and force answere to the questions and we are desperate just to hear them answer one, just one directly. And we don't want some &amp;quot;around April 15&amp;quot; kind of answer!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patty sd: sweetheart, you seriously need to 1) go back to school or 2) stay in school. The errors in your post are so glaring, you are giving a bad name to Hillary supporters? For example, it is ENslaving; it's &amp;quot;her&amp;quot; history (America's) and on and on. You show your true colors in these two lines: totally blaming the African slave traders for the trade (sorry there was WHITE market for them) and accusing blacks for not pulling themselves up by their bootstrings with all the generous, white help! That is Bush 101, not the democratic way! Wake up and try and attend 1) A US civil rights history course and 2)get some help with your grammar. it's painful for the rest of us. Of course, if your texting from your cell phone while in 10th grade English, I understand the errors!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790097</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:48:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790097</guid><dc:creator>ron, California</dc:creator><description>The Wright Stand&lt;br&gt;Judgment, character and Barack Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By Peter Wehner&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Several years ago my wife and children attended a Presbyterian church in Washington, D.C. We liked and respected the senior pastor, we had close friends in the congregation, and we felt spiritually nourished by the congregants and the worship. Two of our children were baptized there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not long after the attacks of September 11, my wife and I heard two different visitors — one in remarks during a church service, the other while teaching an adult Sunday-school class — that were derogatory of and inflammatory toward Israel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Upon hearing the words of these two people — which I found both shocking and disquieting — I immediately raised concerns with the senior pastor. He tried to reassure me and then put me in touch with an associate pastor who was in charge of a ministry to Palestinian Christians (one I had been previously unaware of). I engaged in conversations and written correspondence with the associate pastor and the head of the board of elders over this issue; in the process, I discovered that our church hosted an annual conference which featured only speakers who were highly critical of the state of Israel. For the first time it became clear to me that the church we attended was deeply biased against the Jewish state. When what we deemed to be adequate counter steps were not taken, we left the church, in good measure because of this matter and how it was handled. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought of this episode in our lives in the aftermath of learning about the bigoted and vicious anti-American statements by Barack Obama’s pastor, friend, and spiritual adviser, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright Jr. of United Trinity Church of Christ.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don’t for a moment believe that Senator Obama shares Wright’s manifold and manifest hatreds. What bothers me — particularly as one who has had good things to say about Obama in the past — is why Obama apparently never raised any concerns with Wright about his rhetoric or the black liberation theology being practiced at United Trinity. This was the obvious and appropriate thing to do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reverend Wright clearly preaches from a particular cast of mind, one with which Obama was surely familiar. If Obama isn’t willing to voice his concerns and objections with Wright and stand up for his country as it is being slandered by his pastor, what can we expect from Obama when he is asked to stand up against some of the world’s worst dictators?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The options aren’t particularly good for Senator Obama. He either agreed with the views and core beliefs of Reverend Wright, which would essentially disqualify him as a serious candidate for the presidency; or he didn’t agree with Wright but for decades sat passively by and accepted Wright’s teaching and rants. Didn’t Obama consider, even once, pulling Wright aside and pointing out — as any true friend would, in a civil but forceful way — that hailstones of hate simply have no place in a church and that the “social gospel” is not synonymous with preaching bigotry and anti-Americanism?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beyond that, Senator Obama’s speech on Tuesday, for all the praise it has garnered in many quarters, created additional doubts about Obama’s candor and his willingness to speak up and speak out against a charismatic, forceful, and pernicious figure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ABC News reports that earlier this month Obama, at a community meeting in Nelsonville, Ohio, said, “I don’t think my church is actually particularly controversial.” Obama went on to say, “[Wright] has said some things that are considered controversial because he’s considered that part of his social gospel; so he was one of the leaders in calling for divestment from South Africa and some other issues like that.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last Friday, as Senator Obama was making the round on cable TV trying to explain Wright’s remarks that were being replayed over and over again, Obama indicated that he had never heard his pastor of 20 years make any comments that were anti-American until last week. But in his Philadelphia speech two days ago, Senator Obama seemed to change his explanation:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely — just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is where things begin to get sticky for Obama. In half-a-month we’ve gone from Wright and his church being essentially non-controversial; to Obama implying that the venomous statements by Wright came as news to him; to admitting that he was in the pews when Wright spoke as a “an occasionally fierce critic” of American domestic and foreign policy. Those remarks were so fierce that even Obama, himself an orthodox liberal who has scorched the Bush administration, was clearly made uncomfortable by what Wright said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also begs the question: What exactly did Wright say that Obama strongly disagreed with? Was Wright in fact presenting a “profoundly distorted view of this country”? The odds are a good deal better than even that he was. But Obama has yet to answer those questions — and he probably won’t, at least with any specificity, unless he’s forced to do so. This story, which seemingly changes in every re-telling, is beginning to resemble nothing so much as Bill Clinton’s evolving explanation about his draft notice. It was then that most of America was introduced to “Slick Willie.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Obama’s speech on Tuesday was a brilliant effort to deflect attention away from what remains the core issue: what did Obama hear, when did he hear it, and what did he do about it? The answers, as best we can tell at this stage, is that Obama heard some very harsh things said from the pulpit of Trinity United Church of Christ; that Obama heard them said a long time ago and probably repeatedly; and that he did little or nothing about it. This from a man who tells us at almost every stop along the campaign trail that he has the “judgment to lead.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One always wants to be careful about making sweeping conclusions about any individual, particularly one as interesting and compelling as Senator Obama. All of us, in replaying our lives, would change certain things. We would all hope to show more integrity, more courage, more honor. Nevertheless, in a presidential campaign we have to judge based on the available evidence. And given his deep and long-standing association with Reverend Wright, it is fair to ask whether Senator Obama — a gifted writer and speaker and a man of obvious intelligence and appeal — has the appropriate judgment and character to lead this nation. Spending 20 years at Trinity United Church of Christ under the leadership of Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. doesn’t tell us everything we need to know about Barack Obama — but it may well tell us enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;— Peter Wehner, former deputy assistant to the president, is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790130</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:52:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790130</guid><dc:creator>Chris, MI</dc:creator><description>What's the big deal?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So Hillary was for NAFTA before she was against it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's the kind of tactic that always leads to victory!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh wai...</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790131</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:52:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790131</guid><dc:creator>ge``pa`</dc:creator><description>Dear ME,CA -- I think you are drinking too much spiked Koolaid....You are hallucinating.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790151</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:55:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790151</guid><dc:creator>Mark. Cleveland, Ohio</dc:creator><description>LMAO at the brackets comment. &amp;nbsp;We all needed that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do agree with several of the posters that the media has a responsibility to report the official stance of the government which is that Obama did NOT &amp;quot;wink&amp;quot; them on NAFTA talk. &amp;nbsp;Of course, what would the trolls and haters have if it wasn't for that? &amp;nbsp;oh yeah, the Wright issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'd think the most honest and brave speech on race relations in our generation would quell them, but it is never good enough. &amp;nbsp;Oh well let them carry their baggage of hate around with them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am an Ohio voter and I voted Obama. &amp;nbsp;Why? I didn't trust Hillary on NAFTA and I was right. &amp;nbsp;Penn. voters have the luxury of forsight that most Ohio voters did not have. &amp;nbsp;Don't make the mistake many Democrats made here by believing her spin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someone posted that their wife lost 20 pounds going to Mark Penn's spin class. &amp;nbsp;Another great post and true.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790152</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:55:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790152</guid><dc:creator>Jim Black</dc:creator><description>Really, is anyone not sick of hearing what patty,sd,ca has to say? MSNBC should ban her so we have have a productive conversation, without her spewing her nonsense. </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790158</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:56:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790158</guid><dc:creator>Campdog</dc:creator><description>The Obama camp is very good at going after people that don't agree with them. &amp;nbsp;The problem is they are inconsistent and selective in who they criticize and for what.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier to day I read in a First Read Post, “During an interview with the New Bedford Standard Times, portions of which were posted on YouTube, John Kerry says bluntly that Barack Obama has the potential to “bridge the divide in religious extremism” because he is black”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I didn’t know Black individuals had been endowed by their creator with special powers of negociaton. &amp;nbsp;Is Kerry saying that because Obama is black he is better able to deliver a message that would otherwise be unacceptable if it were delivered by a white person?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it possible that Obama has a lead because his message is better received by a certain segment of the population because he is Black? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So it isn’t the content of the message but the color of the skin that counts with some people. &amp;nbsp;Yes John, we know that. &amp;nbsp;These people are called racists. &amp;nbsp;And the point you make is pretty much the same as the point Ferraro was making when she was slammed and smeared by the Obama camp as they labeled her a racist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So why haven’t we seen any posts from Obama supporters calling John Kerry a racist? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790168</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:56:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790168</guid><dc:creator>MARYLOU JONES, LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ.</dc:creator><description>OBAMA'S GOOD JUDGMENT?? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have an example for you. It's a little drawn out, but hear me out because it makes sense.&lt;br&gt;When I was in the military there was a list the commander would keep on the board where everyone could see(and there was much command-to-soldier speak of abiding by it), it said &amp;quot;OFF LIMITS AREAS&amp;quot;. These were areas that soldiers were legally prohibited by the military to go(and in most cases, for the protection of the soldier).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Included on that &amp;quot;OFF LIMITS AREAS&amp;quot; list was anyplace that publicly (or even to a large congregation behind closed doors) displayed or preached any type of racially motivated extremism and/or any other kind of &amp;quot;audacious&amp;quot; and over the top style of hate breeding. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I'm quite positive that our military units very very quickly added Obama's Church to their &amp;quot;OFF LIMITS AREAS&amp;quot; lists, after the other day when the news came out about Pastor Wright and how he not only &amp;quot;G*d D*med America&amp;quot; to hell, but also blamed the USA for 9/11, and so completely slandered(with utter racism), the former First Lady(and 2 term senator, and Candidate for President) of these United States of America.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note: The Commander in Chief of the Military is the President, and the President sets very high standards for the conduct of our Armed Forces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now hear this: American citizens rightfully enjoy the freedoms of our Constitution(provided by the many hundreds of thousands of Americans who paid the ultimate price(as in death)fighting for their country's freedom), and are given the right to speak freely, and to seek the religious counsel of whatever institution they believe in, and this is a TOTALLY AWESOME founding principle for the USA. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But for a person who seeks to be the #1 Patriot of the land, the person who is trying to become the Commander in Chief and President, this person(family actually) simply has to hold the highest standard of Unity and respect for all people in the land. In other words, associating with an extremist organization for 20 years, completely disqualifies a person from being the President, and rightfully so I might add.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama has failed the test of ultimate loyalty to America(by dedicating 20 years to a hate breeder), and therefore cannot become the #1 Patriot of America. Think about it, it's impossible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Obama's timing for making this colossal mistake could not be worse, as if he were to be selected for the Primary, he would be up against a person that is a highly decorated American War Hero and 5&amp;amp;1/2 year POW (Senator John McCain(since 1987)) (see his wikipedia entry for Military Accomplishments here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain#Militar"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain#Militar&lt;/a&gt; y). Democrats everywhere are gonna realize this sooner or later, and when they do, they will realize that Obama cannot win. If Democrats get on the right track, and select Hillary as the Democratic Candidate, she at least may have a chance against McCain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What makes me so embroiled with my comments is that the nation has vested SO MUCH into Obama and he has completely and utterly failed us. It's a shame to all of those who are credible.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790174</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:56:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790174</guid><dc:creator>SMP, Morristown, NJ</dc:creator><description>As it turns out, in the end, the Canadian NAFTA issue was NOT Clinton. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gNMJKvj5eQRQBNSeQj3bTyETSagQ"&gt;http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gNMJKvj5eQRQBNSeQj3bTyETSagQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, if you recall, Obama denied the meeting ever took place for several days. &amp;nbsp;Then, the truth came out and then he disputed the &amp;quot;characterization&amp;quot; of the meeting. &amp;nbsp;Who is lieing and doing anything to get elected?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jrFPkleRZmbmPtPxHBGNAPSzfUtwD8V5OLP00"&gt;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jrFPkleRZmbmPtPxHBGNAPSzfUtwD8V5OLP00&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790196</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:58:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790196</guid><dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator><description>MSNBC, thank you for picking up this story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm glad someone finally asked questions about Hillary's private NAFTA meeting in 1993. There were rumors about this meeting several months ago, but main stream media would not cover it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will America listen now that the meeting attendees themselves are saying Hillary was a major reason NAFTA was passed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt it. Hillary's been caught lying so many times, but America doesn't care.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790201</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790201</guid><dc:creator>donna, pgh., pa.</dc:creator><description>Clinton and McCain do not want to run against Obama on issues. They will try to keep the waters muddied with anything but. He is too dynamic for their wrong-headed, stale, ineptitude. That's right Barack. Take it to 'em on the issues. They can't handle you, and they,as well as, their campaign handlers know it.&lt;br&gt;Pulling for Obama '08</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790261</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:04:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790261</guid><dc:creator>MARYLOU JONES, LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ.</dc:creator><description>AND NOW THE TRUTH: UPDATE: The Clinton campaign has asked that I post this recent quote on CNN from Mr. Gergen, referenced above, saying, &amp;quot;I was actually there in the Clinton White House during the NAFTA fight and I must tell you Hillary Clinton was extremely unenthusiastic about NAFTA. And I think that’s putting it mildly. I’m not sure she objected to all the provisions of it but she just didn’t see why her husband and that White House had to go and do that fight. She was very unhappy about it and wanted to move on to health care. So I do think there’s some justification for her camp saying, you know, she’s never been a great backer for NAFTA.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790271</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:06:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790271</guid><dc:creator>bhagwan deol irvine , california</dc:creator><description>2008 may be the darkest year in the history of the democratic party and may be america too.&lt;br&gt;if americans voters can be persuaded by empty rhetoric then GOD BLESS AMERICA.&lt;br&gt;senator obama has been claiming to be an honest outsider and claiming to unite america but RESULTS ARE OPPOSITE. HE IS A PERSISTENT POLISHED LIER WHO CAN NEVER UNITE AMERICA BY EMPTY RHETORIC.&lt;br&gt;IF DEMOCRAT VOTERS GET HOODWINKED AND NOMINATE HIM THEN THERE WILL MCCAIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO FOLLOW THE SAME RUINOUS PATH OF BUSH.&lt;br&gt;OBAMA MISSED THE BOAT TO GET VP SPOT. HE CAN NO LONGER USE RACE TO HIS ADVANTAGE&lt;br&gt;bhagwan deol. irvine. ca</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790282</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:07:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790282</guid><dc:creator>Lets Read</dc:creator><description>You can find all about it in a widely under-read article in the September 2007 issue of Mother Jones, in which Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet reported that &amp;quot;through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as the &amp;quot;Fellowship,&amp;quot; aka The Family. But it won't be a secret much longer. Jeff Sharlet's shocking expos&amp;#233;, The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power will be published in May.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790315</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:10:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790315</guid><dc:creator>Stewart, Bethesda, MD</dc:creator><description>STRAWS...STRAWS....STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...STRAWS...</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790317</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:11:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790317</guid><dc:creator>Anne from OHIO</dc:creator><description>Can anyone please tell me what was so awful about the 90's? &lt;br&gt;Economy was stable.... &lt;br&gt;401ks were holding up well.... &lt;br&gt;people had money in their pockets... &lt;br&gt;WHAT was so awful about this? &amp;nbsp;Clinton took a deficit and turned it into a surplus within 3 years... &lt;br&gt;WHAT WAS SO BAD ABOUT THIS ??? &lt;br&gt;PA Voter (Sent Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:23 AM)&lt;br&gt;Dear PA Voter,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are right the 90’s went bad, but only thanks to Bill Clinton. His wife was busy with the Travel Gate and getting herself into a lot of trouble. Do we really want another republican in the White House? That is what will happen if Hillary is the nominee; the republicans will have a field day with her because of her long history in DC. They know too much about her, and know a lot of her skeletons! Just remember It was her husbands presidency not hers, she only made trouble for herself and the republicans will remember that and will use it against her in the fall. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790359</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790359</guid><dc:creator>SCJ CA</dc:creator><description>Come on, Obama! Don't let her manipulate again!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're down in the polls, and misguided folks are taking away the wrong points from your spot-on honest and eloquent speech.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Play to WIN. &amp;nbsp;Get this out there loud and clear. Go on late night talk shows. Whatever. Just do it. Please.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790373</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:16:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790373</guid><dc:creator>Eric, Cincinnati OH</dc:creator><description>There is nothing wrong with changing your position if events change. &amp;nbsp;What is wrong is to lie and say you were against it all along when you weren't. &amp;nbsp;I really hope the media does not let her get away with a lie that won her Ohio. &amp;nbsp;Shame on you Senator Clinton</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790380</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:17:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790380</guid><dc:creator>Heartlight 3, Maui, Hawaii</dc:creator><description>I have heard many allegations about the corporate owned media manipulating the news to promote their agenda. &amp;nbsp;I prefer not to believe that that is true, but it is very difficult to maintain that hope when I see the MSM continuing to report things as fact that have clearly been disproved. &amp;nbsp;I don't understand how they can justify that to themselves without feeling slimy. &amp;nbsp;I would like to have respect for the authors of First Read, but when I see things like this,I have a hard time sustaining that respect.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790397</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:20:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790397</guid><dc:creator>Black American, Texas</dc:creator><description>The Super delegates will soon have a caucas. I hope they go with public sentiment. Obama will lose a general election. Not only because the $250,000 he had to give to charity because given by Rezko, but silently approving of Rev. Wrights inappropriate statements but also his assocaition with Willaim Ayers. WHAT DOES THIS SPELL! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need to come toegther behind one candidate to stop the bleeding George Bush is causing like a 1 trillion dollar war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People - Read My Lips - No more republicans!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Write your the superdelegates in your state to support Senator Clinton!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790410</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:22:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790410</guid><dc:creator>Black American, Texas</dc:creator><description>The Super delegates will soon have a caucas. I hope they go with public sentiment. Obama will lose a general election. Not only because the $250,000 he had to give to charity because given by Rezko, but silently approving of Rev. Wrights inappropriate statements but also his assocaition with Willaim Ayers. WHAT DOES THIS SPELL! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need to come toegther behind one candidate to stop the bleeding George Bush is causing like a 1 trillion dollar war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People - Read My Lips - No more republicans!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Write your the superdelegates in your state to support Senator Clinton!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790417</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:23:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790417</guid><dc:creator>ge`pa``</dc:creator><description>To: Reality Check -- posted thursday march 20, 1:33 pm.======== &amp;nbsp;You better check your own Reality -- Reality will happen this Nov. -- When John Mcain wins.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790470</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:30:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790470</guid><dc:creator>Jay Cee Morristown, New Jersey</dc:creator><description>The Media, Hillary Clinton, John Mcain, Bill Clinton and only God Knows who else is doing everything that is possible to defame Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My question is when are all of you bloggers, members of the media bring to the public the suit of Paul VS Clinton as you have about Rev. Wrights thirty second bites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the election in Penn there is a possibility tha by the time the North Carolina Primary she might be indicted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In closing I will sY TO All of Obamas supporters No Weapon formed against him will succeed.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790537</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:40:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790537</guid><dc:creator>Doles, Miami, FL</dc:creator><description>Patty, SD, CA, you might be too old to go to school now but it's always good to stay silent and listen. &amp;nbsp;It's the best way one can educate yourself. &amp;nbsp;I sometimes dream of the past, however I realize that we can only look forward to the future. &amp;nbsp;I understand how you feel. &amp;nbsp;Longing for the past will not make you any less miserable than you are now. &amp;nbsp;The only thing that can save you from the bitterness is to embrace reality and understand most people are looking foward to the future.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790544</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:41:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790544</guid><dc:creator>voice of reason, PA</dc:creator><description>Oh Barack, don't bring up another issue that'll make you shot yourself in the foot once again. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should explain why your top economic policy advisor was telling the Canadians that his promise to fix NAFTA shouldn’t be taken seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this the best you can do after aligning yourself with hate mongering Wright? I can't believe that man will have a chance to have access in the White House IF you get elected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now MSNBC I know this isn't exactly for Obama but be fair and post this. </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790545</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:41:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790545</guid><dc:creator>zb</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/hillarys-nasty-pastorate_b_92361.html"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/hillarys-nasty-pastorate_b_92361.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MSNBC YOU NEED TO PUT THIS UP AND LET US KNOW IF ITS THE TRUTH!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary's secretive Capitol Hill Bible study group THE FAMILY.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790548</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:42:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790548</guid><dc:creator>Carolyn Davis , Alexandria Va. </dc:creator><description>I think Ms. Clinton is very deceptive, she has a mean streak. She's all smiles in front of the cameras and plotting behind the camera's. She contacted the Canadians and she's behind the scandal concerning Obamas preacher. I dont trust her or her husband. She will do anything to get what she wants. She lies with a smile. </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790555</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:43:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790555</guid><dc:creator>Long Tall Texan</dc:creator><description>The Real Question is: Why isn't the media agressively pursuing this issue of lying about NAFTA in Ohio with Clinton, and questioning her on it?</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790576</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:47:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790576</guid><dc:creator>Lynda Reid, Dallas, TExas</dc:creator><description>This is not surprising - the Clinton's will do and say whatever it takes to win - hoping the truth will not come out. &amp;nbsp;Her statement that she never actively supported or helped &amp;quot;push it through&amp;quot; has been found out to be as many other things she states - a lie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790584</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:48:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790584</guid><dc:creator>Joyce, Pa</dc:creator><description>The distortion of Obama's 'holier than thou' camp is just sickening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary has said numerous times that she would call for an end to the tax code incentives given to businesses that ship jobs overseas.&lt;br&gt;How does Barack plan to enforce his mandate that all children have healthcare? Go after wages? He hasn't even said. Why not??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does Obama even care about trade issues before? He can't even hold a meeting concerning national security - even as he is the alledged chair of sub comittee on European relations and the Afghanistan security issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hilary while campaigning was able to attend at least 2 of them. Barack was absent 48% in the senate while McCain was out 54% of the time. Guess who has the most attendance WHILE campaigning? Hilary was out only 24% of the time!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So who is truly concerned about solving problems in this Country? She rolls up her sleeves and gets to the bottom of issues. Sure Nafta needs work, and she is going to work on it, not just wink wink her way to resolving them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really hope MSNBC gets to post this.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790593</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790593</guid><dc:creator>Tiffany - Glenwood, IL</dc:creator><description>Patty, I am an African American woman &amp;amp; I am very OFFENDED by your comments. &amp;nbsp;How dare YOU try to provide a lesson on American history? &amp;nbsp;It's obvious from your comments you have not a clue. &amp;nbsp;This country was built on the backs of African American &amp;amp; MILLIONS lost their lives being transported to this country and murdered in this country, not 600,000, MILLIONS. &amp;nbsp;I'm not taking away from the lives lost during the Civil War but please don't act like that ended the horrible atrocities African Americans incurred &amp;amp; indured. Peasants, indentured servants, lower ranking members of the aristrocracy came to this country to escape a caste system and enacted the same system they were escaping on African Americans a&amp;amp; attempted to do to Native Americans. &amp;nbsp;Please do not speak to the history of African Americans when you know nothing of what it means to be black in this country. &amp;nbsp;Now I digress because you managed to finally irritate me as I read your posts of the last week.&lt;br&gt;From the reports I've read on the Canadian news sites (Yes, I've done something called research) I've found and our media has also reported that is was the Clinton campaign that called Canadian officals that the would just be giving the &amp;quot;wink-wink&amp;quot; to the American public on NAFTA. &amp;nbsp;The Clinton campaign is continuing to lie on this issue. &amp;nbsp;I understand this is politics but please know that not all Americans are afraid to go and research an answer to get to the real truth. &amp;nbsp;The Canadian government actually have an investigation going on trying to find who leaked the controversial memo and also issued an apology to the Obama camp.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790604</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:51:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790604</guid><dc:creator>Take 2</dc:creator><description>Nothing worse then padding your Bra Hillary and then your padding falls out while bowing for your nomination!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790618</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:53:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790618</guid><dc:creator>PhilZ,  Hilo, Hawaii</dc:creator><description>Obviously Hillary lied to the voters in Ohio about NAFTA, pointing the finger at Obama &amp;quot;I'll see you in Ohio, Barack Obama!&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then she had Geraldine Ferraro trotted-out to say Obama was winning just because he's a black man. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Her campaign strategist, Mark Penn is one of the country's well-known lobbyists for major pharmaceutical and nuclear power industries. He's the one who called Obama &amp;quot;Ken Starr&amp;quot;, when Obama demanded Hillary's tax records- which she still refuses to release.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These sleazy tactics demonstrate what politics under Hillary will look like for the next 8 years... just like Bush/Rove. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We, the public, want the tax records NOW Hillary. </description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790624</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:54:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790624</guid><dc:creator>Kevin, SF, CA</dc:creator><description>You know, Democrats should be ashamed that it is in fact Clinton who wink and nodded to the Canadian government. She is using the same dirty politics and has now started to successfully drag Obama down.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we allow her to succeed, this will be the end of the only sane party left. The Democrats used to be about progress, equality, and integrity. With the Clintons, we get double-talk, divisiveness, and finger pointing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite the recent downturn of Obama's popularity, I am sticking with him. Is he flawed? Yes. But he sure has hell has more integrity and honor than Hillary.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790667</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:00:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790667</guid><dc:creator>BIGOLDTEXAN</dc:creator><description>Foreign Policy Experience?&lt;br&gt;But the calendars also seem to show that, on occasion, Mrs. Clinton was not substantively involved with foreign affairs when a real 3 a.m. crisis hit the White House. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take, for example, when Al Qaeda terrorists bombed the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, killing hundreds of people. Mrs. Clinton’s schedule does not show any foreign policy meetings in the aftermath of the crisis, only a trip to Andrews Air Force Base to console victims and their families as they returned from Africa to the United States. And when, in retaliation for those embassy attacks, President Clinton bombed Al Qaeda terrorist camps in Afghanistan, where was Mrs. Clinton? The records show that she was vacationing at a “private residence” in Martha’s Vineyard, Ma., and had no official events. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Foreign trips offer a mixed review of Mrs. Clinton’s national-security experience. On a trip to Japan and Korea in 1993, for example, her schedule was filled with teas, tours of gardens and other traditional first lady fare. And on a trip to Russia in 1994, Mrs. Clinton met with other first ladies and attended coffees and tours, separate from her husband or the Russian president. Clinton campaign spokesman Carson described the calendars as only a “guide,” and said that they “of course cannot reflect all of Senator Clinton's activities as First Lady.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, on overseas trips in 1996, Mrs. Clinton held &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; meetings with foreign heads of state in Greece, Turkey, and Bosnia--without the president's attendance. And on dozens of times throughout her White House years, she attended White House meetings with Cabinet secretaries, was briefed by senior National Security Council officials and met with foreign dignitaries from around the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790761</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:14:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790761</guid><dc:creator>j branch, saranac lake,ny</dc:creator><description>I am a 45 yr old white catholic conservative WOMAN who thinks that this whole country has gone mad!!! O'bama is getting my vote. Nafta has been a disasterous experiment for this country. The only people who profited from it were the Clintons.Let us not forget that these are the same people who rented out the Lincoln bedroom for $14,000 a night to their hollywood friends. Whitewater and travelgate seem to mean nothing? Lets bring some integrity back to OUR White House and try to be a little more savy in our political convictions.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790801</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:21:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790801</guid><dc:creator>Shadow, Rhinelander, WI</dc:creator><description>Ohio is over and done. &amp;nbsp;Let's spread this information all over Pennsylvania and the other remaining states. &amp;nbsp;Send it to all the media.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790808</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:22:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790808</guid><dc:creator>A Charles, LA, CA</dc:creator><description>patty,sd,ca you ignorance is appalling. It's fine to lie about politics, as you do, but insult African Americans is just wrong. Let's send your inbred children to schools that are basically underfunded prisons for a few generations. At the same time, let's see how well they raise their children living in ghettos filled with other frustrated, under priviledged people. You are what makes people ashamed of the USA, shelfishness wrapped in shamelessness.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790812</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:23:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790812</guid><dc:creator>Nashville Lady</dc:creator><description>does nobody care that if you people elect Hilary the United States of America will have 24 years of being in two families hands. &amp;nbsp;We have already been in Clinton and Bush hands for twenty years, where are we in the world today, what is our standing in the world is it better? &amp;nbsp;Are we in better shape after 20 years of Clinton and Bush? &amp;nbsp;I think not and yet you want to give them at least 4 more years and maybe 8. &amp;nbsp;I know this was not what our founding Fathers had in mind a two family dictatorship. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790818</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:24:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790818</guid><dc:creator>M.C.</dc:creator><description>Amazing Obama lies about NAFTA/Canada contact, trying to have it both ways. Then wants to make it an issue, saying Clinton did the same thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then lies straight-up about Wright on Thursday, but 5 days later gives a speech telling all of America it is racist if it doe not believe him and &amp;quot;lay off&amp;quot; Wright.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now if only someone would ask Obama. Why, given Wrights diatribes and profane blasphemy, was he Obama) the first presidential candidate to call for the firing of Don Imus?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not defending Imus, his remark was in defensible.&lt;br&gt;I am asking, do Obama's call and his statements re his daughters (below) not constitute hypocrisy? Was he not &amp;quot;worshiping in a Glass Church while throwing stones&amp;quot;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an interview with Jack Tapper (ABC) titled &amp;quot;Obama: Fire Imus&amp;quot;, dated April 11, 2007, Obama was the First White House Contender to Call for Imus' Firing Over Racial Slur. Text follows:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an interview with ABC News Wednesday afternoon, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., called for the firing of talk radio host Don Imus. Obama said he would never again appear on Imus' show, which is broadcast on CBS Radio and MSNBC television. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus,&amp;quot; Obama told ABC News, &amp;quot;but I would also say that there's nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama said he appeared once on Imus' show two years ago, and &amp;quot;I have no intention of returning.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;He didn't just cross the line,&amp;quot; Obama said. &amp;quot;He fed into some of the worst stereotypes that my two young daughters are having to deal with today in America. The notions that as young African-American women -- who I hope will be athletes -- that that somehow makes them less beautiful or less important. It was a degrading comment. It's one that I'm not interested in supporting.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though every major presidential candidate has decried the racist remarks, Obama is the first one to say Imus should lose his job for them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His proclamation was the latest in an ever-expanding list of bad news for Imus. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;What we've been seeing around this country is this constant ratcheting up of a coarsening of the culture that all of have to think about,&amp;quot; Obama said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Insults, humor that degrades women, humor that is based in racism and racial stereotypes isn't fun,&amp;quot; the senator told ABC News. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;And the notion that somehow it's cute or amusing, or a useful diversion, I think, is something that all of us have to recognize is just not the case. We all have First Amendment rights. And I am a constitutional lawyer and strongly believe in free speech, but as a culture, we really have to do some soul-searching to think about what kind of toxic information are we feeding our kids,&amp;quot; he concluded.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790835</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:27:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790835</guid><dc:creator>To Patty S.D.</dc:creator><description>Dear Clinton Voters (especially the ones in Ohio) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Due to you being DUPED by Hillary and her statements on NAFTA (the policy that took your jobs) please listin with rapt interest to following: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WARNING: THIS MAY BE YOU LAST CHANCE TO CURE THE DREADFUL DISEASE CALLED &amp;quot;CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe you must have been brainwalshed by the Clintonistas' Brainwalshing Machine which has inadvertently infected you with &amp;quot;&amp;quot;CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Futhermore: We can tell the tell-tale symptoms of said &amp;quot;brain addleation&amp;quot; from your common sense migration to &amp;quot;CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS,&amp;quot; for every time you open your mouths inaccuracys, inattention to detail, and right out un-truths distort, disrupt, and miscommunicate all clear and consise language communication. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your Cure is simple and free for the present time only: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You must repeat the following statement at least one hundred time to be totally cured of &lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Obama is the one, the only one, who has been honest about his feeling and opinions concerning Rev. Wright: This inspires Trust. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is the one: who gave an historic speech that challenged us to see beyond the color of ones skin: This inspires trust! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is the one: who has spent his life serving others rather than trying to get rich: This inspires trust &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The rich and powerful are few: but they will try to destoy Obama because of his stance on special interest:This inspires trust! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama is loyal to his loved ones/family: This inspires trust.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you say it one hundred times? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then you now must realize the followning statement below. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems blantantly obvious to anyone with an education higer than third grade the Clinton has failed to INSPIRE TRUST! &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790868</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:31:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790868</guid><dc:creator>John Doe Allentown PA</dc:creator><description>Hillary all the way!!!!!!!!!!1How can you beleive MR Obama he is a fraud and a lie just how he lies that he was never at service when his Rev Wright was bashing people ot the USA, People wake up do you really want someone like him leading our wonderfull country, Wake up all you Obama Mama's and GET A Grip HILLARY ALL THE WAY Wait all the dirt will come out on him as it startes all ready oh yea Hillary will be ready on day one</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790934</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:42:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790934</guid><dc:creator>Greg, Atlanta</dc:creator><description>If the voters of PA have not figured out Hillary's position on NAFTA by now - oh well, go ahead and vote for her it is only your job you're kissing goodbye!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary was, is, and will always be a NAFTA supporter. &amp;nbsp;You better start thinking clearly on this or just kiss your job bye bye.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790937</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:43:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790937</guid><dc:creator>Tevas Truth</dc:creator><description>Check out Snopes, or fact checker site, Obama-ites; if you do not believe the Firstread folks. The Clintons never contacted Canada. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No nevermind don't check, the truth might mess up your mind. Would not want to burden you with such!</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#790980</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790980</guid><dc:creator>Larry, Dallas, Texas</dc:creator><description>Patty,sd,ca....You need to check your facts before you post. &amp;nbsp;WE now know that you may have missed out on a little education. &amp;nbsp;It's also obvious that you did READ or HEAR Mr. Obama speech. &amp;nbsp;His speech addresses not only African-Americans issues but White American issues. I applaud you for trying to have a discussion around race but before doing so you have reveal that your comments had not research or serious thought involved. &amp;nbsp;Let me give you a little info because I do not think you can handle a lot right now:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Before the Middle Passage began a slave trade already existed in Africa, but this slave trade was much different than the one that Europe would create for the Africans as the Atlantic World developed. The difference was, in Europe the slaves were dehumanized and viewed as property while in Africa, humans were still humans. Also some of the reasons that the Africans were enslaved in their own country traced back to their current status. If a person had committed a crime, were prisoners of war, or had a debt that was unpaid then they were enslaved by a greater force&amp;quot;. Also here's a good book for you to start with...David Brion Davis, &amp;nbsp;The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#791024</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:59:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791024</guid><dc:creator>Tony, West Palm Beach, Fl.</dc:creator><description>Is the White house has Clinton's private address? We just cannot stand another Clinton deception reign again, a reign of lie, deception and delusion.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#791027</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:59:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791027</guid><dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator><description>what's the difference between &amp;nbsp;Clinton and Bush again. Someone please remind me. I see more differences between McCain and Bush than Clinton and Bush.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#791035</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:02:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791035</guid><dc:creator>Thomas, Gainesville, Florida</dc:creator><description>Why isn't this issue a headliner on MSNBC? This should be at the top of the page. Billary's mistruths are being exposed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's about damn time.</description></item><item><title>Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/20/789330.aspx#791055</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:08:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791055</guid><dc:creator>WILLIS</dc:creator><description>Hillary not only lied about NAFTA; she also lied about her experience! &amp;nbsp;ALL OF IT WAS MANUFACTURED BY BILL CLINTON, CAMP HILLARY, AND HILLARY!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THEIR ATTITUDE WAS THAT THE &amp;quot;PRIZE (THE PRESIDENCY)&amp;quot; WAS WORTH ANY AMOUNT OF LOST CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY. &amp;nbsp;BUT THEY ALL FORGOT ONE THING -- THEIR CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY HAD EXAPORATED YEARS EARLIER.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OHIO VOTERS WERE TRICKED! &amp;nbsp;WE CAN'T BLAME THEM BECAUSE THEY ALLOWED OBAMA'S SKIN COLOR TO GET AHEAD OF THEIR GOOD JUDGMENT!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VOTE CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;VOTE OBAMA</description></item></channel></rss>