<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx</link><description>





From NBC/NJ's Carrie DannSeveral Democratic sources familiar with North Carolina politics expressed surprise at today's Wall Street Journal story, saying that -- although several members of the delegation are likely Obama backers -- an en</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844674</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:55:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844674</guid><dc:creator>Gerald, Texas</dc:creator><description>Translation: The North Carolina Leadership is still somewhat afraid of the Bullying Clintons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on NC Supers, show some courage like Sen. Klobuchar!</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844678</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:55:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844678</guid><dc:creator>NoBama</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;But as of today, added another source familiar with the story, the idea might have simply been born of one Obama supporter's wishful thinking.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting quote from this article, huh? Oh, but that can't be, no Obamaton would ever say anything untruthful. &amp;nbsp;Yeh, right. Supporters can follow suit because he lies all the time about relationships/associations, his family, his record. Get a grip, folks. Barry is a POLITICAN just like all the rest. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844703</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:02:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844703</guid><dc:creator>Bill Rochester NY</dc:creator><description>Yes the N.C. Superdelegates are backing Obama.&lt;br&gt;The Supers are peeling towards Obama and away from Hillary.&lt;br&gt;I think the voters will too.&lt;br&gt;How many here (besides myself) are COMPLETELY FED UP&lt;br&gt;with the Clintons gutter campaigning?</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844714</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:06:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844714</guid><dc:creator>Kim, Pasadena, CA</dc:creator><description>Is MSNBC going to announce that Senator Obama won Texas? &amp;nbsp;With 90.75% of the delegates awarded from Saturday's county conventions in Texas (the 2nd part of the caucuses from the Texas two-step), Senator Obama holds 56.04% of those delegates, while Senator Clinton holds 43.96% of those delegates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no doubt at this point that Senator Obama will either gain a 7+ (37-30) or 9+ (38-29) from these caucuses. &amp;nbsp;Senator Clinton gained 4 delegates at the primaries. &amp;nbsp;With either 7+ delegates or 9+ delegates, Senator Obama wins the state of Texas. &amp;nbsp;Senator Obama has won the State of Texas. &amp;nbsp;Yes we can, Thank you Texas!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/"&gt;http://www.burntorangereport.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844716</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:06:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844716</guid><dc:creator>Margaret, Columbus, Ohio</dc:creator><description>I'm so sick of this &amp;quot;destroy the party&amp;quot; crap. &amp;nbsp;Everyone is using it as the new buzz phrase, but I haven't heard one pundit or politician elaborate. No one has given a scenario of a destroyed party.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's have one of the MSNBC shows bring on some politicians to explain how a destroyed party would manifest.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844719</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:07:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844719</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, New Britain, CT  CT for Obama</dc:creator><description>I didn't read the WSJ's original story so I don't know entirely what it said...but that's disappointing that they would suggest that if its not true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh well, perhaps those endorsements are on there way at some point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the fact checking!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama 08</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844728</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:09:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844728</guid><dc:creator>Nj</dc:creator><description>Thats ok.&lt;br&gt;they will come out later like everyone else is..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So who comes out tomorrow?? Its one everyday it seems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will it be Edwards? Pelosi, Biden, Webb, Feingold, Carter, Gore, Bloomberg?????&lt;br&gt;All of them?????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Say good night Hill...............&lt;br&gt;PS_ when are you guys going to report about Hill not paying her Bills?</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844731</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:10:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844731</guid><dc:creator>The TRUTH Hurts</dc:creator><description>Good old &amp;quot;yellow journalism.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Aint nothing like it, eh?&lt;br&gt;If there is no story, make one up.&lt;br&gt;First Read knows all about that sort of thing.&lt;br&gt;If something like this were to have happened involving Hillary's campaign, you'd be accusing her of planting the story.&lt;br&gt;But because Obama is black, you don't want to be accused of racism, so you let it go.&lt;br&gt;That's the only reason the Rezko story isn't getting any &amp;quot;print&amp;quot; too.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844738</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:12:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844738</guid><dc:creator>donna , pgh., pa.</dc:creator><description>A mass migration, of supers, to the side of Senator Obama, would cause the Clinton campaign to throw out so many conspiracy theories, even they could'nt spin them fast enough. This is our Party's&lt;br&gt;Primary season. Let it unfold. Steady as she goes. Barack is being vetted, and it's torturous lenghth is nothing, compared to the hell of a chaotic Convention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; At that time, if Senator Clinton chooses to act in a defiant fashion, The DNC should make swift work of her in the courts. Any of her supporters who have a problem with that, don't understand from where our freedoms hail, or how they are protected. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If The Lord be for you, who can stand against you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pulling for Obama '08</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844751</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:15:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844751</guid><dc:creator>Kendra, Davis, CA</dc:creator><description>To me, this says everything....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9274.html"&gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9274.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844754</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:15:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844754</guid><dc:creator>sg, michigan</dc:creator><description>Despite the fact that further primary elections are &amp;nbsp;to be held weeks away, it sure feels like Obama is quickly wrapping up the nomination. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I feel Hillary Clinton should ride this until the end so that there is no question who the winner is. &amp;nbsp;However, the more she prolongs the inevitable, the less dignified she (and her family) will appear. &amp;nbsp;This may hamstring any political path she may take in the future.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844782</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:22:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844782</guid><dc:creator>kenn</dc:creator><description>But thanks for lying WALL STREET RAG ,no need for journalism here,just keep it moving,hey I heard the wall street journal crowned obamma king and high (get it high) priest he can do drugs and still show good judgement.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844794</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:26:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844794</guid><dc:creator>Lezi, portland, me</dc:creator><description>More pro-Obama wishful reporting? &amp;nbsp;I'm not surprised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The media wants Obama. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thankfully, the wise super delegates are waiting to see...how the votes go...and what other secrets Obama has in store for us.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844800</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:27:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844800</guid><dc:creator>The TRUTH Hurts</dc:creator><description>I see First Read is afraid of the TRUTH.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#844827</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:36:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:844827</guid><dc:creator>m stjohn   somerset, ma</dc:creator><description>I will be one to vote for mccain as I do not like what the superdelegates and staff are doing to hillary clinton. he is a smooth canditate letting all his dirty work to the delegates and staff. Let them all destroy clinton.&lt;br&gt;I am a democrat but will be a republican if he is the nominee.&lt;br&gt;The media is also so biased msnbc the worse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MSJ</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#845013</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:25:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:845013</guid><dc:creator>okla navy vet</dc:creator><description>Patience. &amp;nbsp;As soon as North Carolinians finish counting their votes it's very probable Senator Clinton will be endorsing Obama. &amp;nbsp;The democratic party is going to be fine. &amp;nbsp;Old &amp;quot;Bomb Iran&amp;quot; McCain will not stand a chance against Obama. &amp;nbsp;Even in the event of a Hillary win once the party unites, McCain better get a souped up Rascal and get out of the way.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#845048</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:33:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:845048</guid><dc:creator>MBM, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Old Hillary is destroying herself - not the press. They aren't the ones that are doing the lying. She is. Of all the things she has said she did during the last 16 years of her presidential-oriented experience, has she actually done anything? I mean, what has she done? Besides of course, lying, being untruthful, being dishonest, cultivating questionable relationships, lying, lying. I don't know why I keep repeating &amp;quot;lying&amp;quot;. Must be an attack of dementia. Whoa, look out for that sniper fire.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#845061</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:37:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:845061</guid><dc:creator>MBM, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Hillary destroyed herself without any help from anyone. And notice, nobody is coming to her support anymore. Where are Wolfson and Penn lately. Did Hillary's big money people (the gang of 21) get rid of them the same way they want to get rid of Pelosi? </description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#845084</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:45:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:845084</guid><dc:creator>kenn</dc:creator><description>A hour passes and you cant update your post why have one? You should turn your posts over to jerry or vanrueter or seiirra anyone who pays attention more than your average fast food worker.</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#845150</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:08:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:845150</guid><dc:creator>Myles</dc:creator><description>Obama wins Texas..evebn though Clinton received more votes. &amp;nbsp;Oh yeah...the Obama campaign is all about the people...LIES..typical...it's ok for superdelagates to go against their states wishes (Kerry and Kennedy) and bullying at caucuses is about &amp;quot;energy and enthusiasm&amp;quot;...Obama and his fascist fans have killed the democrats chances...and yet they whine about Clinton..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;must be their first election...they will learn</description></item><item><title>On those North Carolina endorsements</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/31/844646.aspx#845299</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:07:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:845299</guid><dc:creator>S.B. Stein E.B. NJ</dc:creator><description>It is nice to speculate about which is the next person to endorse Obama or Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Truth be told, wait until they actually do that so that there isn't this confusion over who has and hasn't. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To respond to someone wondering who would be next to endorse, if Carter on the list endorsed anyone, that would be the kiss of death. &amp;nbsp;Who would want Carter given his latest book and his track record. &amp;nbsp;</description></item></channel></rss>