Let the conversation continue

Sierra, SF — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:04:26 GMT

The last five Pennsylvania polls:

Insider Advantage 04/02-04/02 45 42 Clinton +3.0
PPP 03/31-04/01 43 45 Obama +2.0
Rasmussen 03/31-03/31 47 42 Clinton +5.0
SurveyUSA 03/29-03/31 53 41 Clinton +12.0
Quinnipiac 03/24-03/31 50 41 Clinton +9.0

Does anybody see a TREND ?
If Hillary wins by under 10% - She LOSES
If Hillary loses - She's OUT

Where is Hillary's MOMENTUM ?

Since the Wright video and the Bosnia video
Obama has come back
Hillary is SLIPPING

Hillary's CREDIBILITY IS GONE ?

Would you buy a used car from Hillary Clinton ?

Would you buy a used war from Hillary Clinton ?

Let the conversation continue

Chris, Dorr, MI — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:05:00 GMT

How's she paying for it?

Where are those financials?

Go Obama!

Let the conversation continue

C A, Tuscaloosa, AL — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:05:04 GMT

Save your time, breadth and money Hillary. You are coming to a part of the country (NC) that unlike PA can see right through your spin.

Let the conversation continue

Max Wickersham Greenville, Ohio — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:05:32 GMT

Oh, the election is about her, and her ability to lie with a straight face. But just to be fair, all the others are experts at lying, too. When are we going to wake up and spend more effort looking for honest, socially responsible leaders, than bashing the same old, same old, were always stuck with?

Let the conversation continue

C.K. Steele Fort Lauderdale, FL — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:06:43 GMT

Ace Smith might be a tough guy but there is no way in hell that Clinton can win in NC. It doesn't even matter if Edwards endorsed her.

Let the conversation continue

You can fool some of the people, some of the time — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:07:48 GMT

How funny! It's already all over the Internet about how she's going to have her supporters ask questions they've been spoonfed, and also ad spots from her supporters that talk about why they're voting for her.

Furthermore, the questions and answers that will be posted on that new website will be edited prior to posting.

But I suppose a great many will think this is such a wonderful idea.

Let the conversation continue

Chris, Dorr, MI — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:08:22 GMT

I couldn't stomach another "conversation". "It's not about you, it's about me me me me me me me."

Let the conversation continue

BL, Cincinnati OH — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:08:23 GMT

Answering only the questions you want to answer is hardly anything important. What needs to be answered is the questions that are tough and you have shown an unwillingness to answer.

But I'm sure many will fall for it, when it's really nothing but an illusion of a discussion and answering questions.

Let the conversation continue

L'viller, Lou, KY — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:10:01 GMT

And the band played on...

...really, when is this whole narcissistic thing going to end? Will she end up holding a conversation with herself?

Let the conversation continue

Jessica — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:11:05 GMT

I CANNOT wait until these debates!!!

She will have to talk about snipergate, NAFTAgate, TAXES, campaign having no money, throwing the kitchen sink, throwing Bill Richardson under the bus, endorsing John McCain........

I HOPE whoever the commentators don't act like wusses. It's always fun to see Billary squirm on the telly.

More votes.
More delegates.
More states.

Obama 08

Let the conversation continue

Janis, NC — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:12:14 GMT

What a joke. That new website is just a redirect to her existing site. All Q&As will be heavily moderated, edited, and then posted. And this is new... how???

Let the conversation continue

Deb, Ma — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:12:24 GMT

Hmmm. Think it's possible she's desperate to get folks to her website to gin up some contributions? Naaaahhhh.

Let the conversation continue

john in la — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:12:30 GMT

To the person who posted the hillary polls going down...hello, did you check the undecided number???

Let the conversation continue

PA Voter — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:12:58 GMT

Obama not responding to wanting to debate?

Like not wanting voices to actually be heard in FL or MI as well?? For a candidate who states he is all for UNITING this country and yet turns around and does all he can to NOT allow for a re-vote in FL or MI is rather... shall we say, distasteful to say the very least!! Let me guess… SEN. OBAMA is TOO BUSY CAMPAIGNING right??

Same response he gave when asked why he has yet to hold a hearing on Afghanistan –WHEN HE IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE on AFGANASTAN!!

Let the conversation continue

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:14:45 GMT

Maybe she'll use one of those ad spots to announce she's dropping out.

Let the conversation continue

debateOverdosed — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:15:48 GMT

I for one will NOT be watching this go-round. There is nothing new to be revealed, said, stumped, brought up, surprise! surprise! Ratings, I hope will be in the toilet...good luck!

Let the conversation continue

Sierra, SF — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:17:08 GMT

Does THIS COUNT as a part of her ...................
'35 years of experience' ?

From DailyKOS:

'...Hillary Fired? (Update)
by Libesatva

Tue Apr 01, 2008 at 09:32:32 AM PDT

'...The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, (Jerry Zeifman) who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Libesatva's diary :: ::
The story goes on to explain the situation in which Hillary was working for Zeifman and included some pretty damning quotes about her candor.

...a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

"Because she was a liar," Zeifman said in an interview last week. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."
To sum up, for those who do not want to read the entire article, Hillary concealed a public file which set precedent for the seeking of council while under congressional investigation. Then proceeded to write a brief for the court which stated the precedent, which she was concealing, did not exist. The brief was never submitted to the court, which is likely lucky for Clinton as willfully attempting to deceive the courts in such a way would likely have resulted in her disbarment. She is lucky that Zeifman only fired her...'

Let the conversation continue

Pat Huntington NY — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:18:21 GMT

I can't wait for this whole thing to be over so we hear the last of Sierra SF and scroll over the last of her diatrobic postings!

Obama is utterly unelectable...and all you Obamabots will bare full responsibility if he loses to McCain. If that happpens, ya'll should just shut the heck up in 2012 and let the more intelligent among us [the current Hillary supporters] pick the next nominee.

Let the conversation continue

PA Voter — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:18:25 GMT

I welcome the chance to ask Sen. Obama about SEVERAL ---and I do mean SEVERAL serious inconsistencies to include:

Mispoke of his position with Univ. of Chicago - stating he was a Law "Professor" when in fact he was a "Lecturer"

Mispoke of Selma Alabama and his parents meeting - when in fact he was born 4 years prior to Selma Alabama

Mispoke of the extent of his association with Tony Resko stating he only worked 5 hrs. on a case when in fact Tony Resko raised an extensive amount of $$$ for his Senate campaign in Chicago

Mispoke of the Kennedy's supporting his Father to come to America - when in fact this is not true.

Mispoke of speaking fluent Indonesian while a young student living abroad - when in fact his teacher indicated this is not the case

Mispoke of his Knowledge of Rev. Wrights extreme tendencies stating he had "No Idea" only to change this to "Yes, I knew" - 3 days later

Mispoke about NAFTA and his staff/advisors "meeting" with the Canadians stating that "In fact, their was no meeting' - only to change his statement to "Yes, we did meet however it was at the Canadians request"

Let the conversation continue

Anne/ OHIO — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:00 GMT

Please someone tell me that the state of PA is not going to have a April Fools Day on the 22nd and really vote for Hillary.

Here in Youngstown, OHIO she still owes business money from the campaining that she did here in our city! We Have no Jobs here and she can't even pay her bill, that is owed!

Please PA don't make the same mistake that the folks in Ohio did!

I voted for Obama, I did so because I too am really tired of the same ole in Washington, let someone change it even if it is alittle bit!

Let the conversation continue

BL, Cincinnati OH — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:10 GMT

FROM CNN:

Here’s a twist on the polls you see every day: A new Gallup survey asks people which of the three remaining candidates they least want to see elected president in November. 40% of those surveyed say they don’t want John McCain, 36% say they don’t want Hillary Clinton and 20% say they don’t want Barack Obama

When it comes to McCain, 27% say it’s his position on the Iraq war, 25% say he’s too much like President Bush and 23% say it’s because he’s a Republican.

As for Hillary Clinton, 24% say it’s because they don’t trust her, 18% say they don’t want Bill Clinton back in the White House, and 16% say they just don’t like her.

With Barack Obama, 39% say he’s inexperienced, 15% say they don’t trust him and 12% say it’s because he’s a Muslim – which he’s not.

Interesting that the criticisms of the Democrats are more personal in nature, while the top issues with McCain are all more related to policy.

Let the conversation continue

Chuck — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:13 GMT

Umm... do we honestly need yet another debate?... what is this like debate 22?

She just wants free TV time.

Let the conversation continue

Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:56 GMT

If Hillary had talked for an hour, on the question people have been asking Chelsea, not only would she have wrapped up the Primary, she'd have wrapped up the Election.

Let the conversation continue

BIGOLDTEXAN — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:20:13 GMT

Clinton said. "And so I wanted to give folks this opportunity to ask me questions."

Ok, I know these will not be aired, but let`s ask the questions anyway.

Ask the questions why have you LIED about the Bosnia trip, NAFTA, Peace in Ireland and How you open borders in Macedonia?

Why did you LIE to the voters in Ohio
regarding NAFTA?

Are you LYING now?

One more, why were you fired as a lawyer?

Pls ask these questions N.C.

Go Obama '08

Let the conversation continue

George Brown, Hermitage, PA — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:20:45 GMT

Pa Voter--You need to get off that. Obama wanted a debate on an earlier date, and now she wants it her way. I guess kinda like counting MICH AND FLA. I guess it's all about what's convient for HER. That add is a joke..."This election is not about me." I guess its all about the lobbyist then.

Let the conversation continue

donna, pgh., pa. — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:20:58 GMT

She does'nt dare debate Obama before April 22nd with all the scandal she's embroiled in at present.

NCAskMe.com is an ingenious idea. It should save her lots in travel expenses.

Here's an appropriate address for the Clinton campaign; LOgInforSPin.com

Pulling for Obama '08

Let the conversation continue

IOWA — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:21:03 GMT

Here is MY question Hillary:

Oh really Hillary, the election is about US, and NOT YOU?

Then why in the hell are you still in this race when you CANNOT win except by STEALING THIS ELECTION. Why are you asking the super Ds to OVERTURN the WILL OF THE PEOPLE and give the election to you, even though you have not earned it?

How is THAT about US?

You are a fool and your supporters that continue to send you money, even though you have NO CHANCE to win, are even dumber than I originally thought.

Obama 08

Let the conversation continue

BIGOLDTEXAN — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:22:07 GMT

April 19th is enough.

He has to campaign and not sit thrugh any more of your lies abiut what you did.

No, don`t do it as state before she just want free air time..................LOL!!

Go Obama '08

Let the conversation continue

C A, Tuscaloosa, AL — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:23:03 GMT

You can fool some of the people, some of the time (Sent Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:07 PM):

"You", how else do you think the ads would be produced other then spoonfed questions. If spontaneous it would take them more time then allotted before the NC primary to find someone in NC who might ask her a different question other than "when are you going to get out of the race Hillary"? I suppose they could fly someone in from Ohio to pretend they are from NC. On second thought, naw. That would be a dead give away. Folks from Ohio look like the brain-dead Hillary zombie followers that they are.

Let the conversation continue

Sierra, SF — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:23:25 GMT

john in la: '...To the person who posted the hillary polls going down...hello, did you check the undecided number???...'

The 'undecideds' don't show up on RealClearPolitics.com

Thus far, that's the best site I've found for polls

I do see Obama going from 41% to 45% in these polls
That's a trend line you want to have

Undecideds do seem to be creeping up
I am a little scared, it's kind of like Texas
It looked like Obama would win..... then the kitchen sink

This time, Hillary has her Bosnia credibility eating away at her support......

We'll see

Let the conversation continue

Jmp, northern MN — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:23:30 GMT

Ignoring my stomach churning from thinking about the 'new' ad campaign, let's go back to the DEBATES.

----------------------------------------------------
Why won't she do the second debate until after PA is done??
What's the holdup??????
----------------------------------------------------

Let the conversation continue

Bill, Rochester,NY — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:23:43 GMT

Should prove to be interesting, ultra lightweight Katie Couric moderating a Debate between the two Democratic candidates!
Hopefully we'll FINALLY get somewhere in this never ending primary season.
Prediction: after Senator Obama trounces Senator Clinton in North Carolina the entitled, rotating one
(Hillary) will have no other choice but to call it quits.

Let the conversation continue

L'viller, Lou, KY — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:24:43 GMT

I can't wait for this whole thing to be over so we hear the last of Pat Huntington NY and scroll over the last of his/her diatrobic postings!

Clinton is utterly unelectable...and all you Hillbots will bare full responsibility if she loses to McCain. If that happpens, ya'll should just shut the heck up in 2012 and let the more intelligent among us [the current Obama supporters] pick the next nominee.

Let the conversation continue

rc , dallas, tx — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:25:11 GMT

She has to debate. She has to get any free press she can. Her run for president was like the vote for the war. It will be over quickly on both accounts. Shock and Awe failed her both times. He needs to decline the debate. Let her spend money to get her message out.

Let the conversation continue

HP Boston — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:25:32 GMT

We CANNOT win the GE with only half or even 2/3 of our numbers voting for our candidate.

Therefore, we must wait until the process is completed and every state is allowed to participate in order to make sure they don't feel alienated, and of course, because we are a DEMOCRACY, people. EVERYONE's vote must be counted!!!

With such a close race, the Clinton camp could just as easily call on Obama to step down "for the good of the party."
I am not voting for Obama I do not care what the Media wants. McCain will be in whether we vote Bo or not! He can not win the GE PERIOD!

Let the conversation continue

Just Wondering — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:25:47 GMT

Notice how she wouldn't do it on the 19th? This campaign is so cynical. They know that her fundraising numbers are due on the 20th and that the voters in Pennsylvania would be watching the 19th debate as well. So, instead, she will ONLY do the debate AFTER Pennsylvania. Gotta hand it to Wolfson & Penn. They're clever. But whatever happened to all the screaming about wanting all these debates as soon as possible?

Let the conversation continue

Diane from Illinois — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:26:33 GMT

Anne in Ohio: That can't be. Hillary SAID yesterday all her bills have been paid! Well, she SAID so....that makes it true....right????? Maybe Pat Huntington and PA Voter can send her some money so they can help pay the bills! Pat can probably send the most because she's the "most intelligent" and probably has the money to spare. Go Obama '08

Let the conversation continue

C.K. Steele Fort Lauderdale, FL — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:26:48 GMT

I hope that the media is proud of themselves. 'Archie Bunker' has just reared his ugly head. http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Obamas_church_faced_threats.html#comments

Now an entire church congregation has been threatened. I hope the extra ratings for the endless loops of Rev. Wright help you in the media to sleep well. Unfortunately now these good people may not. FOX news does deserve a greater amount of the blame but none of you guys are clean in this. I hope that you all in the media do your damndest to denounce this kind of crap! The problems in this country are too numerous to keep being distracted. Not This Time.

Let the conversation continue

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:27:26 GMT

You got it, Chuck. When your in the financial crapper, you start looking for ways to campaign for free... like debates. Plus, she's down to hoping for a complete Obama implosion, like him saying in a debate he sacrifices chickens or something.

Let the conversation continue

Heidi, Houston, TX — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:27:33 GMT

Why doesn't Hillary use that campaign money to repay her debts to the "little guy" vendors in the states, where she's already campaigned, instead of wasting it on this PR move that will definitely have her answering only the softball questions selected by her staff? This is ridiculous and a big waste of donor money!

Speaking of donor money, she won't be releasing her Mar donations until the Apr 20 deadline. Her March numbers can't be good news, now can they? Anyone who donates to her campaign can expect her to waste it on these silly projects that the people will see right through. The lack of March donors alone tells us that people are tired of flushing their money down the toilet.

Go "Anyone but Hillary" 2008!

Let the conversation continue

FED UP IN FLORIDA — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:29:07 GMT

PA voter is an idiot. Call the university of Chicago School of Law Dean of Students office and they will tell you that a senior lecturer which Obama was is considered a professor... albiet not a tenured position. But you probably never been to college to know what all those big words mean.

Let the conversation continue

MK,MO — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:29:16 GMT

hillary should use some of those adds to disclose her and the bills financial records, but I guess it would be hard to muster up much of a campaign from behind bars, which is where they would be is their 'real' financial history ever came to light

Let the conversation continue

HP Boston — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:29:49 GMT

OH my god I love the panic in the Obamabots when they hear the word DEBATE. They go spastic!
The fear of DEBATE is sending shudders down their legs!!!!

Let the conversation continue

Holli, Oklahoma City, OK — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:31:12 GMT

I think that if Obama manages to pull under 5 or 10 points it will be a victory of sorts because everyone has been saying for weeks that he has no chance in Pennsylvania. I still think she looks good to win big there but wouldn't it be a coup if he could narrowly miss defeating her in PA.

Let the conversation continue

Sharon, Helena MT — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:31:13 GMT

To PA Voter~
I read post of yours on another message board saying that you were too busy volunteering at a senior citizens home to campaign for HRC. Are you ever going to be too busy to flood the message boards with the same posts? Please come up with something original-or are you too busy for actual research? I am an undecided voter trying to find the best candidate, but people like you (on both sides of the party) are really turning me off to either candidate....
Oh by the way, rabidly salivating over HRC's website doesn't count as research.....let's attempt to be fair, rational adults here....

Let the conversation continue

Confused — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:32:03 GMT

Wow the Clinton faithful never give up and I commend them for that. I would like them to stick to the real facts though. Senator Obama did not keep Florida and Michigan from having thier votes counted, if you want to blame someone blame the DNC or even some of Senator Clinton's top aides who voted to strip those states of their delegates.

After all the planted questions from earlier in the election does anyone really think that there will be any original questions from REAL voters in NC used?

If Senator Obama does lose to Senator McCain in November it will only be because Senator Clinton used such dirty tricks to make people believe he is a Muslim and lets not forget the race baiting. You can pretend she didn't do those things if you like, but you are only fooling yourself.

Let the conversation continue

C A, Tuscaloosa, AL — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:32:29 GMT

Pat Huntington NY (Sent Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:18 PM):

Pat:

Sierra makes some fine points and is a good writer. Love her comments.

Yours on the other hand like your last post might start out as something one might consider even if of an opposite viewpoint. But then you end it with crap like calling Obama supporters stupid and telling them to shut up in 2012. You go from possibly making some sense or at least a decent point to being totally ridiculous which makes your posts not worth reading and certainly won't change any minds. So why don't you just chill for a while (as your brother Bill would say) and let people like Sierra make some sense of these arguements and issues. Thanks

Let the conversation continue

READ, READ, READ — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:33:12 GMT

PA Voter -- We are constantly being told by the media, pollsters, and pundits that Clinton's base support are the, shall I say, "under educated." (And believe me, I sincerely despise the division being made between races and class.) However, it's posts like yours that makes me tend to believe they're right. Time and again I've noticed that Clinton supporters DO NOT READ. Either that, or they cannot comprehend what they're reading. Perfect example is your opening line: "Obama not responding to wanting to debate?" If you bothered to read past the first line of the article, you would have seen: "although the Illinois senator had agreed previously to an April 19th date.)

Furthermore, where the hell did you come up with that "Chairman of the Sub-Committee on Afganastan?" Sen. Obama chairs a foreign relations subcommittee covering European matters.

The Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on European Affairs doesn’t have primary jurisdiction over the campaign in Afghanistan. The Armed Services Committee (on which Senator Clinton serves) does.

The Subcommittee on European Affairs doesn’t have secondary jurisdiction over the campaign in Afghanistan. The full Foreign Relations Committee (which has held hearings on Afghanistan) does.

The Subcommittee on European Affairs doesn’t even have tertiary jurisdiction over the campaign in Afghanistan. The Subcommittee on Near East and South and Central Asian Affairs does.

Now..... Go READ something!

Let the conversation continue

LP, Maryland — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:34:09 GMT

Lets ask a question on a neutral site with sections devoted to various issues and questions (kinda categorized) to both the candidates and they or their camps can answer with the responsibility and proof for their claims (links, videos, audio files, docs - u know whatever): "I am <candidate> and fully responsible and accountable to all aspects of the response provided by my camp". If they find a dup question the camp can refer to the original question. Fair?

Let the conversation continue

Sheri, AZ — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:34:10 GMT

PA Voter must not be up on politics because as we all know it was the Clinton campaign not the Obama campaign that did the wink wink with the Canadians regarding Nafta. The Canadians mistakenly said Obama and corrected themselves that is was the Clinton campaign. The Obama camp was upset about this and rightly so.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/reportsfromabroad/macdonald/20080310.html

Let the conversation continue

Sue in La — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:34:12 GMT

I am so sick of all of this. The only reason this is still going on is for News ratings. And all the spin I am so dizzy. This back and forth is really gettling old. We really need to end this and elect someone "Obama"

Let the conversation continue

Mark Thieme — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:34:19 GMT

Clinton has been misunintepreted.

She was speaking of the other NAFTA:

Never a Fully Truthful Answer.

She was always for it even while she was against it, though Bill was for it and Chelsea was equivocal, and even then she was totally for its not being a good deal. Except when it was. But that was later.

What was the question again?

Let the conversation continue

Mark Thieme — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:34:55 GMT

Let the conversation continue

Heidi, Houston, TX — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:35:54 GMT

Pat in Huntington, NY:

You want the more "intelligent voters", "Hillary supporters just like" you to vote in 2012? Your grammar in your post is horrible. You said that Obama reporters will "bare" responsibility (wrong word - should be "bear responsibility").

The next time you "intelligent Hillary supporters" want to take the responsibility for voting for the rest of us, while we all stay at home, why don't the supporters just tell Hillary that her foreign policy and economic experience is pretty "bare"!

"Anyone But Hillary" 2008!

Let the conversation continue

Jmp, northern MN — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:36:57 GMT

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

So, she's going to loan herself some more money to cover the costs, right? (And really, let's hope it's technically Bill's money.)

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

And the debate: The reason she won't debate on the date that Obama agreed to (a few weeks ago)??? The new date (in NC) means that this debate won't happen until after PA is done...Is this so that she can change her stance on things to be more like the NC profile? If she went with the earlier date, she'd have to tell PA and NC all the same things and not have time to go back and undo her 'mispeaks' from PA.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Get out the checkbook, girl!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Let the conversation continue

Brother Odd — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:38:00 GMT

I'm with you HP Boston. A vote for Obama is a vote for McWar. I hope fellow democrats wake up to that before we elect another corporate war loving republican.

Let the conversation continue

Janis — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:39:02 GMT

C.A.... Better yet, why not just get people in her campaign to ask AND answer the questions. That will save lots of time in the posting of them on her website. Remember when FEMA set up that fake press core? Want to bet that this whole "Ask me a question, so I can tell you more lies" ad campaign is as fake as that press conference was.

Let the conversation continue

Anne/ OHIO — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:41:30 GMT

Diane from Illinois,

Thank You for the offer, I'm sure that our stage business will be more then happy to get the bill paid! Since Hillary still hasn't paid (ofcouse it is only a small amount around $15,000.00 for each company and there are about 3 of them) they have been posting all over the web about what she owes, one owner said that come November he will not vote for her like he did in March!

Let the conversation continue

PA Voter — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:41:50 GMT

I can see the slip... slip... slipping out of the Swift boaters Wallets NOW...

IF, and again... this is a VERY BIG IF he is nominated (as indeed this is a close race) - with the "consistency of Obama's serious inconsistencies"
The swift boaters are going to have real smooth sailing come Sept/Oct. So I say to all you swift boaters out there... GET YOUR WALLETS OUT FELLA'S we sure are going to see the best of Rev. Wright's religious sermons by Fall 08!!

Sen. Obama is 110% UNELECTABLE !! And the DNC is willing to gamble the Whitehouse that he is is...

GOOD LUCK AMERICA!!

Let the conversation continue

Heidi, Houston, TX — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:41:54 GMT

Retraction from my earlier post that Hillary won't be releasing March campaign contributions until April 20:

Newsflash - The HRC campaign just released that they raised $20M in March, despite the fact that earlier today, they stated that they would withhold the information until April 20.

Still, my original point was valid. How much of this money will go the outstanding balances owed to the vendors in past states and how much will go to this
Q&A PR farce that's she's offering up to us?

"Anyone but Hillary" 2008!

Let the conversation continue

Pete - Albany, NY — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:42:12 GMT

Obama is utterly unelectable...and all you Obamabots will bare full responsibility if he loses to McCain. If that happpens, ya'll should just shut the heck up in 2012 and let the more intelligent among us [the current Hillary supporters] pick the next nominee.

Pat Huntington NY (Sent Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:18 PM)

-----------------------------------

This comment will, of course, get all of us "Obamabots" to line up behind Senator Clinton should she somehow become the nominee.

Yeah, we're stupid and we can't think for ourselves...that's why Senator Obama is leading over Senator Clinton among voters with college educations.

Thanks, Pat!

Let the conversation continue

LP, Maryland — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:43:13 GMT

Hi Chuck,

is there a general poll- nationwide, regional or even at NC that answers the question " Do we need another debate?" - If this is by the people, for the people, of the people ...let the voters say that - a debate is good. Not just when one candidate thinks - "u know ..I feel like want to say something to the people and so lets have a debate"

Let the conversation continue

LP — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:48:07 GMT

Seen this?
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/clinton-floats-delegate-petition/

Let the conversation continue

C.K. Steele Fort Lauderdale, FL — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:48:46 GMT

Hot off the presses-------Clinton campaign source just said they raised about $20 million in March. No other minor details were given such as debt, primary vs. general money, whether healthcare was paid for, and if other small business vendors were paid.

Let the conversation continue

Think about it — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:53:29 GMT

If Clinton, and all of her supporters, are SO SURE that she's the only one who can beat McCain, then why can't she beat Obama in number of states won, in delegates and in fund raising? If she was "all that," the primaries would have been over long ago.

She can't even afford to pay her campaign bills, or her vendors. She's out fundraising again today, so maybe she'll raise enough to pay off that 9 million (and growing) dollar debt.