<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx</link><description>
From NBC/NJ's Athena JonesPITTSBURGH --&amp;nbsp;Clinton can't shake questions surrounding her stance on trade and her husband's differing views on the matter. Today, she responded with a hearty laugh -- the kind once criticized and mocked by pundits and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876018</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:53:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876018</guid><dc:creator>Ron, TX</dc:creator><description>The problem, Hillary, the OBVIOUS conflict of interest, is that, as First Gentleman and former President, Bill Clinton is going to wield a tremendous amount of influence when he gets back into the White House. &amp;nbsp;I mean, if you can't see the conflict of interest when your HUSBAND is a -lobbyist for Colombia-, then WOW.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876027</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:56:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876027</guid><dc:creator>.</dc:creator><description>I can't wait for KO tonight, I know he will play this clip. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876029</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:57:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876029</guid><dc:creator>PeteGebe</dc:creator><description>When is this loser clinton going to stop? &amp;nbsp;she should just quit now before McPain wins it before the election.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876030</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:57:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876030</guid><dc:creator>jmp, northern mn</dc:creator><description>AH - HA - HAR - HAR - &amp;nbsp;HAR !!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;....Was that Chewbacka choking on something?&lt;br&gt;...Or is it the megalomaniac minimizing the truth with her attempt at laughter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gag.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876031</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:58:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876031</guid><dc:creator>pam, NC</dc:creator><description>Clinton = Economy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama = Black America</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876033</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:59:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876033</guid><dc:creator>Chief P, Annandale, VA</dc:creator><description>Stick a fork in her. She's done. She seems to have plenty of advice on what every one else should do but no responsibility for her or her lobbyist husband. Amazing! She can tell Pres Bush to not attend the Olympics, but her husband and her have always supported the free trade and favorite nation trading status of China. Come on. Put your money where your mouth is for a change. Speaking of change, although I have always trended Republican, even I can see that there is only one candidate for change. Not Bush III (McCain) or Clinton II. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876037</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:00:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876037</guid><dc:creator>jmc,Wa</dc:creator><description>She gets more boring everday. &amp;nbsp;BLA --BLA--BLAA. &amp;nbsp;You can't change the rules in the middle of the game. &amp;nbsp;Next it will be the super delegates that aren't fair. I can't believe I was going to vote for her in the beginning.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876040</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:00:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876040</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, IND</dc:creator><description>How about this for a laugh: It's amazing with the amount of money that Obama raises that he hasn't been able to wrap this up. I'm starting to think I wouldn't want this guy managing my tax dollars. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting that even in this late stage of the primary that Hillary is still in it and Obama has not run away with the nomination. Obama needs to re-think his arrogance as he does not have the nomination and most certainly not the general election. He can't unite the party, he most certainly can't unite the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go Democrats!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876041</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:00:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876041</guid><dc:creator>DShawn233, LaVergne, Tn</dc:creator><description> &amp;quot;Hillarious&amp;quot; may often diagree with her husband, but, I would bet that she did not disagree with the $800,000.00 that was deposited into their joint bank account. &lt;br&gt; The Clintons are playing their supporters like Chumps. Every one of the people that are supporting &amp;quot;THEM&amp;quot; deserve whatever they get. I wonder how the good people of Ohio feel about this. Would they have voted to keep this &amp;quot;Primary Death March&amp;quot; going if they had known that the Clintons were playing on both sides of the fence? How silly does she now look throwing that FAKE tantrum while waving that NAFTA flyer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The Clintons are playing their supporters like Chumps. They asked me to tell you all to send more donations to pay off that college that they have owed $5,000.00 since January or February in CA before the bill collector starts calling... LMAOOOOOOOOOOO</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876044</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:01:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876044</guid><dc:creator>Andress CO</dc:creator><description>Yeah, But your husband will take their money Hillary. &amp;nbsp;This is a serious conflict of interest and no laughing matter. &amp;nbsp;You demoted Penn! Are you going to demote your husband. &amp;nbsp;Or, perhaps, your laughing all the way to the bank.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876047</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:03:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876047</guid><dc:creator>Paul, Riverside, CA</dc:creator><description>Can you imagine hearing that laugh at 3:00am?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Phone conversation:&lt;br&gt;Speaker on phone: Madam President, Isreal has just been attacked by Iran, what should we do?&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton:&lt;br&gt;HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.... &amp;quot;I mean, how many angels dance on the head of a pin? I have, I, I have, uh, I have &amp;nbsp;really, uh, nothing to, uh... I mean, how do you answer that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good help us. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876048</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:03:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876048</guid><dc:creator>Lanae, Atlanta, Georgia</dc:creator><description>Why does hillary continue to open her mouth? Every single time she does a lie comes out of it..MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA BROKE THE RULES!! PERIOD!! Obama has no control on those votes. The micigan and floriday LEGISLATION DECIDED NO REVOTE!!! He followed the rules but yet he is the one getting blamed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also pennsylvania would be FOOLISH to vote for the 2 biggest crooks out there BILLARY. Her and her husband are BOUGHT AND SOLD with the biggest con artist/crooks out there and they have to PAYBACK all those lobbyist that they owe so they will do anything outside of having Obama killed (figure of speech)to get back in the white house, and the more I think about it I think he should beef up his security. He is a black man running for president trying to clean up the infested, corruption of washington by going after the crooked lobbyist, going against the clinton machine, bush croonies, the bank industry, the oil industry, the pharmaceutical industries. He has a uphill fight on his hands and if people don't wake up and see that he is for REGULAR people instead of the CROOKED CORPORATIONS we will have the same washington games being played at the expense of regular middle class folks. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876049</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:03:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876049</guid><dc:creator>Elliott, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>This woman is amazing...she has more backbone and fortitude than either Obama or McCain. Thank you Madam President.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876055</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:06:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876055</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas: Minnesota</dc:creator><description>[The senator accused McCain and Obama of failing to show leadership on the issue of whether the president should boycott the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing this summer, something she has called for and that McCain has also called for.]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Not a bad way to change the subject, eh?&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;--I wonder if she'll call herself a leader on this issue too, now. &lt;br&gt;Nicholas: Minnesota (Sent Monday, April 07, 2008 1:41 PM)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**I think I deserve Props for that prediction. &amp;nbsp;And in 4 days time too!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876056</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:06:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876056</guid><dc:creator>Neshka, Minneapolis MN</dc:creator><description>Not to bring up the Rev. Wright issue again, but is this a double standard? How can they hold Obama accountable for something his EX-Pastor said, which he disagreed with, but not hold Hillary Clinton accountable for something her HUSBAND (a real family member) is doing, although she disagree with it. What Rev. Wright said, although it was wrong, only affects a select few. Bill Clinton agreeing to diminish jobs that we so desperately need, affects the majority of us, directly for people without jobs, or indirectly through the economy. They should cover this issue with the same publicity as they did with Rev. Wright.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876058</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:07:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876058</guid><dc:creator>Lee Holmes</dc:creator><description>Geez. Lay off the airbrush.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876060</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:07:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876060</guid><dc:creator>Enrique, Chicago</dc:creator><description>Does Hillary seriously think that she could laugh off such questions?? There clearly is a conflict of interest here. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876062</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:08:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876062</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Phelps</dc:creator><description>What a suprise, another negitve story about Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Now its time for 5 or 6 positive Obama walks on water stories and you'll complete your usual pattern of fawning all day long MSNBC &amp;nbsp;For all the Obama supports that just love to run down Hillary and her supports.....your going to need our votes if he is the nominee so.....back off and quit behaving like children.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876064</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:09:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876064</guid><dc:creator>Jason, Grand Blanc, MI</dc:creator><description>Republicans must be sitting cracking up at the continued ridiculousness of the Democratic nominating contest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean just this afternoon we get a former president's irrelevant trip to meet with Hamas somehow spun as damning to a candidate he hasn't endorsed (oh sorry, he said nice things about him last week - they must be bosom buddies); and now we get the continued spin of another former president's attempt to maximize his post-presidential earnings as somehow damning to his wife.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wake up Democrats! We're in for four more years of Bush-McCain if we keep this up.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876066</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:09:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876066</guid><dc:creator>Adi, NY</dc:creator><description>Is that the answer of someone ready on day one? She is babbling! I know the question is tough and she'd rather avoid it but babbling?! Is that the best she can do, 35 years of experience and all? Hillary, if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen and quit saying you are ready on they one. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876067</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:10:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876067</guid><dc:creator>RS in Calif</dc:creator><description>It takes 2025 delegates to win the Dem nomination. The majority of the popular votes or the delegates does not matter. 2025 is the only thing that matters. Short of that, it depends on what happens at the convention. This nomination will be decided in the second round of voting by the delegates at the convention because neither candidate will have 2025 after the first round. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big question is will the delegates from Florida and Michigan be able to vote in the second round. Seems like they should since all delegates are not bound by the primary results when voting in the second round at the convention. That is where Hillary could win the nomination and it would be a fair victory following the rules of the party. Obama has to win this nomination, not have it handed to him because he is in the lead now. 2025 and only 2025 delegates wins the nomination. If he can get that many then I will vote for him in Nov.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876076</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:12:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876076</guid><dc:creator>BMR, Pittsburgh PA</dc:creator><description>Once again, the Clinton hypocrisy is on full display.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recall the end of February, when Clinton was campaigning in Ohio. &amp;nbsp;She took the CTV news report of Goolsbee meeting with the Canadian government and beat Obama over the head with it for almost a week, non-stop. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama's great sin? &amp;nbsp;Having his *unpaid* economic advisor saying something to the Canadian government that contradicted something Obama held publically - even though Goolsbee was called by the Canadian government independent of the Obama campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fast forward to now. &amp;nbsp;Her husband, former President Clinton, a PAID endorser for free trade with Colombia, holds a position that is diametrically opposed to her stated views. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This outspoken husband also has great political clout and will obviously be at least as involved in a third Clinton administration as Senator Clinton was in the first two Clinton administrations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, Senator Clinton tells us that HER situation is perfectly fine - because she opposes a trade pact with Colombia. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Naturally. &amp;nbsp;Of course. &amp;nbsp;And her word is absolutely golden. &amp;nbsp;No reason to question Senator Clinton, as she's fully vetted already. &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;No conflict of interest to see here - please move on. &amp;nbsp;Ignore that philandering speechmaker behind the curtain.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876078</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:13:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876078</guid><dc:creator>Nickberry, Inchelium, WA</dc:creator><description>Silly. can anyone imagine Bill telling Hillary what to do... especially when she is president? No one questions that Hillary has her own mind and strong convictions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876080</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:13:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876080</guid><dc:creator>Joy for Obama, Vriginia</dc:creator><description>In the words of my 18-month old nephew; she's a do-do head. &amp;nbsp;LOL!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unbelievable and she says it in that voice from hell generated from slightly clenched teeth and barely parted lips. &amp;nbsp;I can't believe I was going to vote for this woman. &amp;nbsp;The hypocrisy is thick you couldn't cut it with a buzz saw. Does she really believe it doesn't matter who she talks to? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876082</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:15:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876082</guid><dc:creator>donna, pgh., pa.</dc:creator><description>Hillary,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing I respond to is your laughter. It has become your 'tell'. (For those who don't know what a 'tell' is; it is a gesture, or tick that announces gaurded information, unconscienciously, or against one's will, while playing poker).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary &amp;nbsp;laughed, and joked on Leno, about Bosnia. Now she's whooping with laughter about Bill, and CAFTA. There is wisdom in the searcher who 'follows the money'. Now we know we can also, 'wait, watch, and listen for her laughter'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For those of us who support Senator Obama, we find his candor, and stammer appealing. He searches for the correct phrase to communicate his ideas. I appreciate how hard he tries to express himself succinctly. It is good he makes the effort to get it right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pulling for Obama '08&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876083</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:15:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876083</guid><dc:creator>Walt, Ohio</dc:creator><description>What about Mark Penn and Wolfson's views on the Colombian trade deal? Laugh that one off Hillary!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876086</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:15:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876086</guid><dc:creator>Take a Stand</dc:creator><description>Hillary should be the first to take a positon on the democratic nominee for presidents by calling Barrack Obama--Mr. President</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876087</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:15:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876087</guid><dc:creator>Just another Obama supporter, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>Ron, &lt;br&gt;That's pretty impressive. &amp;nbsp;I had not realized the writing on the wall - he really is a lobbyist for Columbia. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its amazing how the media just let her get away with a laugh when asked about the 800k she took from columbia (joint return means joint ownership). &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876089</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:16:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876089</guid><dc:creator>lee, sarasota</dc:creator><description>This is proving that Hillary is running for president not her husband. &amp;nbsp;She has shown that she is a stong person so I do not think as president she would defer to her husband. &amp;nbsp;Also I do not think Bill Clinton is a lobbyist per se. &amp;nbsp;There is no conflict for her. &amp;nbsp;Maybe Ron is able to browbeat his female associates but that is not the makeup of Hillary. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876091</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:17:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876091</guid><dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator><description>The problem is not the laugh (picking on that is petty). &amp;nbsp;The problem is the obvious conflict of interest. &amp;nbsp;We don't know where she stands because we can't rely on her word. &amp;nbsp;If her word were good, that'd be the end of the issue. &amp;nbsp;It's not so the question remains.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876095</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:18:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876095</guid><dc:creator>Sick of corruption, sick of the Clintons</dc:creator><description>Hillary is not only one of the most corrupt politicians in history, she is also the most condescending. &amp;nbsp;At least Nixon had the decency to resign when his corruption was uncovered. &amp;nbsp;Not Hillary! &amp;nbsp;She decides she deserves to be President! &amp;nbsp;Maybe the White House has new furniture, and she thinks it would look nice in her New York home. &amp;nbsp;Maybe there are some more convicted criminals who promised her some campaign donations in exchange for pardons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why do people support someone like that?</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876098</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:19:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876098</guid><dc:creator>Billy, MI</dc:creator><description>In my marriage we share our finances. So if one of us gets money from doing work it goes to both of us. I wouldn't let my wife do anything I thought was unethical to earn money as she wouldn't me. I know spouses disagree on things, but this is more like turning the other way and pretending you didn't know where the money came from. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876099</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:19:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876099</guid><dc:creator>Say NO To HillBilly in Paradise</dc:creator><description>News Flash - Saint Hillary dances on the head of a needle.. I am against this and all NAFTA agreements . WINK WINK WINK WINK WINK WINK &amp;nbsp; Senator what is wrong do you have something in your EYES. Maybe some of that sand you and Billy have been kicking is landing back in your face.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876103</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:19:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876103</guid><dc:creator>James Memphis Tn....</dc:creator><description>Laughing is right, she needs to laugh as she will be handed her walking papers right after Indiana an Carolina....Trust</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876104</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:19:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876104</guid><dc:creator>Yasriel, Houston</dc:creator><description>Do we really need more of the same? I mean, I am amazed at how some people have been blindly supporting HRC despite all these revealing flaws.&lt;br&gt;Will she be truely independent? Will her sense of objectivity not be clouded. &lt;br&gt;This is a serious conflict of interest.&lt;br&gt;She can either have Bill step aside or she should step aside. Though, I prefer the later option.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876107</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:20:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876107</guid><dc:creator>Say NO To HillBilly in Paradise</dc:creator><description>News Flash - Saint Hillary dances on the head of a needle.. I am against this and all NAFTA agreements . WINK WINK WINK WINK WINK WINK &amp;nbsp; Senator what is wrong do you have something in your EYES. Maybe some of that sand you and Billy have been kicking is landing back in your face.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876109</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:20:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876109</guid><dc:creator>BMR, Pittsburgh PA </dc:creator><description>This entire piece should be labeled &amp;quot;Clinton Hypocrisy Redux&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can she complain about Michigan (or Florida)? &amp;nbsp;Didn't she sign an agreement not to campaign or participate in either state? &amp;nbsp;Didn't she publicly say that &amp;quot;it's clear this election [Michigan is] having isn't going to count for anything&amp;quot;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only value for her keeping Michigan and Florida in the discussion is to have something to argue about at the convention. &amp;nbsp;She's better off having them unresolved than coming to some sort of a dispute. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the sake of the party, I hope Obama can win NC and IN. &amp;nbsp;Then, he can just give her Florida, which would kill her argument about those two states. &amp;nbsp;(Michigan's primary has been ruled unconstitutional by the Michigan Supreme Court, so it will never count.) </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876110</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:21:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876110</guid><dc:creator>Afraid of more lies</dc:creator><description>I do not see anything funny here....I am still not laughing..........</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876114</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:23:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876114</guid><dc:creator>Amy of Illinois</dc:creator><description>The kind of laugh STILL criticized by the pundits and media. &amp;nbsp;I don't hear the media making fun of Obama's UH's like Letterman picked up on. &amp;nbsp;It's just another cheap shot, smear against the Clinton's &amp;nbsp;Your so-called COVERAGE of this campaign is not fair and balanced and is a disgrace. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, enough people have stopped believing everything they see and hear and are thinking for themselves.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876118</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:24:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876118</guid><dc:creator>Ha ha hee hee HEEE....LMAO</dc:creator><description>Bill Clinton is a paid lobbyist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ha ha ha ha ha ha HA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary/Bill have loaned HRC's campaign $5 MILLION&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha HA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Clinton is a PAID LOBBYIST !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha HA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, yeah, Hillary, that's a Good One !</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876120</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:24:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876120</guid><dc:creator>Nancy, FL</dc:creator><description>If Obama can't see his own lie in his current ad that he doesn't accept &amp;quot;oil company donations&amp;quot; while oil company CEOs are bundling for him - then WOW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama proved he'll say and do anything to win by LYING about his own father's connection to the Kennedy family - in order to obtain the Kennedy endorsement. &amp;nbsp;That's low - very low.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We marked off Obama late last year when we learned he is the ONLY candidate who doesn't think Bush and Cheney have committed impeachable offenses.&lt;br&gt;And yet - his supporters claim he's a DC &amp;quot;outsider&amp;quot; - LOL&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876121</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:24:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876121</guid><dc:creator>ndo</dc:creator><description>Once again, there she goes -- complimenting McCain. Is this the kind of leader we should have -- one who'll without hesitation sell out a member of her own party? And, yes, I'd write the same thing if Obama made it a habit to compliment McCain at the expense of Sen. Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876123</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:25:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876123</guid><dc:creator>Monica L. -DC</dc:creator><description>She sounds more desperate than Bill in a room full of interns. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876125</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876125</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Um.. maybe Obama doesn't want the Michigan votes counted because HIS NAME WASN'T ON THE BALLOT. Geez, this is beyond desperation now.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876126</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:25:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876126</guid><dc:creator>Ed F, Burbank, CA</dc:creator><description>Is it just me or is boycotting only the Olympic's opening ceremonies one of the lamest and impotent political gestures in recent memory. If any of the candidates or other world leaders really cared about human rights in China, or Tibet, or in getting the Chinese to positively influence Darfur, they would &amp;nbsp;call for a boycott of the Olympic GAMES, not the 3 hour opening ceremony. But they don't. Why? Because we can't afford to offend the Chinese too much because they own our country and are about the only thing propping up our economy. So let's be real about that. Clinton's criticism of Obama and McCain on this issue is just more desperate posturing on her part. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876128</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:26:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876128</guid><dc:creator>Jane-pa</dc:creator><description>Any one can lobby or try to have there ideas made but it doesnt mean Hillary or any pres. has to accept that as theres. She said how she felt,has felt and will feel. How more clear can she be. I am sure Pres Clinton knows what he can and cannot do.Obama now comes out calling for another stimulas package. He is so behind, Hillary did this a week or so ago but thats how he operates. Copy is all he knows.I believe Pres Clinton respects his wifes decisions. We cannt blame Obama for things his wife has done or can we?She sat on a board that supplied Wal-mart.We still dont know if she recused herself when deviding her new house came into the office of the board she was on.Good to see ya laugh Hillary keep it up</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876132</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:28:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876132</guid><dc:creator>patty,sd,ca</dc:creator><description>The fact is that Obama CAN'T put Clinton away.She has been hanging on and getting a little closer to the Democratic nomination everyday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama has raised over 200 million and outspending Clinton in EVERY state and he still can't put her away.After all the millions &amp;nbsp;he has overspent her by . He only has a 130 delegate lead and just 700,000 votes lead. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton 08&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876133</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:28:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876133</guid><dc:creator>Mark Thieme</dc:creator><description>Heh. Heh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Heh.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876136</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:29:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876136</guid><dc:creator>OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!</dc:creator><description>GET OVER IT!!! Michigan and Florida didn't follow the rules so they're votes don't count....something they were well aware when they broke the rules to begin with. It wasn't OBAMA's desicion for a re-vote, THE STATES THEMSELVES VOTED NO to it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And who cares about the olympics!!....if you really have a problem with the chinese government then MAYBE WE SHOUDLNT BE DOING SO MUCH BUSINESS WITH THEM!!! Not going to the olympic ceremony is stupid when we have such aclose and huge business relationship with them.&lt;br&gt;OBAMA HASN'T COMMENTED ON THE OLYMPICS BECAUSE IT IS A TRIVIAL ISSUE COMPARED TO MORE IMPORTANT THINGS!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876137</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:30:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876137</guid><dc:creator>Steve B.  NewYork NY</dc:creator><description>Oh my God ... I think I have a Clinton overdose.&lt;br&gt;I just can't take it anymore.&lt;br&gt;Somebody please make her stop .. please</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876140</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:33:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876140</guid><dc:creator>Delores Rose-Kennedy in TN</dc:creator><description>Go Hillary. &amp;nbsp;Head-to-head matchup.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Obama 45 McCain 45 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Hillary 48 McCain 45&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chris Matthews nearly choked on this when Hillary's numbers came up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go Hillary--a woman of substance. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876143</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:34:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876143</guid><dc:creator>Tim, Peoria, IL</dc:creator><description>In the words of the former Washington Posts Ben Bradlee; Sounds like more &amp;quot;non-Denial denials&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep asking these questions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want a President that just knows how to 'DANCE' &amp;amp; trust me, Hillary is never going to go 'on the record' on any of this; 'Just more HA, HA, HA &amp;amp; next question please'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote for Americans!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote for Barack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876145</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:35:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876145</guid><dc:creator>Dean, Waterbury, Ct.</dc:creator><description>First people accuse my girl Hil of &amp;quot;living in the past&amp;quot;, trying to cash in on her famous name. &amp;nbsp;Now that she disagrees with Bill on a policy matter, the usual suspects of Clinton haters pounce on this too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She just can't win with the Hhas the press asked Queen Bee Michelle about any differences between herself and hubby? &amp;nbsp;Gee, I don't remember</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876147</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:35:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876147</guid><dc:creator>Amy of Illinois</dc:creator><description>The kind of laugh STILL criticized by the pundits and media. &amp;nbsp;I don't hear the media making fun of Obama's UH's like Letterman picked up on. &amp;nbsp;It's just another cheap shot, smear against the Clinton's &amp;nbsp;Your so-called COVERAGE of this campaign is not fair and balanced and is a disgrace. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, enough people have stopped believing everything they see and hear and are thinking for themselves.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876148</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:35:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876148</guid><dc:creator>molly</dc:creator><description>GO HILLARY !!!&lt;br&gt;Let's not even talk conflict -&lt;br&gt;Wright/Obama - gee.... I see a Real Conflict here!&lt;br&gt;YOUR SILENCE IMPLIES APPROVAL!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876154</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:37:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876154</guid><dc:creator>More facts</dc:creator><description>The monster hides the truth with that fake laugh! Reality is beyond hollow experience, When your stupid to the question just laugh!&lt;br&gt;The Senate needs a good toilet bowl &amp;nbsp;scrubber!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876162</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:40:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876162</guid><dc:creator>Pete - Albany, NY</dc:creator><description>She said she didn't know why Obama didn't want there to be a revote in Michigan. &amp;quot;I think he would have done very well in Michigan, but he doesn't want the votes to count. Let's not, let's not mince words here. Sen. Obama has been very, very clear. Do not count those votes. Or come up with some kind of a resolution which disenfranchises people by taking away their right to have voted for whom they voted for and neither of those is acceptable to Michigan and Florida voters and I wouldn't agree with that either.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;---------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many freakin' times do we have to go over this Senator Clinton?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA VIOLATED THE PARTY RULES AND YOUR ADVISOR HAROLD ICKES WAS PART OF THE DNC LEADERSHIP THAT VOTED NOT TO SEAT THE DELEGATES FROM MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA AND YOU SIGNED A PLEDGED THAT YOU AGREED THAT THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY DELEGATES SEATED AND THAT YOU WOULDN'T CAMPAIGN IN EITHER STATE AND NOW THAT YOU'RE LOSING YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE RULES!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many freakin' times must we remind you?</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876172</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:43:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876172</guid><dc:creator>Genie Encinitas, Ca</dc:creator><description>She(Hillary) wants the votes to count. &amp;nbsp;The problem is, and we all know it, including Obama, that Fla and Mich lost their count because of their early primaries were against the DNC rules. It has nothing to do with Obama wanting votes counted or not. He's standing by the rules. Hillary makes her own rules I guess.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876183</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876183</guid><dc:creator>Bob Lucas, Pittsburgh, PA</dc:creator><description>Laughing about this clear conflict of interest is like laughing on the Tonight Show about totally fabricating the Bosnia sniper fire story. &amp;nbsp;Hopefully she will keep that same sense of humor when we Pennsylvanians give Obama the nod in our April 22nd primary.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876185</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876185</guid><dc:creator>Ree, Virginia</dc:creator><description>Has HRC forgotten that she agreed (signed off) that Michigan and Florida were be stripped of their delegates and now she wants to go back on her agreement? &amp;nbsp;What does that say about her honoring her commitments. &amp;nbsp;There is no trust when you go back on your agreed commitment or words. &amp;nbsp;DOUBLE TALK TO THE NEXT LEVEL!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876186</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876186</guid><dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator><description>Wow she asked the delegates of North Dakota to not support Obama as the people voting wants and switch to her then she says this hey pot, hi kettle.&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Or come up with some kind of a resolution which disenfranchises people by taking away their right to have voted for whom they voted for and neither of those is acceptable to Michigan and Florida voters and I wouldn't agree with that either.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;She is funny do as i say not as i do. So while she spends some of that 800,000 bill got for supporting the Colombia trade agreement, she keeps her union by spaeking against it while penn meets with the colombians to talk about supporting the agreement she says she is against it. While she promised the people of New York all these jobs if elected senator the state actually lost jobs, but she did bring peace to ireland, opened borders, dodged sniper fire. And if you dont agree with her you are a sexist lol&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876190</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876190</guid><dc:creator>Carlie Stevens</dc:creator><description>Obama Insidious Affiliations&lt;br&gt;The only possible reason why anyone would vote for Obama is because he is black. &lt;br&gt;This is the most insidious form of racial discrimination. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;There is no way a white man with the same background and credentials could have even been considered as a senator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look at Obama’s affiliations:&lt;br&gt;- Mr. Rezko a major mob figure&lt;br&gt;- Mr. Auchi a billionaire and major funder for Obama’s campaign – While working with Saddam Hussein, Auchi made his money through the sell of arms in Iraq and by stealing money from the Oil for Food program (no wonder Obama voted against invading Iraq)&lt;br&gt;- Mr. Wright a racist who hates America and whites and is reminiscent of Hitler&lt;br&gt;- Mr. Meeks who hates whites and gays and is one of Obama’s major supporters and super-delegate&lt;br&gt;- Mr. Ayers members of the Weather Underground, a group that killed police and tried to bomb the US Capitol&lt;br&gt;- Mr. McPeaks Obama’s military adviser and national campaign co-chairman who claims that American Jews are the &amp;quot;problem.&amp;quot; and “Christian Zionists were driving America's policy in Iraq to benefit Israel.”&lt;br&gt;- Michelle Obama’s who trumpets Obama as “the second coming of the messiah.” And also states she “has never been proud to be an AMERICAN in her adult life&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The list goes on. &amp;nbsp;Am I missing something here? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876191</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:47:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876191</guid><dc:creator>phil, philly</dc:creator><description>put the shoe on the other foot. if michelle obama had taken 800K in order to promote the agreement, how do you think the clintons would react? think they would still say &amp;quot;oh, that's no big deal. that doesn't affect barack's position.&amp;quot;? uh, something tells me the might launch an endless series of attacks. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876193</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:48:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876193</guid><dc:creator>tr</dc:creator><description>lies lies and more lies. Always the same lies coming out of her mouth</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876197</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:48:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876197</guid><dc:creator>Russell, New York</dc:creator><description>Pelosi came out against CAFTA today.... Looks like it's no longer 3-to-1. (Bill,Hill &amp;amp; McCain Vs. Obama)</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876198</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:49:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876198</guid><dc:creator>Oddy Lakewood CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary is really trying to &amp;quot;have her cake whole, while eating it&amp;quot; ....on one hand we should look at her 35 years of experience &amp;nbsp;which makes her ready &amp;quot;Day One&amp;quot;, but now she wants us to separate her views from Bill's, because after all, She is the one running for President, not Bill. &amp;nbsp;The fact that her family has profited from the Columbia lobbying by Bill, is a direct conflict???? Where is the outcry??? &amp;nbsp;Once again Bill believes he is above the law!!!!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876204</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:52:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876204</guid><dc:creator>Ken Higgins, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>Two positive Hillary items today from MSNBC's First Read! &amp;nbsp;Thanks for something a bit more fair and balanced on this candidate for the Presidency. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876210</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:55:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876210</guid><dc:creator>Tim Garrett, West Hollywood, CA</dc:creator><description>RON- &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So they can't disagree on something? &amp;nbsp;Do you think every First Spouse has been in complete agreement with everything the President they were married to did? Surely Laura Bush has given George W. an earful. &amp;nbsp;In his case, I wish he'd listened. &amp;nbsp;But for Hillary... she is strong and steadfast and while I am sure she will listen to Bill... she will make her own objective decision on what is best for the country. &amp;nbsp;Stop being such a misogynist. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876223</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:58:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876223</guid><dc:creator>Sue, Bloomington, IN</dc:creator><description>I agree with Ron from Texas--the conflict of interest is enormous! &amp;nbsp;And, Hillary is sounding pathetic when she talks about the FL and MI votes. &amp;nbsp;She signed off on disenfranchising those two states when she thought she didn't need them. &amp;nbsp;And it was the Michigan board of electors who said they simply don't have enough time to hold another election. &amp;nbsp;Hypocrisy, thy name is Clinton.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876224</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:58:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876224</guid><dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator><description>The president make decission, and she will. You guys should stop looking down on women as if they are to follow mens lead in everything. please give them a chance, they can always do better than us. I know we men have ruled for so long and we think we are all-in-all, but give a break, we mess-up everything and make this country what it is now. I have the believe that women can do better if we give them a chance. Codi Rice is doing a great job in the state department. Tell me what men did when they were there rather than went to United Nation to lie about Irag and they took us to war, because we dont know how to think as we have claimed.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876226</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:59:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876226</guid><dc:creator>Leah ln ALA</dc:creator><description>I don't believe for a second she was not completly aware of what he was doing down there and the Money he was being paid, I would like to know when she made these votes against CFTA It has only been in the news in the past couple of months that I have seen, when were these votes made against CFTA, maybe since the NAFTA questions from Tim Russert??? After Bill had already been paid??? Does anyone know-first read-do you know when she voted no and when Bill said Yes</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876230</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:01:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876230</guid><dc:creator>Ingrid, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>Keep laughing Hillary. Barack will have the last laugh yet.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876232</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:01:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876232</guid><dc:creator>Thomas, Gainesville, Florida</dc:creator><description>Same old politics from the Clintons. If Hillary doesn't get the nomination I expect her to hold her breath and stomp her feet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's almost time for Hillary to throw another kitchen sink at Obama. I can hear her staff now saying- &amp;quot;wait for it...wait for it...not yet...not yet...wait for it...&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About a few days before the polls open we'll get a new smear campaign. Hillary will go SUPER negative. AGAIN.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never mind the veracity of the new &amp;quot;sink.&amp;quot; Never mind the affect on the party and its chances in &amp;nbsp;November.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is all about Hillary. How dare we not hand her what she believes to be hers. Shame on us.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876237</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:03:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876237</guid><dc:creator>Josh, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator><description>FL and MI broke the rules, no re-vote is needed, they don't count this time, as Hillary said before they 'voted'. Now that she is losing the nomination she is scrambling to catch up to Obama, she can't, and the people won't let her steal this nomination. Sorry HillBilly it's about time to drop out.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876239</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876239</guid><dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator><description>At least Hillary has more than 3 years of experience...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know high school class presidents who have more than 3 years</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876240</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:05:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876240</guid><dc:creator>amy of Illinois</dc:creator><description>The conflict of interest wasn't so apparent to Obama when worked with Rezko (who was under indictment at the time) to work a shady real estate deal. &amp;nbsp;Smoking didn't seem like a bad idea to Obama either until he ran for President. &amp;nbsp;Going to a black separatist church showed great judgement until he was called out about it. &amp;nbsp;If we're talking about judgement I'm afraid Obama hasn't shown good judgement. &amp;nbsp;And the latest flip-flop on his pledge to accept public financing and now trying to wrangle out of it because how could he know people would be dumb enough to donate millions of dollars to him each month! &amp;nbsp;It's not so easy to have high ideals (like he had when he took to time to write an elaborate statement about why he felt it so important to accept public financing) when there are actual consequences involved.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876242</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:05:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876242</guid><dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator><description>We really need a 'cackling' President in the White House, laughing off any 'conflict of interest' concerns...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The more she speaks, the more she embarasses the people who used to support her, including me...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876246</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:07:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876246</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>Yet, she never answered the question...she used the dreaded laugh as a bait &amp;amp; switch so that the title of the papers reads &amp;quot;Hillary's laugh is back&amp;quot; not Hillary funds her campaign with trade deal money from Bill.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876247</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:07:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876247</guid><dc:creator>Chelle, Portland, OR</dc:creator><description>Would the HRC PLEASE stop blaming Obama for the Michigan votes!! And why do you people keep reporting on that and omitting the fact that her &amp;quot;go-to&amp;quot; guy Ickes was the one who lobbied for the &amp;quot;disenfranchisement&amp;quot; of those FL and MI votes. The only reason she cares now is because she's behind. She also agreed to not let the votes count, and now as usual she's going back on her word and trying to guise it as &amp;quot;wanting every vote to count&amp;quot;. Give me a break.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not to mention, Hillary cannot distance herself from her husbands politics. It's there and he has more of her time to move her his way than anyone else. So for her to say (and the media support) that she and her husband don't have to agree and then say Obama and his delegates/ Pastor must agree and their mistakes reflect on him- is just plain naive. He can speak out strongly against their beliefs and distance himself politcally and physically. She can do neither to her husband.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876248</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:07:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876248</guid><dc:creator>LaDene, Oceanside, California</dc:creator><description>Hillary is mis-speaking again. &amp;nbsp;She supports the Columbian Free Trade deal and just denies it &amp;nbsp;until she gets the nomination. &amp;nbsp;Then she gets to say she didn't really mean it when she said it she was merely mis-speaking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Family trait. &amp;nbsp;Clinton never had sexual relations with that woman, either.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876252</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:09:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876252</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>Just ask Hillary to release the minutes of meetings she attended on NAFTA which was greatest achievement of Bill and people will come to know her real stand on trade deals. Clintons lie on anything to get nomination, when you catch them they claim that they misspoke(=lied) or only laugh on foolishness of Americans (As they believe i what they say). </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876258</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:10:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876258</guid><dc:creator>Lizbeth, CA</dc:creator><description>This report makes her look like a completely disingenuous manipulator. &amp;nbsp;I am not a Hillary supporter, but I question whether she came across as inept as this report suggests. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps she did.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876260</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:10:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876260</guid><dc:creator>Russell Gorall, Green Bay, WI</dc:creator><description>MSNBC - why don't you just endorse Obama and make it official.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have never seen a network give such widespread praise for one candidate and when Obama says the typical white person is racist or he has yet to truthfully answer the whole Jeremiah Wright &amp;quot;Why did you sit in church for twenty years listening to these comments, and why has your story changed on the matter five times?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MSNBC - The network of Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Typical White Person</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876264</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:11:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876264</guid><dc:creator>Nobama</dc:creator><description>No different when Michelle lobbies for more money from the hospital board she sits on.She got a big fat raise and also sat on the walmart board.Oh my god ---the same walmart that Hillary sat on.That -itch Michelle.</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876265</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:13:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876265</guid><dc:creator>MK, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>Let me get this straight Senator Clinton: &amp;nbsp;Your husband gets nearly a million dollars to advocate on behalf of passage of the trade deal, your campaign strategist (Mark Penn) gets paid 300K to do the same, your communication's director (Howard Wolfson) is part of a company also hired to do pr on behalf of the trade deal, and you want all of us to believe that this does not call your own credibilty into doubt? &amp;nbsp;I for one will take whatever you say about the trade deal &amp;quot;with a grain of salt&amp;quot;!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876267</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:13:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876267</guid><dc:creator>Tom, Tamarac, FL</dc:creator><description>I live in Florida, and my take is that she's nuts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can she put one sentence together that has any sense of truth in it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NAFTA, Bosnia and now Columbia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My concern is all the speech money that’s being claimed on the Clinton’s tax returns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, it seems that every place that Bill claims to have received speech money, there seems to be a separate and controversial side story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have any of these speeches been recorded?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was it worth the price that he was paid?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, it appears odd that wherever he gives a speech and seems to make a fortune for it, there’s also an agenda issue that he appears to have supported and that he hasn’t accounted for in a reasonable light.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Examples: &amp;nbsp;the Columbia free trade deal; Dubai running our ports; Kazakhstan, where Bill Clinton issued his support for Nazarbayev and where Giustra afterwards won a lucrative mining contract; etc…..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I claim that the speech income is a bogus way to cover-up ill gotten gains from alternate income sources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe the Mafia, bootleggers (that didn’t get caught during prohibition) and the smarter drug dealers of today perfected this kind of money laundering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want income to appear legal, then you have to give it a legal twist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be completely honest, I personally don’t believe his income was illegal, just misrepresented. &amp;nbsp;I believe that at least part of the speech income should have rightly been listed as a lobbying income.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, if he claimed it as a lobbying income, then Hillary would have had other problems trying to explain it away with some other lie that she can’t substantiate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need more research into the speech money of Bill Clinton. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who in there right mind would have paid him so much without a Quid pro Quo being part of the deal? &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876270</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876270</guid><dc:creator>Lino, Euless, TX</dc:creator><description>She really IS a Monster!!!!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876282</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:18:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876282</guid><dc:creator>JJ, Pasadena</dc:creator><description>WOW is an understatement on this one. </description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876286</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876286</guid><dc:creator>DB</dc:creator><description>Wow, coherent answer! &amp;nbsp;Go away please, liar!</description></item><item><title>Hillary's laugh is back</title><link>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/10/875999.aspx#876290</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:20:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:876290</guid><dc:creator>ToastOnDayOne</dc:creator><description>Hillary, I personally absolve you of any wrongdoing or ill intent. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will go one step further. &amp;nbsp;Because I am a nice guy and think you are a nice person too, and because I really want to help you out, I am willing to take your 50% share of the $800,000 off your hands ASAP. I promise to provide all that cash with a warm, loving home. &amp;nbsp;Please contact me through this post if I can help. Regards,</description></item></channel></rss>