First thoughts: Contest No. 45

A weary nation needs you Senator Obama — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:29:12 GMT

Our best wishes to Senator Obama today. We hope to see you at a huge victory rally tonight. Then we hope to watch Chuck Todd, Chris Matthews, the Clinton Broadcast System (CBS) and the Clinton News Network (CNN) eat crow.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Pat Huntington NY — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:30:46 GMT

Lessons to be learned from this disasterous primary season - Dems...change the system to a winner takes all, 100% primary, zero caucus, system! Enough with the proportional nonsense. Enough with super delegates. It just makes it more complicated and the likelihood of these kinds of nasty bitter fights that only harms the party.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

JohnnyU, WA State — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:31:01 GMT

Clintons have been "Dirty & Dirtier" in the PA camapign, assumimng that voters there are "Dumb & Dumber"...Come on PA, send em packin'.
------------------------------------------
Boo MSM...not a word about the Farakan/Rendell/Clinton "association"
Guess threre is a double standard about these kinds of things. Don't count on th Main Stream Media to make your decision...THINK!!! "If you want a good cool drink of water you gotta dig a little deeper in the well..."
OBAMA '08!
YES WE CAN!!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

G Costanza, NYC — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:31:38 GMT

Just like it always does, the election is going to come down to Guam.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

jerry/corpus christi texas — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:34:37 GMT

If anything will cause Hillary to lose this, it will be her husband. Deep down, he is a racist and he shows his true colors.

Of course he will win Puerto Rico....
Bill let two terrorists go when he pardoned them....
To this day, I still believe if we capture Bin laden, a liberal will pardon an free him.....

The Clinton's can spin this all they want to until Hillary gets dizzy and barfs in Bill's lap; but she has to win big tonight. I'm sure she will get a bunch of folks in the PA who just think she is darling and vote for her, but then will realize a year later, all Hillary wants is the power.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Bill Jones — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:34:45 GMT

Bring on the Good News

Obama'08

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Nancy Walters, Greenberg, NC — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:34:56 GMT

After today, the superdelegates will start to move towards Hillary. After Obama loses big in Pennsylvania, these superdelegates, many of them freshman middle of the road congressman, will realize they cannot win reelection with Obama at the head of the ticket. They will start to move to the more moderate Hillary as their nominee.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:35:23 GMT

What happens if all them Pennsylvaniacs write in 'Al Gore'?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Rush L., Florida — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:36:33 GMT

Operation Chaos - Engage!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

j fl — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:36:53 GMT

Ah... yes we can what? Change...change our whole political system? Turn the page...what does that mean? Nobody seems to be able to answer. Obama is a gigantic fraud...and I pray that people are finally waking up to this. I will not vote for this phoney democrat.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Ron, TX — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:38:58 GMT

Let's take a step back to reality for a second.

Obama WAS down 20% a few weeks ago when this all started.

If he finishes down 8%, or even 10%, that means Clinton's support is eroding. The superdelegates, even in their wildest dreams, will not give the primary nomination to someone whose support is eroding.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Derek Smart — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:40:25 GMT

I find it ridiculous the media seems to equate Ohio and Pennsylvania. The demographics are better for Sen. Clinton in PA and ads aren't nearly as effective at this late point of the race.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Derek Smart — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:41:46 GMT

Furthermore, PA's political culture is very different from Ohio's.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Nashville_fan — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:42:37 GMT

1. Senator Obama has spent more money because he has more money. The money was donated for him to campaign with, so why is there a problem with him using it? Why is him spending money he has a bigger story than Senator Clinton being in debt with a string of UNPAID bills?

2. Senator Clinton is talking FREQUENTLY about annihilating Iran with a nuclear weopon. Why is this not news? What is the point of withdrawing from Iraq if we are going to follow it up with bobming Iran? How is this approach to diplomacy any different than the Bush administration?

3. No matter how the media "spins" the numbers, the simple fact is that Senator Clinton is not going to have more pledged delegates than Senator Obama, and that no amount of rearranging of the popular vote and/or expectations is going to change that.

4. Finally, after all the talk about Senator Obama's "seal of approval" for Farraknan, when is Senator Clinton going to "reject and denounce" Ed Rendell, for his glowing endorsement and appearence with Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam? (Double standard much "main stream" media?)

BARACK THE VOTE!

OBAMA '08

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Sick of corruption, sick of the Clintons — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:43:46 GMT

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Mike Jones — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:46:46 GMT

"You gotta really go some to play the race card with me – MY office is in Harlem.”

Bill Clinton is a clown if he thinks having an office in Harlem grants him any favor in the Black community.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

The Concscience of America — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:47:39 GMT

Can't wait to watch Hillary's victory speech tonight!
Wonder how negatively MSNBC's TV Crew (Mathews, Olberman, Eugene Robinson) and their political-whore unit here at First Read will spin it.
Also wonder when Obama's going to explain the relationship he has today, with people who bombed buildings, shot law enforcement and security officers, and robbed an armored car 30 years ago.
Real good people for a potential President to be taking money from and hanging around with.
But hey, that's all forgottemn now. Those police officer's families have surely gotten over their grief by now. So what the hell?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

OBwan, IN — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:47:55 GMT

G Costanza, NYC (Sent Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:31 AM)

Yeah! Sure! Ya Betcha!
And they don't even get an electoral vote in November.
Of course primaries and political parties aren't in the constitution. We had two presidents that belonged to none.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

J Chisholm, Madison, WI — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:48:03 GMT

What happened to the pundits' declaration that anything less than a 10 point win by Clinton meant she was out of the race. Suddenly, Todd is saying anything less than 5? Why do you continue to move the bar in Clinton's favor? Does it not count that she was originally ahead in the polls by more than 20 points? Why can't you help this nation by being objective rather than helping to create a feeding frenzy of speculation and innuendo?
I long for the good old days, when journalism meant objectivity and facts. Now, its 24 hour so-called "news" cycles of hype and sensationalism.
I miss Uncle Walter Cronkite and the other noble journalists more than words can say.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:48:14 GMT

What in the world is up with Clinton's nuclear threats against Iran?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

jerry/corpus christi texas — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:48:16 GMT

Legal troubles ahead?
Campaign finance experts said yesterday that large extended debts owed to professionals could create legal trouble for the campaign if they remain unaddressed.

"Anybody who extends credit to a campaign runs the risk of either losing money or violating the law," said Jan Baran, a Republican election lawyer who defended a mail house for not collecting debt from a campaign.

Hillary started April $9.3 million in the bank
She has over $10 million in debt
A preview of how she will run the country if she gets the win in november.....

She better tap that $109 million her and her worthless racist husand made to pay her bills....

Or is it bcause she is a woman and a liberal, she will be allowed a pass on this?????

Hillary Clinton
A liar for All Seasons.....

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Trey, Indianapolis, In — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:49:19 GMT

MSNBC won't post this, but I'll say it anyway. Hillary is not going to the super delegates claiming Obama is unelectable; she is doing it for the people of Pennsylvania and Indiana. Basically she is trying to scare white and black Democrats who are not prejudiced; but who fear America is still a racist country. Of course if Obama keeps 90% of the people currently voting for him and 70% of Hillary's voters; even with defections he wins the Presidency. What the media is not saying is that the majority of the 30% claiming to vote for McCain; will most likely vote for Obama or not vote at all.

Also, to all this stuff about Obama being Kerry, Gore, or Dukakis? First, I don’t remember people going crazy over any of these guys when they ran for office. As I recall, my mom and I said they lost as soon as Kerry was chosen (we liked Edwards). More to the point, wasn't Kerry a not very likeable policy wonk? Isn't that also what Clinton is described as; cold, not very friendly, but she knows her stuff? Wouldn't this mean then that she, not Obama, looks more like the type of candidate Democrats have paraded out and lost with in the past? The red phone moment, pictures of Osama, Hillary is proving more Mondale than B. Clinton.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

TPina, San Diego, CA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:49:25 GMT

I do not believe that Obama has "some splaining to do." In Conn. the electorate is that way it is. Older,white, etc.
If the tables were turned , Hillary was the front runner, she had the money, and the contest was in Mississippi, would she have some "splaining to do?" No. It has to do with the electorate. This is why the illusion of momentum is just that, an illusion. You guys no better than that.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

B.Wood, Fawn Grove pa. — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:49:50 GMT

:-) This 54 yo white male just voted for Obama after switching to the Democratic party from the Republican Party. Best of luck Obama. :-)

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Carole, Fort Lauderdale, FL — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:49:52 GMT

There is no reason for the networks and cable news not to be counting the popular vote in Florida. If the DNC doesn't want to seat the delegation, it doesn't change the fact that Clinton got 300,000 more votes than Obama in Florida. I am sick of this popular vote not being factored in by the MSM. And I don't know what planet the first commenter is living on -- clearly CNN and MSNBC are 'in the tank' for Obama, despite his phoniness, lack of experience, failure to keep any promises he made before and after being elected to the Senate, and failure to act in the Senate. I am sorry to see that such a great chance for the Democrats to win this year has been ruined by the spin the MSM has chosen to give in favor of promoting Obama, despite his complete lack of credentials for the job. The president of the US can't vote 'present' and waffle - he/she has to make decisions. Obama has voted with the majority for the brief time he is in the Senate, thus helping to keep the war in Iraq that he presciently supposedly opposed before he was in Senate going on, after he got elected. He has not kept one promise (including his promise not to run for president in 2008!). If Obama gets the nomination, we have four more years of GOP.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Pander, Picayune MS — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:50:03 GMT

"Lessons to be learned from this disasterous primary season - Dems...change the system to a winner takes all, 100% primary, zero caucus, system! Enough with the proportional nonsense. Enough with super delegates. It just makes it more complicated and the likelihood of these kinds of nasty bitter fights that only harms the party. "
-Pat, Huntington NY

That's a bad idea in my opinion. While the current system is too unfriendly to the victor considering how the delegates awarded rarely match the popular vote, the GOP system of winner-take-all is horrible. It's certainly more decisive, but winning 50.1 to 49.9 shouldn't result in a 150 delegate swing for a state. That result doesn't reflect the voting trend of that state, or reward the electability of BOTH candidates.

As usual, the best system would likely be a mix of both. Many people say seating Mich/Flor would best be done by combining the votes cast with the overall national vote. Perhaps for future elections they could somehow award delegates based upon a mix of district-by-district breakdowns with the winner-take-all popular vote.

This way, winning 51% to 49% would give the victor a bump, but not the ridiculous all to nothing results of current winner-take-all states.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Becky Holliday, Monroeville, PA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:50:47 GMT

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:51:10 GMT

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Mrs. J - Illinois — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:51:47 GMT

It's a "no brainer". Senator Obama has more supporters who are willing to finance him as their candidate of choice. Therefore, he has more money to spend. He has handled his finances quite well and, may I remind you, had not left a string of debts behind him.

One cannot help but observe each candidate as they handle the finances of their campaign and project that on how they would handle the financial responsibility of this country as President.

This is only one clue, of many, as to which candidate would make the better president.

This is from a great-grandmother (who happens to be a "recovering republican")that sees hope and encouragement for a future with Obama as our leader.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Amy B Portland, ME — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:52:18 GMT

Has anyone noticed if Al Gore has lost weight lately?
He is the only candidate I will accept if Obama is denied the nomination. Never, never, never Hillary.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Joe - STL — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:52:28 GMT

So, you can waste web space with badgering over waffles and sausage, but NOT on a blatant double speak by the Clinton camp RE: Rendell and Nation of Islam!?

So much for news priorities. I suppose you thought it was too late to make a difference in peoples' minds?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Jerry S. Oakland, Ca — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:00 GMT

I really don't think money would help either candidate. Look at how much Romney spent and was not even able to get close to McCain.
I would argue that Obama's massive spending has more to do with his introduction to voters, and he needs this massive amount because he is an upstart national politician, not a firmly established candidate like Hillary Clinton.
So, stop trying to make a big deal out of his spending. You should also note that Pa. is a closed primary state with more conservatives than those in Ohio.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Bill Jones — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:29 GMT

Where's the Hope

Obama '08 and 4PEACE'09

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

He's cooking socialism — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:48 GMT

do you smell what Barack is cooking?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Lisa in CT, with you in spirit in PA. YES WE CAN! — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:53:49 GMT

I'm not sure what there's left to say other than it does feel like an eternity since we've had a primary or caucus. Sigh.

I salute all the people on the ground for Obama, all the supporters, all the endorsers, and the candidate himself.

Keep the faith, we will prevail in November...our support is only just beginning.

Lisa in CT (Obama for our best future)

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Down the Center 2008 — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:54:47 GMT

Don't forget you can vote for the third Democrat:

JOHN McCAIN 2008

Vote for someone who actually works with both sides.

Imagine a President that isn't too far left or right.

How about a President who walks down the center.

John McCain / Colin Powell 2008

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Cindy Lou, TX — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:58:16 GMT

Why does the MSM insist on playing these games? There has NEVER been a poll showing Obama might win in Pennsylvania. Even BEFORE all the media-induced dramas about flag pins and Weathermen, Obama was not slated to win Pennsylvania. So nothing can really be read into a loss in the state for him.

Furthermore, it won't be embarrassing if Obama loses after all the money he's spent. Please give the man credit for trying so valiantly. He could have been like Hillary and just not campaigned much, like she did in D.C., Maryland, Virginia, Wisconsin, etc., places where she was slated to lose. But Obama at least tried even though he is slated to lose in Pennsylvania. The media were all over Hillary because she didn't even try in the post Super Tuesday states, but now it's reversing position to parrot the Clinton campaign spin by making mockery of Obama's efforts to try to close the gap in Pennsylvania.

Do you people get dizzy from turning yourselves inside out to parrot Hillary's talking points, even if it contradicts something you've said months earlier?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Stewart, Bethesda, MD — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:58:48 GMT

OJ SIMPSOM ..... What does Oj Simpsom have to do with barack obama, well .... let me tell you. During the Oj murder trial, the prosecutors were trying their case totally based on what the TV pundits and court TV was saying and telling them. guess what, they LOST big time.
Now fast forward to today and barack obama is running his campaign totally based on the TV pundits and what MSNBC tells him. Guess what, he WILL LOSE BIG.

12000,000 million dollars ...WOW.... and still cannot win a BIG State or knock HILLARY CLINTON out.

YOU WANT TO SEE REAL STRENGTH .... HILLARY APPEARING ON KEITH OLBERMANN SHOW, DESPITE THEIR OVERWHELMING SUPPORT FOR " THE RACE BAITER " barack obama.

Polls .... Polls .... All you media and proctectors of the COOKIE package WHINNER, Hillary Clinton will WIN by 20+ pts today in PA.

...... MASTER CARD MOMENT .....
Whatching olbermann trying to trip up and get a gotcha moment during his interview with Hillary Clinton ......... PRICELESS.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

HP Boston — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:59:11 GMT

Today is the last stand for Monica Lewinsky's boyfriends wife. She needs a minimum of 60% in order to salvage her pathetic debt-ridden campaign. Also, she needs 60% to take the focus off of April 25, when a hearing will be held in the Peter Paul trial. Imagine someone accusing Hillary Clinton of fraud. Who would believe such a thing would happen.
Sick of corruption, sick of the Clintons (Sent Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:43 AM)

--------------------------
The reason I will vote for McCain is YOU! YOU and ALL the scum who trash and bash Senator Clinton, may you rest in peace!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Brian, DC — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:59:13 GMT

Philadelphia Flyers have game 7 tonight. Do some Clinton voters stay home and watch the game after work instead of going to vote? The Capitals win last night sets up this morning's headline: "Ovechkin Delivers Win for ... Obama"

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Ismael, Weslaco TX — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:59:38 GMT

Chuck Todd, on every blog this morning I submitted a link to the youtube video showing Rendell praising Farrahkan. Why have you not posted it? And, why have you not made any comments of your own about the video? Be unbiased.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Gerald, Texas — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:59:39 GMT

I remain mystified that the media omits that Obama began with a 20% deficit and a 16 year disadvantage. Still, nothing will occur today that will alter the ultimate outcome - Obama has already won the nomination.

I, for one, will be glad when we finish this stuff and get on to the General Election!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Jon, TX — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:59:46 GMT

Pat Huntington, NY... Your recommendations for changing the primary system is too pro-Hillary and too biased for even sensible Hillary supporters to agree. I really don't think Hillary won your state and California because they were primaries, but because she is a well established candidate that even the media did not predict Obama would defeat.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

NoToHillBillyInParidise — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:01:30 GMT

My Thoughts on The Clinton Camp After seeing Them in action just before Mini Tuesday. Hillary is an irrational liar , Bill is a Semi- racist liar (only racist when coming to the defense of his wife wink wink ) ,and poor Chelsea is a snobby little liar. I trully believe that anyone that can vote for Hillary after the way she has carried on this past few months. Deserves her for anyone that lies and gets caught as much as she does is to obvious. The problem is not that they are liars (which is a problem ) the problem is that they are bad liars much like G W Bush another bad liar. Using fear tactics is so republican it makes me sad that they have stooped to the level. But as my republican friends from work have been telling me. That' the Clintons.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

25% win for HILLARY — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:01:33 GMT

Like I said yesterday, I kinda hope Clinton wins by 20, so everyone will be forced to acknowledge it doesn't matter. She's lost.

Which is a good thing, based on what seems to be some reckless talk regarding Iran. She's a foreign policy nitwit.
Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA (Sent Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:51 AM
------------------------------------------------

Mmm... A dream is a wish your heart makes, when you are fast asleep!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Diane from Illinois — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:01:36 GMT

The problem is that Obama built an early lead in small states before anyone really knew the man. Now that we see what Obama stands for, who he associates with, and that he is elitist who knows what's best for us bitter people, his popularity is waning.

I'm voting for Hillary today.
Becky Holliday, Monroeville, PA
------------------------------------------------------It's always amazing to me that apparently it doesn't matter to Hillary supporters WHO the Clinton's associate with.........shady business deals, Bill giving not only speeches, but jobs to Columbia. And you see THAT as being okay? Go figure. Obama '08

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Jon, TX — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:02:59 GMT

Cooking socialism? Too bad you have fallen a victim a Hillary's excellent propaganda machine.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Ruth — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:03:52 GMT

I can't believe that msnbc Keith O., and cnn Larry King did not ask Hillary about her campaign being in debt. This goes with how she will run the country. They both gave her a free pass on this. They both took the easy way, and asked very easy questions. I expected that from cnn, but not from msnbc.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

JP, Sedona, AZ — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:04:40 GMT

Don't forget that when considering the popular vote, several states that held contests are not included in your estimates. IA, NV, ME, WA have not reported turnsouts. Although the margin of victory in cummulative popular vote for Obama was relatively small because they were caucuses, Obama's true popular vote lead includes an additional 100,000-200,000 votes you haven't included in the 700,000 number.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Sick of corruption, sick of the Clintons — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:04:44 GMT

The Conscience of America:

So, how do you feel about Bill Clinton pardoning those terrorists? Oh, wait, Hillary was against that decision wasn't she? I'm sure she was also against the Marc Rich pardon. Yep, so sad, she cried all the way to the bank.

Obama in 2008. Integrity matters and the Clintons have none. Just ask their creditors.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Lisa in CT, with you in spirit in PA. YES WE CAN! — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:04:47 GMT

Since when is being able to raise lots of money a negative in politics?

Just another example of the old double standard...

We are proud of being active participants (including donating money) to Barack's campaign...and we can continue, haven't even come close to topping out.

I speak as one of nearly two million (and counting)

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

sheila.williams@wolterskluwer.com — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:06:48 GMT

I'm praying for you Barack!

I think he'll make an excellent president. Hillary is shameless. She may win this battle, but she will not win the nomination. As for Bill Clinton, I am so sorry that I voted for that man twice. I can't believe what I'm hearing and have been hearing since this campaign started. Enough of the Clintons. Hillary should reach into that $109 million that she and Bill have collected since cashing in on the Presidency and pay her bills, especially the health insurance premiums for her campaign employees. Is that how she would run the WH? Mark Penn gets tens of millions of dollars while the working stiffs get the shaft on healthcare? I wish Barack would have used that in an ad!!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Jon, TX — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:07:33 GMT

Cindy Lou,
Todd meant to say that several polls showed Obama briefly leading in PA. I don't remember which polls, but try www.campaigndiaries.com

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Abby, SD — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:07:35 GMT

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Paps Williamson, Minnesota — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:08:49 GMT

This is too funny to watch. Obama's supporters spinning his big lose today in PA as a win? Very Clinton-ian! Very old time politics.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Margaret, Columbus, Ohio — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:09:59 GMT

Chuck, I think your 'rosey' scenario for Clinton is waaaaaaaay underestimating the voter turnout in Puerto Rico. How many people do you think will turn out?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Jim, the Mississippi Delta — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:28 GMT

This "analysis" erases all doubt that MSNBC is hot for Hillary Clinton. You folks are salivating for a McCain/Clinton matchup in November. Last night Keith Olberman was a shill for Hillary as he interviewed her. Have you no shame, ladies and gentlemen of MSNBC, have you no shame?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Tim — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:30 GMT

Carole, Fort Lauderdale, FL, you must be out of your mind? The result of what happened over the past few weeks, the fact that Obama has been able to shrink Clinton's lead from 20 to 5 shows the importance of campaigning in the state. Count Florida? You’re ridiculous!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Alison. New York, NY — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:32 GMT

Chuck, OBama had a huge disadvantage coming into the state. Clinton had the party machine; better name recognition; family ties; more older voters and fewer with college degrees. This is her core base. He needed to work very hard to get the numbers up, and he has.

But he is a black man in a state that still harbors a lot of racist attitudes. I saw this firsthand while knocking on doors in PA for the past three weeks. I suggest you do the same, Chuck, instead of pontificating from your cozy commentator's perch. This was always a tough state for OBama

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

kenn — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:11:02 GMT

MONEY IS WHAT OLZD POLITICS IS MADE OUT OF> double standards are the best standards arent they? OBAMMA IS BUSH LITE

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

KENN — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:12:34 GMT

I cant wait for hilliary to run aS AN independant AND LETS SEE WHO WINS macain obamma OR HER.Keep up the insults obamma

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

sotiredofignorance — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:12:44 GMT

Sorry Chuck, you have missed the salient point. People have already voted with their dollars. It doesn't matter WHAT Clinton does today. Unless she starts paying her own way, she's done.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:46 GMT

HP: "The reason I will vote for McCain is YOU!"

I'm sure that's not true, HP. But if it is, personally, I think anyone who's vote is determined by personalities on an internet message board ought to be asking themselves if they have the maturity to participate in the democratic process.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

ChrisD, West Hartford, CT — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:53 GMT

The best of luck to Senator Obama today! I am a 35 year hispanic and I think the Clinton's have a big surprise in store if they think they can beat Obama in Puerto Rico without a GOOD fight. A lot of family members I talk to in Puerto Rico are very disappointed with the Clintons and they say they will be voting for Obama. The people from Puerto Rico do not always vote the same way as the puertoricans that are in the U.S.! I wouldn't be quick to assume that Puerto Rico is going to go to Hillary Clinton. Obama has a GREAT chance to win Puerto Rico.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Joy for Obama — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:53 GMT

Bless you and others like you Mrs. J. of Illinois. Our hope for the future lies with Barack Obama. My heart and soul ia filled with hope and possibility when I see Barack's support, old, young, white, black, Jewish, Catholics, Muslims, Baptists, Gays, Gentiles, Democrats, Republicans, Independents etc, this is what America is. When I see us all together striving to unite as one people, I believe there is nothing we can't handle. Together we are America's greatest strength. We are playing for keeps so we can all WIN!

Obama for President!!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Becky Holliday, Monroeville, PA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:56 GMT

------------------------------------------------------It's always amazing to me that apparently it doesn't matter to Hillary supporters WHO the Clinton's associate with.........shady business deals, Bill giving not only speeches, but jobs to Columbia. And you see THAT as being okay? Go figure. Obama '08
Diane from Illinois

If this is so true, why is Obama going to lose so badly today? At some point you need to face the truth and admit that Obama is not that compelling of a candidate. The man had over a month to get his message to the people in Pennsylvania, and he failed. Today he pays for that failure.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

HP Boston — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:14:16 GMT

It's always amazing to me that apparently it doesn't matter to Hillary supporters WHO the Clinton's associate with.........shady business deals, Bill giving not only speeches, but jobs to Columbia. And you see THAT as being okay? Go figure. Obama '08
Diane from Illinois (Sent Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:01 AM)
-----------------------------------------------
Obama the angel only goes to heaven and visits his God Wright, he sits wright there on the wright hand of God his father...............and the angels sing!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

counting crows — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:14:32 GMT

to j fl: I suppose if you are happy with the way things are in DC and how this country has been run the past eight years, you wouldn't be interested or concerned with the concepts of change and turning the page. And, if that's the case, naturally you wouldn't "get it" when Obama talks about changing the way things have been done up to now.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Stewart, Bethesda, MD — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:14:38 GMT

ITS FUNNY HOW WHEN CHUCK TODD SPEAKS THE FACTS AND TRUTH, THE barack obama MINDLESS ZOMBIES CALL HIM A HILLARY SYMPATHIZER BUT IF HE PSUEDO-HYPE THE " RACE BAITER " HE IS PRAISED.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

JohnnyU, WA State — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:15:33 GMT

Dear Becky Holliday: God bless you for voting, for caring. In the long run I think you'll see it was Barack who had your best interests at heart and Hillary who played on your emotions for her own gain.
God Bless America!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Jason Zellston — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:15:36 GMT

I speak as one of nearly two million (and counting)

Lisa in CT, with you in spirit in PA. YES WE CAN!

______

That's quite a burden you bear. How do you hold up?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

bobbi eau claire, wi — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:16:22 GMT

Clinton by 22 pts in PA tonite! Go girl!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Joe, Missouri — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:16:40 GMT

So Clinton will be getting between five and ten percent, which means there's no game changer, which means this long national nightmare plods on. Or at least our long national dream-with-distressing-and-repetitive elements. Not as catchy, that.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

May Huddleston — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:17:51 GMT

Pat Huntington, you are SO right -- especially in abolishing caucuses since they are unconstitutional, presuppose there is NO secret ballot!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

AND SO IT GOES — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:19:36 GMT

Do you really support Obama, or do you just hate the Clintons? I'm going to have real problems voting for a candidate whose supporters are talking about rioting and burning Denver if he loses. They are so close on issues I thought Obama's messages of hope and change deserved to be listened to. Now I'm concerned. If he should lose the general, what would happen?
Abby, SD (Sent Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:07 AM)

------------------------
Abby be very afraid of the rabid Obama cult, they will riot, McCain wins!
Ease your mind the Clinton supporters will just go away, McCain wins!
This has been the plan of the repukes all along they divide and conquer it is the only way they win.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Lisa in CT, with you in spirit in PA. YES WE CAN! — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:20:20 GMT

Abby, prior to super Tuesday I very clearly supported both. I voted for Obama on Feb. 5th and went to his rally on the 4th. But I clearly remember (at the rally) still feeling like I'd support either candidate.

By late February, I had reached my tipping point on Clinton, due to her campaign tactics (I'll win at all costs even if I destroy the party) and her negative ads and general nastiness. Sorry, but for me its the truth.

I am just as much for Obama as I am anti-Clinton. Both forces come to play with me. For me, it was a lot like the 5th Congressional District election in CT between Nancy Johnson and Chris Murphy (in Fall, 2006). Nancy Johnson felt desparate and went horrifically nasty against Chris Murphy and he had to respond.

I never vote for nasty and Chris Murphy pulled off an upset here.

I am one of those voters who will never support the candidate who goes massively negative and nasty first, don't care what there stances are, the negative campaigning is what tips it for me every time.

Speaking for myself only...Clinton had my support, she lost it in Feb.

Obama for our best future.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

iowan — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:21:24 GMT

Enough with the 'popular vote' as a reliable marker. We have 43 elections which have taken place over a period of four months. And, you cannot collect a popular vote for many of the caucus states as they elected only 'delegates', so your count is inherrently off that way, too. Stop it.

Obama will be, and should be, the candidate. What the Clintons are doing has taken most voters (note her poll negaties) beyond resentment. An experienced liar? No thanks. One can say Nixon was a skilled politican (and he was, and, frankly, a much better prez than Slick Willy), but that does not mean he was a good leader. Obama has put together one hell of a campaign and, given the paucity of moral leadership from the current Congress and president, I am much more than willing to give him the keys to the car for eight years.

Pennsylvanians, get with it, please.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Doug, MN — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:21:49 GMT

CMON PENNSYLVANIA, TIME TO END THIS UGLY CONTEST. VOTE OBAMA AND END THE MADNESS!

Clinton actually spoke about NUKING Iran!!!! If THAT is what you want as a President, then you might as well be voting for McCain.

VOTE FOR OBAMA TONIGHT!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Nj — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:22:53 GMT

I will RIOT if this gets stolen from Obama as well
COUNT ME IN
She is EVIL and has not business in this. She is losing and cant win
So why stay???
EGO

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Heart of America — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:22:57 GMT

If I were a betting woman, I would put my money on the underdog. Since this is the campaign for hope I am going to bet on the lucky #1 today. Wouldn't it be something sweet to celebrate if Obama wins Penn st. by 1% of the vote. I am not a drinking woman either, but I would definitely drink to that!

Obama 08!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Christine, Perkasie PA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:22:58 GMT

And this 49 YO White Female (who happens to be one of those Bitter Pennsylvanians) just placed my vote for Obama - as did my two 20-something children and my 85 year old former Republican mom.

Enough of old school politicians. Enough talk from Hillary about Obama being an "Elitist" - she who is a millionaire many times over yet can't manange the finances of her campaign. If she ends up answering that phone at 3 a.m. come next January, you ain't seen BITTER yet.

Go Obama!

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Pam OC,CA — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:23:26 GMT

Obama can afford to spend the money, he had it, and he needed to. I know the media wants a close contest between these two-it keeps them engaged and employed. Keep the masses riled. I am Hoping that Hillary just runs out of funds..something I think she already has done..without an infusion of cash her campaign will die.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

counting crows — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:23:32 GMT

Diane from Illinois: To call Obama an elitist is really absurd and it's sad that folks like you can't see through that particular smoke screen created by the Clinton campaign. No, Obama is not an elitist. One can't be an elitist if one is mixed race, raised by a single white young woman, having had to resort to food stamps, and paying for his education via student loans (which he paid back only in the past few years, while in his 40's). No, Obama is smart, Obama is hopeful, Obama would like to raise the sights of folks like you so that you can be as successful and productive as he has become. When Hillary Clinton says to people "I'm one of you" she's really saying "you're down there in the lower classes, uneducated, and that's where you need to stay, so vote for me because I'll help you stay there so you won't ever know the crap that I'm pulling on you." This elitist business is stupid and a non-issue. Vote for Hillary if she's your choice but don't use the "elitist" argument because it doesn't hold true.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Sherri, Charleston WV — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:24:32 GMT

The only thing I can think of right now is her glee is declaring she would drop the nuke in Iran..... are you serous????? That is sabre rattling, unresponsible, warmongering----stop me any time. I guess we'd better hope lke hell the troops ae out of Iraq: and out of Turkey, and out of the Gulf states, and out of Egypt. Does she not realize they would be goners as well??????? THis is an absolute outrage.....

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Tim Louisville, KY — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:25:40 GMT

BUCHANAN'S LAST STAND?

Pat Buchanan has been going on for quite some time about how Obama can't win among blue collar white voters. (Or without them.) Today is his last stand. Hillary has to have a blowout today to even keep running. It will be interesting to see if Pat will be crowing or eating crow once the numbers are tallied.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

tsp reno nv — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:25:48 GMT

Winner take all is the worst and most unfair practice for elections. It means if someone loes a state by 100 votes the people voting for them are disenfranchised in the election process. As far as whether to do caucus or primary they both have good and bad points. In a primarty you don't have to be very informed in the races just run ina vote and be done. In the caucus system you go in and have the chance to talk to the supporters of all candidates and make a more informed decision on who to vote for. My state Nevada has always had a primary until this year. I found the caucus to be much better because I had the chance to look more clossly at the candidates before just making assumptions and voting. As far as psoters don't tell me you are the conscience of america and bad mouth Obama. I cannot in good conscience vote for clinton given her campaign tactics. I don't however presume to be anyones elses conscience I am not that egotistical.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Tom Daniels, St.Louis, Missouri — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:26:26 GMT

I love the process of selecting our next President. If my employer would give me a year off with pay and taxpayers would give me money to run I would be happy to express and explain my views of our country and the world. Of course I am only one person, can one person really make that much of a difference?

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Stephen James — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:26:29 GMT

$11.2 million to $4.8 million is the proportiion of expenditures in the Pennsylvain primary, according to MSNBC - that is, Obama outspent Clinton 2.33 to 1 - that's not three times as much: it's closer to twice as much. A little more Wolfson math - someone should point out that the figures are skewed. Otherwise an excellent report.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Rider, Louisville, KY — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:26:54 GMT

Abby: The last poll I saw on the issue had more Clinton supporters unwilling to vote Obama than vice versa. You may have a few people spouting craziness for Obama but the Clinton supporters have been showing a greater liklihood of handing the Presidency back to the GOP.

First thoughts: Contest No. 45

Ed G — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:27:02 GMT

It's Barack vs Ba-roke.
If she can't manage a campaign... how can she manage a country? In her only 3AM moment, she voted for a war without even reading the intelligence reports.

Who is ready on Day One?
Obama.