Clinton: The bigger loser?

Selina, Wilmington, Delaware — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:21:08 GMT

I'm so tired of hearing Billary talk. She and he speak out of both sides of her mouth. I actually liked them at one point, but now I'm so disgusted by them and their "Clinton" math. This is their downfall. And if you can't see the 2012 angle, you don't deserve to vote.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

CANADA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:22:08 GMT

NOTHING ON MR. WRIGHT BOYS? YOU NEVER SEEM TO AMAZE ME ......IF THAT WAS CLINTONS PASTOR LAST NIGHT YOU ALL WOULD HAVE BEEN ALL OVER HER. YOU ARE ALL SO SMOOTH........... WE KNOW YOU ARE BIAS AGAINST CLINTON.YOU THINK OBAMA WALKS ON WATER...........

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Gregory Peek, Birmingham, Alabama — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:23:41 GMT

If Hillary Clinton was to win the Democratic nomination with a majority of valid elected delegates, she would have a reasonable chance of winning the general election. If she gained the nomination any other way, well, remember the Titanic?

If Senator Clinton can not win a majority of valid elected delegates and can not win the general election with an illicit or suspect nomination, why is anyone still supporting her campaign?

It appears to be time to move on.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Campdog — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:24:20 GMT

The effort to taint Bill Clinton's reputation has been part of the overall Obama plan. Select a statement, pick it apart and call it a gaffe. It doesn't happen to just Bill Clinton, many supporters of Hillary have also been attacked for making observations many others have made.

Just last night I spoke with a friend in Indiana and learned that Bill Clinton spoke in her small town to a wildly enthusiastic crowd made up by most of the people in town. I guess they haven't read that Bill is a political has been and has lost whatever ability he once had.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Robert,N.Y. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:29:35 GMT

The bigger question is did she in fact raise $10 million,given her track record of endless lie's and the fact that the number of donors keep changing I rather doubt that she raised much at all.She stated that her campaign was running on fumes but when you look at her limited amount of advertising I would rather believe she is now running on nothing but vapors which of course means only one thing,she's running on nothing but desperation and the race is over!!!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

jerry/corpus christi texas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:30:06 GMT

Debate in a flatbed truck...
With hay bales and chickens around them??????
A couple of bottles of moonshine for them to drink?...

Everybody knows Bill Clinton's game. He is running his wife so he can get a third term as president. His wife has proven that she does not have the stones to be a president. She cannot keep a checkbook in the campaign and her ideas have been laughed at and torn apart by the experts. In this age of youtube and increased internet scrutiny, Bill is seen as nothing more then a moron who nobody can figure out how e got two terms as president. Why this man is not in jail for lying to a grand jury and being a sexual predator is beyond me.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

bill, okla — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:35:19 GMT

The defeat of the self-righteous finger pointer and his whining, sulking wife will be no great loss to the democratic party or America.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

garyd, amherst, nh — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:43:59 GMT

Sorry....but there can be nothing further from the truth that Hillary might be the better candidate. She might be the most aggressive candidate....the most dishonest candidate...perhaps even the most evil candidate ..... but "better" ..... not even "better than nothing".

Clinton: The bigger loser?

MI Chick — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:49:45 GMT

‘There's a certain style to the campaign, and it shows what we might expect in a Clinton presidency: a lot of viewpoints and a messiness,’

Amen to that. Scary thought, eh?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Cheryl — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:57:51 GMT

My comment is simply this and it's addressed to Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews, David Gregor, Nora O'Donnell or anyone who will answer the question for me:

Why hasn't the story of the Peter Paul lawsuit against the Clintons been covered in the media? I had seen several references to it on First Read by bloggers in various story comments. I followed the links left by the commentators and kept following the threads. I eventually found: http://www.paulvclinton.com/pp_complaint_022504_njw.pdf
Makes you think about the old adage about the 'Leopard changing it's spots" or "dis-honor among thieves".

I have no party affiliations, and I probably fall within Mrs. Clinton's voter range, 57 year old white woman, own my own small business. One thing though, I don't feel I am owed anything. I work hard, I respect others and give a helping hand when I can. I do not respect the Clintons or their political or business habits. I am asking/demanding all of you, report what is real in this race. I want to know and I am sure the public does. I have heard enough about Rev. Wright. Tell me about this lawsuit.

Thank you if someone replies on air.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

JIm, Santa Cruz — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:59:14 GMT

Kristol wishes Hillary is the candidate because he knows he can beat her, but Obama is the anti-Bush and will move the country in the right direction, away from the precipice to which conservatives have taken us.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Eric, Salinas, CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:33 GMT

I've lost plenty of respect for Bill Clinton, whom I voted for twice, with his overly contentious spiel on the campaign trail this year. The more he talks the more I now dislike him. Keep it up Bill and soon you'll only have the Republicans rooting for you.

Go Obama!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Tony, Chicago — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:02:51 GMT

Hillary and Bill could never be trusted. They both lie and talking about race both Clinton's have allow their true color to show. We use race to divide and I often ask people if you were black and all you ever had was white presidents how would you feel. Hillary and Bill are hurting because they didn't think a black man could win the party.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Neenahfox,MI — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:07:16 GMT

Why is Hillary Clinton receiving so much praise? Clinton is a household name. She was suppose to blow Barack away by February 5th and she didn't. You all can stop trying to put the onus on Barack because remeber, he's the inexperienced candidate that's beating her.

I would hate for her to steal this election. If America thinks we're in bad shape now, just imagine what the rest of the world will think of us then. I've always been taught that you lead by example. What sort of message will we send to the rest of the world?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:08:19 GMT

Clinton desperately wants another debate because she knows the pre-debate TV hype would make her seem like she's still viable, despite the numbers. Right now she's desperately trying to retain that impression of viability - a campaign of "seeming" over "being," and she needs (and is getting) media help with that purpose.

But the reality - the "being" - isn't there.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Trev — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:11:07 GMT

It is amazing how everyone forgets all the good that Clinton did. I wich I had the 1990s economy back.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Class Warrior, D.C. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:13:56 GMT

I used to think Clinton was one of the greats as a president...still do, maybe. He rescued the nation from the economic mess Bush 41 had made and transformed the economy into a dynamo. But now, he just seems like some craven jerk who can't keep his foolish opinions to himself. I don't know what happened, but someone needs to put a muzzle on that man...especially (God forbid!) if he rambles around the White House again.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Andress — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:14:29 GMT

Who would trust a women who trusts Bill Clinton?

Did we learn anything last time?

Bad Judgement!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

the Pajama Pundit — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:39 GMT

Probably a bit of a biased blog post title...

but true nonetheless.

http://thepajamapundit.com/

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Gail, TN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:53 GMT

I just listened to Rev. Wright's address to the National Press Club and the Q and A afterward in its entirety. No doubt, he is a fiery orator, but he speaks truth. He presented a colorful history lesson about the black church in America and its tradition of liberation theology.

He stated that it was not really him or Sen. Obama who was under attack, but the religious traditions of the black church. Hopefully people will listen to the entire address and learn or be reminded of some American history.

If the media insists that this speech was damaging to Sen. Obama, they will be culpable for making it so. I don't think it was and hope it won't be presented that way.

As Jesus said, "Let those who have ears, hear."

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Thomas, Phoenix, AZ — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:42 GMT

The Clinton campaign has no one to blame but itself for completely falling apart mid-stream. The candidacy was hers from day one, but her lack of management strength, lack of strategic focus, questionable choice of advisors and poor financial oversight has led her to where she is today: unable to win the candidacy due to her current position.

While Obama is somewhat of an unknown to many voters, they can take solace from his superior management skills - which include the ability to develop and stay on plan, superior staffing and money raising abilities. Since he also hasn't adopted a 'slash and burn' approach to his opponents, it should be easier for him to unite the party when he wins the nomination. Hillary has lost in that category as well...

Clinton: The bigger loser?

lucyna — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:22:42 GMT

I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary would try to steal the nomination. It is so typical of her to do that. In a billion years I would not vote for this woman.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Lalama4OBAma — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:29:07 GMT

I have it on good authority that radicals within the powerful rightwing Jewish Lobby including [AIPAC] American Israel Public Affairs Committee are vexed, frustrated and displeased with Barack Obama's refusal to accept special interest money and consequentially seek his crucifixion. The concern is that the Senator's policy prevents them from exerting influence or extracting favor from his administration should he become the next President in these United States of America. In an effort to allay their fears, Senator Obama has offered his assurance that if elected, an Obama administration would not be a foe- yet this does not seem to halt their resistance to his candidacy. Reportedly, Senator Clinton's campaign saw an opening to exploit the Jewish community's apprehension and began stoking the anti-Obama fire behind the scene.

In collaboration with the Clintons, they [the Jewish Lobby] dispatched a number of "candidacy assassinators" including former Clinton special counsel, Lanny Davis, Florida congress woman, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, California congress man, Brad Sherman, CNN news anchor, Wolf Blitzer [vis-a-vis Lou Dobbs], Independent Senator, Joseph Lieberman, the far right crippled Washington Post Journalist, Charles Krauthammer and others to torpedo Obama's nomination bid. The above mentioned Jews were mandated to fan the flames of hateful passion against the Illinois Senator using demagoguery and nefarious spin of the Reverend Wright issue to toxify the American voters. Their mission is to convince the public that Obama would be unelectable in November due to his optics and alleged third party association to Rev. Farrakhan. This while simultaneously promoting Hillary as the only friend of Israel. It is also reliably reported that Democratic Jews are being counseled to vote for John McCain as a penultimate option should Senator Clinton not get the nomination.

Take a look at the YouTube video where Rachel Maddow from Air America recently discussed the topic on her show. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdYzGzvXO0U

African American Leaders dub the Jewish and Clinton's anti Obama campaign, "mean spirited" but so far have opted to remain restrainedly tentative. They however suggest hypocrisy when Governor Rendell [who happens to be a Jew] is able to extol the virtues of Minister Farrakhan by praising his "goodness" and still remains an embraced surrogate of Senator Clinton. Elected Democrats have also taken note and are increasingly frustrated with the Clinton's controversial tactics of infusing racial divide into the electoral process. Appalling is how they describe her alliance to hawkish groups including John McCain to annihilate a democratic colleague and worry that it provides damaging ammunition to their nemesis [the republicans] that could derail Obama's candidacy should he become the nominee. Some are even calling her conduct treacherous and privately accuse her of deliberately trying to sabotage the Democratic Party because of the unlikely odds of her fairly winning the nomination. Mrs. Clinton has also been criticized for taken the low road by exploiting the gender card to foster disharmony amongst the sexes. But who is willing to bell the Cat? After-all, the Clinton's wield influential power within the party and super delegates worry about political reprisals should they offer public criticism.

Additionally, the Jewish Lobby has tremendous financial reach and political clout. For decades they have been able to effectively manipulate the Holocaust to keep politicians beholden to their agenda. Those who resist or oppose are targeted with the anti-Semitic or Bigoted label [as evidenced by President Carter] in order to gain compliance. Some feel they run the risk of overplaying their hands in this instance though. Their chief Obama "Hit-Man", Lanny Davis is causing tremendous concern at the great lengths he goes to decapitate the Illinois Senator's chances of ever ascending to the Presidency and his conduct is described as vilely snake-like. The argument is that public opinion can boomerang if blacks are able to expose hypocrisy in what many now view to be a Jewish lynching of Senator Obama. Some posit that Jews have a historical pension for betraying visionary men who promise sweeping changes to the status quo. Coincidentally, it was they [Biblical Jews] who betrayed Jesus to the Romans so he could be crucified.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Jessy Hamilton, Orlando, Florida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:31 GMT

Have fun with your analysis. If Hillary's math is wrong (and Florida and Michigan aren't seated as voting delegations in Denver) you can begin plans for at least four more years of failed Republican policies. The general feeling in Florida is count us now, or count us out. I guess if you ignore the plight of Floridians (as MSNBC has for some time now) and marginalize our own take on the issue, you wouldn't know that though. Rallies were held throughout the state Saturday in protest and buses are leaving from all major Florida cities tomorrow morning to protest on the stairs of the DNC. Where's the coverage?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

JOAN CHICAGO IL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:42 GMT

Neenahfox,MI

One simple answer, African AMerican are just blind, desperatly want a black for president, so, they have to drop the Clinton in order tosupport Obama, because he is black, thats all.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Ismael, Weslaco TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:31:32 GMT

In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

In an astonishing ruling by the Judge he ordered that Hillary Clinton would not be compelled to explain in a sworn deposition what her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign was until after the election. This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving to the Washington Post in August 2000 and in four false FEC reports made from 2000-2006

Clinton: The bigger loser?

twocanpete — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:31:41 GMT

http://twocanpete.blogspot.com/
That White House must be some fancy digs to give up $10 million a year!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

latinovoter1 — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:31:55 GMT

C'mon, she did not raise $10 million, and if she did, it's only going to pay off the THOUSANDS of hard working vendors, caterers and locations that she owes. And a lot of them will get stiffed. How is not paying for "EVENTS", helping the average blue collar workers that need a paycheck, just like the Clintons. Anyone who donates money to Hillary's Campaign are suckers, she's the Field Bet on a Crap Table.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Ogwumagana, Houston, Texas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:32:39 GMT

Did you say 'big win?'. Has anyone given Obama credit for closing the gaps in all the so called swing states? The trend says that Clinton is running a losing campaign and with time she'll be lucky even to be saved by the bell.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Ms. Green, Bowie, Maryland — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:38:20 GMT

Hillary is a fighter I will giver her that. However, she is saying "If I go down, I'm taking Obama with me" and that is not right. She hasn't pulled anything in while. Not since she exploited the "bitter" remark and had her Boy Steph moderate a unbalanced debate. But I'm sure she has something up her sleeve before the May 6th Primary.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Dave, Tn — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:39:25 GMT

Hillary Clinton is the best candidate because just like Paris Hilton she has name recognition :-)

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Leslie, Aliso Viejo, Ca. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:46:12 GMT

CLINTON FATIGUE - I am so sick of hearing and seeing them on TV that I change the channel now whenever they appear. I can't imagine them in the White House, I'll never be able to watch TV again. Hopefully Senator Obama will prevail and we can all be happpy again. Having the Clinton's back in the White House is like the Bush's never leaving.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Lisa Simons, Palo Alto, California — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:46:41 GMT

This is interesting, but what happened to the days when a reporter actually dug up news to report? The Obama campaign is making a push online for new contributions, and there is a big donor offering a "matching grant". Who is it? Follow the money.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Joe, Manchester, VT — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:48:23 GMT

Bill Clinton has no one to blame but himself. He's turned into the buffoon we've ever had as a Past President. The voters will decide, but nothing would better serve the country than have Bill fade into relative obscurity. He's like an over-the-hill actor who doesn't know when to get off stage.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Mary Gallant, Rutherfordton, N>C — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:51:17 GMT

I think the superdelegates should vote now and get it over with because even if half of them vote for Clinton she still can't possible win. So why not bow out gracefully now Hillary for the sake and well being of the party, and maybe you can still keep some of the dignity and friends you have left. If not you lose everything.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

CraigB; Chincoteague, VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:52:15 GMT

It is quite simple...the more that Bill speaks, the more we truly understand his real person. He and Hillary USED the African American community for years...until they needed to play the race card and show their real faces. They are the most disgusting politicians in history, and HRC is QUITE inexpertienced for this job, because she shows NO signs of leadership and unity.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Patricia Gordon, Brookline, MA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:40 GMT

The 1990's economy was, to quote The Guardian, "a potemkin economy" in both the US and the UK. Also Bill passed NAFTA, repealed Glass Steagall (enabling the subprime debacle), and promoted trade with China.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Dave, Beaumont, Texas. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:57:43 GMT

Hook, crook, lie, steal, will and deal. This is the Clinton's stratergy. The only thing they care about is getting in office and lineing up their deals so they can make another $109 million dollars after leaving the Whitehouse. Superdelegates wake up and put a end to this before the voters put a end to the Democratic Party.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

MJL REdondo Beach CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:01:14 GMT

Give credit where credit is due. Obama would have been crushed and smeared all over the U.S. if the media did the same to him that they do to Hillary and Bill Clinton. For once the media questioned him on his associations with Wright and Ayers (who are definitely anti-american) he fails miserably in his explanation, then he cries, whines and blames. He is weak. Hillary can take whatever they dish out. We need a strong President. Not a WIMP who can't win a debate to save his life.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

maksim tsionskiy, hollywood FLorida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:01:14 GMT

How is clinton is better candidate? where is proof? She is destroying democratic party. she needs to quit.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

BO Go Home, QCA, Iowa — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:02:19 GMT

Obamabites like to call it both ways. They call him the "inexperienced" candidate, but then say he has more legislative experience. They say "Clinton's a household name" - well he is now too, so you have no arguments to justify.

He won't debate because he looks like a fool in debates, plain and simple . He only speaks "eliquently" when reading his speeches off teleprompters.

His arrogance and cockiness are just like Bush's. I don't want a cocky, arrogant "know-it-all" as my president.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

NObama-MI — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:02:56 GMT

The obamanoids have succeede d in destroying Bill Clintons 2 terms in office.I cannot stand all this uniting of the Democratic party that has occurred.I suppose that when Obama gets creamed in the general they will blame it on the Clintons like they blame them for everything else.One thing Obama has taught his crazy followers--is to never take the blame for anything they say and do---blame the clintons.Oh dear---rev wright getting death threats and Nation of Islam is protecting him.Are they protectin Tavis smiley from the death threats from the Obamanoids ,too?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

ObamaRamaDramaSissBooBamma! — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:03:08 GMT

If Hillary is the Biggest Loser, then why is her butt still soooooo faaatttt!!!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Independent Voter, FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:03:23 GMT

Cheryl,

If you read more of the comments on the Internet concerning the Peter Paul Fraud trial you will find that someone has stated that the news media WILL NOT report on the trial. So we are on our own.

I do not have the link at this moment but I will try and find it and post it. However I have posted many comments on the trial and MSNBC has not posted ANY of them

Clinton: The bigger loser?

John, Maine — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:04:15 GMT

Gregory Peek, Birmingham, Alabama:
What do you mean by Valid Elected Delegates? You mean states that have Cacuses where you have to spend hours upon hours, where I had people yelling at me to switch to Obama? This is what you call a Valid Elected Delegate? Where turn out in Cacuseses are alot lower than direct voting? Where working class individuals, and elderly (which are Clinton's strong points) cant come out and spend hours on a week night? THis is what you call a valid Elected Delegate? Where Clinton losses Texas delegate count although more people voted for Clinton? Get Real! Clinton is doing just as well as Obama.

(I know MSNBC will not post this, as I have lost alot of faith in them. They are rank and file Obama fans. really sad)

John
Maine

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Terry, IN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:04:31 GMT

“Because of the way he is covered, the only thing anyone ever sees is fifteen seconds that is deemed by the pundits to be off message.”

HOW RICH!!!!!!!!! deja vu??? IRONIC JUSTICE?

Kinda like the Rev. Wright snipits? The "BITTER" remark??

Clinton: The bigger loser?

gemma garcia Dallas, Texas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:05:08 GMT

I agree with you. we all wish he had the 1990s economy bnack, but we dont. this is no Obama's fault. the clinton's down own the white house, they did good and they served their time, now it's =time to give someone else a chance to also do some good. they are not the only ones can do good. do you realized fort he past 20yrs or so, the country have been run by either a bush or a clinton? it's a democracy or so they say, time for someone else to show what they can do. if she win the nomination by all means .......but if she does not then .......move on.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Shame and Hollow — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:08:13 GMT

Major conjecture! The path back to yesterday is not spelled "Future"! DNC, The dumb no counts have destroyed progress and unity. By all counts, HRC and Obama have failed the experience and leadership qualifications required! Yes, their party has nothing which is qualified. Such a failure, people are being forced to vote an idiot into the oval office. Sense when are they and their lies leadership traits.

Is their being not what we already are being forced to contend with now, so in reality these two offer nothing!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

chris, SC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:13:16 GMT

The way I feel about Bill is give him enough rope.... The problem with him is that he just can't help himself. The desire to be back in the white house is too great. He and Hillary will do anything to move back. We can't have the dishonesty that accompanies the Clinton team. And when I say team, that's exactly what it'll be. Bill and Hillary both ruling the US. The fact that they act as if the presidency is their entitlement is rather distasteful. We really need Obama to take us in the right direction. He is the one individual that can unite the country like no other.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Sherri, Charleston WV — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:13:20 GMT

I wholeheartly agree with Cheryl in her last post......this is a court situation where the Clintons have to acount to a judge and/or jury people......is there no shame with you all?? You would rather harp about a preacher in Senator Obama's church instead. If you really must go on and on.......my memory tells me Rev. Wright was embraced by PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON at a prayer breakfast very shortly after his come to Jesus moment with Monica Lewinski. Yes Hillary, you defintely can choose your pastor, and Rev. Wright was one of those chosen. Now, the Hell enough with the crap that will do absolutely nothing to lower my taxes, bolster my infrastructure, and keep this country in better world standing. OBAMA 08

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Joe Einloth — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:13:57 GMT

Jerry, only a damn fool ever considered Bill Clinton to be a moron. He's not in jail for lying because he was never brought to trial and convicted. That's the way we do things in this country. Impeachment was unnecessary after 1/20/01. Why wasn't he tried? I'm guessing that the case wasn't strong enough to convict.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Jing Li — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:14:05 GMT

I don't wish we had the 1990s back, we need to move forward, and moving backward will make us slip even more in the world.

This is a global economy, if you cling to the past, it will only mean self-destruction. Just shows that how much Clinstones understand the economy issues.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Sue F, Idaho Falls, Id. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:14:10 GMT

Boy I'm beginning to wonder how many Media mouthpieces the Clintons have, seems every web site you go too it's poor Hillary, she's the better candiate, she's not getting treated fairly, too quote the Queen herself, if you can'ts stand the heat stay out of the kitchen! Obama is a self made man and candiate, the Clinton's are Washington politicians from the get go. They have friends in high places with deep pockets, yet her constant lies that are then somehow dismissed as mispeaks are an insult to those of us who support Obama. He's been raked over the coals about Rev. Wright, who's name last I looked isn't on the ticket, about Bitter remarks etc., and how I wonder did those come up to begin with, because the Clinton campaign put it out there for all too see. From Hillary's "well I don't think he's muslim" to Bill's remarks in South Carolina, it's beginning too look like the media would love to have Hillary as the nominee so the GOP and Dem Diva could give them a general with all that slime. No thanks, I'll stick with Obama, like he said he hasn't been in D.C. long enough to have the syrup stick to him yet. Bill Clinton was a good President, he wasn't very moral, but Hillary isn't Bill, period, end of story.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Matt San Angelo TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:14:22 GMT

Clinton was good in the 90's but now we need a real change and that change is Barrack Obama. No more Clintons and Bushs third terms please!! President Obama 08'

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Michael, Miami Beach, FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:17:33 GMT

So are you trying to say that the Clinton DID NOT raise 10 million in one day?. It's interesting that you never write articles questioning Obama's fundraising efforts but when Clinton raises a record amount it comes into question? HMMM bias maybe? I was one of those people that donated money to Clinton's campaign in the wake of the PA primary $125 to be exact and I will keep donating. This bias reporting is not democratic and is not serving the voters at all.

If you went onto her website the night of the PA primary like I did you would see that there were also a record number of blog entries with people displaying their donation amounts. I have never seen this many comments to a blog on her website in one night since I have started following the campaign in October. There were over 800 just on one entry. Maybe next time Obama comes out with his record setting fundraising figures you should question the validity of that assertion also?

I take great offense to this post. I was one of many people that believe that Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for the job. To suggest to your readers that we as supporters somehow did not give in record numbers is very disrespectful to us and is completely bias.

Why don't you spend time on these blogs talking about Clinton's plans on health care, the economy, energy independence, the home forclosure crisis, making college affordable, the war in iraq, restoring our image around the world, and her plan to end the war on science. I find it ineresting that the news today is always about crap that people don't care about. Things that won't affect my life your life and the lives of all of your readers. We care about what these candidates will do to make this country a better place for us and our children.

Thank you for this blog, I will now go donate another $100 to Hillary's campaign.

GO HILLARY 08

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Lynn Price — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:20:43 GMT

I agree with most of the others, I would like to know why the tv networks have not aired to lawsuit with the clintons. If it had been Obama,It would be new every 5 minutes on msnbc, cnn, and all the other major shows.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Obama08PA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:24:05 GMT

she is and will be the loser if the media reported that her pastor is in prison for sexual abuse of a 7 year old girl not to mention the case Peter Paul v. Hillary Clinton.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Carol, CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:24:08 GMT

All this talk about Senator Clinton taking Senator Obama down is ludicrous...he's the one with Rev. Wright, with Rezco, with "bitter/bigot gate", with little experience, lacking in debate prowess, etc. Senator Clinton didn't manufacture these...he's done this himself...it's about who he is...it's about a left wing liberal agenda at a time when America needs better!!

Take responsibility for your candidate...stand up for him, without tearing down the other candidate that's what an election is about!

Can't any Senator Obama Supporters come up with any good reasons WHY he should be the Democratic nominee...????????????????

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Sheila from Texas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:24:49 GMT

Bill and Clinton are the Biggest Loser Couple! Far worse than Reverend Wright or any Senator Obama's naysayers. It is apparent that people refuse to listen and hear only what they want. They both stand on their own words and actions. Reverend Wright is his own man as is Senator Obama. Senator Clinton is far from cooperational or confrontational. She is glib and deceitful. Her husband, Bill Clinton is the master and her deception further twisting and protracting her lies.

It's funny that we have yet to hear the sound bite in which Reverend Wright said in Senator Obama's role as president he (Reverend Wright) will "come after Senator Obama" holding him (Senator Obama) accountable for policies that he (Reverend Wright) feels objectionable.

Some you are way off base as you spew your tales and fictional actions of honorable American-Obama and Wright. No matter, Senator Clinton's baggage has not been rummaged through as she claims as in addition to her suitcase the American public will soon be looking in her trunk, garment bag and even her carry-on to see where all of the body parts are buried.

No time for paralysis of analysis as we've heard the candidate's policy stances. We need to focus the candidate's and their direct contact with the American public as they are the one's on the ticket.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Diane from Illinois — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:31:22 GMT

Go, Cheryl (above)! I, too, can't believe the media isn't all over this Paul lawsuit story. What IS it with the Clinton's and the media? THIS is a huge story......NOT whether or not Obama wears a lapel pin for heaven's sake! Tell us about this lawsuit involving the Clintons! Why is the media covering up this story?????

Clinton: The bigger loser?

katrina-Canada — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:36:48 GMT

I'm wondering how fair it is in a democracy to have a former President campaigning on your behalf? Overall,doesn't this provide a huge advantage?
As for the prospect of another debate where Clinton plus the hosts try to disguise the real issues-Iraq,clean up Washington,solve housing crisis-by focusing on junk issues-I think the American public is smarter than that.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Iyke, PH, Rivers — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:38:43 GMT

Just Words?! Clinton Says Actions Matter - They Do!
CLINTONS:
Paula Jones - LIE
MONICA - LIE,
BOSNIA - LIE,
COLUMBIA - LIE,
IRAQ VOTE - LIE,
NAFTA - LIE,
WRIGHT ONLY FRIEND OF OBAMA NOT CLINTON - LIE,
RUNNING FOR 2008 BUT NOT FOR 2012 - LIE
RACE CARD - LIE
RE-OPENING MI, FL VOTE - LIE
OBAMA AS VP - LIE
POPULAR VOTE - LIE
FERRARO - LIE
FARRAKHAN NOT FRIEND FOR ED RANDELL - LIE
$105 MILLION ASSET, 50% NOT FROM LOBBYISTS - LIE
ENDING IRAQ WAR - LIE
BILL, not intentionally "RACE CARD" topic every primary day to capture more WHITE VOTES - LIE
NOT FLIP-FLOPING ON OBAMA ELECTABILITY IN DEBATE vs RALLY - LIE
CLAIMING HER FAILED HEALTH INSURANCE UNIVERSAL - LIE
BILL "NOT" Bombing other countries 7 times day before Monica's Court Appearance - LIE
HILLARY NOT USING 3AM Ad, "BIN LADEN" to use BUSH SCARE TACTICS - LIE
Last 20 YEARS its "BUSH+CLINTONS" like SADDAM HUSSAIN did to IRAQ REGIME. USA IS NOT REGIME - LIE
Do you really want to VOTE for 8 more years of these?
Posted by: kg | April 28, 2008 12:56 AM

Clinton: The bigger loser?

manny, roanoke, va — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:43:23 GMT

Going by the numbers (like pledged delegates votes and primary votes and given the few days left before the DNC August convention date in Denver), Obama will win over HRC.Obama has also more campaign money than HRC not to mention the fact that Obama staff manages the spending more efficiently than HRC's indicating that Obama might be a better presidential material in managing a country cost effectively. Having more donors to contribute to his campaign, Obama can easily outspent HRC 3 to 1. You know the rule: The one with gold rules.
Having said that, I find it hard to see a win by HRC.
However, my gut tells me that HRC will prevail as the nominee. So something really big will happen that will change the equation of the race between now and August. WATCH!!!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Maria Boggiano — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:43:30 GMT

I used to respect Bill Clinton. Now I see him for what he has been all along- a sleazy, lying and pandering politician. I think his legacy has been damaged and he no longer will be considered a respected party elder by the democratic party establishment.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Rick, NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:44:12 GMT

Aren't we all "bushed" hearing about the clintons? Are we so timid in this nation that all we end up choosing between is a former first lady, a senator with no experience or a senator who wants to occupy Iraq for another century...are redos allowed?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Obama for President — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:47:15 GMT

I am a white, female Jew that will vote only for Senator Obama. I don't believe Jews are against Obama. Just because clinton says something doesn't make it true as we all well know.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Jack Hussein Donovan — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:48:11 GMT

RE: Campdog

You've got to be joking! Bill Clinton's reputation could hardly be dragged any lower than is already (deservedly) is. He was IMPEACHED for gosh sake! Remember? The Obama campaign has little to do with "tainting" his sterling reputaton.

As for drawing a crowd in a small town - he is a former president as I recall - not much competition for a crowd unless there's a tractor pull.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

jackie baltimore,maryland — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:51:31 GMT

Obama supporters call's it like it is.We have always women or man up to what we have done.Mr clinton need to do so now.He has destoryed his two terms in the whitehouse his relationship with black america has been damaged by his action not obama supporters.His wife does not help him to protect his legacy just win me the whitehouse Clyburn is right or who ever said it they are hellbent on destorying Mr obama It's about race And the lesson is we must defeat this black man The clinto would rather give the presidency to John mc cain than have him win

Clinton: The bigger loser?

David M, Bloomington, IN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:52:38 GMT

They are definitely "clinging to the throne". They had a chance to change things and they didn't. They could not pass health care, prevent 9/11, etc. No second chances on something so important.

I will proudly cast my vote for Barack Obama - true change via millions of grassroots American voters. Our voice will be heard and because of that change will happen. Barack Obama will bring the change we need.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

steve — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:54:08 GMT

everyone that continues to say the media favors Obama must have slept through the last seven weeks.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Amanda, Indianapolis, IN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:56:14 GMT

Check out the Clinton's financial dealings:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120908058761543293.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

Add to that their Cayman Islands accounts.

They are scary.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

James J, Orange, California — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:30 GMT

When the soundbite that is played over and over is about McCain or Obama then that's O.K. But it's never O.K. or fair if it's a Clinton!
It's time for the Clintons to take the back seat in their party and only step up into the spotlight when they need to support their party's canidate, Barack Obama

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Vonnie — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:01:01 GMT

ELECTION 2008
Clintons to face fraud trial
Judge setting date, testimony to include ex-president, senator

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: February 19, 2008
11:27 pm Eastern

While Hillary Clinton battles Barack Obama on the campaign trail, a judge in Los Angeles is quietly preparing to set a trial date in a $17 million fraud suit that aims to expose an alleged culture of widespread corruption by the Clintons and the

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Karen, Newtown, CT — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:02:16 GMT

Listen folks--our country has HUGE problems that are getting worse as all of you waste your time bickering back and forth on blogs like these just to hear yourself "talk." The media is useless--for the media, it's all about making money. The media certainly doesn't care about you and me, except insofar as they want us to be able to afford TV's, radios and computers so we can be hypnotized by the dribble we are fed.

WAKE UP! Premium gas in CT is up to $4.25 gallon. The price of everything is going up, up, up. Now, we are seeing the beginning of food shortages (some stores are limiting the amount of rice and flour people can buy). Companies are laying off people left and right. Foreclosures continue to rise. And my God, not only does the war in Iraq keep killing and maiming people, but the amount of money we have wasted there and continue to waste there is simply mind-boggling. The staggering amount of debt our country is in is incomprehensible to most people---they can't even count that high.

It is absolutely imperative that we elect a president who not only has the will to tackle these problems head on, but also has the ability to do it. We need someone who can actually lead this country into better days. It is not going to be easy, but it can be done.

My choice is Hillary Clinton. I know others out there think Barack Obama is the one. I prefer Clinton because I believe she knows more about the bigger picture and I think her resolve to change things and help people is huge. I have less confidence in Obama because I see him as being inexperienced, untested and a little naive. However, I know he's smart and I assume his heart is in the right place. I would rather have Clinton at the helm, but if Obama is the nominee, I will support him. I still hope to see a ticket with Clinton as Pres and Obama as Veep. I'd love to see them knock the socks off McCain. It shocks me that polls show McCain running even or in some instances beating the dem nominee, whether it's Clinton or Obama. We have our work cut out for us!

Am I the only one who is worried about the future of my 20-something kids and everyone elses kids, grandkids, parents, the poor, the weak, the hungry, the downtrodden..in our country and all over the world???? Is there nothing we can do about it?????

Clinton: The bigger loser?

fooled_once, Houston — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:03:26 GMT

I see how they helped the poor and the needy: $109,000,000. They needed it.

If all America's got is Clintons we are in trouble. Their consumption time has expired. They only make everything taste worse.

Go away, retire. Leave some room for fresh blood and new ideas.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

bknight north carolina — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:09:28 GMT

Both Democratic Candidates need to pull together and defeat McCain this Fall, but instead of pulling together they are tearing each other apart...Can you imagine President Obama and Vice President Hillary Clinton...Bill Clinton was almost right when he said they need to be on the same ticket except for one thing,,, Mr Obama should the #1 person on the ticket. Together we all stand divided we all fall.. Please get it together "Dems" America needs your help...

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Linda, Austin, TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:10:04 GMT

Jessy Hamilton, Orlando, Florida: "The general feeling in Florida is count us now, or count us out."

Glad to see the voters in Florida are speaking out.

Every vote must be counted!

Good luck with the protest Florida!!!!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

denise bailey houston tx — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:11:54 GMT

sure, we can talk about wright as long as we can also talk about hagee and monica lewinsky. is she coming back to the white house too or will there be someone new?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

denise bailey houston tx — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:12:33 GMT

sure, we can talk about wright as long as we can also talk about hagee and monica lewinsky. is she coming back to the white house too or will there be someone new?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

TAMMY, PA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:12:42 GMT

I strongly disagree that Clinton would make the better candidate. I wish people would do their research and realize that the Clinton "good years", were due to policies and bills that were set into play before Clinton took office and he was able to reap the benefits. The Clintons have misrepresented themselves in many ways and have taken credit for bills and laws whos only association with President Clinton was his signature, after they were passed. The Clintons manipulation machine never ceases to amaze me. For every story they tell, you can find another story to contradict it. Hillary is her own worst enemy and if she gets elected, Mccain will rip her apart. It does not matter how much money Obama would have spent in Pa, because the demographic would never have elected a black man over any white person. I live in PA, I knew what the outcome was going to be and so did everyone else. Look at the votes and you can see this primary was racially divided and that doesn't say a lot for our country and how far we claim we've come. I applaud Obama for taking Clintons 25 point lead and cutting it more then in half. I am tired of the talk of Rev. Wright, if he was running for President I would care, but until that day, I don't give a crap. I will not judge a man who has lived with racism his entire life. I would never be able to understand his hurt, anger and frustration. We need to move beyond Rev. Wright and look at what is important in this election. We need to get our service men and women back home, we need to not have to live from pay check to pay check, we need to be able to take care of our elderly and our children with adequate health care. Clinton questioning Obama about who he associates with took a lot of nerve considering her husband pardoned over 150 criminals the week before he left office (fact-look it up). America needs to wake up and start getting real and doing their homework. The Clintons have duped us for years, the longer her and billy boy keep going with this primary the more you see them for who they really are. I don't think they have gone a week without a lie. We deserve better. I implore all of you to not judge by hear say and opinion. When you hear something about Obama research it and you will find, (just as I did ) that there is no evidence, witness or criminal activity or investigations concerning any of these horrible stories that are being told about him. OBAMA - IS TRULY OUR BEST HOPE

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Chris, Higganum CT — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:13:46 GMT

At 9 am this morning Rev Wright made a fool of the media and all they can do is question what this will do to Obama. As long as the media keeps following Rev. Wright , Rev Wright will keep talking. I would be inclined to say that Rev. Wright is getting the atheists and the racists very upset. I would imagine he always will get them upset. I don't think Obama is going after that vote anyway. I believe the media will eventually find that taking on Rev. Wright is biting a bit more than they can chew...after his speech in Detroit msnbc said they will have break it up into "snip-its" so they give to us better. Maybe the media should have taken someone else on. Let's face it if Dr. Martin Luther King were alive we know what the media would be trying doing to him right now. But what do I know? I'm just a mid fifties white middle class man who has been inspired for the first time since Robert Kennedy. I'm suppose to be voting (by the polls) for Hillary Clinton like a everyone expects.
My "once in lifetime" heros were murdered in the 1960's . This must be my second chance in a lifetime.
I'm going with Obama.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

ob08 — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:16:12 GMT

In response to Canada's comment. "NOTHING ON MR. WRIGHT BOYS? YOU NEVER SEEM TO AMAZE ME ......IF THAT WAS CLINTONS PASTOR LAST NIGHT YOU ALL WOULD HAVE BEEN ALL OVER HER. YOU ARE ALL SO SMOOTH........... WE KNOW YOU ARE BIAS AGAINST CLINTON.YOU THINK OBAMA WALKS ON WATER........... "

Wright was lier Hillary and her husband's pastor too. They both invited Wright to the Whitehouse when Bill had an affair with Lewinsky. Yes, they asked Wright for spiritual guidance when Bill was sleeping around on lier Hillary.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Carl Williamson, Pittsburgh, PA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:16:15 GMT

The following is wrong: "Obama had accepted an invitation to debate in North Carolina, but the forum was later canceled by organizers."

The facts are that Obama accepted and then opt'ed out of that debate in NC. It was to be hosted by CBS.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Alaina Mantel — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:17:32 GMT

Who in their right mind would accept a vice-president postion from Hiliary Clinton. (If she should win of course). They would be #3 in postion and if they don;t realize it, they deserve what they get.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

BettiH. Indpls. IN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:18:27 GMT

JOAN CHICAGO IL

Hey Joan...what branch of the KLAN to do serve?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

William, Raleigh, NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:18:39 GMT

I'm a fiercely independent voter who has no dog in this fight at the moment, I'm just a political junkie who wanted to make an observation.

As I'm reading through all these comments, I'm amazed at how many people supporting Obama have terrible writing skills, while the people supporting Clinton seem to be much better at writing their thoughts in complete sentences using proper grammar.

I thought the "educated" were pulling for Obama and the "blue collar" classes were pulling for Clinton? I'd expect the writing skills of the "educated" to be better.

I wonder if this is an indicator of the intelligence of the people supporting the candidates, and what it says about the candidates themselves?

Clinton: The bigger loser?

jackie baltimore,maryland — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:19:11 GMT

thanks for letting me voice my views. Alot of us need to.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

John S — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:19:12 GMT

I never believed that Hillary raised $10 million in 24 hours. The numbers won't be released by her until May 22nd. It is another of the Clinton lies. This one will come home to roost though.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Robert N.Y. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:19:54 GMT

To all the loosers who wish we had the 90's back,wages were cut in half or more, benefits went down to drain,the American people recieved the second largest tax increases in history(Reagans was the largest)and you want that back not me.While we are wishing lets wish we were back in the fifties when we still had some freedom left when the dollar would buy something and you bought quality made items made in America,ah those were the day's but remember Clinton sold those out with his trade deals to benefit the wealthy so I suppose one should be wary of what one wish's for it just might come true.!!!

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Deborah Greenlawn, NY — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:20:22 GMT

A third Clinton term would be as messy and lacking
transparency as the first two. Ready to be moved across the street for the WH this time for sure guys?

No to the debate. She's annoying enough to us, now
even more so...like a spoiled, pesty kid.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Mary - Casa Grande AZ — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:21:22 GMT

have figured it out!
I went to a website called "The SuperDelegate Transparency Project" where all of the primary elections are broken down by congressional district for each state. If we say that a superdelegate for any given congressional district should vote with their constituency - and if we also say that any statewide office superdelegate should vote as their state voted, then Senator Obama would be leading Senator Clinton by more than 200 (psychologically amazing) delegates. What I did as I was analyzing this data was to commit any uncommitted superdelegates including state add-on's. I also corrected any current endorsements to follow the rules above. Using this logic, Senator Clinton would have 1671 delegates (pledged and super) and Senator Obama would have 1883 delegates (pledged and super).
This scenario is a true representation of the people's vote.
So, you can have superdelegates vote as the people voted or you can have them vote "what is best for the party" (which may or may not be what is best "for the people").

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Lynn Price, Quincy, Florida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:23:26 GMT

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Tyler, Warsaw Indiana — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:23:54 GMT

"One simple answer, African AMerican are just blind, desperatly want a black for president, so, they have to drop the Clinton in order tosupport Obama, because he is black, thats all."

Maybe the "African-Americans" want a candidate that will listen to their voice and not simply ask for their vote. Barack left college and became a community organizer, working with reguar folk. I know talking about his work experience prior to his political life gets monotonous at times, but I feel that this is extremely important in understanding the man he is. I believe that he is a man that is willing to hear the American people's voice, and not let them get drowned out in Washington, like so many politicans do.

I find it hilarious that HRC thought she had the black vote in in the bag because of her husbands presidency. The black community does not owe the Clinton's anything. We need a President that will work in bipartisan efforts and will turn the hearts and minds of elected politicans to the American people...not just those who share their party affliation. And this is why Barack gets this White males vote. I don't believe I owe Barack anything, but I do believe I owe it to myself to choose the best President of the United states...not The President of the divided demographics. This is why I am upset MSM didn't run with the "screw em" remarks by HRC.
Maybe one day

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Disgusted, Madison, Wisc. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:25:45 GMT

I'm fascinated at the similarities between Hillary and George W. Bush. I.e., do anything to win. Distort and pounce. Slice and dice. Insist upon personal loyalty, no mater what the national interest). Run a chaotic, fiscally irresponsible campaign (or federal government). Never admit that attacking Iraq was unwise and unnecessary.

Clinton: The bigger loser?

Linda, Austin, TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:32:04 GMT

Bill Clinton was a very good president and his charity work since leaving office speaks to his sincere commitment of helping people, not only the people of this country, but around the world.

He is being criticized now simply out of a desire by his critics to gain political advantage. The empty rhetoric of a political campaign will not endure.

Actions speak louder than words. President Clinton has done so much for this country and to improve the quality of life for millions in the world. That is the legacy of President Clinton that will endure.