First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jeff, Austin TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:21:20 GMT

"I'm not here for political reasons. I'm not a politician. I know that fact will surprise many of you because many in the corporaate-owned media made it seemed like I am running for the Oval Office. I am not running for the Oval Office. I've been running for Jesus a long, long time and I'm not tired yet."

Do you consider the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. "descriptive," or "divisive" when he speaks about racial injustices?

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=2295

.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

HT Ida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:21:29 GMT

Just like Obama, Wright comes from some sort of alternate universe. Not sure what the color of the sky is in their world, but my bet is it isn't white.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Mooky Brazer — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:23:05 GMT

Wright is certifiably insane.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

jerry/corpus christi texas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:23:15 GMT

If President Bush announced his plans to destroy Iran, the press would tar and feather him....

Must be a diffrent set of rules for women.....

After 21 debates, if people cannot figure out Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama by now, they never will. Hillary is just running her mouth because she needs to get Obama in a setting where she can try to tear him down. She is very lucky she is running against a man who's wit i a little short. Of course, Hillary speaks as well as a second grader, so she can't say she is an excellent speaker herself. Now I know why Bill gets all the money from speaking; Hillary lacks the skills.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Nj — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:23:53 GMT

As an Obama supporter I say its time to disown The Crazy Rev and move on. This guy is clearly a nut case and has no regard for Obama and what he is trying to do.
Throwing JFK, LBJ and Teddy under the bus in a speech is not good.

I HOPE OBAMA DISOWNS HIM TODAY

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Matt (Buffalo) — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:24:50 GMT

I really don't think Obama is in as bad of shape as he was when Wright initially broke, nor after the "bitter" comments, nor even after the Penn. debate. From what I can gather from people I talk to--who represent all sorts of political views--people just don't care that much about Wright right now. Most have already made up their mind about him and about whether this will affect their view of Obama.

I think the media has to stop treating Wright as some sort of celebrity whose every word and action must be scrutinized. For the most part, he's a non-issue right now.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Edgar Lotts, Brookhaven, Ohio — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:25:26 GMT

Howard Dean. For some reason, Howard thinks he's in charge of something, but that's turning out not to be true. He personally disenfranchised two states, and now he's telling the superdelegates what to do and when to do it. The man has no control over anything.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Yvonne, Charlotte, NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:25:28 GMT

I think you are wrong about Wright hurting Obama. Wright is not going away because the Republicans are intent on using him to harm Obama. But now that Wright is speaking out, and not in soundbites, it's hard to ignore what a thoughtful, insightful, unlearned and gifted preacher he is.

Him being out there dilutes the notion of the scary preacher. This is actually good in the long run because come September/October, the right will be old news and the right will no longer be able to define him by a few snippets.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Susan, Nashville, TN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:26:46 GMT

I watched the ENTIRE speech made by Rev. Jeremiah Wright, which is his name, not "Barack Obama's former paster", please use his name.... he has earned it. whether you guys like it or not. For that matter, Barack Obama's proper title is "Senator Obama" to you. First, Rev. Wright's speech last night was moving, true and if it makes you uncomfortable, that's your problem. You guys think that you can define a man who has been working his entire adult life to help black americans, well you can't. You guys gave him a platform and he is going to use it to lift up black people even more. Good for him and good for all of us. I am appalled at the questions posed by your show this morning. It's probably smart to remember that he has preached in the face of much worse than you guys and he will reach deep down inside and will win hearts and souls. I'm 35, white and from the south and Morning Joe is sounding more and more like a white conversation in the south. This has been a long time coming and none of you are educated enough to go toe to toe with Rev Wright. Thank god that he is brave enough to get into the media's face!!!!!!!! What bravery! Now I know why Senator Obama had the courage to stand and be counted. I hope that you guys have just a little of that type of courage, but I'm likely to be dissappointed. You guys better buckle in b/c this conversation will be real and many of us will support Senator Obama and Rev Wright like a thinking person, not like the typical demographics that run your profession.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Michelle Zee — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:27:48 GMT

I think it is amazing that the news has hyped Wright up and given him a platform to have the opportunities to earn extra money.

Even more stupid is for them to believe he should hide under a rock and let them prosecute him in the media.

It is the close minded individuals who have helped him, so for them to say this hurts Obama; is crazy.

I don't see how talking about our differences and how we are different, but not inferior or superior to one another; is a problem.

The media is looking for the story of the hour, but the more they talk about Wright the more elevated he will become. Hahahahaha...he will laughing all the way to the bank!

Clinton, puullease give us a break! Well the media is not talking about Clinton's gaffe's, but the public is not stupid. The republicans can't wait to bring up her suitcases of issues.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jason, Clearwater FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:27:54 GMT

Obama is a typical elitist. He's comparing the working mans economic problems with that of professional basketball players? Those players make tens of millions of dollars each! Barack is a man out of touch with everday Americans.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

GDI in Michigan — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:29:44 GMT

I will not debate you on a truck.
I will not debate you in a bus.
I will not debate you here or there I will not debate you anywhere.
Sorry but this is getting silly.
so i thought i would use the king of silly Dr Suesse.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Pete - Albany, NY — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:30:48 GMT

I watched Bill Moyers' interview of Rev. Jeremiah Wright and I watched Wright's speech to the Detroit NAACP. I doubt that Senator Clinton's supporters or Senator McCain's supporters can say the same.

Rev. Wright is a whole lot smarter than his critics are giving him credit for being.

Memo to the GOP and the Clinton Campaign:

If you want to go after Rev. Wright to get at Senator Obama forget about it. You're going to have to stick to Senator Obama because Rev. Jeremiah Wright is WAAAAAY out of your league!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Diane from Illinois — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:31:21 GMT

I am so sick of the Rev. Wright controversay. What other Pastor of ANY candidate has been followed this past weekend with a camera in tow, just to get more sound bites? It's absolutely ridiculous and the medai plays right into it. Get over it. Wright isn't the one running for office. Why not try something unique and focus on the REAL issues of this country? Not Rev. Wright or whether or not Obama wears a lapel pin. I can't believe how dumb some people truly are when it comes to politics. I'm actually disappointed. I don't see how the Democratic Party is going to recover from this in order to be successful in the fall. Guess we shall see.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Chel Meagen, Normal, OK — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:31:38 GMT

Obama can't walk away from Wright. They're one in the same people. Barack has just "whited" up his message a little so rich white liberals can understand it.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

John, Detroit MI — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:31:49 GMT

I want to breathe again. I want time to heal and get ready for November. I want NC and IN to put an end to HRC’s campaign.

I want the media to come out and say what it will take to end the Rev. Wright story. I want the media to stay sharp and focused on pointing out HRC’s failures. I want to argue with Jerry in CC, not Patty in SD or Pat in Huntington NY.

Outside of your preferred candidate getting the nomination, what do you want?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Pat, Boston, MA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:32:30 GMT

I have a different view on the Rev. Wright situation than First Read does.

One of the best things about life is taking the time to learn about different cultures.

I am certain that there are millions of citizens in this country who either did not watch Rev. Wright over the weekend, or who did and just don’t get it. We all know that there is a certain segment of our society who are not open to change, regardless of the circumstances.

Rev. Wright is a sophisticated, intelligent, well educated man. He is interesting and as patriotic as any person I have ever met in my entire life. Unfortunately, the media will not portray him as such.

So again we will be exploited and the media will use Rev. Wright as an example of what’s wrong in America, instead of holding him up as positive example of what a good education can mean.

It’s a lose-lose situation.

By the way, has anyone brought up the fact that Rev. Wright mentioned on Bill Moyers’ program on Friday evening that his church has received bomb threats because of all the hateful coverage? A church in which children attend.

Everybody in the media, go to church, say your prayers and don’t question the realities of our society. Don't challenge the system.

Just like always.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Gretchen, TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:33:05 GMT

I find your comments about Hillary Strangelove the least self aware statement I have read in a long time. You state "Because of Jeremiah Wright remaining in the news, not that much attention has been paid to Clinton’s recent comments regarding Iran and the Middle East." Do you not understand that you, and the MSM control the narrative?

Which do you think people have more of a non-purient interest in? Which of this things will actually impact the lives of not only Americans, but citizens of the world?

Do your damn jobs! Stop the tabloid journalism and actually report on those things that are important!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Barry Scott, Stockton, CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:33:11 GMT

Wright helping or hurting Obama?, it's hard to say.
His appearances renew the debate and remind us of what we might have preferred to have gone away. However, we now have context for those snippets and an opportunity to more fairly judge the man, his comments, and Obama's association with him.
Maybe wishing he'd disappear is avoiding some of the very topics that deserve closer scrutiny. Maybe we need to look a bit more closely at race in America.
And maybe the discussion will serve to heal, which might in the end help Barack Obama win this nomination.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Gregory Peek, Birmingham, Alabama — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:33:20 GMT

Hillary Clinton can not win a majority of valid elected delegates. If she were to gain the nomination any other way, she and the Democratic Party would sink faster than the Titanic.

It is time to move on.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Renee, disgusted with the MSM in the US — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:33:36 GMT

I can not believe the MSM and their take on Wright's speech. I listened to it in its entirety twice as I did his sermons. They are not nearly as offensive if you listen to the entire thing. I am a white woman and my experience in church is different but I have been to all black churches and his presentation style is the same.

He said nothing offensive last night and in fact I think if people will open their minds and watch the Moyer interview, they will see an entirely different side of Rev. Wright rather than that portrayed by the MSM.

I refuse to watch any MSM anymore until you start being more accountable for your actions and quit reducing everything to 30-45 second soundbites. We could embarrass almost every on air person at MSNBC if that is how we showed each of you.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

John Mercer, Clearwater, Florida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:34:03 GMT

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT EVERY VOTE SHOULD COUNT ? WHOULD "YOU" BE MAD IF YOU WERE TOLD YOUR VOTE DOES NOT COUNT,EVEN THOUGH YOU ALLREADY VOTED IN A LEGAL ELECTION WITH ALL CANIDATES ON THE BALLOT ? IF SO,PLEASE SEE FLORIDA DEMANDS REPRESENTATION ( FDR ). A VOLUNTEER GRASSROOTS COALITION, DEMANDING THAT THE 2008 FLORIDA PRIMARY VOTES BE COUNTED AND ALL DELEGATES BE GUARANTEED A SEAT AT THE NATIONAL CONVENTION.FDR IS "NOT" FUNDED BY ANY CAMPAIGN,CANIDATE, PARTY,ORGANIZATION, OR OTHER ENTITY. www.floridademandsrepresentation.org , please tell your friends.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Silent Soul — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:34:18 GMT

Th Iowa strategy no longer works for Obama. If Iowa and New Hampshire knew then what we know now about Obama, he wouldn't have come close to winning either of those states.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

LeAnn, VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:34:33 GMT

Who does McCain think he is fooling??

http://www.slide.com/r/M7KJbPFL4z-Y1a7pXOu-NuKLN9_Iv2Xz?previous_view=mscd_embedded_url&view=original

First thoughts: You're so vain...

MI Chick — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:35:07 GMT

Joshua (Sent Friday, April 25, 2008 5:49 PM)

Uh, wow, dude. That's quite a list there. Why is no one talking about that I wonder?
************************************
I have not had a chance to read everything on this board this weekend, but I did see Rev. Wright's speech on CNN last night. I thought that it was intelligent, well thought out, and he had many good points. Did he come across as making fun of some? Yes, but I did not get the impression that he was trying to be mocking as much as he's a bad impressionist who was trying to make a point.

Do I agree with the way he delivered it? No, but I wasn't his target audience. As a white woman from a different generation than he, I am not going to hear the same things as those in the room did. However, I am educated enough to understand what he was saying and appreciate it.

I am going to change my vote for Obama in the fall? No. At least, not because of this. Hillary still reeks of desperation to me. Jockeying for free air time and trying to be tough. C'mon.

I think this election will really come down to the educated vs. the uneducated. I won't say "working class" vs. "the elite" because it's not the same. You can have uneducated folks in white collar jobs and scholars among the factory workers.

I think everyone should hear the entire speech before making a decision. Lord knows the chattering classes on Morning Schmoe today were just disecting snippets. Tucker and Pat are Republicans - what do you expect them to say?

Do I think this guy should go away now? If he cares about Obama, then yes. He's had his say. Otherwise his grabbing of the spotlight will further divide this country because people would rather concentrate on sound bites rather than the actual content of his words.

Happy Monday!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Cara in MN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:36:43 GMT

Frankly, I'm getting pretty tired of the media telling me how I should process information. I watched Reverend Wright with Bill Moyers and I watched the entire speech last night. I thought the speech was just fine. It gave you a full picture of Rev Wright and not just 30 second soundbites. I can see why this man has a huge church following.

This morning the news stations are showing short little soundbites that make the speech seem more controversial than it was. They tell me that this is a big problem for Obama and that we should all be concerned. It's just really sad that talking heads feel that I am too stupid to form a conclusion on my own.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

boogeyman, mamaroneck, n y — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:37:03 GMT

These are lame articles this morning. Why is the media still trying to keep Hillary in this primary. There is no way she can win, unless stolen. This primary is mathematically over.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Susan — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:37:04 GMT

I am certainly hopeful that MSNBC will cover Mrs. Clinton's religious affiliations just as closely when the book that chronicles the subject is published May 20th.

Rev. Wright is Rev. Wright. Barack Obama is Barack Obama. Their paths crossed in life, but they did not somehow morph into one person.

This horse is dead. Quit beating it.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Cheri Campbell, Sheffield Lake, OH — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:37:05 GMT

I am an Obama supporter, but I am also a proud (if former) member of Rev. Wright's denomination.

This is not about Obama, it's about defending the reputation of his church, the black church & the reputation of the United Church of Christ. Rev. Wright was one of the pre-eminent voices of the diverse, inclusive UCC denomination long before Obama was on the national scene, and he will continue to be one of the pre-eminent voices in the years to come. If these insults to his local church, the black church tradition and the UCC remain unchallenged in the mainstream media, it will do untold damage to these groups. The world does not function according to a campaign strategy, not should it.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Orin Blue — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:37:17 GMT

Obama appears to be trying to run out the clock. Not a good way to win a nomination. Hillary has pulled out all the stops and is trying to win the nomination. Obama looks like he's trying not to lose it. Not showing much of a leadership position by the supposed "front-runner".

First thoughts: You're so vain...

OGLib — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:37:29 GMT

I'm sorry, I fail to see how hiding Wright under a rock - as if Obama had the power to do that (hint - he doesn't) - would change anything. Right now, we have sound bites that have been played over and over again and will be played over and over again. Does anybody think that by somehow preventing Wright from doing anything public between now and November will magically cause the GOP to say, "well, let's not use the Wright thing"? Of course not. Better that this guy get out there in fuller context, in a nice, reserved setting like a Bill Moyers interview. De-sensitize people. Plus, the more you listen to the guy beyond the sound bites, you realize that he's not a racist, that he's not some crazy anti-American black nationalist. What he is is a liberal Christian pacifist. Now, you can disagree with his liberal positions, you can think that pacifism is a hopeless and silly ideology, but the man's not some hateful bigot hellbent on seeing the destructions our our country. That's the media distortion. So I say, get 'em out there - early and often (but not too much). Better that he control the narrative rather than Limbaugh and Hannity. I just don't see this hurting Obama any more than it already has. Media types who opine that it will are just hoping for some hyped up non-scandal to boost ratings...and their own self-importance.

Let's just watch Obama defy the odds again - odds set almost solely by our all-knowing pundit class.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Amy B Portland, ME — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:37:30 GMT

I don't agree that Rev. Wright is hurting Obama. Believe me, after the last seven years of right wing rule we are all inured to preachers using inflamatory language to justify their political positions. How many times have I had to read about James Dobson's and Pat Robinson's views? No one suggests they go away and be quiet for the sake of the right wing politicians they support. This is America, everyone has a right to speak, (even me!)

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Patsy Wilkerson, Bravo TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:38:45 GMT

Obama is such an elitist, he probably is 'bored' with the primary. He wants to get right to his coronation.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

CJ — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:38:46 GMT

Wright and Obama are seperate entities. I don't believe it's hurting Obama in the way the media thinks. I think by know it's clear people don't attribute his actions to Obama. Wright should defend himself b/c he is a preacher that was basically lambasted on the national stage for sensational and political reasons. Save for this press club event today the media has been following him around like hounds whenever he speaks...expecting something new.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Mark, St. Louis MO — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:40:15 GMT

"Nevertheless, Obama seems to be starting off this week in about as bad of shape as we've seen in him in some time."

---------------
Could you be more blatantly obvious as to being in Clinton's camp FR? Are you trying for a position with a Clinton Administration? What right did you have to make that statement?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

iowan — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:41:25 GMT

Dude--

1. We're ALL bored with the primary campaign now.

2. Would a lion accept the challenge of a mouse to a duel? I don't think so. His strategy is sound.

3. I'm not so sure 'more' Wright doesn't help Obama. For god's sake, you people are worse than tabloid journalists with these things. Obama's strength (and risk) has been that he refuses to underestimate the electorate's intelligence. He needs to stick with that game---that is the big change.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

pat huntington ny — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:44:15 GMT

For those still thinking that this primary campaign is the nastiness one ever, I direct you to:
www.newsday.com
for an editorial piece showing that this is in fact, one of the most civilized campaigns, going all the way back to Adams vs. Jefferson in 1800.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

MK, Baltimore, MD — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:45:22 GMT

I disagree that Reverend Wright's self-defense is hurting Obama. I think it would be hard to keep quiet after death threats, and he's not going on like Fox News - he went on Bill Moyers and then spoke at the NAACP, and I'm sure it's not the first time he's spoken. He was at the White House several times during the Clinton administration for official events for goodness sakes!

Let's give it a rest. Obama has dealt with the matter, said all he can say, and really it's the media that persists on asking questions and pushing the issue to the forefront - even though it's now a non-starter. As long as Reverend Wright is still alive and kicking on this Earth, he will continue to live his life, speak freely, and make choices, and I think now that he is no longer associated with Obama's church and is not part of his campaign, I do not see why Obama should have to account for what Wright says/does still. That is simply absurd.

As far as I can tell, none of the media's further questions on Wright have been anything new - just a re-hash of the same old, same old from you guys! Why is THAT not surprising?

And, unlike Norman Hsu, Wright did not break the law. Furthermore, how come you guys are not asking McCain about his inconsistencies re: John Hagee at every stop?

This is just so old and it needs to stop. The more you all push this point in your little Beltway bubble, the more the American people are going to continue to turn away from mainstream media as a source for accuracy and truthfulness in reporting. But if that's what you want, and maybe YOU'RE trying to sabotage your own jobs and careers (as ridiculous of a statement as you suggesting Wright actually is trying to sabotage Obama) then you're doing a darn good job of it!!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

MK,MO — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:46:21 GMT

the washington political machine is making a full force assault on obama it would seem, the media insists on going negative on him also, while allowing clintons hideous remarks on her middle east policy to go un-noticed, someone explain to me the policy differences between hillary and mccain cause I don't see any, all the more reason to vote for obama

First thoughts: You're so vain...

New Independent — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:47:07 GMT

I am truly sick of all this, and I blame the media for it TOTALLY! Enough about Rev. Wright. Gosh almight, when will we have had enough? STop ramming this down our throats already. Let's focus on important issues like Hillary saying we need to be stronger in Afghanistan, and yes, why aren't we hearing about the Umbrella of protection?????? That should mean more to Americans than what Rev. Wright says. You guys are really, really doing America a total disservice just like the media didn't bother to research and report the truth before the Iraq war. I know a lot of people who are going to vote for Obama one way or the other, and no one is bothering to poll us. We live in New Jersey by the way, are women and are 50 or above. So, so much for your putting us all in little boxes. Where are the super-delegates? If they don't know by now that the majority of America wants Obama than they shouldn't be superdelegates. I am so sick of this. It is so obvious that Big Business is doing their best to get rid of Obama. After all, the people are the ones sending the money into him to run, so he is beholden to nobody. Even the Republicans know they want to get rid of Obama because that's who they are attacking! Doesn't that tell the superdelegates anything?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

brian in nc — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:47:32 GMT

I wonder if John McCain has listened to Reverend Wright's sermons in total or listened to his interview with Moyers or his speech to NAACP. How is it that Christians find it so easy to try and destroy a man who has given his entire adult life to Christ, growing many good missions, bringing thousands to Christ, without looking at the man in total? How many Christians in this country have asked for forgiveness for Tuskeggee? How many Christians in this country would rather bury their heads in the sand than look at injustice and poverty as Christ has asked us to do?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Eliz — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:47:48 GMT

Note to Hillary: We're bored, also. As soon as Obama can focus on McCain, we'll be interested again. This primary season is old news.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Carol, CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:48:02 GMT

It doesn't matter who you're voting for in this election, Rev. Wright is bad news for everyone!

He's all about himself and he's taking Senator Obama down with every word he says! Talk about bad timing!!

I'm sure he's going to be making a great deal of money off of this...a book deal, the speech circuit, etc. Meanwhile, with friends/family like this who needs enemies!! Senator Obama's candidacy is in real trouble...you couldn't pay for this kind of negative impact in an election!!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Neenahfox,MI — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:48:41 GMT

It's amazing how the media keeps jumping all over Reverend Wright. If you're going to talk about comments that he made in a speech you should talk about why he was making those comments. You should show the whole sermon or tell viewers where to go see the entire sermon but you're not.

I'm tired of these political games because it's my children's future that you're playing with.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Sue, Elyria, OH — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:50:03 GMT

You must have watched something different than I did. I saw a respectable man talk about spreading the word of the Lord. Maybe you are not religious. In the Catholic faith ministers like Dr.Jeremiah Wright would be welcomed based on his social work in his communities. This is what it is about. He as not just complaining about history he is doing something to CHANGE it!! How would you like to have a 30-second snippet made of you......I can tell you from watching you pundits; it would present a different picture of the true meaning of your life as a person.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Brian M. De. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:19 GMT

My take on Jeramiah Wrights speaking are this.It's a free country the last time I checked.Secondly he is not a part of the Obama Campaign so to tie him to it is another unjust action of the media.The fact that CNN interupted its normal programming to air the speech over and over again was rather interesting.First off If you listen to the people that saw it in person it was great, then when you have people that are not in touch with the African American experience they find fault.Yet almost every African American can find parts of that speech that have been proven in their daily lives. I think that people that resent the comments made by Rev. Wright from the NAACP do not have any business commenting on the subject matter.I also think that to keep trying to tie Obama to his former pastors words is another bad media tactic. John McCain is a hypocrit and should be laughed at ,on every occasian possible.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Margaret, Columbus, Ohio — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:34 GMT

I don't think Hillary needs to say or do anything more against Obama, defensively or offensively.

McCain's 527 friends seem to be chomping at the bit to unleash hell on Barack. That may end up being the real 'tie-breaker'. It may not be fair, but the last thing politics is, is fair.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Leanza Cornett — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:42 GMT

The only reasonable, possible explanation to the Wright/Obamba debacle is that Obama agreed with his mentor for 20 YEARS. That is why Wright is out there giving his Black Recentment Speeches and Obama dares not refused nor denounced him because if Obama does, then Wright will spill out exactly what Obama said and how he felt for these last 20 YEARS. Obama cannot denounce nor refused Wright because the truth will come out. Wright is Obama’s true political liability. Expect the following:
1- WRITE A BOOK.
2- CONTINUE TO GIVE NATIONAL SPEECHES.
3- HE WILL CHARGE FOR THOSE NATIONAL SPEECHES.
4- HE WILL APPEAR IN MORE COMMENTARY PROGRAMS.
5- DONT BE SURPRICE IF WRIGHT HIMSELF RUNS FOR SENATOR.
6- THERE WILL BE A WRIGHT IDIALOGY BASED ON HIS POLITICAL ANGLE.
7- OBAMA WILL NOT DISASSOCIATE, NOR RENOUNCED REV. WRIGHT.

SO ASK YOURSELF WHY? Why CANT THE NEXT POSSIBLE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DENOUNCE AND RENOUNCE HIS CRAZY, ANTI-AMERICAN PASTOR? EASY; WRIGHT KNOWS TOO MUCH.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:52 GMT

Shouldn't that be 'Ramba' rhetoric? I mean, it's 'Macha', no? "Brava, Hillary!", you've found the Inner-Warrioress.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

B. Obama — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:57 GMT

No comment,no debates.Just fancy stolden speeches.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Houston — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:52:03 GMT

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Tonid, Orlando, FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:52:24 GMT

"You’re so vain, you probably think this campaign is about you..."

You're kidding, right? Perhaps if the media didn't keep playing clips of the man and trying to caricature him as some anti-American, racist zealot to the point where he, his family and his church are reciving DEATH THREATS he would have happily gone into retirement with nary a word.

GROW UP! It's not all about the campaign. A man's reputation and his LIFE is also on the line. I seriously hope you "journalists" reap what you sow.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jeff B., Washington DC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:52:59 GMT

I think you are wrong about Rev. Wright. His interview with Bill Moyers was splendid. He showed what an intelligent and caring man he is. The fact that Obama took him on as a spiritual mentor shows Obama's GOOD judgment.

Moyers also showed the "questionable" Wright sermons IN CONTEXT! These clips didn't show a raving lunatic, but an impassioned liberal Christian speaking out for social justice.

The mainstream media should be ashamed at their poor journalism. Instead of repeating a 15-second sound bite a 100 times a day, why didn't MSNBC just show a 15-minute IN CONTEXT clip of the sermons in question? That simple act of good journalism would have alleviated a majority of the hysteria that the media itself created.

Rev. Wright has every right to defend his career and his message. He is not "hurting (Obama) and hurting him very badly." He's saying to the press and the right-wing, "I've held my tongue long enough, stop bashing Obama, you took me out of context, now let me speak, let get back some of my dignity.’"

And one more thing: Has MSNBC reported that Rev. Wright and his church have received death threats and bomb threats over this controversy? The media blew this out of proportion, and real lives were affected--with death threats. Why aren't you reporting that? Are you too embarrassed? Or are death threats not news anymore?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Rob — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:53:22 GMT

Can you guys please write an article describing your obsession with Jeremiah Wright? I think that would be way more news-worthy than what Wright is doing wrong.

Do you even know the difference between Wright and wrong?

Moving on.....

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Rennie, College Park, Md — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:53:33 GMT

While I agree that Rev. Wright has every right to speak out in his own defense, his religious roadshow couldn't have come at a worse time, just more fodder for the press.

Obama will continue to distance himself from Rev. Wright as well he should.

There seems to be a huge cultural disconnect with Wright and the stage that Obama is now on.

As an African Americn woman, who works for an African American church, I understand to preachers sometimes say things things that make people cringe.

As they say in the media, Rev. Wright has now become the gift that keeps on giving. Too Bad Wright doesn't seem to care.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jim, Santa Cruz — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:53:41 GMT

"Still, if Wright Vol. 1, “bitter,” and Pennsylvania didn’t move superdelegates, what will?" -

Exactly - and the media as usual has it wrong - because as much as it would like these issues to resonate they don't, and people are bored with this primary and tired of being told to concern themselves with non-issues.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Eric, Salinas, CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:54:01 GMT

After listening to Reverend Wright's speech this morning to the National Press Club I find that he has been much maligned. He is witty and has a point that racial and religious prejudice still lives here in this country. Those who condemn him have plenty of sin to cover for as they are the ones who perpetuate this prejudice for their political gain. The media has unfairly maligned this pastor while making light of conservative pastors who say hateful nonsense like Hagee and Parsley who support McCain.

Go Obama!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Ellie, Gainesville, VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:54:56 GMT

Re: "McCain’s harsh tone toward Obama -- on . . . even Hamas (noting that the terrorist organization prefers Obama to win the presidency)" --- say what???

Senator McCain had better check his facts and refocus his ire on Senator Clinton. As far back as the 1980’s, Senator Clinton served on the board of the New World Foundation, which gave a grant to the PLO, then designated by the United States as a terrorist group. And as First Lady, in 1996, she organized a White House conference for the American Muslim Alliance, an anti-Israel group whose leaders have sanctioned terrorism, published anti-Semitic statements and repeatedly hosted conferences that were forums for denunciations of Jews and exhortations to wage jihad. She later took a $50,000 donation from the Alliance when she ran for Senate, but disguised it on her disclosure forms as the “American Museum Alliance,” until it was discovered and she belatedly returned the money (but only after she’d forsworn use of “soft” money in the campaign, so the donation had lost its usefulness in any event). http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageld=62012 To learn more about Senator Clinton’s ties with terrorist groups, just Google “Hillary and Hamas,” and settle in for a night’s reading.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

maryrose, ga — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:55:09 GMT

I just happened upon Rev Wrights speech to the NAACP last night and it was a doozie. Is this guy single handedly trying to destroy Obama? Everyone must listen to it because some of his ideas about important things are completely wacko. This guy has been Obamas mentor and confidant for over 20 yrs. Obama is sunk. Its about time.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jackie, AL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:56:00 GMT

Chuck, you really missed it on the effect of Wright's defending himself. Everyone who actually took the time to listen to him (either on Moyers or CNN) realized that the MSM had lied to them with their 10 second sound bites. People who take the time to listen to him know that whatever else he is, Wright is not the demon the MSM tried to make him out to be.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

turnip — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:56:01 GMT

The press, and MSNBC, must take the American public for complete morons if you/they paint Reverend Wright's appearances in a completely negative light. I watched Reverend Wright's appearance on Bill Moyer and was completely amazed by the man's brilliance. I do not agree with some of his statements, just as I disagree with many of Senator Obama's policies, but I admire a man who can think, cna stand firm in the face of attacks, and can show humor in a time of distress.

Many Ameerican are too blind otr jaded to listen, and in that respect, no his appearances will not help. Mainly becaus ethe MSM will filter to find the most sensational soundbites, but voters willing to listen will only better understand the hitjob done by the media and will support Senator Obama even more.

Jeremiah Wright is the Richard Jewell of this election cycle.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Rick, NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:56:43 GMT

Jeremiah was a bullhorn...yes he was a good friend of mine...barry is going to have a tough time using the "he is my pastor" storyline from here on out...and senator mcshame should denonce the reverend hagee who hatee so much too

First thoughts: You're so vain...

J. Brough, Brandon, Mississippi — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:57:20 GMT

Did anybody in the Press actually watch Wright's speech before the NAACP? The sound bites and comments are very near propaganda and completely misrepresent the speech. I cannot help but believe these misrepresentations are deliberate and with malice. I am disappointed in Chris Matthews, Andrea Mitchell and MSNBC in general. I am a 70 year old white female from Mississippi and I understood the speech as informative and inclusive. I have gained insight into both Reverend Wright and the news media.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

nickk — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:58:00 GMT

I don't and never did like Hillery But if I could not vote for McCain I'd vote for her after watching that ass... Wrigth Screw obama

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Paul Miller, Woodbridge, VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:58:42 GMT

Obama reflects millions of Americans who also are bored with the nomination race... seemingly kept alive only by the media, which wants a race on which to report, and thus still listens to the inane arguments spewing from the once-inevitable and now ridiculous Clinton campaign.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Barbara Snowberger — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:59:41 GMT

Chuck Todd, was the message to close to the truth? Did you not hear what he was saying? Cannot you not handle biblical history? Nothing more needs to be said, the press is totally unaware. God help you.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

WCW, Roswell, GA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:29 GMT

Let's all give the Rev a bye! After all he's only a 20 yr. mentor to Oby - his comments are probably Clinton's fault (somehow)anyway!

So, let's concentrate on Clinton's surrogates gaffes instead of the latent black racism that is currently dividing us!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Matt Gabriele, Blacksburg, VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:31 GMT

Why don't you guys report on what Wright's actually saying, in addition to telling us about what everyone's saying about him? If you listen to him, he doesn't sound all that crazy after all.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Democrat — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:33 GMT

Obama was pulled away from his message. He will have to get back to it before the GE.

He must stay above the fray and keep pushing his concrete plans that encompass hope and change! They will try to drag you down to their level and if they do, you can get stuck there permanently.

If Senator Obama really wants to connect with Hillary's constituency he has to do it in person, through mail and on television. Blue-collar people also like fun and feeling like they are important. It is the reason that traveling preachers, high-energy evangelistic churches and carnivals are still so popular. Internet savvy and geriatric don't go together. Internet savvy and working-class is hit-or-miss. Debates aren't watched by someone who is working or when it conflicts with prime-time. They are watched by the Jerry Springer crowd only if they are like the last farce in Pennsylvania. Debates are useless. He has basically stated this in his response to Senator Clinton about the debates.

This is why Senator Obama should go back to big speeches in small towns. If he keeps ignoring her and addressing the people directly he will eat into her base very effectively. Senator Clinton attacked Barack Obama for his speeches because for him it is a strength and for her it is a weakness, not because they lack substance. She is incapable of anything high-energy or motivating unless it is in an us-against-them (polarizing) situation. If Senator Obama really wants to counter back about this one all he has to do is ask "I am able to attract thousands of people to an enthusiastic rally whether it is in a big town or small town, why can't she? What is it about me that she doesn't have?"

Let her answer the questions. He doesn't have to anymore.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Pittsburgh Soldier — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:37 GMT

Wow, this site is becoming just as bad as Fox News and the rest (maybe it already was). Let's review: Obama crazy pastor is ruining Obama by trying to show people who he really is, McCain is drawing a line in the sand to attack Obama, The NYT says (not really, but we might as well finish its sentence for them) Obama is bored and Clinton could (let's just use it for her) use it against Obama, Clinton isn't letting go of the debate thing even though they just debated two weeks ago for the 21st time. Hmmmmm. Yep, just what I thought. A bunch of distractions from a main stream media source. Who would have guessed it.

Come on MSNBC--help the country, not distract us.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

sg, michigan — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:02:17 GMT

Another debate? Ugh.

Hillary Clinton appears to embarass herself by demanding more debates. It draws attention that she needs a public forum to get free air time.

And it sounds silly when she demands a debate without a moderator on a flat-bed truck. She may as well demand that Clinton and Obama have a spitting contest, compete on American Idol or arm wrestle to decide a winner.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Florida, Florida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:02:19 GMT

What's so wrong with Rev. Wright?

Only those that deny the TRUTH and will only settle for THEIR version of it, can misunderstand this man and consider him a fanatic.

He's all "wright" with me.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Rob In Boston — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:02:29 GMT

Question on delegates - It seems that clinton and obama are pretty much splitting delegates. How many total delegates are left to be allocated in NC, IN, KY, etc? If they split them, more or less, how many would that give Obama? He only needs under 400 more, so if he got close to the magic number wouldn't the superdelegates feel pressure to move in his direction? If he got close and then he cut a deal to split FL and MI (even if he took less than half of those delegates) would that put him over the top? Thanks for anyone who can clarify this.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Hillary4President, California — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:03:14 GMT

The man needs some help and we all need to pray for him.

Go Hillary!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Brenden — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:03:15 GMT

Your first read usually has a little more substance. Did any of you guys actually listen to what Rev. Wright actually said? Are we that far gone, that vapid symbols really matter more than ideas?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Andre, Seattle, WA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:03:16 GMT

As an Obama supporter I have a hard time not believing that there has been some coordination between Obama and Rev. Wright. Recently the press has repeatedly said that that the Republicans would use this against him in the general. Well it looks to me that the Obama ppl are trying to head them off now rather than later. So far the press has been somewhat kind to Wright since Thursday. I get the impression that they are giving the press and the country some new sound bites to run. The only way to get the Wright issue solved is to change the impression that ppl have of him. In other words defend him. Obama can't do it so Wright has to. If they media won't stop talking about Wright then gamble on giving them something different to talk about and see if America can handle it. He has the nomination sewed up so dealing with the Wright issue in a slow and steady was is smart in context of the GE

Yes We Can.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Johnny Bananas, Philadelphia, PA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:03:31 GMT

Maybe it's because I majored in Religious Studies, but I thoroughly enjoyed the Jeremiah Wright interview with Bill Moyers. Wright is extremely well-educated, and he is spot-on with his interpretations of scripture through the lens of liberation theology.

However, I can understand that our sound-byte culture doesn't like spending an hour of their time listening to the subtleties of a theological argument, so in that sense, Wright's extra exposure may be hurting Obama with the general public. But as an academic, Wright has every responsibility to defend himself.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

ge`pa` — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:04:07 GMT

I think Rev. Wright is enjoying his new found celebrity. He is so full of himself. I could never sit in a church with a pastor who speaks with such a ranting and raving voice. I would surely get a headache. Obama makes excuses for him by saying he is from the old generation, but he is obsessed with it. How can Obama claim to make change when sits in a church for 20 yrs. with a pastor who is so stuck in the past?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Mark Thieme — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:04:22 GMT

Don't you think maybe this "Comments" feature has run its course?

Why waste staff energy and resources editing and putting up nonsense every day when it is your commentary that makes this blog valuable?

Think about it.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Independent Voter, FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:04:53 GMT

There are comments!!!!

MSNBC just refuses to post them.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Robbie Williamson, Austin, TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:05:25 GMT

How can John McCain attack Obama over Wright, when he was endorsed by, and continues to defend, John Hagee? This guy comes on television every Sunday morning in my area, still preaching hatred of Islam and supporting his statement that hurricane Katrina was God's punishment to New Orleans.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Lilo Stitch — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:05:48 GMT

Jimmy Carter endorses Obama, Rev. Wright does the same, and now Hamas. Barack nearly has this presidency locked up. Is Hamas a superdelegate?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Doles, Miami, FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:06 GMT

Your ranting about Jeremiah Wright is to do what? I mean, you can change your position to being a commentator instead of someone who should be give the news and let us decipher it ourselves. I am frankly offended by your characterization. You know what, if Obama must be linked to everything Jeremiah does then so be it. Maybe that's what he's talking about being different. Why can't you understand just because you believe a certain way does not necessarily make it so?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Chip Chapman Portland, OR — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:23 GMT

Go ahead tell People what to think about Wright & his Brilliant speech @ the NAACP, his telling open honest interview w/ Moyers, make it all about Obama instead of the man actually speaking, who by the way has contributed more to this society than most of the media pundits combined. If you really gave one ounce a care about our Country you'd help open the minds of Americans to Rev. Wright's different, not deficient thinking. I guess it's more important to keep your job than speak truth to power. Reverend Wright is a National treasure & if Obama's made a single misstep in "dealing with" the Wright "controversy" it would be not correctly framing the issue & not supporting Wright more forcefully. People fear what they don't understand & instead of nurturing societal growth the powers that be continue to stoke that fear. BOOOOOOOOOH!!!!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

John, Charlottesville, Va — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:42 GMT

I watched Wright's interview on PBS Friday night, and I thought he seemed totally reasonable and correct in everything he said. PBS was courteous enough to play his controversial quotes in context, and after hearing them, I don't understand why Obama didn't stand up for what Wright said. There really wasn't anything that bad in what Wright said.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Barbara C., - Fort Lauderdale, FL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:58 GMT

But all of you are NOT going to cover Obama's stump speech. You are all going to continue to bloviate about Reverend Wright. Someone on one of the news stations said it best...."Then let every Catholic politician go and denounce and reject the Catholic Church for continuing to sit in the pews while children are being sexually abused." This is what we all need to ask ourselves. What is it that scares the stuffing out of this country about free speech? From Mitt Romney who got a tough tow because he is a Mormon to Obama to McCain switching religious denominations. What is up with how hung up we are on Religion? Has Hillary switched her Church lately...? Has she even gone to Church lately? We have yet to cover this baloney on her too.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Class Warrior, D.C. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:07:32 GMT

It's interesting to watch...Hillary is willing to destroy her party for the (slim) chance of a nomination and the presidency, and Jeremiah Wright is willing to destroy his friend and candidate by continuing to latch onto his fifteen minutes of fame as if it wa an alligator he was wrestling. Why is the Democratic Party letting these egomaniacs destroy their chances at the white hose? Isn't there ANYONE who can tell them to SHUT UP AND QUIT, ALREADY?!? If someone doesn't, we will soon be saluting McShame. Ego should NOT be a reason to stay in the news!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Class Warrior, D.C. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:07:40 GMT

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Joe, Indianapolis — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:08:19 GMT

This man, Rev. Wright, has been assailed in and vilified first by the PRESS, and yet you now call him 'vain' and 'selfish' to go out and defend himself against character assassination? Just more of the press doing what it does, attack and tear down to the delighted glee of a media market that thrives on spectacle, real or conjured.

To the point, whether or not Wright's appearances help or hurt Sen. Obama's campaign: It's NOT one-sided as this post and most of the talking heads seem to suggest, rather for those media outlets who will slice and dice these comments, find the worst possible and spin them endlessly with the others, for those voters who will digest only 30 second sound bites, yes, he hurts Obama. HOWEVER, for those voters who seek information, if they don't listen to his entire sermons (too long), perhaps these speeches give them pause, to reflect not only on the media's unfair vilification, but also realise that his opinions might be different from Obama's.

In short, do his appearances harm Obama? Perhaps, but they're unlikely to change many minds gainst Obama; do they help Obama? Perhaps, but the up-side of more voters perhaps changing their minds and voting FOR Obama does exist.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Laura, Milwaukee, WI — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:08:28 GMT

Rev. Wright is not running for president. Barack Obama is. They are not the same person.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

John Doe, Seattle, Wash — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:08:31 GMT

It's going to get worse for Senator Obama.

Good luck Dems!!!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

EC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:09:04 GMT

I'm so upset by this. Why does this guy have to do this when Obama is trying to regroup, a week away from critical primaries? And why is the media covering all this live. There are so many more important things to cover about Obama than Wright, bowling, bitter. The most important issue for voters is who is best equipped to bring about change. Why not focus on that with both Obama and Clinton? Obama is running for president, not Reverend Wright. This denigration of a fanastic candidate by stupid distractions makes me very, very sad. I believe in being tough on cadidates. Rip Obama apart on his Iraq War plan, the fact that he doesn't have a lot of expereince, his health care plan, or any of his positions. But to knock him down based on these things is so misguided and unfair.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

vicki, florida — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:15:47 GMT

I'm GLAD Rev. Wright is not hiding.

He's more intellegent than his critics who rush to judgement about him and then take pride in the fact that they can unapologetically MISLEAD millions of people who are stupid enough to let pundits do their thinking for them.

More power to him.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Mark, Houston Texas — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:16:35 GMT

The pundits have been wrong so many times. They will be wrong again here.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Chad — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:16:48 GMT

I bet the republicans cannot wipe the smiles off their faces today. They are smelling a win come November.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Suzy Q in VA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:11 GMT

I think all of MSNBC must be for Hillary. The entire speech was moving and wonderful. This is ONE SMART man....he didn't hurt Obama...if everyone would watch it and listen to the man they could see that. What is wrong with you? I have switched to CNN...much better campaign coverage...balanced. You guys no longer are....and it is too bad.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Elise Denton, TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:17 GMT

I'm just curious as to what another debate would accomplish. HRC is only interested in debating Obama's weaknesses - not the issues. He has been fairly restrained in regards to rehashing her and Bill's former years in the White House, much less her outright lies and hypocrisies. In understand that she is involved in a court case accusing her and Bill of fraud - Obama hasn't even mentioned it. Why would he ever agree to get in the tank with that bloodthirsty piranha?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Rob Winnipeg Canada — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:24 GMT

To say Mr. Todd that Reverand Wright speaking out hurts Mr. Obama is surrendering that America is not quite ready or sophisticated enough to have a meaningful dialogue about the Black experience in America - period

First thoughts: You're so vain...

RX, Balt — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:30 GMT

When do we start to talk about the crazy Reverend whose endorsed McCain?

First thoughts: You're so vain...

More Hillary Help from MSM — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:32 GMT

How can you fools say Obama is bored --IF HE DID NOT SAY THAT!!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

COL.[retd]A.M.Khajawall MD — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:17:37 GMT

Dear Fellow Americans,

Our Great-grand Nation, the United States of America
is and will face very critical "Challenges" in coming
years and decades.

The Problems will be tough and solutions would not
easy.

The key will the cool, calm, and collectedness of our
next President[ What I call Presidential Temperament'
The one remaining candidate who has consistently that
Presidential Temperament is Senator Obama.

His message of change makes sense. We have to stop
doing business in Washington old ways. The new ways of
lifting each other up and stopping tearing each other
down will not held our Great grand Nation. The
Terrorists around the world[real] and inadvertently
assisted by some shortsighted media [Who are party to
this perpetuation of psychological terrorism of
mis-information, dis-information, and duplicity], that
is what we do not need.

In order to send the message around the world that
America is get Senator Obama our next president. At
least on thing he has shown consistently is the
presidential Temperament. The Temperament of our next
president is very critical address internal and
internal challenges. Let us defeat real external
terrorists snd internal psychological terrorists once
for all.

God Bless out Great grand Nation, its diverse people,
and Senator Obama. He is the ans her to our future
stability, security, safety, and regain our status in
the world.

Yours truly,

COL.[retd] A.M.Khajawall
Disables American Veteran.
Las Vegas Nevada.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Michael Tudor — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:19:07 GMT

Someone with an open mind might acknowledge that Rev. Wright actually has a reputation worthy of defending. It is insulting of the American people to insist that they will "cling" to their characatured views of the reverend when presented with a more balanced view. Of course, the media has already defined this as a "problem" for Senator Obama, so there is no opportunity for the man to seek redemption. Surely, we will be treated to another round of the most inflammatory clips with little or no attention paid to the meaningful parts of his message and ministery. The man just gave a wonderful speech on tolerance last night and somehow it is now being portrayed as a "problem." I guess we really don't want that national conversation about race. IF we plug our ears and close our eyes, the racism in this country will magically go away. Maybe, just maybe, Rev. Wright knows this is not about him but something bigger... that if the message of justice and equality he has preached for nearly 40 years is mischaracterized as "hate speech," then this country is not ready for change. He is betting that the American people are better than that and when presented with the truth, they will be able to handle it.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Ian — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:19:36 GMT

"He's hurting him and hurting him very badly. Frankly, it’s as selfish of a move as we've seen in some time."

What's your role, Chuck? Newsman or columnist? I saw the Moyers interview and, frankly, I think most reasonable people who did the same would be able to see this issue more as an indictment of the press than anything else. Whatever damage Rev. Wright has done has already been done. The good pastor has a right to respond to what amounts to a media lynching.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Andress — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:00 GMT

Yeah, DEBATE but let it be on Obama's terms (moderators,questions, etc..) revenge on ABC's coup.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Mike, Manteo, NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:40 GMT

I continue to find it amazing that so many people who have still not heard the entire unedited version of Rev. Wright's remarks, and this includes many, many members of the media, still feel they should comment on or draw conclusions about those remarks.

If you have not heard the entire speech, then shut up! You have no idea what you're talking about. For instance, the whole line about "America's chickens coming home to roost"? That was a quote from the American ambassador to Iraq, a white man appointed by guess who? Why, our current President, of course!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

the Pajama Pundit — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:45 GMT

Wright is not a political issue. Obama addressed this long ago. Why are we still seeing him in the news?

Ugh.

My thoughts:
http://www.thepajamapundit.com/

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Bill, Corpus Christi, TX — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:57 GMT

I watched both the Bill Moyers' interview and the entire speech and found both to be enlightening. If Rev.Wright is hurting Sen. Obama, it is only because of the sound-bite nature of the mainstream media. Rev. Wright makes a well-reasoned point that the point-of-view of some Americans is altered by their history, that the things we as Americans are proud of have to be tempered by the things we as Americans should be ashamed of. We often act as if our nation is infallible, but only God is. "A true patriot is a lover of his country who rebukes and does not excuse its sins." (Fredrick Douglas)

First thoughts: You're so vain...

L-Mani — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:23:41 GMT

MSNBC and all,
This is no longer about Rev Wright nor Obama. That stopped a long time ago. this is about the issue of race. I've looked at all the blogs and you can see the racial divisions on here. As the Media you have a responsibility to discuss this issue in its fullest. To not do so could cause irreparable racial divisions for the sake of ratings and conflict in which you the media profit off of. This is a dangerous game you are playing. This is not about politics but the lives of people. please think carefullly in moving forward with this story

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Just say NO to Obama. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:24:08 GMT

WOW!!! The Rev. Wright does like the spotlight. Did he offer up himself as Obama's vice-president?? I do believe he did and it might not be a stretch. I strongly believe that to give the keys of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to Obama and his cohorts would be a HUGE mistake. I pray that will never happen.

What it is with Rev. Wright mocking JFK & Senator Kennedy and President Johnson? I thought he was a uniter. If he defines uniter, I don't want any part of it. Obama mocked Hillary after he got caught saying bitter things. Guess the Rev. Wright taught Obama and Michelle really well.

Read Obama's books and be fearful.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Pam OC,CA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:24:33 GMT

Pittsburgh soldier. Thank you. counldn't have said it better myself.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

JR, Chicago, IL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:24:36 GMT

On a rival network, Donna Brazile made a fascinating comment about Wright. He's gone public because he feels the black church itself is under attack and being mischaracterized. This white woman thinks she's right.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

James — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:24:49 GMT

I heard Jeremiah Wright speak at an MLK celebration back in 2001 at Valparaiso University, a very, very white, main-stream Christian place. He got a standing ovation from a capacity crowd of whites. He is well-known in Chicago as an active leader.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

twocanpete — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:25:02 GMT

http://twocanpete.blogspot.com/
It is obvious that the old black power elites can not stand for a new generation of african-americans to challenge their power. Obama needs to realize that these people are sabotaging his campaign. You could almost hear Wright's disdain for Obama in his voice in that speech at the press club.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

jenig, South Carolina — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:26:17 GMT

There is no way of telling if the negativity about Rev. Wright is coming from folks who would have never voted for Sen. Obama in the first place. That said, the mere fact that what I HEARD FOR MYSELF is FAR DIFFERENT from how it was presented to me by the media is a fact that has made the media more of a concern than Rev. Wright has. I can discern for myself when given ENOUGH information. In that regard, the media failed for weeks and furthered the exploitation by having others rationalize their opinion. I know there are some who will not read, think or listen to a fair and balance view but I trust that there are more folks who want the relationships we have with each other in America and all over the world to become one of peace and as Rev. Wright said, "reconciliation". Rev. Wright is a Pastor thrown into politics by association. He not only has the right to speak but as a Christian, his call to stand for Christ is more important than how you use it to attack Sen. Obama. True believers will know the difference. Those who are not bias, will look for broader perspectives than what is fed to them and in the end, the things we do for evil will not prevail. I do than you as you reporting made me aware that the news is bias and sensationalism the goal. I will keep you dishonesty in mind when/if I turn to you station.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Bobbi Kidwell — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:27:08 GMT

Howard Dean better watch out. These other states want to vote and are turning out in record numbers. And yes they are doing it for their health literally. Thank goodness Hillary is giving everyone a chance to know Obama and staying in. She is the right one for the job of President but we still need to have the right for every vote to count and everyone to get to go to the polls and cast their vote. This is AMERICA, not a 3rd world.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Andrew Daly, Medford, MA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:27:24 GMT

What exactly has Rev. Wright said to Bill Moyer, at the NAACP or Press Club that is hurting Obama, and how is it worse than keeping quite on an issue that will not go away? The media is doing an incredible disservice to the Rev. Wright when you make useless generalization like this, when your readers will take these comments to heart and never actually watch any of Wright’s appearances on TV.
I am not a member of a black church and not religiously inclined (though wife is an active Catholic). Watching the NAACP speech was thrilling and enlightening to me. It’s very, very sad that what you folks came up with for your First Read entry was not any of the multitude of positives in the speech, but “You’re so vain, you probably think this campaign is about you”. The man is not beholden to you or Obama. I think you fellows need to look deep down and discover if the problem is Wright, or the media. Look real deep, maybe the problem is not just the need to find issues where none exists, maybe you folks have a serious issue with race.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Haley Bronson, Ft. Wayne IN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:27:51 GMT

Rev. Wright is maligned. It is just so easy to misinterpret "God D*mn America" and "Whites introduced AIDS into the black neighborhoods".

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Pat Hammond, Indiana — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:28:46 GMT

I stopped watching MSNBC because of Chris Matthews and Joe Scarbourgh. I could not take Chris' blantant Hillary worship "she came across as a girl from Scranton brilliantly", or Joes' debasing of Senator Obama. I watched all of their shows nightly. My TV was silent this weekend. I am tired of the pundits. I want no more debates. I want no more Rev Wright. I want no more Weathermen. I would like to know what is going to be done to help me and my family. The pundits can talk themselves to death, we want to know plans. BTW I am afraid I am also tired of Billary!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Libby Lou — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:28:52 GMT

The truth of the matter is Obama believes the same things Wright does.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Greg, N.Y. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:29:39 GMT

I really can't believe the fantasy world people seem to be living, in which they don't realize just how offensive the attack on Wright have been for African-American Christians. The whole justification for being able to attack Obama is to blame him for staying in that church; therefore, it must mean that all of the congregation in that church are bad people as well. In fact, all people who go to similar churches all across America are bad people.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Maddog, Charlotte NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:29:47 GMT

Chuck, I'm a big fan of yours but your blog today is way off base. Did you even see the speech at the NAACP dinner last night? Did you even listen to the speeach at the Press Club today?

I think it's time for integrity check!!!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Lance — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:37 GMT

You guys can't be serious! You're comparing Reverend Wright to Norman Hsu, a convicted criminal? It is only the MSM who's spinning this to be a bad thing, I and many see Reverend Wright as a good, honorable man, wrongly crucified because of out of context, and yet no doubt incendiary comments that represent a fraction of a fraction of the big picture of who this man is. His being out in public is EXACTLY what he should be doing versus cowering in shame! Let him face those who've painted him wrongly... I find it hard to believe Senator Obama does anything but, embrace and admire this man's willingness to step out into the spotlight and make his voice heard.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Grannie Annie, Knoxville, TN — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:40 GMT

Having just watched the Press Club remarks, I am sifting through my own reactions. On the positive side, I think Dr. Wright has brought forward real issues that we as a nation need to address. Whether we believe in God or not we all live on this planet and the world needs reconciliation. That message is one for Pastors. And, may I point out was mentioned by the Pope in his various talks last week.

On the other hand, with the spin of sound bites, some of Dr. Wright's remarks can be used to thwart Senator Obama. I do not think that is fair or balanced.

Bottom line, Dr. Wright is a pastor. Senators Obama, Clinton and McCain are politicians. Their jobs and emphasis are not the same. For the election it all gets down to policy, leadership, and integrity.

For me, Senator Obama is his own person. I think each one of us has to ask: Would I want to be judged by the words of any friend (or enemy) in my circle of acquaintances? My answer is a resounding NO.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

nickk — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:40 GMT

I don't like Clintion but after hearing Obamas rev. Please if John does not win anyone but Obama go back to your church..Now we are sure what ms. obama ment when she said she never before was proud of USA

First thoughts: You're so vain...

cindy, New Bern,NC — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:30:50 GMT

As a Hillary supporter, I would like to thank the NAACP for giving Rev.Wright an award. We can really use the extra votes.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

lea,fredericksburg,va — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:31:59 GMT

AMERICANS, we the people are not stupid, I agree with many of you.
Forget all the hype, be positive, and look at the man's character.
I read Sen. Obama's books and got to know him as he sees himself and learned about politics and history in the process.
A man who can inspire an entire country and especially the young at heart and young in age to work harder,to believe in themselves, to volunteer for common purpose is a LEADER
There is no better reason to elect someone but for his leadership qualities and character, who embodies the principles and ideals of the constitution and loves this country enough to risk his life to save it..
Independent white woman close to 60.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jbentley, Chicago, IL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:32:52 GMT

"Nevertheless, Obama seems to be starting off this week in about as bad of shape as we've seen in him in some time." Yeah, it's so bad that he's on the verge of winning the Democratic nomination and is tied or ahead with John McCain in virtually every poll, not to mention that those numbers will go up considerably when Hill is put away and her supporters start falling in line. Obama will be just fine.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Liz in SD — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:32:54 GMT

Did you hear the same speech I did? I'm starting to think the MSM believes they can tell us black is white and we'll believe it! I don't think he's had a bad week at all--but then I watch other media outlets.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jim, Santa Cruz — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:33:18 GMT

Obama said on Fox that Wright was a legitimate political subject, or something to that effect. It seems to me that Obama is drawing the media and the republicans into an opportunity to make complete asses of themselves by continuing to demonize someone that the MAJORITY of people won't think of as a demon after they have learned more about the man from shows like the PBS one or by these recent speeches.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Ruth, Portland OR — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:33:43 GMT

I am sick and tired of this process. Hillary cannot catch up, it is over.

I find it ironic that First Read acts as if some outside force ignored Hillary's reckless "obliterate" comment and is focusing everything on the statements of Obama's former pastor, rather than acknowledging that it is *the media who choose* what to highlight as "important news." I am far more interested in what each candidate has to say than their various associates etc. Enough already!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Houston — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:34:13 GMT

[[Wright has to know he's not helping his friend; his decision to go public and defend his reputation at this point in the campaign is doing nothing to help Obama,]]

How do YOU know that? Since the elite corporate media have been demonizing Wright for weeks now, it might help Obama if Wright shows that Obama was sitting in a church for 20 years listening an intelligent and erudite human being rather than to Satan preaching anti-Americanism, contrary to what you in the media want people to believe.

I find it unbelievable that the media are now attacking Wright for defending himself, which I always expected he would after Fox News stirred up this bogus "scandal" and the other networks started parroting Fox. Apparently, the corporate media thinks they've got a monopoly on freedom of speech.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Kathryn — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:34:25 GMT

I listened to quite a bit of Rev. Wright's speech and I was impressed that HE is articulate and informed and that since this is a free speech country HE has put HIS own spin on HIS words. He has been around for 40 years and in all that time he has attracted little, if any attention outside of Chicago for being decisive until NOW. No one in HIS church of 8,000 members and no local news coverage after 9/11. I thought he was provacative and well spoken. I don't have to agree with him, but if he opens the lines of communications about race in this country, I do not think that is a BAD THING. The news pundits are looking for the negatives in his speech instead of looking for the points of interest that he is trying to bring to the table. We go one step ahead and five steps back. I believe at this rate Mother Nature will when the race issues and destroy manknind before we can put and end to the PETTY BICKERING.
What do I know, I am over fifty ( nearer to 60)and white and I probably won't see the CHANGES that everyone is talking about, because we can't seem to agree on the a table or who to bring to the table -----POLITICS----

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Pat Huntington NY — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:35:27 GMT

I think it's unwise to debate in these primaries anymore as it will only serve to benefit McCain by giving his campaign more ammo to use at whoever the Dem. nominee is. Also, its not going to make a difference since by now, voters know who Obama and Clinton are, and where they stand on the issues.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Michael H, NZ — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:35:50 GMT

Excuse Me... Its the media's reactive opinion that is hurting Obama, not Reverend Wright. He is his own man, and doesn't owe Obama anything. They are not each other, get that fact clear, then we can move on!

First thoughts: You're so vain...

AB, Buffalo, NY — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:37:17 GMT

Chuck Todd... you're so wrong: Wright, along with Clyburn, are throwing the Democratic Party under the bus. African-americans are galvanizing... you take the nomination away from Obama, you WILL cause an irreparable breach between the Dems and the most LOYAL voting constituency in the Party. Take away the nomination from Obama, and watch the Democratic party 'disintegrate'.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Jessica — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:38:28 GMT

Thats funny.

For WEEKS now, the MSM has been characterizing Wright, after watching just a few seconds of a sermon OUT OF CONTEXT, labeling him as crazy and radical, and then when the man comes out to defend his name and his church, you think he is being selfish and trying to make it all about him.

Unbelievable.

The last I checked we have freedom of speech in this country, and ANYONE can come out and say WHATEVER they want.

And if any of you actually listened to Rev. Wright, you would feel ASHAMED for the last few weeks of BASHING HIM.

Rational people, understand that Obama IS NOT Rev. WRIGHT.
Wright is NOT the candidate.

I actually think this will help Obama, because the comments were put into context.

Now how about we talk about something that people really care about?

Like how am I going to pay for $4.00 gas??

Do your job for once please

First thoughts: You're so vain...

LGreene, Las Cruces, NM — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:38:56 GMT

I have yet to hear anything said by Rev. Wright that was much more than religious hyperbole spoken by a very good, deeply feeling man. He's not selfish for "ruining Obama's campaign". He speaks and acts for himself. It it YOU, lazy mainstream media "experts" who choose to interpret his words and their impact on the rest of us, as if we are too stupid to know how to judge this for ourselves. Just stop it already.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

Carrie, Boston, Mass — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:39:02 GMT

Chuck, have you ever considered that Wright's speaking tour might be good for Obama? I happen to think it's great that Wright is showing he's a smart, thoughtful, caring human being who knows an awful lot about theology and history, not some shadowy figure. The media should be ashamed at how they've caricatured him, and I bet this whole effort by Wright is to make them see how wrong they've been.

First thoughts: You're so vain...

jbentley, Chicago, IL — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:39:07 GMT

Obama needs to run an ad pointing out that under the rule of John McCain's friend and mentor, George W. Bush, that Hamas has increased its strangle hold on Palestinian society considerably and that peace in the Middle East is as remote as ever. Besides, beating your chest about tough you're going to be on groups like Hamas shows little understanding of reality. Israel has bombed the crap out of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah for decades and all it does is enhance their popularity and political power.