ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Congress: Franken wins, 238 days later

Posted: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:13 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

Minnesota, your long Senate race nightmare is over.

The Star Tribune: "Al Franken, a satirist known for his biting political humor, is headed to the U.S. Senate, the survivor of an epic legal struggle that opponent Norm Coleman finally conceded he couldn't win."
 
And is Minnesota governor on Coleman's mind... again? "Conceding defeat outside his St. Paul home shortly after the court ruling, Coleman sidestepped questions about whether he would turn his attention to running for governor in 2010. 'We'll talk about the future in short order,' he said."

The Washington Post: “In a unanimous ruling, the court rejected Republican Norm Coleman's legal arguments that some absentee ballots had been improperly counted and that some localities had used inconsistent standards in counting votes. The ruling led Coleman to concede his Senate seat to Franken, who could be sworn in as soon as next week, when the Senate returns from a recess.” 

According to NBC’s Pete Williams, Minnesota officials intend to hand-deliver the official election certificate to the U.S. Senate this morning. Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and the secretary of state signed the papers at about 7:15 ET last night. Copies of the documents were faxed to the Secretary of the U.S. Senate last night, and the originals were sent overnight for delivery this morning. This clears the way for Franken to be sworn in when the Senate reconvenes next week, after the July 4th break.

Franken is on the cover of the Boston Globe with the headline: "Franken wins long Minn. battle, gives Democrats a 60th Senate vote.

The New York Times: “It was an oddly abrupt ending to an election contest that had left Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat, handling the state’s business alone and had left many ordinary Minnesotans weary of the fight.”  

Per NBC’s Dax Tejera, Franken holds a victory rally in St. Paul at 1:00 pm ET.

As the AP warns -- channeling the Cook Political Report’s Jennifer Duffy from way back before November '08 -- 60 votes doesn't guarantee Dem success. "[N]umbers aren't the same as votes in the Senate. And to enact administration priorities on health care, energy and other issues, Democrats will have to remain as united in support of legislation as Republicans are in opposition, no easy task in an institution where lawmakers weigh regional concerns, ideology and narrow political self-interest as well as party loyalty." 
 
The Hill: "But even as Franken becomes the 60th Democrat in the Senate, health problems could prevent the party from actually being able to field its full team on a given vote. Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) was released from the hospital Tuesday after spending a few weeks there -- a stay that included treatment for a staph infection for the 91-year-old incumbent. And Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) should also continue to miss time in the Senate as he battles a brain tumor."
 
And note The Hill's analysis -- and chart -- on Dems who've broken with their party, as the party has gotten a greater majority: "At least three dozen vulnerable Democrats have deserted their party during important votes this year -- a move that could bolster their reelection chances but has left Democrats lacking unity."
 
Roll Call warns that Franken's seating -- and No. 60 -- raises the bar for Dems: "On the one hand, 60 is the magic number to beat back a GOP-led filibuster. On the other, Democrats will have no one but themselves to blame if they can’t pass President Barack Obama’s ambitious plans to rewrite health care, overhaul banking regulations and tackle global warming. And Democratic infighting will likely be the predominant media storyline rather than the partisan gridlock that has characterized the chamber over the past several years."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Where else am I going to get my daily entertainment? Political satire videos perhaps...
   Michelle Bachmann vs. the census: http://www.governmentalityblog.com/my_weblog/2009/07/michelle-bachmann-vs-the-census.html
Franken comes into a Senate that is totally broke. No money to spend, only new printed money that will fill the gaps for all the spending the very liberala Obama wants to do, and wven that is drying up. So have fun Al.
Minnesota, your long Senate race nightmare is over.

I am happy for the "last" but favorite of my home States. I knew the Minnesota Supreme Court would do him right. I am truly happy...
Coleman, who has no insight whatsoever, underestimates the outrage in MN. about his refusal to take in what the rest of us knew...that he is one big loser.  The only reason he was elected in the first place is that Senator Wellstone was killed in a plane crash toward the end of the race.  He has not been popular, especially in outstate MN.  We recognize that the only thing Coleman is for is himself.  He has not done one thing to help MN.  His ethics problems are going to be coming to light prior to a race too.  The only good thing is that Pawlenty will not be running again.  He has destroyed the state.
Yup Ron, we were winning 10-1. And we lost. I don't know what the biggest blown lead is in baseball, but this has to be right up there! Holy cow.

I was thrilled to see Markos on Ed's program last night. He means business. What a great guest.

I guess Eric Cantor & Co. are again sulking; this time it's because President Obama isn't calling and writing as much as he used to with them.

Oh brother. Leadership is sorely missing in their party. They have nothing. Well, except Ronald Reagan I suppose.
So democrats, here is my practical question now that you have majorities in everything how long before I can start complaining about the job your guys are doing without getting the Bush admin. Thrown back in my face?  
See I complain now because I understand my history (like any good libertarian), and I can see very clearly that the same mistakes of past administrations are being made by this administration and in turn anyone could more or less predict what will happen.  
So here it is.  How long?  2 years?  4 years?  Never?  Just wondering.  Things aren't getting any better, but I understand you have to give these policies time to succeed or fail.  But all hyperbole aside.  I just need an amount of time before an educated counter-argument can be made against the liberal policies of this Admin. And the Majority liberal Legislature without being lumped in with the republican who created the initial mess (which I am not a part of) or just called an Idiot (which is false and I resent the idea).

I realize MSNBC is a liberal stomping ground for many of you, but in the interest of honest debate and political education how long?
That was a great show of Justice yesterday in Minnesota as the Supreme Court there gave Senator Al franken a clear 5-0 mandate to take office.  Good thing that sore loser coleman finally showed some class and concded, about time he finally allowed the healing process to begin.

How classy was Senator Al Franken in his acceptance speech yesterday, totally classy is the answer.  His line that he's not the 60th Senator but the second Senator for Minnesota shows he's got some serious political moxy.  He will be formidable as a Senator, just as he has been in everything he's done.

I hope the Big Fat Idiot blows a gasket as Senator Al Franken now has a much bigger bully pulpit than the Drugster Lush Limburger ever will.

Senator Al Franken Won!  Ha Ha!
Franken is the latest example of liberal hypocrisy....when convenient they scream bloody murder about "unqualified" conservative candidates, and in the next breath they are elated when a liberal jokster with ZERO qualifications becomes one of 100 US Senators.  Many of you who sound so "deep" with your arguments just became pretty shallow.
Just another commedian for the circus that is Congress. You get what you vote for and so far its pretty sad. Nothing to be proud of on either side of the aisle regardless of the diehards on both sides who defend poor performance.
Pat, Boston, MA (Sent Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:29 AM)

Pat,

The BoSox's loss last night, while an exercise in futility, was not the biggest comeback loss ever.

That honor goes to the 1911 Chicago White Sox, who took a 13-1 lead into the fifth inning against the Detroit Tigers, before losing 16-15.  Ty Cobb had four hits and five RBIs and scored the game-winning run in the 9th inning on an RBI double by Sam Crawford.
Coleman wants to be governor? Unless the parties have some real idiots running he doesn't have the chance of an icecube in the Sahara of getting elected. People will be reminded, lest they forget, of the protracted fight he just lost and who dragged it out.

For those who think Franken is some silly clown remember this. It takes a very intellegent and observant person to be funny week after week with new and relevant material. He also graduated magna cum laude from Harvard. Those are not the qualifications of a fool but of an astute individual who knows enough to be an effective Senator. Congratulations, agin Senator Franken.
Well thank you Baseball Historian. Leave it to Ty Cobb, my favorite all time baseball player, to provide the fireworks in their comeback.

I wonder, do pitchers just want the game to end when they possess such a big lead? And get, shall we say, careless? Or perhaps they feel the game is won because they're playing a team with much less talent and just took it for granted they would win?

Our lead is shrinking by the hour!!!! Again, thanks for taking the time to look into this very embarrassing moment. I was too furious to bother looking it up. Lol!!!
Prepare for increased snarling from the right today, as they just lost another round in their futile comeback effort.  This was a matter of patience and preseverence, two traits that are foreign to most righties as they want to get their way RIGHT NOW (which is probably why they're on the RIGHT).  Anyhow, get your popcorn and watch the fireworks.

http://jawillie.blog.com
Doesn't really matter as he's going to be with his fellow liberals when they assume minority status in the very near future.
I posted this on First Thoughts; but just in case:

"... I just need an amount of time before an educated counter-argument can be made against the liberal policies of this Admin..."  Jonathan Flint, MI (Sent Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:39 AM)

I think you are being sincere so I will tell you where I am at on this, I think Obama gets the first year,...Reagan's Recession started two years into his first term; but he cried Carter's mess that whole time.  I thought that was 'unfair'.  9/11 happened in the first 8 1/2 months and Bush claimed "No one could predict..." - well, I won't go there - you've read the reports.  So, since this recession was already packaged and waiting on President Obama's desk on 1/20/09 - I say he gets a full year.  If by January 21, 2010 we are still bleeding 400K-600K jobs a month; well then I will probably have to agree with you that he isn't the miracle worker I was hoping for.  In the interest of further 'fairness' - I think he gets a few Trillion to play with in the first 2 years.  If we don't see significant program cuts by budget (Fall 2011, looking at Fiscal 2012) then I will probably have to agree with you that the massive spending was a boondoggle.  "W" spent FAR more and kept much of his spending 'hidden' - we have literally LOST billions in Iraq (KBR, Halliburton) and none of your team have lined up the mobs to go and hunt that money down.  If you will recall, those contracts were "no-bid" because "...no other companies had the organization to handle such a massive undertaking...".  Do you see ANY irony there?

I will admit when I think Obama is screwing up (I have repeatedly on Civil Liberties issues) - but why can't any of you right leaning water carriers ever flat out say "W" was a class A screwup?
--------
PS.  I think Chuck preparing for Hardball this week has caused the blog to run a little slower than usual.  You guys are doing a great job!  By far my favorite place on the web to share ideas and opinions.

Happy 4th of July everyone - To coin Tim Russert:

What a Country!
Finally a Repub that did something right and reasonable, Thank you Coleman for finally being a REAL MAN and not a pawn in the Repubs party any longer. Acknowledging you lost and stepping aside. Albeit billions of dollars to late.

To Al Franken congratulations sorry you weren't able to celebrate your time at the right time but hopeful Minnesota will grant you that honor next time around.
>>>I will admit when I think Obama is screwing up (I have repeatedly on Civil Liberties issues) - but why can't any of you right leaning water carriers ever flat out say "W" was a class A screwup?
Clara Kansas City, MO (Sent Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:24 AM)
==========
The simple answer is that many of them voted for him in 2004 even knowing what a class A screwup he was in 2000.  People have a very hard time admitting that they are wrong, and the right is going through a major grieving process (see my blog entry http://jawillie.blog.com/4572815/">http://jawillie.blog.com/4572815/).  In their defense, I suspect that if Obama actually turns out to be the big dissapointment they claim he'll be, we'll probably go through the same process.  Of course, given how the Generally Obsolete and Pathetic party is imploding, I doubt he could do much worse.

http://jawillie.blog.com
Franken is the latest example of liberal hypocrisy....when convenient they scream bloody murder about "unqualified" conservative candidates, and in the next breath they are elated when a liberal jokster with ZERO qualifications becomes one of 100 US Senators.  Many of you who sound so "deep" with your arguments just became pretty shallow.
shallow (Sent Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:36 AM)
____________

I always love this "qualifications" talking point that the GOP loves to wave around.  The Constitution clearly lists the qualifications for the job, and Franken meets them all.  Age, and residency, nothing more.  The Constitution does not decree that you have to hold certain jobs at local levels in advance.  Never has, never will.

So, pray tell, enlighten the masses, what "qualifications" do you think a US Senator needs?

You are the same people who love to say Biden isn't qualified to be VP.  Biden has been a US Senator for how many years?  Palin has never been a Senator, but has been a Governor for how few years?  Yeah, see, this is what comes of having a "qualifications" talking point.  It never holds water.

What about that hot shot young Republican kid that won election to the House, Aaron Schock?  Is he qualified to be a Congressman?  Has he ever held *any* public office before.  By the standards you wish to impose on Congress in terms of "qualifications" does he meet them, and why?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1983748

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google